News
Lawyer slams SLPP for backing Ranil’s ‘destructive economic agenda’
… explains how Parliament enacted harmful laws
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Veteran lawyer Kalyananda Thiranagama said that the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peremuna (SLPP) should be held responsible for backing President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s economic strategy meant to privatise the remaining state enterprises.
Addressing a public gathering in Colombo, the liberal civil society activist emphasised that the SLPP couldn’t absolve itself of the crime perpetrated by the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government in the form of an economic strategy that would deprive the people of their rights.
Thiranagama, who does not fear to call a spade a spade, declared that UNP leader Wickremesinghe was now implementing the third phase of his despicable project, having already privatised some state enterprises during his tenure as the Industries Minister in the late President Ranasinghe Premadasa’s administration and during the 2002-2003 period when he served as Prime Minister of the UNP-led UNF government.
Now, the SLPP was backing Wickremesinghe’s last phase of that project to sell what is left of the family silver, Thiranagama said, adding that the SLPP voted for the 2024 Budget meant to authorise the President to go ahead.
The Third Reading of the Appropriation Bill (Budget) for the financial year 2024 was passed in Parliament last Wednesday (13) by a majority of 41 votes, where 122 votes were cast in favour of the Budget and 81 votes were cast against. One MP abstained from casting the vote.
Thiranagama reminded the SLPP that it authorised an increase of Value-Added Tax (VAT) from 15% to 18% for products and services while imposing the same on nearly 100 items that weren’t subjected to VAT previously. Declaring the current overall Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa economic strategy was nothing but a national crime, Thiranagama warned the consequences would be unbearable and irreversible.
The outspoken lawyer urged right thinking people to shed whatever their differences to pave the way for a campaign against the government project. Thiranagama stressed that the government strategy should be opposed and reversed at any cost.
Thiranagama said that the imposition of VAT in a way that is extremely harmful to the people should be condemned taking into consideration some goods were subjected to VAT on more than one occasion, causing a cascading effect. The lawyer declared that all those who protected the incumbent government were traitors.
At the onset of his explosive speech, lawyer Thiranagama emphasized that the Nov 14 Supreme Court ruling in respect of fundamental rights cases against the economic ruination of the country warned politicians and officials regardless of their standing in the society.
That ruling paved the way for the public to move court against politicians and officials in the future, the lawyer said, while questioning the Opposition demand to deprive those found guilty of their civic rights.
Pointing out that pertaining to fundamental rights applications the SC based its ruling on the period Nov 2019-early 2022, Thiranagama explained how the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s administration deprived the government of much needed revenue by either abolishing or reducing a range of taxes. That caused loss of billions of Rupees in tax revenue, the lawyer said. The situation took a turn for the worse when the government decided against seeking IMF intervention, Thiranagama said. Therefore, the SC dealt with reduction and abolition of taxes that led to the weakening of the economy and the failure on the part of the then government to seek an IMF bailout package, he said.
Thiranagama said that there was no basis for claims that the SC, in its Nov 14 ruling, dealt with corruption.
Commenting on the overall economic situation, Thiranagama said that the Yahapalana government, during Wickremesinghe’s tenure as the Prime Minister, enacted Foreign Exchange Act No 12 of 2017 that paved the way for unscrupulous exporters to conveniently refrain from bringing back export proceeds to the country. That law abolished the time-tested Exchange Control Act of 153, Thiranagama said, urging all those concerned to examine the consequences of Foreign Exchange Act No 12 of 2017 and Active Liability Management Act No 08 of 2018.
The so-called Active Liability Management Act No 08 of 2018 was essentially meant to raise loans for the purpose of management of the public debt, Thiranagama said, drawing public attention to how political parties maneuvered Parliament to enact laws immensely harmful to the country.
Commenting on Sri Lanka securing an unbearable amount of ISB’s (International Sovereign Bonds), Thiranagama said that the Active Liability Management Act No 08 of 2018 facilitated that operation during the UNP led Government of 2015 to 2019. The lawyer pointed out that of the total amount of ISBs, USD 12.5 bn were taken during the Yahapalana administration and was one of the primary causes for the current crisis.
Alleging that there hadn’t been at least proper examination of these laws that harmed the country, Thiranagama recalled how it transpired before the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) probing April 2019 Easter Sunday carnage that the Central Bank couldn’t inquire into massive amounts of funds received by various parties from suspicious overseas sources.
Thiranagama discussed how the country’s supreme institution, the Parliament, played a destructive role in a political agenda through the enactment of harmful laws. The lawyer also dealt with the ongoing move to privatize the CEB in line with overall government strategy.
Reference was also made to the reversal of the privatization of Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation (SLIC) as well as Lanka Marine Service (LMS) during Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga’s tenure as the President. However, the UNP leader was now going all out to achieve what he couldn’t do as the Premier during the 2002-2003 period, Thiranagama alleged.
