Opinion
Red Sea, Gaza and Sri Lanka’s foreign policy
by Lasanda Kurukulasuriya
Sri Lanka’s remarks at the meetings of the 19th Summit of the Non Aligned Movement in Uganda, must surely have had observers of international relations, especially relating to West Asia, scratching their heads. President Ranil Wickemesinghe in Kampala on Friday (19 Jan.) said he welcomed the fact that the 19th Summit gave “highest priority to the crisis in Gaza and the inalienable rights of the people of Palestine to self- determination and the realisation of an independent and sovereign state of Palestine,” according to the Foreign Ministry.
At the Ministerial Meeting on Wednesday 17th Foreign Minister Ali Sabry asserted that “Non-alignment forms a cornerstone of Sri Lanka’s foreign policy.” At the Ministerial Committee on Palestine the following day, he expressed Sri Lanka’s “deep concern on the tragedy that is continuing to unfold” in Gaza, stressing that “a humanitarian ceasefire is the only solution to halt the mounting civilian death toll.”
These remarks would appear ironic, coming a fortnight after Wickremesinghe announced a decision ‘to deploy a ship from the Sri Lanka Navy to the Red Sea, contributing to the security of the region against Houthi activities.’ It would contribute to a US-led operation to counter attacks on merchant ships by Yemen’s Houthi militants in the vital trade route. The Houthis say they are targeting Israeli-linked vessels in solidarity with Palestinians, and to bring pressure on Israel to end the assault on Gaza.
It is not clear how the President’s decision came about. There has been speculation that he was possibly responding to a request from the US, to support its military action against the Houthis. His disclosure on January 3, at an event at the BMICH, came on the same day that the White House issued a joint statement from the US and some allies, warning that the Houthis would bear the responsibility of the ‘consequences’ if they did not stop the attacks.
There has been a marked reluctance on the part of even the US’s western allies to be associated with the exercise. Some countries, like India, reportedly deployed their ships in the region to protect their own maritime traffic, but not under US command. The call to join a US-led military adventure in the Red Sea cannot be seen as simply an exercise to protect international shipping for the common good, comparable with, say, the multinational effort launched some years ago that effectively countered piracy in the seas off Somalia.
This was a call to ‘take sides’ on a political issue – one that has shaken the conscience of the world. Sri Lanka, a founding member of the NAM and part of the global South will be seen, not only to have taken the wrong ‘side’ on this issue, but will end up on the wrong side of history with this wrong-footed decision – if it is carried out. It doesn’t help that amid the crisis, Sri Lanka dispatched a group of workers to Israel, possibly to meet a labour shortfall arising from the ongoing war on Gaza.
Charge of genocide
The UN General Assembly has overwhelmingly voted for an immediate humanitarian truce in Gaza, while UN agencies deplore the catastrophic proportions of the humanitarian crisis. Israel now faces the charge of genocide before the International Court of Justice, the UN’s highest legal body. The charge brought by South Africa is one that “fits clearly under the definition of genocide in the Geneva Convention, to which Israel is a signatory,” wrote Prof. John Mearsheimer, Distinguished Service Professor in Political Science and Co-director of the Programme on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago. He described the application as being “comprehensive, well-written, well-argued, and thoroughly documented.
” Anuradha Chenoy wrote that “South African lawyers unpeeled the layers of Israel’s actions in each sphere of Gaza’s people’s life to show that ‘a people are being destroyed.” The retired Dean and Professor at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University went on to say, “The argument and evidence presented by South Africa, is been watched by the world over the last three months. What South Africa has done is to systematically bring it together, in a compelling, convincing and courageous way.”
The US has joined Israel in rejecting South Africa’s charge of genocide.
This is the backdrop against which the Sri Lanka government seeks to support the US-led Red Sea military operation. The government’s argument is that the re-routing of ships around Africa, resulting from disruption of shipping in the Red Sea, would lead to a rise in the cost of goods and would be harmful to Sri Lanka’s economy. It is anybody’s guess whether this rationalisation would fly with ordinary Sri Lankans, who may find reasons for the ‘rising cost of goods’ nearer home.
