Connect with us

Features

Inside election and political stories from the Chandrika years

Published

on

Chandrika Kumaratunga

Events subsequent to the attempt on CBK’s life

President Chandrika Kumaratunga spent several weeks in the United Kingdom receiving treatment following the assassination attempt on her by the LTTE. On her return to the island, she immediately dissolved the parliament and called for a parliamentary election as Karu had expected.

According to Karu, facing this upcoming parliamentary election was to be no easy task due to the threats and harassment meted out by opponents in several electoral seats in Gampaha. Kumaratunga’s younger brother Anura Bandaranaike was to contest from the Gampaha district under the United National Party (UNP) ticket. Anura and Karu would set out together every morning to canvas the area and meet their supporters.

“Even though we set out together every morning, around early afternoon Anura would claim he was too tired to go on and turn back…” Karu recalls. According to him, UNP candidates had to face threats and acts of intimidation in many areas of the Ja-Ela, Minuwangoda, and Gampaha electorates.

“We were attacked while campaigning in these areas. At times we were even shot at by ruffians sanctioned by our opponents. Each time I escaped unscathed but several UNP supporters were injured in these incidents…” Karu recalls.

According to Karu, despite repeated complaints by him, not only did the police seem disinterested in putting a stop to these acts of election violence, but they also failed to apprehend any suspects involved. Refusing to back down Karu lodged a complaint with the election monitoring office. Based on his complaint the office assured Karu that additional election monitors will be assigned to the Gampaha district.

But the threats and harassment Karu had to face did not come from his political opponents alone. Karu says these incidents stemmed from the preferential vote feuds among the candidates of the UNP itself. While it was impossible to avoid competitiveness between party colleagues under the preferential voting system, Karu says he often did his best to stay clear of such conflicts.

“I avoided asking people to cast a preference vote for me. Instead, I asked the people to first vote for the UNP and vote for three UNP candidates of their preference…” he says. Karu believes by doing this he was largely able to avoid conflict with other UNP candidates and carry out a successful election campaign.

Though a large number of election monitors had been deployed for the parliamentary elections of 2000, Karu says it had little effect on preventing election violations and frauds from being committed in some rural polling centres. Voters presumed to be UNP supporters were threatened and driven away by armed thugs on election day, preventing them from casting their votes. The thugs carrying out these acts had been brought from other areas of the country.

Karu says the UNP lost out on a large number of votes from the Gampaha district due to these acts of intimidation of voters. He says election monitors were unable to prevent these acts as the groups of thugs would make their getaway before the monitors could visit the scene. In this situation, the only step the monitors could take was to obtain statements from witnesses and enter them into their observation reports.

At the election, the ruling People’s Alliance (PA) managed to secure a majority of the seats in the Gampaha district while the UNP was merely able to score victories in the Wattala and Negombo electorates. Though the UNP had suffered a setback, the election was a personal triumph for Karu. To his surprise, he had won the preferential vote race by becoming the UNP candidate from the Gampaha district with the most number of preferential votes, a staggering 237,387.

While UNP stalwarts Anura Bandaranaike, Dr Jayalath Jayawardena, John Amaratunga, Joseph Micheal Perera, Edward Gunasekara and Suranimala Rajapaksha were also elected to parliament from the district, they had all received less than 100,000 preferential votes. I was humbly pleased about receiving such a large number of votes at the very first parliamentary election I contested …” Karu says.

Not only did Karu surpass his party colleagues, but he was also able to receive more votes than Susil Premajayantha, the PA district leader and the former Chief Minister of the Western province. The 165,905 preference votes he received paled in comparison to Karu’s 237,387. Nevertheless, the PA was able to once again emerge victorious in the parliamentary elections held that year. The ruling party secured 107 seats in parliament while the UNP only laid claim to 89. In a surprising turn of events, the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) which held only one seat in parliament till 2000, was able to increase it to 10.

But the PA’s win was to be bittersweet. “It was tragic news…” Karu says recalling the incident. The country went into mourning after it was announced that Sri Lanka’s former Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike had died at age 84 after suffering a heart attack on October 10, 2000, the very day of the country’s parliamentary elections.

Bandaranaike, the mother of President Chandrika Kumaratunga and UNP politician Anura Bandaranaike had been returning home after casting her vote at the Sri Sanghabodhi Vidyalaya polling station in Nittambuwa when the incident occurred. A formidable stateswoman, Bandaranaike was the world’s first non-hereditary female head of government in modern history after she was elected as Sri Lanka’s Prime Minister on July 20, 1960.