News
US sinks Iranian warship off Galle returning from Indian naval exercise
Of 180 member crew, 30 rescued by Sri Lanka Navy
Iran warship IRIS Dena (F75), returning home after participating in the Indian International Fleet Review, and MILAN 2026 international naval exercises, has been sunk off Sri Lanka. The US, Russia and Iran were among 74 participants.
Speculation is rife that the US attacked the vessel in international waters as part of the continuing offensive action under Operation Epic Fury, launched on 28 February. Before the attack in the Indian ocean, President Trump declared that the Iranian Navy Headquarters and nine Navy vessels had been destroyed.
The ill-fated Moudge-class frigate participated in the Indian exercises with the US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Pinckney (DDG-91) and the Marshal Shaposhnikov, a Udaloy-class frigate of the Russian Navy. Sri Lanka also participated in the exercises. SLNS Sagara and Israeli built Fast Missile Vessel Nandimithra represented Sri Lanka. Forty two warships and submarines and 29 aircraft had been involved.
At the time of the attack, the domestically built vessel was crewed by 180 officers and men.
The US Embassy here did not respond to The Island media query whether the US sank IRIS Dena . The Island was unable to get in touch with Iranian Ambassador in Colombo Alireza Delkhosh though he earlier indicated his availability later in the day.
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment and Tourism, Vijitha Herath, told the Parliament yesterday that the Sri Lanka Navy and the Sri Lanka Air Force had acted in less than an hour of receiving the distressed signal at 5.08 am.
According to the Minister, the first naval craft was dispatched by 6 am, followed by a second vessel at 7 am, while Air Force units joined the mission, including the deployment of a surveillance aircraft to support search operations.
Approximately 180 personnel were believed to have been on board the stricken vessel. Of them, around 30 were reported to be in critical condition.
“To save the lives of those 30 persons, we intervened immediately,” Minister Herath said, adding that the rescued crew members were being transported to Karapitiya Hospital for urgent medical treatment. Some had already arrived by the time of his statement.
SLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa asked whether the Iranian ship had been attacked within Sri Lanka’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
Responding to questions raised by Opposition MPs, including NDF Badulla District MP Chamara Sampath Dassanayake, who alleged that the Iranian vessel may have been struck in Sri Lankan waters, the Minister said the ship had been outside Sri Lanka’s maritime boundary when it issued the distress call.
MP Dassanayake queried whether the frigate had been hit as part of the ongoing military escalation involving the United States and Israel against Iran. There was no immediate confirmation from the government regarding the cause of the emergency.
Minister Herath stressed that Sri Lanka’s intervention was guided solely by humanitarian considerations and international obligations.
“We are bound by the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (SAR) of 1979, which we have signed,” he told Parliament.
Under the convention, a signatory state is required to respond to maritime emergencies, regardless of nationality, the cause of the incident, or whether it occurs beyond its own territorial waters.
“According to this convention, if a vessel, or its crew, encounters danger beyond our territorial limits, we are obligated to intervene and protect those lives on humanitarian grounds,” Minister Herath said, adding Sri Lanka had acted immediately to prevent loss of life and had taken all urgent and necessary measures as a responsible state.
The Minister noted that the incident highlighted broader regional security vulnerabilities in maritime safety amid escalating tensions in the region. “A regional military situation would also have an impact on our country. The government’s position is that a negotiated solution must be pursued,” he said.
He also disclosed that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake had held a telephone discussion on Tuesday night with the leadership of the United Arab Emirates regarding the evolving regional situation.
Rescue operations were continuing at the time of going to press.
By Saman Indrajith and Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Justice Kumudini complains of male domination at senior levels, absence of a woman head of BASL
Judge of the Supreme Court Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe has recently presented a stark analysis of the legal profession’s gender disparity, noting that in spite of women entering the legal field in substantial numbers, their representation dwindles at senior levels. She has highlighted critical statistics and the fact that only two women currently serve in the Supreme Court, none in the Court of Appeal, and that there has never been a woman President of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL).
“Inclusive leadership is not satisfied by entry-level participation,” Justice Wickramasinghe said. “It concerns who occupies the apex of institutional authority, who shapes doctrine, who speaks for the profession. These figures are not merely statistics; they are indicators of work yet unfinished.”
Justice Wickramasinghe said so at a seminar organised on the eve of International Women’s Day by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), in collaboration with the Sri Lanka Women Lawyers’ Association (SLWLA). She underscored the need to address the systemic barriers preventing women from reaching the apex of the legal profession. Justice Wickramasinghe addressed the gathering as the Chief Guest.
BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya, in his address, framed inclusivity not as charity or tokenism, but as “structural fairness.” He raised an important question being ‘who bears the responsibility of inclusivity’ and addressed the vital role of leadership in inclusivity. Furthermore, Amarasuriya challenged the profession to address the “gap between what we see coming into the profession and what we see at the top,” and clarified that such disparity did not stem from a lack of competence or commitment but from deep rooted practices and structural issues.
