Connect with us

Business

Public spending on education in SL declining but non-state actor participation in sector up: IPS

Published

on

L-R Dr Madura Wehella, former Additional Secretary (Policy, Planning and Review), Ministry of Education; Prof Harischandra Abeygunawardena, Chairman, National Education Commission; Dr Nisha Arunatilake, Director of Research, IPS; Asith de Silva, Senior Manager - Social Innovations, Dialog Axiata PLC and Dr Harsha Alles, Chairman, Gateway Group

By Lynn Ockersz

‘Despite Sri Lanka’s free education policy and expansion of state activities in education, public spending on education has historically declined. Government expenditure on education is low compared to Nepal, India and Malaysia, for example, although research indications are that non-state actor participation in the sector is growing, Director of Research at the Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka Dr. Nisha Arunatilaka said.

‘Encouraging non-state sector participation in education services and expanding on successful collaborative initiatives between the state and non-state sectors to improve services, efficiency and quality, though under regulation and with attention to ensuring equity, are some measures that could be taken to address the challenges faced by Sri Lanka’s non-state education sector, Dr. Arunatilaka added. She was addressing an IPS and UNESCO-initiated panel discussion titled, ‘Non-State Actors in Sri Lanka’s Education Sector’, on January 24, at the IPS’s Dr. Saman Kelegama auditorium, to mark International Day of Education.

The event was aimed at raising public awareness on the findings of the ‘Global Education Monitoring Report 2022 South Asia’, which draws on the global comparative research by the ‘Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report at UNESCO’. The IPS is one of six regional partners who contributed to the report on the basis of Sri Lanka’s experiences in the relevant areas of interest, IPS sources said.

Earlier, addressing the audience online, Senior Project Officer (Research), Global Education Monitoring Report, UNESCO, Dr. Priyadarshani Joshi said: ‘The 2022 GEM Report demonstrates inadequate public provision in South Asia and discusses the different contributions to education made by the region’s diverse non-state providers. To strengthen South Asia’s education sector, we suggest bringing all actors under one umbrella to work towards achieving educational goals by creating an enabling policy and regulatory environment, built on standards, information, incentives and accountability.’

The IPS-UNESCO panel brought together some key figures in Sri Lanka’s educational sphere from the state and non-state sectors. Following their presentations a Q&A session with the audience followed.

Chairman, National Education Commission Professor Harishchandra Abeygunawardena said in his presentation and in response to issues raised by the audience: ‘There is certainly a role for non-state actors in Sri Lanka’s education sector. We need to improve non-state access to the lower levels of education and to the tertiary level of the structure. Currently, resource constraints face the government. Here’s where the private sector could come in and help meet this shortfall in resource-allocation. In these efforts we need to keep in mind the primary aims in education: Providing universal access to education, irrespective of creed, ethnicity, language and other differences and bringing out good citizens. The promotion of patriotism among students is important.

‘However, there is no accountability on the part of some private schools. Many private schools do not get registered with the authorities. The impression that one gets with regard to many institutions in this sector is that ‘education is up for sale’. The number of students “passing out” with “top degrees” is astounding. The quality of teaching and the educational qualifications of many teachers leave much to be desired.’

Chairman, Gateway Group, Dr. Harsha Alles said: ‘There is no support for the private sector in education. There are no loans for us free of charge but we have to pay all taxes without fail. Currently, there are 140,000 students in private schools. However, there are some 1,500 state schools with less than 50 students.

‘But private educational institutions could to do things differently. For example, through the use of modern technology in teaching. The public and private sectors have to work together. But the monitoring of private schools is important. The entirety of the latter institutions need to register with the authorities but this has not happened. We need to work out the cost per student. When this is done it will be found that the cost per private sector student is lower than that of his counterparts in the public sector.’

Senior Manager, Social Innovations, Dialog Axiata PLC, Asith de Silva stressed the need for up-skilling teachers. They need to acquire the ability to teach with the aid of modern technology. At present there is a lack of awareness among many teachers on the need for such abilities. They and the general public should be made aware of the importance of IT technology, if not such technology would be a like a new car that has been for bought for running but left completely unused. It is unfortunate that some school administrators and teachers have a misleading view on IT technology. Prejudices to the effect that the use of IT in teaching could lead to harmful consequences need to be dispelled.

Outlining some ways in which Dialog is helping in achieving educational goals, De Silva said that under its ‘Nenasa’ program eight channels are dedicated to teaching students from Years 1 to 13. There are four such dedicated channels in Tamil.