“Those of us in the UNP were also truly shocked and saddened by her demise. After being elected as both the world and country’s first woman Prime Minister she served three terms. Even though she as the leader of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) had held a different ideology to that of the UNP, Madam Bandaranaike had cast her vote for me – at the local government elections for Colombo…” Karu says. According to Karu, he came to know this after Bandaranaike had personally told him of the fact. Hearing of her death, Karu had visited her residence.”Tintagel’ in Rosmead Place that night to pay his last respects.

Based on their performance in the parliamentary elections of 2000 the PA was able to once again form a government. However, the party was pressed to maintain a majority in parliament. The only political solution was to appoint more members to the cabinet than previously. At the time private media institutions dubbed this new cabinet a `Mega Cabinet.’ Karu says it was ironic that Kumaratunga who had lampooned the large cabinets under Presidents Ranasinghe Premadasa and D.B Wijetunga was herself forced to appoint a similar cabinet at the very beginning of her second term as President.

Kumaratunga had appointed a cabinet consisting of forty-four members. But the government was still on shaky ground. A conflict had arisen between President Kumaratunga and Rauff Hakeem, the leader of the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) – a party to the government. Hakeem had vehemently disagreed with Kumaratunga’s decision to appoint her mother’s cousin General Anuruddha Ratwatte as the Deputy Minister of Defence. As Hakeem continued to voice his disapproval, Kumaratunga was forced to appoint Ratwatte as the Minister of Power and Energy instead. Ratwatte, a seasoned military man, had responded to the snub by being passive- aggressive.

Reports of yet another rift within the government appeared in the gossip columns of Sri Lanka’s weekend newspapers. They claimed Kumaratunga and S.B Dissananayke, a Minister in her government, had fallen out for reasons unknown. “Though we never found out the truth, we were able to confirm through several government ministers that Dissanayake had stopped attending cabinet meetings during this time…” Karu says laughingly.

It was widely accepted among Karu’s UNP colleagues that rifts within the government had begun to appear. Kumaratunga’s alleged favouritism of SLFP members formerly of the Sri Lanka Mahajana Pakshaya (SLMP) had also left many senior SLFP politicians disgruntled giving rise to even more conflict within the government.

In 1994 the PA led by Chandrika Kumaratunga had swept into power on the promise of abolishing the curse that was the executive presidency. At the elections, Kumaratunga had also promised a political solution to the national question in Sri Lanka. However, she was not able to fulfil either of these promises during her first term. Kumaratunga failed to abolish the executive presidency as her government did not possess the required two-thirds majority in parliament.

Meanwhile, Kumaratunga also held a discussion with LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran in January 1995 in a bid to arrive at a political solution for the decade long national question. These talks were followed by several more discussions. But unfortunately, Kumaratunga was unsuccessful in her efforts.

But in 1999 and 2000 the PA in its election manifestos reiterated these pledges. The party then requested the public to vote them into power and provide them with the necessary two-thirds majority to deliver on those promises.

Though the UNP introduced the executive presidency to Sri Lanka in 1978, by 2000 the party had also begun to realize its many pitfalls. As the Tamil political parties of the North also held similar reservations about the post, the Kumaratunga government decided to look into the possibility of abolishing it with the support of all parties in parliament. As a result, the government organized one-on-one discussions with each political party. It was also decided that following these discussions a multi-party conference will be held on the agreement of all parties.

The UNP had readily accepted the government’s invitation to attend the multi-party conference. On the advice of party leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, Karu along with UNP MPs K.N Choksy and Tyronne Fernando attended the discussion. Ratnasiri Wickremanayake and Nimal Siripala de Silva attended on behalf of the SLFP. Members representing several Tamil political parties from the North had also attended the much awaited conference.

“Discussions were held over several months. At the end of it, a proposed draft constitution was formulated by G. L. Peiris. It was proposed that the executive presidency be abolished and be replaced by a ceremonial president instead in addition to the appointment of three vice presidents…” Karu recalls.

According to him, the UNP had initially expressed its agreement to the draft only to backtrack later. “It was proposed the new constitutional amendments would only come into effect at the end of Kumaratunga’s term in 2005. We were not agreeable to this…” he says. “It was, therefore, decided the UNP should withdraw from the conference…” he adds.

