Connect with us

News

FM accuses UNHRC of resorting to punitive, politicised, divisive, unhelpful action against Lanka for extraneous reasons

Published

on

The Foreign Ministry has accused the UNHRC of resorting to punitive, politicised, divisive, unhelpful action against Sri Lanka due to extraneous reasons.

The OHCHR has now established a “Sri Lanka Accountability Project” citing resolution 46/1, in a situation where the language of OP6 (Operative Paragraph) in resolution 46/1 only sought to “strengthen the capacity of the OHCHR to collect, consolidate, analyse and preserve…evidence.” Thus, what was supposed to be only an internal capacity building exercise, within the OHCHR, has arbitrarily been elevated to the level of a project and listed with other external mechanisms of the UNHRC, the Foreign Ministry alleged in a statement that dealt with the 49th session of the UNHRC.

Text of the statement issued yesterday: “The delegation from Colombo that attended the 49th session of the Human Rights Council, in Geneva, was led by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Professor G.L. Peiris, and comprised the following members: Minister of Justice Ali Sabry, State Minister of Production Supply and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Prof. Channa Jayasumana, Foreign Secretary Admiral Prof. Jayanath Colombage, and Additional Solicitor General Nerin Pulle.

The 49th session of the Human Rights Council was held in a backdrop where a written update on Sri Lanka was to be presented to the Council by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in pursuance of resolution 46/1 which was adopted in March 2021, without the consent of Sri Lanka as the country concerned, and with only 22 of the 47 Council members voting in favour of it.

Operative Paragraph 6 of this resolution set a very dangerous precedent by requiring the Office of the High Commissioner to take on the role of collecting criminal evidence with a view to future prosecution. Due to its fundamentally flawed nature, even countries that voted in favour of resolution 46/1, in their ‘explanation of the vote’ expressed reservations regarding this new task assigned to the OHCHR which is not consistent with its founding document GA resolution 48/141.

The OHCHR has now established a “Sri Lanka Accountability Project,” citing resolution 46/1, in a situation where the language of OP6 in resolution 46/1 only sought to “strengthen the capacity of the OHCHR to collect, consolidate, analyse and preserve…evidence.” Thus, what was supposed to be only an internal capacity building exercise, within the OHCHR, has arbitrarily been elevated to the level of a project and listed with other external mechanisms of the UNHRC.

Furthermore, all this adversarial action is taking place in Geneva in a situation where the Government of Sri Lanka is vigorously engaged in initiating and implementing a series of national processes, aimed at advancing reconciliation and human rights for all our people. In this context, it was important for Sri Lanka to explain to the stakeholders in Geneva, including the Council, UN Member States and other relevant actors, our position on this matter and to present before them the significant progress that Sri Lanka has achieved, in this regard, even amidst COVID 19 – related challenges.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs addressed the High Level Segment of HRC49 on 1 March 2022 highlighting Sri Lanka’s longstanding profile as an active participant in the multilateral framework, the national Constitutional, legal and institutional frameworks that are in place for the realisation of human rights, including the right to development, and our achievements in this regard. The Minister also stressed the importance of the HRC being guided by the principles of impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity, based on the principle of the sovereign equality of Member States, and raised objections to punitive, politicised, divisive, unhelpful action, initiated due to extraneous reasons.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs made a statement, on behalf of Sri Lanka, as the country concerned at the interactive dialogue that followed the introduction of the written update on Sri Lanka on 4 March 2022, pointing out among other things, that resolution 46/1 on Sri Lanka was directly contrary to the founding principles of the HRC. He also pointed out to the Council, the aspects of the High Commissioner’s written update that were discriminatory and intrusive.

At the Interactive Dialogue on the High Commissioner’s written update, Sri Lanka received cross-regional support and solidarity from a large number of countries of the Global South, who appreciated the Government’s significant efforts towards reconciliation and reiterated the importance of objective and constructive cooperation as the fundamental basis for multilateral engagement. Of the 45 countries that delivered statements at the interactive dialogue, 31 spoke in support of Sri Lanka. These speakers represented a broad spectrum of states from South, South East and Central Asia, Latin America and the Africa.

