Opinion
Red Sea, Gaza and Sri Lanka’s foreign policy
by Lasanda Kurukulasuriya
Sri Lanka’s remarks at the meetings of the 19th Summit of the Non Aligned Movement in Uganda, must surely have had observers of international relations, especially relating to West Asia, scratching their heads. President Ranil Wickemesinghe in Kampala on Friday (19 Jan.) said he welcomed the fact that the 19th Summit gave “highest priority to the crisis in Gaza and the inalienable rights of the people of Palestine to self- determination and the realisation of an independent and sovereign state of Palestine,” according to the Foreign Ministry.
At the Ministerial Meeting on Wednesday 17th Foreign Minister Ali Sabry asserted that “Non-alignment forms a cornerstone of Sri Lanka’s foreign policy.” At the Ministerial Committee on Palestine the following day, he expressed Sri Lanka’s “deep concern on the tragedy that is continuing to unfold” in Gaza, stressing that “a humanitarian ceasefire is the only solution to halt the mounting civilian death toll.”
These remarks would appear ironic, coming a fortnight after Wickremesinghe announced a decision ‘to deploy a ship from the Sri Lanka Navy to the Red Sea, contributing to the security of the region against Houthi activities.’ It would contribute to a US-led operation to counter attacks on merchant ships by Yemen’s Houthi militants in the vital trade route. The Houthis say they are targeting Israeli-linked vessels in solidarity with Palestinians, and to bring pressure on Israel to end the assault on Gaza.
It is not clear how the President’s decision came about. There has been speculation that he was possibly responding to a request from the US, to support its military action against the Houthis. His disclosure on January 3, at an event at the BMICH, came on the same day that the White House issued a joint statement from the US and some allies, warning that the Houthis would bear the responsibility of the ‘consequences’ if they did not stop the attacks.
There has been a marked reluctance on the part of even the US’s western allies to be associated with the exercise. Some countries, like India, reportedly deployed their ships in the region to protect their own maritime traffic, but not under US command. The call to join a US-led military adventure in the Red Sea cannot be seen as simply an exercise to protect international shipping for the common good, comparable with, say, the multinational effort launched some years ago that effectively countered piracy in the seas off Somalia.
This was a call to ‘take sides’ on a political issue – one that has shaken the conscience of the world. Sri Lanka, a founding member of the NAM and part of the global South will be seen, not only to have taken the wrong ‘side’ on this issue, but will end up on the wrong side of history with this wrong-footed decision – if it is carried out. It doesn’t help that amid the crisis, Sri Lanka dispatched a group of workers to Israel, possibly to meet a labour shortfall arising from the ongoing war on Gaza.
Charge of genocide
The UN General Assembly has overwhelmingly voted for an immediate humanitarian truce in Gaza, while UN agencies deplore the catastrophic proportions of the humanitarian crisis. Israel now faces the charge of genocide before the International Court of Justice, the UN’s highest legal body. The charge brought by South Africa is one that “fits clearly under the definition of genocide in the Geneva Convention, to which Israel is a signatory,” wrote Prof. John Mearsheimer, Distinguished Service Professor in Political Science and Co-director of the Programme on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago. He described the application as being “comprehensive, well-written, well-argued, and thoroughly documented.
” Anuradha Chenoy wrote that “South African lawyers unpeeled the layers of Israel’s actions in each sphere of Gaza’s people’s life to show that ‘a people are being destroyed.” The retired Dean and Professor at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University went on to say, “The argument and evidence presented by South Africa, is been watched by the world over the last three months. What South Africa has done is to systematically bring it together, in a compelling, convincing and courageous way.”
The US has joined Israel in rejecting South Africa’s charge of genocide.
This is the backdrop against which the Sri Lanka government seeks to support the US-led Red Sea military operation. The government’s argument is that the re-routing of ships around Africa, resulting from disruption of shipping in the Red Sea, would lead to a rise in the cost of goods and would be harmful to Sri Lanka’s economy. It is anybody’s guess whether this rationalisation would fly with ordinary Sri Lankans, who may find reasons for the ‘rising cost of goods’ nearer home.