Meanwhile, stiff opposition against the draft proposals had also begun to rise among some groups of Bhikkus as well as political and civil society activists. At the time the opposing Bhikkus even held a Maha Sangha Sabha at the Bandaranaike Memorial International Conference Hall in Colombo to voice their dissent.

It was also rumoured that certain big wigs in the government were also displeased by the proposed draft constitution. “Some claimed Kumaratunga’s own Prime Minister Ratnasiri Wickremanayake did not agree with the new proposals either. At the time Wickremanayake refrained from commenting publicly on the matter so the truth remains unknown…” Karu says. The government however refused to drop the proposal challenged by the UNP, thereby failing to gain the main opposition party’s support for the new constitutional draft.

This one clause resulted in the overall failure of the proposed draft constitution. Karu says the then government must bear the responsibility for this debacle. The many meetings resulting in the formulation of a new constitutional draft had been all for naught. Had it been successful Karu says it would have possibly led to a much needed sense of fellowship between the members of the government and the opposition. “This was a key reason I was keenly dedicated to the effort…” he adds.

Karu says he received a phone call from President Kumaratunga the very next day after the UNP dropped out of the multi-party discussions. The President, it appeared, was irked by the UNP now opposing the draft formulated with the party’s participation. “A clause we had not agreed to has been included in the final draft. This is the reason…” Karu explained. “Are you referring to the clause on the timing of the abolition of the presidency?” Kumaratunga had asked, adding that the clausehad been added on the insistence of G. L. Peiris, her Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs.

“Fine, we will remove that clause. Ask Ranil to support us. This issue can be resolved through discussions…” she assured Karu. Before ending the phone call Karu had agreed to speak to the UNP leader on behalf of the President.

Karu had immediately called Wickremsinghe to relate Kumaratunga’s message. Wickremesinghe had merely said “It is too late for that now,” and moved on to another topic of discussion. Admitting he sadly failed in his efforts, Karu says had Wickremesinghe been more flexible it would have perhaps been possible to introduce a new constitution to Sri Lanka at the time.

(Excerpted from the biography of Karu Jayasuriya by Nihal Jagathchandra)



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Proactive peacemaking becomes a paramount need

Published

on

Wasting wars: Some war-displaced people in Lebanon. BBC

It may be some time before the full impact of food inflation is felt in the West. Until such time the world would continue to keep itself in suspense over whether the Trump administration is in earnest when it seeks to convey the impression that it is backing a negotiated solution in West Asia.

As is usually the case, consumer stress would be one of the final determinants of political change. To the degree to which the average US consumer somehow ‘muddles through’ and puts the food on the table, to the same extent would the Republican sections of the US public in particular be tolerant of the Trump administration’s inconsistent handling of the West Asian war and the main issues stemming from it. That is, there would be no grave popular disaffection and a demand for political change in the short term.

However, the indications are that the Trump administration’s support base is suffering some erosion in the wake of the current economic crisis. While reports indicate that Democratic sections are firming-up their opposition to the political centre, Republican support for Trump is also showing signs of waning, we are given to understand.

The above developments are probably why Trump is on record as having given Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a ‘dressing down’ recently on his seeming intransigence on the question of giving negotiations a chance in West Asia. The show of displeasure could be really aimed by Trump at containing the impatience of the American public.

However, the current ground situation in the Middle East, particularly the uncontained bloodshed, is likely to impress on the thinking sections of the world that more than temporary political change is needed in West Asia and the US.

A well thought out political solution that addresses all the contentious issues at the heart of the Middle East conflict is what enlightened opinion would demand, and very rightly. Right now, the ‘peace efforts’ initiated by the Trump administration give the impression of being piecemeal solutions at best.

There have been, of course, numerous initiatives in the past aimed at bringing permanent peace to the Middle East. These failed mainly because they did not address in full the root causes of the conflict.

At bottom the Middle East conflict is mainly about race and religious hate bred by socio-economic and material inequalities. For instance, if the Palestinian people were not displaced and deprived of land occupied by them at the time of the founding of the Israeli state, ethnic enmities would not have grown to the current unmanageable proportions.

When addressing the above questions, though, it must be remembered that the Israelis too were a displaced people who were entitled to land and a state of their own in the Middle East. Basically, out of these seemingly irreconcilable and conflicting demands have grown the Middle East imbroglio.

