Connect with us

News

Lawyer slams SLPP for backing Ranil’s ‘destructive economic agenda’

Published

on

Kalyananda Thiranagama

… explains how Parliament enacted harmful laws

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Veteran lawyer Kalyananda Thiranagama said that the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peremuna (SLPP) should be held responsible for backing President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s economic strategy meant to privatise the remaining state enterprises.

Addressing a public gathering in Colombo, the liberal civil society activist emphasised that the SLPP couldn’t absolve itself of the crime perpetrated by the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government in the form of an economic strategy that would deprive the people of their rights.

Thiranagama, who does not fear to call a spade a spade, declared that UNP leader Wickremesinghe was now implementing the third phase of his despicable project, having already privatised some state enterprises during his tenure as the Industries Minister in the late President Ranasinghe Premadasa’s administration and during the 2002-2003 period when he served as Prime Minister of the UNP-led UNF government.

Now, the SLPP was backing Wickremesinghe’s last phase of that project to sell what is left of the family silver, Thiranagama said, adding that the SLPP voted for the 2024 Budget meant to authorise the President to go ahead.

The Third Reading of the Appropriation Bill (Budget) for the financial year 2024 was passed in Parliament last Wednesday (13) by a majority of 41 votes, where 122 votes were cast in favour of the Budget and 81 votes were cast against. One MP abstained from casting the vote.

Thiranagama reminded the SLPP that it authorised an increase of Value-Added Tax (VAT) from 15% to 18% for products and services while imposing the same on nearly 100 items that weren’t subjected to VAT previously. Declaring the current overall Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa economic strategy was nothing but a national crime, Thiranagama warned the consequences would be unbearable and irreversible.

The outspoken lawyer urged right thinking people to shed whatever their differences to pave the way for a campaign against the government project. Thiranagama stressed that the government strategy should be opposed and reversed at any cost.

Thiranagama said that the imposition of VAT in a way that is extremely harmful to the people should be condemned taking into consideration some goods were subjected to VAT on more than one occasion, causing a cascading effect. The lawyer declared that all those who protected the incumbent government were traitors.

At the onset of his explosive speech, lawyer Thiranagama emphasized that the Nov 14 Supreme Court ruling in respect of fundamental rights cases against the economic ruination of the country warned politicians and officials regardless of their standing in the society.

That ruling paved the way for the public to move court against politicians and officials in the future, the lawyer said, while questioning the Opposition demand to deprive those found guilty of their civic rights.

Pointing out that pertaining to fundamental rights applications the SC based its ruling on the period Nov 2019-early 2022, Thiranagama explained how the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s administration deprived the government of much needed revenue by either abolishing or reducing a range of taxes. That caused loss of billions of Rupees in tax revenue, the lawyer said. The situation took a turn for the worse when the government decided against seeking IMF intervention, Thiranagama said. Therefore, the SC dealt with reduction and abolition of taxes that led to the weakening of the economy and the failure on the part of the then government to seek an IMF bailout package, he said.

Thiranagama said that there was no basis for claims that the SC, in its Nov 14 ruling, dealt with corruption.

Commenting on the overall economic situation, Thiranagama said that the Yahapalana government, during Wickremesinghe’s tenure as the Prime Minister, enacted Foreign Exchange Act No 12 of 2017 that paved the way for unscrupulous exporters to conveniently refrain from bringing back export proceeds to the country. That law abolished the time-tested Exchange Control Act of 153, Thiranagama said, urging all those concerned to examine the consequences of Foreign Exchange Act No 12 of 2017 and Active Liability Management Act No 08 of 2018.

The so-called Active Liability Management Act No 08 of 2018 was essentially meant to raise loans for the purpose of management of the public debt, Thiranagama said, drawing public attention to how political parties maneuvered Parliament to enact laws immensely harmful to the country.

Commenting on Sri Lanka securing an unbearable amount of ISB’s (International Sovereign Bonds), Thiranagama said that the Active Liability Management Act No 08 of 2018 facilitated that operation during the UNP led Government of 2015 to 2019. The lawyer pointed out that of the total amount of ISBs, USD 12.5 bn were taken during the Yahapalana administration and was one of the primary causes for the current crisis.

Alleging that there hadn’t been at least proper examination of these laws that harmed the country, Thiranagama recalled how it transpired before the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) probing April 2019 Easter Sunday carnage that the Central Bank couldn’t inquire into massive amounts of funds received by various parties from suspicious overseas sources.

Thiranagama discussed how the country’s supreme institution, the Parliament, played a destructive role in a political agenda through the enactment of harmful laws. The lawyer also dealt with the ongoing move to privatize the CEB in line with overall government strategy.

Reference was also made to the reversal of the privatization of Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation (SLIC) as well as Lanka Marine Service (LMS) during Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga’s tenure as the President. However, the UNP leader was now going all out to achieve what he couldn’t do as the Premier during the 2002-2003 period, Thiranagama alleged.



Latest News

Landslide Early Warnings issued to the Districts of Badulla, Kandy, Matale, Monaragala and Nuwara Eliya

Published

on

By

The Landslide Early Warning Center of the the National Building Research Organaisation [NBRO] has issued landslide early warnings to the districts of Badulla, Kandy, Matale, Monaragala and Nuwara Eliya for a period of 24 hours effective from 1200 noon today [07th January].