Related events
It does not appear that the Sri Lanka Navy has been consulted on matters such as readiness of its vessels and weaponry to counter attacks by drones and anti-ship ballistic missiles reportedly being used by the Houthis, or the costs (that experts suggest could far exceed the government’s estimate of Rs 500 million a month – calling into question the argument of ‘rising cost of goods.’) A decision relating to the crisis in Gaza would anyway call for an approach that goes beyond pedestrian considerations of a ‘cost-benefit analysis.’ This was amply displayed in the high priority accorded to Palestine and Gaza at the 19th NAM summit.
At this summit Sri Lanka strongly supported the call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and stood by Palestine’s cause, alongside other leaders of the global South. The apparent desire, at the same time, to appease the US by acceding to a request to join its military operation against Houthis in the Red Sea, is inexplicable. Has the government failed to see any connection between the two? The relatedness of these events was noted by Russian envoy to the UN Vasily Nebenzya. The developments in the Red Sea are the “direct projection of violence in Gaza, where the cruel operation of Israel continues already for three months,” he is reported as saying at a UN Security Council meeting,
Analysts looking at the bigger picture say that what the US and UK are doing could lead to further escalation of conflict. “The US and UK are ignoring the source of the crisis, which is the genocide in Gaza, but they’re also enabling it,” said Omar Rahman, a fellow with the Middle East Council on Global Affairs. Speaking to Al Jazeera, he observed “They’re trying to prevent a wider regional escalation by taking military action against the flashpoints that are occurring as a result of what’s happening in Gaza.”
President Wickremesinghe has often said Sri Lanka will not join any big power or ‘take sides.’ But observers have sometimes found it difficult to fathom the rationale for seemingly contrary positions adopted by the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government in its foreign relations. Could a remark by the president at an event hosted by the Carnegie Endowment in New York last year, give a clue to the thinking? The question put to him, in the context of US-China rivalry, was whether Sri Lanka was ‘hedging back and forth to extract as much as possible.
’ In the course of his reply he said “We have to deal with all powers that come in. We may have played one against the other, but that’s for our survival.” Can such an approach, if that is the case, be justified with the crisis in Gaza, with its deeply moral dimension, and a genocide case before the ICJ? One can only hope the government’s seemingly principled stance in Kampala will translate into course-correction, even now, on the matter of sending a Sri Lanka Navy ship to the Red Sea.
Opinion
We do not want to be press-ganged
Reference ,the Indian High Commissioner’s recent comments ( The Island, 9th Jan. ) on strong India-Sri Lanka relationship and the assistance granted on recovering from the financial collapse of Sri Lanka and yet again for cyclone recovery., Sri Lankans should express their thanks to India for standing up as a friendly neighbour.
On the Defence Cooperation agreement, the Indian High Commissioner’s assertion was that there was nothing beyond that which had been included in the text. But, dear High Commissioner, we Sri Lankans have burnt our fingers when we signed agreements with the European nations who invaded our country; they took our leaders around the Mulberry bush and made our nation pay a very high price by controlling our destiny for hundreds of years. When the Opposition parties in the Parliament requested the Sri Lankan government to reveal the contents of the Defence agreements signed with India as per the prevalent common practice, the government’s strange response was that India did not want them disclosed.
Even the terms of the one-sided infamous Indo-Sri Lanka agreement, signed in 1987, were disclosed to the public.
Mr. High Commissioner, we are not satisfied with your reply as we are weak, economically, and unable to clearly understand your “India’s Neighbourhood First and Mahasagar policies” . We need the details of the defence agreements signed with our government, early.
RANJITH SOYSA
Opinion
When will we learn?
At every election—general or presidential—we do not truly vote, we simply outvote. We push out the incumbent and bring in another, whether recycled from the past or presented as “fresh.” The last time, we chose a newcomer who had spent years criticising others, conveniently ignoring the centuries of damage they inflicted during successive governments. Only now do we realise that governing is far more difficult than criticising.
