News
UNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act
The UNP yesterday said that the government did not have the power to establish a Dharma Court. According to the Constitution, neither the executive, the legislature nor the judiciary had the power to interpret the Dharma, it added. The power to pass laws on disciplining the clergy had been granted to Parliament in terms of Article 105 of the Constitution, the UNP said, emphasising that the ultimate powers lay with the committees of the respective sects.
The UNP said so in response to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s recent speech that a concept paper had been submitted for amending the Vihara – Devalagam Act and the Cabinet had approved it. The President further stated that he had held a discussion with the Registrar, the Commissioner for Buddhist Affairs and the Attorney General. It is not known whether he discussed the matter with the Buddhist MPs in the Opposition.
Excerpts of the statement issued by former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Office: ” President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has recently publicly agreed to a call to take the same measures as previous kings in cases where the Buddhist religion is distorted under the guise of Dhamma.
Over our history we have seen some kings kill the Sangha during their reigns. The JVP also killed the Sangha in the same way during the years 1987-89.Kotikawatte Saddhatissa, Weltota Pangnadassi, Beligalle Mahinda, Kumbagoda Gnanaloka, Athurugiriya Pangnatissa, Soragune Pangnasara, Pelpola Dharmapala, Kandy Dhammarakkhitha and many other monks are included in the list of the JVP’s assassinations.
Apart from shedding the blood of the Buddha, the greatest sin that Buddhists can commit is the killing of the Sangha. The JVP has not apologised for the killings. Is it moral for the President to accept this invitation without first taking this step?
In addition to killing the Sangha, the JVP also looted valuable historical items from the monasteries and temples.
The JVP has never accepted that Buddhism should be given priority politically. The JVP has always acted against Buddhism.
A major question that arises from this is whether the JVP, which has a history of killing monks, can do such a thing after taking power. What is the hidden motive here?
Mr. J. R. Jayewardene took steps to include a separate chapter in the 1978 Constitution to take necessary measures for monks who behave undisciplined and engage in crimes. Provisions were made for the establishment of a Sangha Court to decide on the discipline of monks.
What did the NPP government done during the Sinhala and Tamil New Year? It disrupted all the auspicious signs. While the whole world was celebrating Vesak Poya on May 1st, the Vesak Poya day in Sri Lanka was postponed to a later date in order to hold political rallies.
There is no objection to taking action against unruly monks. But there is a procedure for how to discipline monks. Cabinet papers related to this should be prepared and presented to the Maha Sangha led by the Mahanayaka Theros and then a decision should be taken. Everything should be carried forward according to the existing tradition in the country.
The President has also expressed his views on taking monks to court. He has expressed such views without understanding the tradition. Taking wrong-doing monks to court in their robes is not something that only happened yesterday. Thalduwe Somarama and Mapitigama Buddharakkhita were presented to court wearing their robes for the assassination of Mr. Bandaranaike and later their robes were removed. This is not limited to monks. Father Mathew Peiris first came to court for legal proceedings wearing his robe. Accordingly, the monks who are currently acting in an undisciplined manner must also follow the same procedure that was implemented earlier.
The President mentioned in his speech that a concept paper was submitted for amending the Vihara – Devalagam Act and the Cabinet agreed to it. The President further stated that he had held a discussion with the Registrar, the Commissioner for Buddhist Affairs and the Attorney General. It is not known whether he had discussed this matter with the opposition Buddhist parliamentarians. This work has all been done only by the government without any consultation.
The government does not have the power to establish a Dharma Court. According to the Constitution, neither the executive, the legislature nor the judiciary have the power to interpret the Dharma. The power to pass laws on disciplining the clergy has been given to Parliament under Article 105 of the Constitution. However, the final powers lie with the committees of the respective sects. At present, this work has been done by the cabinet, officials and a handful of monks of a government that does not accept Buddhism.
The temples with the most assets and properties today are in the monasteries and temples that fall under the Vihara – Devalaya Village Act. It is no secret that the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) is taking the position that these temples should be taken under government control. There is a strong suspicion that the Dharma Court is being created for this purpose.
An organized program to destroy Buddhism is being implemented today through government-affiliated social media. A section of civil society is also involved in it. What is always happening today is the marginalization of the Buddhist monastic-lay opinion.In the President’s speech, a reference was also made to the holding of the World Buddhist Congress in this country under the current government.
Such a situation is also indicated in the Vasala Sutta.
“Na jaccha vasalo hoti,
Na jaccha hoti brahmano;
Kammana vasalo hoti,
Kammana hoti brahmano”
Its Sinhala meaning is as follows.
“One is not a householder by birth.Nor is one a Brahmin by birth.One becomes a householder or a Brahmin by one’s actions.”
News
Judicial vacancies: President keeps country guessing
The NPP government has not taken a final decision regarding filling of the vacancies in the judiciary.
