News
National Security House Committee head asks why Diaspora doesn’t want India and TNA investigated
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Chairman of the Sectoral Oversight Committee on National Security, Rear Admiral (retd.) Sarath Weerasekera, MP, yesterday (15) asked whether a comprehensive international investigation into accountability issues here could be conducted unless India, too, was subjected to the same.
The former Public Security Minister was responding to the Global Tamil Forum (GTF) declaration that India and Sri Lanka Core Group at the ongoing 54 session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, emphasised Sri Lanka’s continuing failure to fulfil its own commitments to justice and accountability. The Core Group consists of the US, the UK, Canada, North Macedonia, Malawi and Montenegro.
The Colombo District lawmaker said that the bone of contention seems to be whether the killings in the Northern and Eastern Provinces, during the deployment of the Indian military (July 1987-March 1990), and seaborne PLOTE (People’s Liberation Organization of Tamil Eelam) raid on the Maldives, in Nov, 1988, too, should be investigated.
The GTF, in a statement issued from the UK, declared its support for an international investigation as demanded by senior Opposition political leaders and the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka. The UK-based GTF also welcomed the latest report on Sri Lanka by the Human Rights Commissioner.
Acknowledging the death of nearly 1,500 Indian officers and men, and the assassination of former Premier Rajiv Gandhi, MP Weerasekera said that those demanding accountability on the part of Sri Lanka should explain their stand on
India’s culpability, as well as the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) that served the LTTE until the very end, having declared Velupillai Prabhakaran as the sole representative of the Tamil-speaking people. The Sri Lanka Army lost approximately 23,500 officers and men whereas the Navy, Air Force, Police, including the STF, lost about 4,000 personnel.
Weerasekera, who retired in 2006 after having served the Navy for over three decades, said that interested parties had raised unsubstantiated war crimes allegations in the wake of the UK television station Channel 4 claim that SLPP presidential election candidate Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s camp engineered the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage to facilitate the former Defence Secretary’s victory.
The former Minister was responding to the GTF declaration that near simultaneous attacks were meant to cause what the Diaspora grouping called a sense of insecurity and blatant communalism needed for the Rajapaksas to recapture power.
Referring to the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage, the GTF alleged that the deterioration in inter-communal relations were often viewed as an acceptable price for acceding to political power. This appalling culture was built on the unshakable confidence that the Sri Lankan judicial system would never be able to deliver truth or justice, the group added.
The Chairman of the Sectoral Oversight Committee said that as the close relationship between the GTF and the TNA that had been formed in 2009, the year the LTTE was brought down to its knees is well known, it would be pertinent to ask them for an explanation regarding their backing war-winning Army Chief General Sarath Fonseka’a candidature at 2010 presidential election after accusing him and his forces of committing war crimes.
The MP pointed out that following the 2004 general election, the EU Election Monitoring Mission declared that the TNA secured over 20 seats in the Northern and Eastern Provinces with the help of the LTTE to stuff ballot boxes in the areas it controlled. Having benefited from its relationship with the LTTE, the TNA threw its weight behind the UNP-JVP-SLMC coalition that fielded Fonseka who handsomely won all Northern and Eastern districts because the Tamil speaking community was relieved by the eradication of the LTTE.
The SLN veteran urged all political parties, represented in Parliament, to use the two-day debate, scheduled for next week, on the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks and national security, to engage in a meaningful discussion.
Weerasekera said that a thorough inquiry was definitely needed to establish the number of deaths, due to the conflict. The recent disclosure that Mohamed Mihlar, the father of C4 whistle-blower Mohamed Mihlar Mohamed Hanzeer aka Moulana, had been killed in Chennai, India, along with 12 others of the EPRLF, underscored the need to ascertain the number of victims, MP Weerasekera said.