There is a saying: “Even with elephants, you cannot bring back the wisdom that has passed.” But are we learning? Among our legislators, there have been individuals accused of murder, fraud, and countless illegal acts. True, the courts did not punish them—but are we so blind as to remain naive in the face of such allegations? These fraudsters and criminals, and any sane citizen living in this decade, cannot deny those realities.
Meanwhile, many of our compatriots abroad, living comfortably with their families, ignore these past crimes with blind devotion and campaign for different parties. For most of us, the wish during an election is not the welfare of the country, but simply to send our personal favourite to the council. The clearest example was the election of a teledrama actress—someone who did not even understand the Constitution—over experienced and honest politicians.
It is time to stop this bogus hero worship. Vote not for personalities, but for the country. Vote for integrity, for competence, and for the future we deserve.
Deshapriya Rajapaksha
Opinion
Chlorophyll –The Life-giver is in peril
Chlorophyll is the green pigment found in plants, algae, and cyanobacteria. It is essential for photosynthesis, the process by which light energy is converted into chemical energy to sustain life on Earth. As it is green it reflects Green of the sunlight spectrum and absorbs its Red and Blue ranges. The energy in these rays are used to produce carbohydrates utilising water and carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen in the process. Thus, it performs, in this reaction, three functions essential for life on earth; it produces food and oxygen and removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to maintain equilibrium in our environment. It is one of the wonders of nature that are in peril today. It is essential for life on earth, at least for the present, as there are no suitable alternatives. While chlorophyll can be produced in a lab, it cannot be produced using simple, everyday chemicals in a straightforward process. The total synthesis of chlorophyll is an extremely complex multi-step organic chemistry process that requires specialized knowledge, advanced laboratory equipment, and numerous complex intermediary compounds and catalysts.
Chlorophyll probably evolved inside bacteria in water and migrated to land with plants that preceded animals who also evolved in water. Plants had to come on land first to oxygenate the atmosphere and make it possible for animals to follow. There was very little oxygen in the ocean or on the surface before chlorophyll carrying bacteria and algae started photosynthesis. Now 70% of our atmospheric oxygen is produced by sea phytoplankton and algae, hence the importance of the sea as a source of oxygen.
Chemically, chlorophyll is a porphyrin compound with a central magnesium (Mg²⁺) ion. Factors that affect its production and function are light intensity, availability of nutrients, especially nitrogen and magnesium, water supply and temperature. Availability of nutrients and temperature could be adversely affected due to sea pollution and global warming respectively.
Temperature range for optimum chlorophyll function is 25 – 35 C depending on the types of plants. Plants in temperate climates are adopted to function at lower temperatures and those in tropical regions prefer higher temperatures. Chlorophyll in most plants work most efficiently at 30 C. At lower temperatures it could slow down and become dormant. At temperatures above 40 C chlorophyll enzymes begin to denature and protein complexes can be damaged. Photosynthesis would decline sharply at these high temperatures.
Global warming therefore could affect chlorophyll function and threaten its very existence. Already there is a qualitative as well as quantitative decline of chlorophyll particularly in the sea. The last decade has been the hottest ten years and 2024 the hottest year since recording had started. The ocean absorbs 90% of the excess heat that reaches the Earth due to the greenhouse effect. Global warming has caused sea surface temperatures to rise significantly, leading to record-breaking temperatures in recent years (like 2023-2024), a faster warming rate (four times faster than 40 years ago), and more frequent, intense marine heatwaves, disrupting marine life and weather patterns. The ocean’s surface is heating up much faster, about four times quicker than in the late 1980s, with the last decade being the warmest on record. 2023 and 2024 saw unprecedented high sea surface temperatures, with some periods exceeding previous records by large margins, potentially becoming the new normal.