Middle East peace is considerably about reconciling these demands and arriving at a solution that would ensure the creation of two states that would opt for peaceful co-existence thereafter.

As long as the US does not see the need for a non-partisan solution that addresses the needs of both ethnicities and religions and goes all-out, as it were, to have it implemented, the Middle East would continue to bleed.

However, staunching the blood flow through the creation of two states would be only half the job done, though a very important part of it. More pernicious, pervasive and difficult to remedy are the inter-ethnic and inter-religious hatreds that have been unleashed over the decades.

However, if substantial, long-lasting peace is to be fostered in the region the latter ‘demons’ would need to be exorcised from the hearts and minds of the communities concerned. No doubt an uphill task but one that must be undertaken by those who wish the region well.

The UN would need to put its ‘best foot forward’ in such undertakings but it is time that it dawned on the international community and other caring quarters that Middle East peace, and all other such uphill challenges, require proactive peacemaking on the part of all civilized sections for their effective management. That is, public involvement in peacemaking too is a must.

Since hatreds are harboured in the human consciousness the enmities embedded in the latter need to be managed and defused judiciously alongside other undertakings in a peace process. In the case of West Asia, such enmities could be even spread globe-wide besides being multi-dimensional. For instance, it ought to be thought-provoking that Iran is insistent on a peace initiative that would also include Lebanon.

Besides security considerations it is also ethnic and religious affiliations that account for Iran making this demand. For instance, the Shias are a numerically important religious community in Lebanon and they provide a significant number of Hizbollah fighters, who are in a vital sense carrying out a ‘proxy war’ for Iran. It also needs to be factored in that Iran is a Shia-majority country.

Thus trans-border religious affiliations could add to the complexities and enormity of ethno-religious conflicts. However, the task of managing centuries-long enmities needs to be launched and prodded on with by peacemakers since a downing of arms alone would not guarantee substantive peace.

It is not realized sufficiently that the process of ending hatreds begins with mutual apologies by antagonists to a conflict for the harm inflicted on each other. This would be anathema in some ears but there is no getting away from the requirement. It is the vital first step to permanent peace anywhere.

In fact there could be no reconciliation worth speaking of without such mutual apologies. It is a point worth re-iterating in these times when even the government of Sri Lanka is voicing the need for national reconciliation. Well, without the words, ‘I am sorry’, there could be no permanent end to enmities – they would do well to remember.

The above requirements may not go down very well with governments, but they resonate in the hearts and minds of most people, since they are inheritors of religious traditions of some kind.

This is a principal reason why peacemaking works well when publics too are involved in them. The effectiveness of such campaigns increases several fold when they have a Mahatma Gandhi or a Jawaharlal Nehru at their helm. A strong proactive involvement by the public in peace could lead to the emergence of such leaders at some point in these campaigns.

Continue Reading

Features

Dialog Brings Sri Lanka’s Largest Digital Vesak Experience to Matara

Published

on

From left to right: Hon. Saroja Savithri Paulraj, Hon. Sunil Handunnetti, and Lasantha Theverapperuma experience the Dialog 5G Ultra-powered VR tours.

Official Digital Partner of the 2026 ‘Dakshina Prabha’ National Vesak Zone

Dialog Axiata PLC, Sri Lanka’s #1 connectivity provider, collaborated with the Ministry of Buddha Sasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs to bring one of Sri Lanka’s largest and most technologically advanced Vesak experiences to the ‘Dakshina Prabha’ National Vesak Zone. The three-day celebration, in Matara attracted more than hundred thousand visitors, who engaged with a series of innovative digital activities powered by Dialog 5G Ultra, including Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Virtual Reality (VR) experiences, digital pandols and a Data Dansala. The opening ceremony was attended by Hon. Sunil Handunnetti, Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development and Hon. Saroja Savithri Paulraj, Minister of Women and Child Affairs, along with distinguished guests and Dialog’s senior management.

One of the key attractions at the venue was the Dialog 5G Ultra-powered Virtual Reality (VR) experience, which attracted more than 35,000 participants. The activation enabled devotees to virtually visit and pay homage to sacred Buddhist sites, including the Jaya Sri Maha Bodhi in India and the Atamasthana in Anuradhapura, directly from the Vesak zone in Matara.