A group of Opposition MPs, led by SJB leader Sajith Premadasa, on 12 June, requested Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremeratne to take up the issue of judicial vacancies with President Dissanayake. Opposition sources said that there were four vacancies, each in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, and the inordinate delay had adversely affected the judiciary.
Government sources indicated that there was no change in the status quo as regards filling of vacancies. Referring to the government proposal to extend the retirement age of judges, authoritative sources said that no final decision had been taken yet.
SJB lawmaker Dayasiri Jayasekera told The Island that they would raise the issue in Parliament this week.
He said that the deliberate delay in making appointments to superior courts and the move to extend the retirement age couldn’t be taken separately.
The MP noted that the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, the Lawyers’ Collective, the Colombo High Court Lawyers’ Association, Colombo Magistrate’s Court Lawyers’ Association and the Bar Association of Badulla had opposed the government move.
There hadn’t been any public statements in support of the government move, MP Jayasekera said, urging the government to end uncertainty in the judiciary.
by Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Sajith calls on Opposition parties to rally around SJB
SJB leader Sajith Premadasa has invited the UNP and other political parties to join his party. Premadasa, who is also the leader of the Opposition, has emphasised that the UNP and the SJB could reach a consensus on policies but his party wouldn’t, under any circumstances, accept whatever formula to share positions. Premadasa said so, speaking to the media over the weekend, after meeting the Mahanayaka Thera of the Malwatta Chapter of the Siyam Nikaya Most Venerable Thibbatuwawe Sri Siddhartha Sumangala Thera.
A statement issued by the Opposition Leader’s Office quoted MP Premadasa as having extended an invitation to all political parties to give up extremist policies and join the SJB.
The SJB leader alleged that the NPP government feared facing elections and that was the reason for the inordinate delay in holding Provincial Council polls. PC polls were last held in 2012, 2013 and 2014, on a staggered basis. Premadasa said that if PC polls were held his party would definitely win the majority of PCs.Premadasa also urged the government to reduce electricity tariffs and fuel prices.
News
Ex-EC Chief slams govt. over PC polls delay
Former Chairman of the Election Commission, Mahinda Deshapriya, on Saturday, strongly criticised the continued postponement of local government elections, declaring that every day without elections constitutes a violation of both the Constitution and democratic principles.
Speaking during an interview with journalist Bhanuka Rajapaksa, on Hiru TV, on Saturday, Deshapriya described the current administration of local government institutions by unelected officials as fundamentally undemocratic and contrary to the spirit of representative governance.
Deshapriya said local authorities, across the country, are presently being managed by secretaries and bureaucrats rather than elected representatives, depriving citizens of their democratic right to be governed by individuals, chosen through the electoral process.
“If the Constitution recognises and provides for local government institutions, then it is the responsibility of the State to ensure that elections are held and that these bodies are administered by representatives, elected by the people,” he said.
Deshapriya rejected attempts to justify the prolonged delay, arguing that responsibility for the situation rests with the government.
He noted that while various political parties have publicly stated their readiness to face elections, the ruling administration possesses the authority to resolve any issues relating to the electoral system.
The former Election Commission chief pointed out that the government enjoyed a two-thirds majority in Parliament, enabling it to enact any legislative amendments required to facilitate the conduct of elections. Instead, he said, successive committees and review processes had been used to postpone a final decision.
He also referred to efforts by opposition legislators who have moved motions seeking to address concerns relating to the electoral framework and expedite the holding of local government polls.
Deshapriya warned that any attempt to appoint a fresh delimitation committee could further delay the electoral process, making it unlikely that local government elections would be held within the current year.
He also dismissed claims that financial constraints have prevented the conduct of elections. Expressing surprise at such assertions, he questioned how funding shortages could be cited as a reason for postponement while expenditure continues in other sectors.
According to Deshapriya, the existence of laws establishing local government institutions imposes an obligation on the State to ensure that those institutions are populated through democratic means.
“The legal framework exists. If elected representatives are not appointed through elections and institutions continue to function under unelected administrators, that is a failure of the State,” he said.
-
News6 days agoBeijing Capital Airlines to resume flights to Colombo signalling boost to tourism
-
Features5 days agoKilling of Colombo’s ancient trees — a warning on UN’s World Desertification Day – 17 June
-
News3 days agoCreditor receives USD 2.5 mn as Lankan public bears loss from theft of Treasury funds
-
News2 days agoCreditor not yet paid
-
News2 days agoConsumers bearing 22% tax burden despite 18% VAT claim: Dr. Harsha de Silva
-
Opinion4 days agoBeyond diagnosis: A strategic design for 7% growth by 2029 (Part I)
-
Opinion6 days agoFifty years after Soweto uprising
-
News5 days agoIndia provides military stores worth USD 5.5 mn to SL