Former Additional Secretary (Policy, Planning and Review), Ministry of Education Dr. Madura M. Wehella focusing on existing gaps in educational regulations drew attention in particular to the 1961 Education Act which does not recognize non-state actors in local education. She said, among other things, that ‘state and non-state actors could collectively overcome regulatory constraints and strengthen the education system holistically’. For example, the two actors could collaborate in introducing innovations in the area of teacher training.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

At Asia’s crossroads, Sri Lanka must decide how it will join the future

Published

on

The first official meeting was the Governors’ Business Session, and it was chaired by the President of Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, as host of the annual meeting. Pic courtesy: Ministry of Finance , Kingdom of Tonga

In the ancient Silk Road city of Samarkand, where merchants once connected civilisations through trade and ideas, a new conversation unfolded from 3–6 May at the 59th Annual Meetings of the Asian Development Bank.Political leaders, central bank governors, investors, innovators and development partners gathered under a compelling theme: “Crossroads of Progress: Advancing the Region’s Connected Future.”

The message resonating across the forum was unmistakable. Asia and the Pacific are entering a decisive decade in which connectivity, technology and regional cooperation will shape economic power and social resilience. Supply chains are being redesigned. Artificial intelligence is transforming productivity. Energy systems are becoming increasingly interconnected. Financing models are evolving to accommodate climate pressures and development needs. Countries that move quickly and cohesively are likely to benefit from this transformation. Those trapped in internal fragmentation risk falling behind.

The Annual Meetings demonstrated that the future envisioned by the ADB is no longer theoretical. Across the region, governments are already repositioning themselves to participate in a more integrated Asian economy. Discussions focused heavily on cross-border infrastructure, digital innovation, energy interconnection, sustainable finance and regional policy harmonisation.

One recurring theme was that “integration is power.” In an era marked by geopolitical uncertainty and economic disruption, regional cooperation is increasingly viewed as the foundation of resilience. From trade corridors and logistics systems to energy-sharing mechanisms such as the ASEAN Power Grid, policymakers emphasised that countries can no longer afford to operate in isolation.

The conversations in Samarkand also reflected how development itself is being redefined. Data, digital infrastructure and artificial intelligence are becoming as important as roads, ports and airports. Governments across Asia are already deploying AI-enabled public services, fintech systems, smart agriculture and real-time disaster response technologies to improve efficiency and social inclusion.

Equally important was the recognition that public financing alone will not be enough to meet the region’s ambitions. The ADB repeatedly stressed the need for innovative financing mechanisms capable of mobilising private capital while strengthening domestic fiscal systems. Climate adaptation, energy transition and infrastructure expansion will require development finance that is scalable, catalytic and capable of attracting long-term investor confidence.

For Sri Lanka, the discussions carried particular significance.

Having emerged from one of the gravest economic crises in its post-independence history, Sri Lanka today stands at a delicate juncture. The country possesses many of the advantages needed to participate meaningfully in Asia’s next growth phase: strategic geographic positioning, human capital, maritime access and longstanding relationships with multilateral institutions such as the ADB. Yet the gap between potential and preparedness remains considerable.

While many Asian economies appear to have moved toward greater institutional maturity and long-term policy coordination, Sri Lanka continues to wrestle with recurring political instability, governance concerns, debt restructuring pressures and inconsistencies in economic policymaking. Questions surrounding legal processes, public sector reforms and policy continuity continue to affect investor confidence and national coherence.

The challenge facing Sri Lanka is therefore not merely economic. It is fundamentally institutional and political.

The larger Asian story unfolding in Samarkand was one of countries aligning national purpose with regional opportunity. Whether through digital transformation, energy integration or climate financing, many nations appear increasingly focused on continuity, coordination and long-term execution. Sri Lanka, by contrast, still appears engaged in resolving foundational questions about governance, accountability and economic direction.

This does not diminish the country’s prospects. Rather, it highlights the urgency of reform and policy harmonisation if Sri Lanka is to become a meaningful participant in the region’s connected future.

The ADB’s vision for Asia is ultimately centered on resilience through cooperation. It is a vision in which countries strengthen themselves not in isolation, but through deeper engagement with regional systems of trade, finance, energy and technology. For Sri Lanka, this presents both an opportunity and a warning.

The opportunity lies in leveraging multilateral partnerships, embracing digital modernisation, strengthening institutional credibility and integrating more deeply into emerging regional networks. The warning is that Asia’s transformation is accelerating. Countries unable to build stable governance structures and coherent development strategies may struggle to capture its benefits.