Visitors receive complimentary mobile data through Dialog’s QR-powered Data Dansala.

Dialog also conducted an AI Digital Vesak Greeting Card Competition from 21 May to 01 June 2026, attracting numerous entries from across the country. The shortlisted designs were showcased across 20 large LED screens throughout the venue and across Matara City, and were also made available for download via mobile devices. Further, through the use of AI, traditional Jathaka Katha were reimagined in a digital format, demonstrating how technology can be used to preserve and enhance cultural and religious heritage. Together, these initiatives blended traditional Vesak celebrations with emerging technologies, offering visitors a unique and immersive way to engage with Vesak traditions.

 Extending the spirit of Vesak through connectivity, Dialog conducted a special Data Dansala powered by its QR Reload platform, enabling visitors to receive complimentary mobile data by scanning QR codes placed across the venue. In addition to the Matara National Vesak Zone, similar Data Dansala activations were also conducted at the Gangaramaya and Bauddhaloka Vesak zones in Colombo.Visitors also had the opportunity to create personalised Vesak-themed digital photos through an AI Photo Booth, generating AI-enhanced portraits using their own photographs and adding a contemporary digital element to the Vesak celebrations.

Visitors watch AI-generated Jathaka Katha

Commenting on the initiative, Hon. Sunil Handunnetti, Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development, said, “The 2026 Dakshina Prabha Vesak Festival marked the first time AI-powered digital innovations were incorporated into a National Vesak Festival in Sri Lanka. Presenting Buddhist stories and teachings through technology created a new and engaging way for visitors to connect with these traditions. We thank Dialog for supporting this initiative and for working closely with us to bring our vision to life. Their contribution played an important role in making this first-of-its-kind event a reality.”

 Lasantha Theverapperuma, Group Chief Marketing Officer of Dialog Axiata PLC said, “We thank the Government of Sri Lanka for the opportunity to support the 2026 Dakshina Prabha National Vesak Festival and for embracing technology as part of this year’s celebrations. As the Official Digital Partner, we were privileged to contribute through our Dialog 5G Ultra and AI capabilities, creating new ways for visitors to engage with Vesak traditions while preserving their cultural significance for future generations.”

Beyond supporting the National Vesak Zone in Matara, Dialog also enhanced the Gangaramaya and Bauddhaloka Vesak zones through a range of digital activations during the Vesak season. The company additionally continued its sustainability initiatives, including the Thirasara Aloka Poojawa, which illuminated rural places of worship through solar-powered lighting solutions.

Continue Reading

Features

Beauty, elegance and talent…for women

Published

on

Universal Woman is an international pageant focused on “beauty, elegance, and talent” for women, positioning itself as a platform to shape global ambassadors. The 2026 edition will be held in Cambodia, and Sri Lanka will be there, as well.

According to reports coming my way, contestants, at the international event, will work with industry trailblazers, under international standards.

Sri Lankan supermodel, runway and pageant trainer Chulpadmendra Kumarapathirana, is the National Director for Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026.

With over two decades in the industry, Chula was crowned Miss Sri Lanka 2006, and has since shaped the next generation of titleholders through her Colombo-based Chulpadmendra Catwalk Studio, widely regarded as one of the country’s leading modelling academies.

The team behind Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026

A former host of Derana Miss Sri Lanka for Miss World 2008 and a judge for Miss Universe Sri Lanka 2025, Chula now serves as National Director for Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026, leading the franchise’s search for Sri Lanka’s delegate to the international final in Cambodia.

Applications for Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026 are being taken, via WhatsApp: 077 659 4994, says Chula.

The judging panel for Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026 includes Senaka De Silva, Pageant Aesthetic Advisor & Chairperson of the Judging Panel, Angela Seneviratne, Caroline Jurie, Rozelle Plunkett, and Suraj Mapa.

Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026 officially began its journey with a first round of auditions, held in Colombo, marking the start of an exciting new chapter in Sri Lanka’s pageant industry.

Launching the first round of auditions

The platform aims to empower women while selecting an intelligent, confident, and inspiring representative to compete at the Universal Woman International Pageant 2026 in Cambodia, this September.

Universal Woman Sri Lanka now moves forward with the vision of creating one of the country’s most prestigious and empowering pageants while preparing to crown a queen who will proudly represent Sri Lanka on the international stage.

Continue Reading

Trending