Related events
It does not appear that the Sri Lanka Navy has been consulted on matters such as readiness of its vessels and weaponry to counter attacks by drones and anti-ship ballistic missiles reportedly being used by the Houthis, or the costs (that experts suggest could far exceed the government’s estimate of Rs 500 million a month – calling into question the argument of ‘rising cost of goods.’) A decision relating to the crisis in Gaza would anyway call for an approach that goes beyond pedestrian considerations of a ‘cost-benefit analysis.’ This was amply displayed in the high priority accorded to Palestine and Gaza at the 19th NAM summit.
At this summit Sri Lanka strongly supported the call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and stood by Palestine’s cause, alongside other leaders of the global South. The apparent desire, at the same time, to appease the US by acceding to a request to join its military operation against Houthis in the Red Sea, is inexplicable. Has the government failed to see any connection between the two? The relatedness of these events was noted by Russian envoy to the UN Vasily Nebenzya. The developments in the Red Sea are the “direct projection of violence in Gaza, where the cruel operation of Israel continues already for three months,” he is reported as saying at a UN Security Council meeting,
Analysts looking at the bigger picture say that what the US and UK are doing could lead to further escalation of conflict. “The US and UK are ignoring the source of the crisis, which is the genocide in Gaza, but they’re also enabling it,” said Omar Rahman, a fellow with the Middle East Council on Global Affairs. Speaking to Al Jazeera, he observed “They’re trying to prevent a wider regional escalation by taking military action against the flashpoints that are occurring as a result of what’s happening in Gaza.”
President Wickremesinghe has often said Sri Lanka will not join any big power or ‘take sides.’ But observers have sometimes found it difficult to fathom the rationale for seemingly contrary positions adopted by the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government in its foreign relations. Could a remark by the president at an event hosted by the Carnegie Endowment in New York last year, give a clue to the thinking? The question put to him, in the context of US-China rivalry, was whether Sri Lanka was ‘hedging back and forth to extract as much as possible.
’ In the course of his reply he said “We have to deal with all powers that come in. We may have played one against the other, but that’s for our survival.” Can such an approach, if that is the case, be justified with the crisis in Gaza, with its deeply moral dimension, and a genocide case before the ICJ? One can only hope the government’s seemingly principled stance in Kampala will translate into course-correction, even now, on the matter of sending a Sri Lanka Navy ship to the Red Sea.
Opinion
Lankan hotels and price discrimination
In planning a long trip to Sri Lanka from the UK, I was disappointed to see different hotel pricing for foreign visitors when compared to local rates. Like many travellers, I prefer to book directly with hotels, rather than international hotel consolidators, as more money goes to local businesses. But the assumption that foreigners should pay more is simply distasteful. As such, I’ve chosen another long-haul destination that does not follow such practices, and hope that Sri Lanka will change its approach to overseas visitors in the near future.
Neil Roskilly Wetherlee UK
Opinion
When will this craziness end?
We are living in ‘Trump times’ characterised by never ending craziness but it is not confined to the USA alone. I will come to our part of the world later. As a large part is due to Trump, perhaps, normalcy may return when he ends his second term on 20th January 2029, at 12.00PM Eastern Standard Time. We cannot be sure of that either because the ‘Great man’ may decide to govern the world for ever, after having purchased Greenland and forcing Canada to be the 51st state of the US!
Trump had an unprecedented opportunity, being only the second to be elected to a non-consecutive second term as the US President, the other being Grover Cleveland at the tail end of the nineteenth century. If only he kept to his campaign promises, his name would have been written in history in golden letters but the complete transformation, following the election, is likely to make his name go down as one of the craziest!
It is a moot point whether even Trump knows what he is going to do that day, when he wakes up, considering the illogicality of some actions, best illustrated by the ad-hoc imposition of tariffs without any discussions or negotiations. The adverse effects of these, to the world economy, is yet to be seen compounded, of course, by the continuing war with Iran. He promised to be a ‘Peace-maker’ but turns out to be a war-monger, like many of his predecessors! His excuse was that he went to war because he was denied the Nobel Peace Prize.