Samarkand itself offered a symbolic reminder of this reality. Historically, it flourished because it connected worlds. Today, Asia is once again building new networks of connection – digital, financial, infrastructural and geopolitical.

The question confronting Sri Lanka is whether it can align its political will and economic resilience quickly enough to travel alongside the region’s next decade of growth rather than watch it from the margins.

By Sanath Nanayakkare

Continue Reading

Business

CBSL and Australia’s S4IE programme partner to advance digital financial literacy for MSMEs

Published

on

Dr. P. Nandalal Weerasinghe, Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, and Matthew Duckworth, Australian High Commissioner to Sri Lanka, at the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Australia’s Skills for an Inclusive Economy (S4IE) programme to launch a pilot initiative aimed at enhancing digital financial literacy among micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Recognised as a vital engine of Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and inclusive development, MSMEs stand to benefit from targeted interventions designed to improve access to finance, strengthen institutional coordination, and foster a more supportive enabling environment.

The pilot will test evidence-based approaches, the outcomes of which will inform future policy design and programming. CBSL intends to scale successful measures in collaboration with national and international partners.

Commenting on the partnership, Dr. P. Nandalal Weerasinghe, Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, stated: “This initiative reflects CBSL’s dedication to practical, evidence-based solutions. The pilot enables us to test and refine methodologies that can be expanded over time to deliver sustainable outcomes for MSMEs across the country.”

His Excellency Matthew Duckworth, Australian High Commissioner to Sri Lanka, emphasied the program’s long-term vision: “Australia is pleased to partner with the Central Bank of Sri Lanka on this initiative. From the outset, our focus has been on building systems and partnerships that are both sustainable and scalable, ensuring benefits extend well beyond the pilot phase.”

The initiative aligns with broader efforts to promote inclusive economic growth and strengthen institutional capacity. It reflects Australia’s ongoing partnership with Sri Lanka in support of reforms that advance economic stability, resilience, and shared prosperity.

Representing the Australian High Commission, Zoe Kidd, First Secretary (Development), and R. Sivasuthan, Senior Programme Officer, reaffirmed Australia’s commitment to close collaboration with CBSL. Their aim is to ensure the pilot yields actionable insights and sustainable outcomes, with a clear pathway toward future scaling.

Continue Reading

Business

Higher power costs and a weakening rupee set to strain Sri Lankan kitchen budgets

Published

on

Adding to the existing pressures, the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) has approved a revision of electricity tariffs for the second quarter of 2026, effective from today for users who consume over 180 electricity units. This increase arrives just as the Sri Lankan rupee faces renewed pressure, having recorded a 3.6% depreciation against the US dollar year-to-date. The convergence of a weaker currency and higher power costs creates renewed pressure on the cost of living.

For the average Sri Lankan household, this policy shift is not just a line item on a utility bill; it is a catalyst for a broader inflationary trend. Even before this revision, headline inflation had already shown signs of a sharp ascent, with the Colombo Consumer Price Index (CCPI) surging to 5.4% in April 2026, a stark jump from the 2.2% recorded only a month prior.

This statistical climb is most painfully visible at the local marketplace. At the Narahenpita Economic Centre, the cost of essentials has become highly volatile: beans have climbed to Rs. 700/kg, while carrots have reached Rs. 400/kg. The protein basket is equally strained, with Kelawalla fish priced at Rs. 2,980/kg. With the new electricity tariffs taking effect, the food manufacturing industry now faces fresh overheads for processing, refrigeration, and packaging. These increased costs will inevitably trickle down to the retail shelf, threatening to push these prices even higher.

While global energy markets offered a brief moment of relief with Brent crude prices dipping by over $6 per barrel last week, the domestic impact of a depreciating rupee means that the cost of imported fuel and raw materials remains high.

This invisible pressure, combined with the visible hike in electricity rates, leaves little room for families to breathe.

Despite these immediate challenges, the broader economic framework shows pockets of resilience, according to the Central Bank’s economic indicators. Industrial production in food and apparel grew steadily earlier this year, and the government recorded a notable budget surplus of Rs. 169.7 billion in the first two months of 2026.

However, as the nation moves into the second quarter, the strength of this fiscal discipline will be tested against the lived reality of its citizens. As the new rates come into effect from today, Sri Lankans are left to wait and see just how much further their kitchen budgets can be stretched.

By Sanath Nanayakkare

Continue Reading

Trending