A dynamic panel discussion, moderated by Attorney-at-Law Tanushka Gunawardane, explored the multifaceted nature of inclusive leadership. The panel featured Justice Wickramasinghe, Constitutional Council Member Professor Wasantha Seneviratne (joining online), Senior Instructing Attorney Shiranthi Gunawardhana, and corporate leader Yanina Weerasinghe.
Professor Wasantha Seneviratne distinguished between mere representation and true participation, stating that inclusion becomes meaningful only when women have the “agency and authority to make decisions.” She emphasised that inclusive leadership is both a moral obligation and a pragmatic governance strategy.
Senior Instructing Attorney Shiranthi Gunawardhana shared personal anecdotes from her 50-year career, urging senior lawyers to act as mentors rather than gatekeepers. She stressed the importance of creating space for young female lawyers by offering flexibility and support to help them balance professional and personal responsibilities.
Yanina Weerasinghe, Head of Legal at Brandix, argued that true inclusion is measured by influence, not optics. “Diversity is being present; inclusivity is being influential,” she explained, warning against tokenism and calling for “cerebral opportunities” where women are selected, based on talent, and given a genuine voice in decision-making.
Justice Wickramasinghe addressed the relationship between judicial hierarchy and inclusion, asserting that authority and accessibility can coexist. “A judge can be firm in decisions while remaining approachable,” she said, adding that power exercised with transparency and humility strengthens, rather than weakens, institutional legitimacy.
The seminar also heard from Dilani Yatawaka, Managing Director/CEO of Ideal Motors, who shared her perspective as a female leader in the male-dominated automotive sector. She reinforced the critical role of supportive superiors and societal encouragement to enable women to ascend the career ladder while managing family responsibilities.
BASL Women Lawyers’ Professional and Career Development Committee Chair Indika Nagaratne Koththagoda in her welcome address said that the distinguished gathering was honoured to have Her Ladyship Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe, Judge of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, as the Chief Guest and a key panellist and also welcomed the other panellists Attorneys-at-Law Professor Wasantha Seneviratne, Ms. Shiranthi Gunawardena and Yanina Weerasinghe for agreeing to share their insights on the subject during the ensuing panel discussion to be moderated by Attorney-at-Law Ms. Tanushka Gunawardane.
In her closing remarks, Nalani Manatunga, Co-Chairperson of the BASL Women Lawyers’ Professional and Career Development Committee, challenged the audience to reflect on the true meaning of leadership. “A position gives authority, but leadership gives direction,” she said. “Inclusive leadership is not about occupying space; it’s about creating space. Let our leadership not be measured by the chairs we occupy, but by the doors we leave open.”
News
No qualified printer to head Government Printing Department
A crisis was prevailing at the Government Printing Department due to the absence of a permanent Government Printer, Parliament was told yesterday, raising concerns over confidentiality, quality control and national security.
NDF MP Ravi Karunanayake demanded to know what steps the government had taken to fill the long-standing vacancy at the department, describing the situation as a serious administrative lapse.
“The Government Printing Department is a very important and closed service category institution. However, it has been functioning without a permanent Government Printer for some time,” Karunanayake said.
The MP pointed out that the department handles highly sensitive material, including documents related to defence and national security, as well as other classified publications.
“The non-availability of a permanent Government Printer affects the quality, confidentiality and sustainability of the work there. Has the Government conducted an audit on the possible issues arising from this situation? What immediate action has been taken to resolve this crisis?” he asked.
Responding on behalf of the Government, Prime Minister Dr Harini Amarasuriya said the vacancy had been filled on a temporary basis following a Cabinet decision.
She said an experienced officer from the Sri Lanka Administrative Service had been appointed on contract as Acting Government Printer to ensure operational continuity and maintain security standards in relation to sensitive printing tasks.
The Prime Minister acknowledged that the issue reflected broader systemic weaknesses in public service recruitment and professional development that had persisted for years.
“To bridge these gaps, the Government is initiating specialised training programmes and offering international scholarships for high-performing students to build future technical capacity,” she said.
Chief Government Whip and Health and Mass Media Minister Dr Nalinda Jayatissa said that under existing service minutes, more than two decades of experience were required for an officer to qualify for the top post, and that there were currently no internal candidates eligible for appointment.
He said that the department was facing a leadership crisis and administrative instability due to the lack of a permanent, qualified Government Printer.
By Saman Indrajith
-
Features3 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more
-
Opinion6 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features6 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Opinion3 days agoSri Lanka – world’s worst facilities for cricket fans
-
Business6 days agoAn efficacious strategy to boost exports of Sri Lanka in medium term
-
Features4 days agoOverseas visits to drum up foreign assistance for Sri Lanka
-
Features4 days agoSri Lanka to Host First-Ever World Congress on Snakes in Landmark Scientific Milestone
-
Features3 days agoA life in colour and song: Rajika Gamage’s new bird guide captures Sri Lanka’s avian soul