Accordingly,
LEVEL III RED landslide early warnings have been issued to the divisional secretaries divisions and surrounding areas of Udadumbara in the Kandy district, and Nildandahinna and Walapane in the Nuwara Eliya district.

LEVEL II AMBER landslide early warnings have been issued to the divisional secretaries divisions and surrounding areas of Kandaketiya in the Badulla district, Wilgamuwa in the Matale district, and Mathurata and Hanguranketha in the Nuwara Eliya district.

LEVEL I YELLOW landslide early warnings have been issued to the divisional secretaries divisions and surrounding areas of Meegahakiwula, Lunugala, Welimada, Passara, Badulla and Hali_Ela in the Badulla district, Doluwa in the Kandy district,Ambanganga Korale in the Matale district, and Bibile in the Monaragala district

Continue Reading

News

Prez seeks Harsha’s help to address CC’s concerns over appointment of AG

Published

on

Chairman of the Committee on Public Finance (CoPF), MP Dr. Harsha de Silva, told Parliament yesterday that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake had personally telephoned him in response to a letter highlighting the prolonged delay in appointing an Auditor General, a vacancy that has remained unfilled since 07 December.

Addressing the House, Dr. de Silva said the President had contacted him following the letter he sent, in his capacity as CoPF Chairman, regarding the urgent need to appoint the constitutionally mandated head of the National Audit Office. During the conversation, the President had sought his intervention to inform the Constitutional Council (CC) about approving the names already forwarded by the President for consideration.

Dr. de Silva said the President had inquired whether he could convey the matter to the Constitutional Council after their discussion. He stressed that both the President and the CC must act in cooperation and in strict accordance with the Constitution, warning that institutional deadlock should not undermine constitutional governance.

He also raised concerns over the Speaker’s decision to prevent the letter he sent to the President from being shared with members of the Constitutional Council, stating that this had been done without any valid basis. Dr. de Silva subsequently tabled the letter in Parliament.

Last week, Dr. de Silva formally urged President Dissanayake to immediately fill the Auditor General’s post, warning that the continued vacancy was disrupting key constitutional functions. In his letter, dated 22 December, he pointed out that the absence of an Auditor General undermines Articles 148 and 154 of the Constitution, which vest Parliament with control over public finance.

He said that the vacancy has severely hampered the work of oversight bodies such as the Committee on Public Accounts (COPA) and the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE), particularly at a time when the country is grappling with a major flood disaster.

As Chair of the Committee responsible for overseeing the National Audit Office, Dr. de Silva stressed that a swift appointment was essential to safeguard transparency, accountability and financial oversight.

In a separate public statement, he warned that Sri Lanka was operating without its constitutionally mandated Chief Auditor at a critical juncture. In a six-point appeal to the President, Dr. de Silva emphasised that an Auditor General must be appointed urgently in the context of ongoing disaster response and reconstruction efforts.

“Given the large number of transactions taking place now with Cyclone Ditwah reconstruction and the yet-to-be-legally-established Rebuilding Sri Lanka Fund, an Auditor General must be appointed urgently,” he said in a post on X.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Govt. exploring possibility of converting EPF benefits into private sector pensions

Published

on

The NPP government was exploring the feasibility of introducing a regular pension, or annuity scheme, for Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) contributors, Deputy Minister of Labour Mahinda Jayasinghe told Parliament yesterday.

Responding to a question raised by NPP Kalutara District MP Oshani Umanga in the House, Jayasinghe said the government was examining whether EPF benefits, which are currently paid as a lump sum at retirement, could instead be converted into a system that provides regular payments throughout a retiree’s lifetime.

“We are looking at whether it is possible to provide a pension,” Jayasinghe said, stressing that there was no immediate plan to abolish the existing lump-sum payment. “But we are paying greater attention to whether a regular payment can be provided throughout their retired life.”

Jayasinghe noted that the EPF was established as a social security mechanism for private sector employees after retirement and warned that receiving the entire fund in a single installment could place retirees at financial risk, particularly as life expectancy increases.

He also cautioned that interim withdrawals from the EPF undermined its long-term sustainability. “Even the interim payments that are given from time to time undermine the ability to give security at the time of retirement,” he said, distinguishing the EPF from the Employees’ Trust Fund, which provides more frequent interim benefits.

Addressing concerns over early withdrawals, the Deputy Minister explained that contributors have been allowed to withdraw up to 30 percent of their EPF balance since 2015, with a further 20 percent permitted after 10 years, subject to specific conditions and documentary proof.

Of 744 applications received for such withdrawals, 702 had been approved, he said.

The proposed shift towards an annuity-based system comes amid broader concerns over Sri Lanka’s ageing population and pressures on retirement financing. While state sector employees receive pensions funded by taxpayers, including EPF contributors, the EPF itself has been facing growing strain as it is also used to finance budget deficits.

Jayasinghe said the government’s focus was to formulate a mechanism that would ensure long-term income security for private sector employees, placing them on a footing closer to a pension scheme rather than a one-time retirement payout.

Continue Reading

Trending