Well, he got the FIFA Peace Prize from FIFA President Gianni Infantino, another shameless leader who is ruining the ‘Beautiful Game’. When a US team member was given the red-card, Trump, who claims to know better than referees, decided it was not so, with a successful appeal to Infantino. During the next World Cup match, Belgium, supercharged with this injustice, thrashed the USA team 4-1.
Even the Semiquincentennial celebration of the US was not about the country but about himself! In fact, a cynic may point out that most of what the US has left behind, over the 250 years, is death and destruction. Paradoxically, whilst fighting a war with Iran to prevent it acquiring nuclear capabilities, the US is the only country to have dropped Atom Bombs, not one but two. Even though Japan was on the verge of admitting defeat, ‘Little Boy’, a uranium-based bomb, was dropped over Hiroshima on 6th August, 1945. Not giving time for Japan even to consider surrender, the second ‘Fat Man’, a plutonium implosion bomb, was dropped over Nagasaki, just three days later. Why did the US drop two A-bombs in rapid succession? It was to test the two different types of bombs they had.
Over the past 250 years, the US has started wars in many countries and, in most instances, lost leaving behind a trail of devastation and destruction. In spite of all that, it is continuing its war with Iran, a war that was started with false intelligence supplied by the war-monger Netanyahu who predicted the instantaneous fall of the Clerical regime in Iran. This war has turned out to be a blessing in disguise for Iran, as it realised the economic value of the Strait of Hormuz. The language Trump uses in reference to Iran is despicable. What sane person, nay a world leader, refers to flattening of a country and erasure of a civilisation?
Back in Sri Lanka, we know that most of our modern-day politicians are also self-serving. They are also very good at amassing wealth, when in power, just like the Trump family had done. However, what is of concern is the rapid decline in the standards of some vital professional classes. Special reference has to be made to the Attorney-General’s Department. Perhaps, the present holder is a decent man but some of his predecessors brought the high position into disrepute.
Dappula Livera allegedly concocted a conspiracy theory about the Easter Sunday terror mastermind as President Gotabaya Rajapaksa denied him an extension in service as the Attorney General. If he has any information about such a conspiracy, it is his bounden duty to come out with facts but has not done so.
A remark recently made by Deputy Solicitor General Dileepa Pieris about gallantry medals awarded to military personnel is said to have caused an affront to the dignity of Air Force officer Shantha Jayathilleke, who has received the highest decoration awarded to a living officer and sought to represent the interests of former Director of State Intelligence Service Maj. Gen. (retd.) Suresh Sallay as permitted by the Penal Code.
When political leaders and professionals holding high office behave in this manner, is there any hope for the nation?
By Dr. Upul Wijayawardhana
Opinion
Prime Minister’s contribution to education reforms
Education has always been one of the strongest foundations of Sri Lanka’s social and economic development. In today’s rapidly changing world, however, education must prepare students not only for examinations but also for life, employment, innovation, and responsible citizenship. Recognising this need, the government of Sri Lanka has introduced a new programme of education reforms. As Prime Minister and Minister of Education, Higher Education and Vocational Education, Dr. Harini Amarasuriya has played a leading role in guiding and promoting these reforms, with the aim of creating a more inclusive, modern, and student-centered education system.
One of the Prime Minister’s most significant contributions has been providing a clear vision for transforming the education system. Rather than focusing only on examination results, the reforms seek to develop students’ creativity, critical thinking, communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and emotional well-being. This approach recognizes that success in the twenty-first century requires a broad range of skills that go beyond memorisation.
A major feature of the reforms is the introduction of a new curriculum. The Prime Minister has emphasised that revised syllabuses will be introduced in stages, beginning with Grades 1 and 6, before expanding to other grades over the following years. The updated curriculum is designed to make learning more engaging, practical, and relevant to modern society. It encourages inquiry-based learning, teamwork, creativity, and the application of knowledge to real-life situations rather than relying solely on textbook learning.