The 31 countries that spoke in favour of Sri Lanka, at the interactive dialogue, were Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the Philippines, Nepal, Kenya, Ethiopia, Maldives, China, Cuba, Japan, Syrian Arab Republic, Viet Nam, DPRK, Venezuela, Nigeria, Pakistan, Cambodia, the Russian Federation, Lebanon, Uganda, Belarus, Zimbabwe, Eritrea, South Sudan, Lao PDR, Yemen, Iran, Niger, Kazakhstan, Bangladesh and Azerbaijan.

In addition, in its statement, at the General Debate on Item 2 that followed, the interactive dialogue on Sri Lanka, South Korea also recognised Sri Lanka’s efforts at reconciliation and at initiating legal reforms.

The interventions from the States of the Global South recognised Sri Lanka’s commitment to promoting reconciliation and human rights through national processes, including through legislative reform, and the progress achieved in this regard, irrespective of COVID 19 – related challenges. They also underscored the importance of the Human Rights Council and the international community supporting voluntary national processes, as well as upholding the core principles of impartiality, non-selectivity and non-politicisation.

Among the matters stressed by the intervenient delegations were concerns over the micro-management of Sri Lanka’s internal constitutional and governance matters, and the imperative of strict adherence to the provisions of UN Charter and relevant UNGA and HRC resolutions. It was also stressed that cooperation with international human rights mechanisms should be without any external pressure from outside, with states having the power to determine its priorities and areas for international assistance and that only cooperative action will be truly effective and contribute to the real strengthening of human rights in a country.

Certain intervenient delegations also disagreed with the role being set for the OHCHR in collecting evidence, noting that the decision of the OHCHR to establish an “accountability project” is a breach of its mandate. The exorbitant cost of this mandate, in the region of US$ 3 million, was also commented on.

The delegation from Colombo held bi-lateral meetings with the following foreign delegations on the sidelines of HRC49 listed in the order in which they took place. – Lord Tariq Ahmed, Minister of State for South and Central Asia, UN and the Commonwealth accompanied by Rita French Ambassador/DPR of the UK. – Baroness Patricia Scotland, Commonwealth Secretary General – Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Timor-Leste Mrs. Adaljiza Magno – Mrs. Nassima Baghli, Ambassador, Permanent Observer, Permanent Delegation of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation – Mr. Daren Tang, Director General, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) – Mr Abdulaziz M.O. Alwasil, Permanent Representative of Saudi Arabia – Foreign Minister of Palestine Rizad Al Maliki and Mr Ibrahim Khraishi, Permanent Representative of Palestine to the UN in Geneva – Federal Minister for Human Rights of Pakistan, Ms Shireen M Mazari and the Permanent Representative of Pakistan in Geneva Mr Khalil Hashmi. – Minister of International Relations and Cooperation of South Africa, Dr Naledi Pandor – Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs for Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs of Egypt Khaled El Bakry, and Mr. Ahmed Ihab Abdelahad Gamaleldin, Permanent Representative of Egypt – Permanent Representative of the USA in Geneva Ms.Bathsheba Nell Crocker – Permanent Representative of the UK Mr. Simon MANLEY, and Mrs. Amanda GORELY, Permanent Representative of Australia – Deputy Head of the Judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran Dr Kazem Gharibabadi, and H.E. Mr. Esmaeil Baghaei Hamaneh, Permanent Representative of Iran – Permanent Representative of Turkey Mr. Sadik Arslan – UN High Commissioner For Human Rights Michelle Bachelet – President of the Human Rights Council Mr. Federico Villegas, Permanent Representative of Argentina – Permanent Representative of Bangladesh Md. Mustafizur Rahman, and Febrian Ruddyard, Permanent Representative of Indonesia.