Half of the global sea surface has gradually changed in colour indicating chlorophyll decline (Frankie Adkins, 2024, Z Hong, 2025). Sea is blue in colour due to the absorption of Red of the sunlight spectrum by water and reflecting Blue. When the green chlorophyll of the phytoplankton is decreased the sea becomes bluer. Researchers from MIT and Georgia Tech found these color changes are global, affecting over half the ocean’s surface in the last two decades, and are consistent with climate model predictions. Sea phytoplankton and algae produce more than 70% of the atmospheric oxygen, replenishing what is consumed by animals. Danger to the life of these animals including humans due to decline of sea chlorophyll is obvious. Unless this trend is reversed there would be irreparable damage and irreversible changes in the ecosystems that involve chlorophyll function as a vital component.
The balance 30% of oxygen is supplied mainly by terrestrial plants which are lost due mainly to human action, either by felling and clearing or due to global warming. Since 2000, approximately 100 million hectares of forest area was lost globally by 2018 due to permanent deforestation. More recent estimates from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) indicate that an estimated 420 million hectares of forest have been lost through deforestation since 1990, with a net loss of approximately 4.7 million hectares per year between 2010 and 2020 (accounting for forest gains by reforestation). From 2001 to 2024, there had been a total of 520 million hectares of tree cover loss globally. This figure includes both temporary loss (e.g., due to fires or logging where forests regrow) and permanent deforestation. Roughly 37% of tree cover loss since 2000 was likely permanent deforestation, resulting in conversion to non-forest land uses such as agriculture, mining, or urban development. Tropical forests account for the vast majority (nearly 94%) of permanent deforestation, largely driven by agricultural expansion. Limiting warming to 1.5°C significantly reduces risks, but without strong action, widespread plant loss and biodiversity decline are projected, making climate change a dominant threat to nature, notes the World Economic Forum. Tropical trees are Earth’s climate regulators—they cool the planet, store massive amounts of carbon, control rainfall, and stabilize global climate systems. Losing them would make climate change faster, hotter, and harder to reverse.
Another vital function of chlorophyll is carbon fixing. Carbon fixation by plants is crucial because it converts atmospheric carbon dioxide into organic compounds, forming the base of the food web, providing energy/building blocks for life, regulating Earth’s climate by removing greenhouse gases, and driving the global carbon cycle, making life as we know it possible. Plants use carbon fixation (photosynthesis) to create their own food (sugars), providing energy and organic matter that sustains all other life forms. By absorbing vast amounts of CO2 (a greenhouse gas) from the atmosphere, plants help control its concentration, mitigating global warming. Chlorophyll drives the Carbon Cycle, it’s the primary natural mechanism for moving inorganic carbon into the biosphere, making it available for all living organisms.
In essence, carbon fixation turns the air we breathe out (carbon dioxide) into the food we eat and the air we breathe in (oxygen), sustaining ecosystems and regulating our planet’s climate.
While land plants store much more total carbon in their biomass, marine plants (like phytoplankton) and algae fix nearly the same amount of carbon annually as all terrestrial plants combined, making the ocean a massive and highly efficient carbon sink, especially coastal ecosystems that sequester carbon far faster than forests. Coastal marine plants (mangroves, salt marshes, seagrasses) are extremely efficient carbon sequesters, absorbing carbon at rates up to 50 times faster than terrestrial forests.
If Chlorophyll decline, which is mainly due to human action driven by uncontrolled greed, is not arrested as soon as possible life on Earth would not be possible.
(Some information was obtained from Wikipedia)
by N. A. de S. Amaratunga ✍️
-
News3 days agoSajith: Ashoka Chakra replaces Dharmachakra in Buddhism textbook
-
Business3 days agoDialog and UnionPay International Join Forces to Elevate Sri Lanka’s Digital Payment Landscape
-
Features3 days agoThe Paradox of Trump Power: Contested Authoritarian at Home, Uncontested Bully Abroad
-
Features3 days agoSubject:Whatever happened to (my) three million dollars?
-
News3 days agoLevel I landslide early warnings issued to the Districts of Badulla, Kandy, Matale and Nuwara-Eliya extended
-
News3 days agoNational Communication Programme for Child Health Promotion (SBCC) has been launched. – PM
-
News3 days ago65 withdrawn cases re-filed by Govt, PM tells Parliament
-
Opinion5 days agoThe minstrel monk and Rafiki, the old mandrill in The Lion King – II