Teacher development has also been identified as a key priority. The Prime Minister has repeatedly stressed that meaningful reforms cannot succeed without well-trained and motivated teachers. As a result, the government has planned professional development programmes to help teachers understand the new curriculum, adopt modern teaching methods, and integrate digital technology into classroom instruction. Strengthening teachers’ skills ensures that students receive a higher quality education and are better prepared for future challenges.
Improving school infrastructure is another important contribution under the Prime Minister’s leadership. Many schools across Sri Lanka continue to face shortages of classrooms, laboratories, libraries, and digital learning facilities. The reform programme aims to reduce these disparities by giving priority to improving physical infrastructure, upgrading learning environments, and ensuring that children from rural and urban areas have more equal educational opportunities. These investments are expected to create safer, more effective, and more inclusive learning spaces for all students.
The reforms also place strong emphasis on digital education. As technology continues to shape every aspect of modern life, students need digital literacy to succeed in higher education and future careers. The Prime Minister has supported initiatives to expand the use of digital tools in teaching and learning while encouraging schools to make greater use of educational technology. By promoting digital learning, the reforms seek to narrow the technological gap between schools and prepare students for a knowledge-based economy.
Another noteworthy contribution is the promotion of vocational and skills-based education. Traditional education has often placed greater emphasis on academic achievement, while practical skills received less attention. The new reforms aim to change this balance by introducing vocational subjects within the school system and creating clearer pathways for students who wish to pursue technical and vocational careers. This approach helps students develop employable skills while supporting the country’s economic growth and workforce needs.
The Prime Minister has also encouraged a more balanced approach to student assessment. Instead of measuring success only through final examinations, the reforms seek to include continuous assessment, classroom activities, projects, and practical learning experiences. Such an approach recognises different learning styles and provides students with more opportunities to demonstrate their abilities. It also reduces excessive pressure associated with high-stakes examinations and supports the overall development of children.
Inclusivity is another important aspect of the Prime Minister’s contribution. The reform process has involved experts, educators, and advisory committees representing diverse communities. The government has emphasised that curriculum development should reflect fairness, inclusiveness, and respect for Sri Lanka’s multicultural society. By involving different stakeholders in the planning process, the reforms aim to build a national education system that serves all children equally.
Despite these promising initiatives, implementing large-scale education reforms is not without challenges. Teacher training, infrastructure development, adequate funding, and effective monitoring are essential for the long-term success of the programme. Public awareness and cooperation among parents, teachers, school administrators, and policymakers will also play a vital role in ensuring that the reforms achieve their intended outcomes. Sustained commitment from the government and continuous evaluation will be necessary to address emerging issues and improve implementation over time.
The Prime Minister of Sri Lanka has made a significant contribution to the country’s new education reforms by promoting a modern, inclusive, and future-oriented vision for education. Through curriculum modernization, teacher development, improved infrastructure, digital learning, vocational education, and better assessment methods, the reforms seek to prepare students not only for examinations but also for lifelong learning and responsible citizenship. If implemented successfully, these reforms have the potential to strengthen Sri Lanka’s education system, reduce inequalities, and equip future generations with the knowledge, skills, and values needed to contribute positively to national development in an increasingly competitive global environment.
Saumya Aloysius
saumyaaloysius@gmail.com
-
News5 days agoHerath warns prospective migrant workers not to get fleeced by racketeers
-
Features3 days agoPrison riots and politics: NPP’s biggest challenge and Sri Lanka’s biggest opportunity
-
Editorial4 days agoWhat’s the world coming to?
-
Foreign News5 days agoTensions erupt in Indian state after 11-year-old raped and murdered
-
Features5 days agoDevanesan Annan – in Memoriam
-
News6 days agoNegombo Prison riot: Ensuring protection of prisoners fundamental responsibility of the state – UN
-
Editorial5 days agoPunishment in hellholes
-
News6 days agoRepresentatives of the Organization of Professional Associations (OPA) of Sri Lanka meet the Prime Minister