In addition to the above, State Minister of Production Supply and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Prof. Channa Jayasumana held the following bi-laterals with – Dr Tedross Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General, World Health Organization – Mr Santiago Cornejo, Director of COVAX’s Country Engagement Team.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Ex-lawmakers group calls for IPU’s intervention to check “irregularities” in Parliament

Published

on

Association of Former Members of Parliament of Sri Lanka has requested the Inter-Parliamentary Union to inquire into, what the group calls, institutional irregularities in Parliament.

The Association cited the decision taken by the Attorney General not to appear for Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremeratne, in a case filed in the Court of Appeal by sacked Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, to underscore the need for IPU’s intervention.

The following is the text of the letter signed by former JVP MP Premasiri Manage, on behalf of the Association:  We write to Your Excellency on behalf of the Association of Former Members of Parliament of Sri Lanka, an independent body representing former legislators who have served the Parliament of Sri Lanka across successive administrations. The Association is committed to upholding democratic values, parliamentary traditions, institutional integrity, and the rule of law within Sri Lanka’s governance framework. It is with grave concern that we bring to your attention a series of developments that, in our respectful view, seriously undermine parliamentary democracy, administrative fairness, and institutional independence in Sri Lanka.

1. Unlawful Cancellation of Parliamentary Pensions

The present Government of Sri Lanka has, through actions that we consider both unlawful and unethical, cancelled the pension entitlements of former Members of Parliament. This decision appears to have been taken arbitrarily, without adherence to established legal principles, legitimate expectations, or due process, thereby undermining the dignity and security of those who have served in the national legislature.

2. Illegal and Malicious Interdiction of the Deputy Secretary General of Parliament

We wish to draw urgent attention to the interdiction of the Chief of Staff and Deputy Secretary General of Parliament, which raises serious concerns regarding abuse of authority and interference in administrative due process. According to material presently before the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka (CA/Writ Application No. 109/2026), the interdiction:

• Was imposed through the Parliamentary Staff Advisory Committee (PSAC), which lacks lawful authority to exercise such disciplinary powers, rendering the action ultra vires;

• Was based on a preliminary inquiry conducted without proper legal mandate, thereby invalidating the process from its inception;

• Was not the result of an independent administrative determination, but was carried out following the direct personal intervention and influence of Speaker, Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne;

• Appears to have been driven by personal and retaliatory considerations, amounting to a malicious exercise of authority rather than a lawful disciplinary process.

Importantly, it is also noted that the Attorney General of Sri Lanka has withdrawn from appearing on behalf of the Hon. Speaker in the related proceedings, reportedly in view of serious procedural irregularities associated with the interdiction process. The Speaker has consequently retained private legal counsel. This development strongly indicates that serious legal and procedural defects exist in the interdiction process, further reinforcing concerns regarding its legality and propriety. It is therefore evident that the lawful disciplinary framework vested in the Secretary General of Parliament was bypassed, resulting in a serious violation of the principles of natural justice, institutional independence, and the rule of law.

3. Discrimination and Harassment within Parliamentary Administration

We are also deeply concerned by credible allegations of discrimination and harassment within the parliamentary administrative structure, which, in our respectful view, have arisen as a result of the interference of the present Speaker in the administrative affairs of Parliament, thereby undermining the independence of the parliamentary administration. These concerns include:

• Discriminatory conduct affecting senior officials, including the Deputy Secretary General;

• Harassment and discriminatory treatment of female staff members within Parliament;

• The resignation of one female officer due to such circumstances;

• Confirmed findings of harassment in respect of another female officer attached to the Information Technology Division, as established by a report submitted by a former High Court Judge.

These incidents indicate a disturbing pattern of administrative misconduct and a failure to ensure a safe, independent, and professional working environment within Parliament.

3. Broader Institutional Concerns

The above matters collectively raise serious concerns regarding:

• The erosion of the independence of parliamentary administration;

• Abuse of authority and concentration of power;

• Undermining of due process and established legal frameworks;

• A broader decline in adherence to democratic governance standards.

 Request for Engagement

In light of the foregoing, we respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:

1. Intervene and monitor the situation;

2. Call for reports and clarifications from the Speaker and senior parliamentary administration;

3. Facilitate independent review and observation of relevant judicial proceedings;

4. Promote accountability and restoration of institutional integrity within Parliament.

Given the IPU’s distinguished role in safeguarding parliamentary democracy and promoting good governance worldwide, we firmly believe that your timely engagement will contribute significantly to restoring institutional integrity and public confidence in Sri Lanka’s Parliament.

Continue Reading

News

Power and Energy Minister, Ministry Secy resign over coal probe

Published

on

Power and Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody and Ministry Secretary Prof. Udayanga Hemapala have resigned from their posts.According to the President’s Media Division (PMD), the two officials submitted their letters of resignation to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake this afternoon.

The resignations come in the wake of a Special Presidential Commission of Inquiry appointed to probe possible unlawful activity and financial irregularities in coal procurement and power generation.

The PMD said the decision was taken to ensure that the Commission’s work proceeds without interference or perceived influence from individuals holding office.

Minister Jayakody, in his resignation letter, noted that following the appointment of the Commission, he had requested that investigations into coal imports, since 2009, be referred to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), describing it as part of the government’s anti-corruption mandate.

He added that the inquiry should be conducted independently and without bias, and said his continued presence in office could be perceived as an obstacle to the process.

Prof. Hemapala, in his resignation letter, said his decision was intended to facilitate the commencement of investigations and ensure a transparent and independent process, the PMD said.

The Special Presidential Commission was recently appointed to examine allegations of irregularities in coal imports and electricity generation over a prolonged period and to recommend corrective measures.

Continue Reading

News

President appoints Commission to probe irregularities in coal imports from inception of Norochcholai

Published

on

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake yesterday appointed a Presidential Commission of Inquiry to investigate alleged irregularities in coal imports and electricity generation, amid concerns over possible financial losses to the State.

The President’s Office said the Commission would examine transactions from the inception of coal-based power generation in Sri Lanka up to April 16, 2026, focusing on operations linked to the CEB-affiliated Lanka Coal Company (Pvt) Ltd., its successors, and private suppliers.

The three-member body is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gihan Kulatunga, with Court of Appeal Justice Adithya Patabendige and High Court Judge Sanjeewa Somaratne as members. Former Ministry Secretary P.V. Bandulasena has been appointed Secretary to the Commission.

Appointed under the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act No. 07 of 1978, as amended, the Commission has been mandated to scrutinise procurement procedures, supply chains, quality testing, and operational processes connected to coal imports and utilisation.

The Commission has been tasked with the following mandates:

• To determine whether irregularities or illegal acts occurred in the procurement process for coal imports and to assess any resulting financial loss to the government.

• To investigate whether substandard coal was imported during the relevant period and to examine the entire associated workflow, including procurement, supply, quality testing, operational, and utility processes.

• To ascertain whether electricity generation using imported coal reached the expected levels of efficiency and productivity.

• To investigate whether legal or financial irregularities or illegal acts occurred during the power generation process if substandard coal was indeed utilized.

• To examine whether there were any breaches of expressed terms or conditions in these processes and, if so, whether measures such as withholding payments or other compensatory actions were taken.

• To identify the political authorities, government officials, officers of Lanka Coal Company (Pvt) Ltd, suppliers, or their agents responsible for any such incidents and to recommend future action to be taken against them.

• To propose measures to prevent the recurrence of such alleged malpractices or illegal acts in the future and to ensure proper governance and integrity.

In addition to the above, the Commission will also report on any other alleged malpractices or illegal acts related to coal importation and electricity generation, and recommend preventive measures to address such issues.

Continue Reading

Trending