Noting that incumbent TNA MP Dharlamingham Siddharthan (Vanni) had declared years ago that his father V. Dharmalingam and his parliamentary colleague M. Alalasundaram, both Jaffna District MPs of the now defunct TULF, were killed by TELO (Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization), in early Sept. 1985, at the behest of India’s premier intelligence service, RAW, MP Weerasekera called for no holds barred investigation. The MP said that accountability issues couldn’t be resolved until those concerned established the number of people killed in India due to clashes among Tamil groups, the number killed by India, after the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, deaths due to raid on the Maldives, and Indian Navy action against PLOTE cadres fleeing that country in a commandeered ship, those killed as a result of fighting among Tamil groups here, those caught in crossfire between the LTTE and the Indian military, and finally those killed during fighting between Sri Lankan forces and terrorists. The victims of LTTE massacres and the number of child soldiers should be counted separately, the ex-Minister said, urging the GTF to acknowledge the number of LTTE cadres killed during the three decades long conflict.
Their latest statement at least failed to indicate that there had been two wars – one between LTTE and Indian military and other between LTTE and Sri Lankan military, the former Minister said. Weerasekera found fault with successive governments for failing to set the record straight.
News
US sinks Iranian warship off Galle returning from Indian naval exercise
Of 180 member crew, 30 rescued by Sri Lanka Navy
Iran warship IRIS Dena (F75), returning home after participating in the Indian International Fleet Review, and MILAN 2026 international naval exercises, has been sunk off Sri Lanka. The US, Russia and Iran were among 74 participants.
Speculation is rife that the US attacked the vessel in international waters as part of the continuing offensive action under Operation Epic Fury, launched on 28 February. Before the attack in the Indian ocean, President Trump declared that the Iranian Navy Headquarters and nine Navy vessels had been destroyed.
The ill-fated Moudge-class frigate participated in the Indian exercises with the US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Pinckney (DDG-91) and the Marshal Shaposhnikov, a Udaloy-class frigate of the Russian Navy. Sri Lanka also participated in the exercises. SLNS Sagara and Israeli built Fast Missile Vessel Nandimithra represented Sri Lanka. Forty two warships and submarines and 29 aircraft had been involved.
At the time of the attack, the domestically built vessel was crewed by 180 officers and men.
The US Embassy here did not respond to The Island media query whether the US sank IRIS Dena . The Island was unable to get in touch with Iranian Ambassador in Colombo Alireza Delkhosh though he earlier indicated his availability later in the day.
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment and Tourism, Vijitha Herath, told the Parliament yesterday that the Sri Lanka Navy and the Sri Lanka Air Force had acted in less than an hour of receiving the distressed signal at 5.08 am.
According to the Minister, the first naval craft was dispatched by 6 am, followed by a second vessel at 7 am, while Air Force units joined the mission, including the deployment of a surveillance aircraft to support search operations.
Approximately 180 personnel were believed to have been on board the stricken vessel. Of them, around 30 were reported to be in critical condition.
“To save the lives of those 30 persons, we intervened immediately,” Minister Herath said, adding that the rescued crew members were being transported to Karapitiya Hospital for urgent medical treatment. Some had already arrived by the time of his statement.
SLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa asked whether the Iranian ship had been attacked within Sri Lanka’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
Responding to questions raised by Opposition MPs, including NDF Badulla District MP Chamara Sampath Dassanayake, who alleged that the Iranian vessel may have been struck in Sri Lankan waters, the Minister said the ship had been outside Sri Lanka’s maritime boundary when it issued the distress call.
MP Dassanayake queried whether the frigate had been hit as part of the ongoing military escalation involving the United States and Israel against Iran. There was no immediate confirmation from the government regarding the cause of the emergency.
Minister Herath stressed that Sri Lanka’s intervention was guided solely by humanitarian considerations and international obligations.
“We are bound by the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (SAR) of 1979, which we have signed,” he told Parliament.
Under the convention, a signatory state is required to respond to maritime emergencies, regardless of nationality, the cause of the incident, or whether it occurs beyond its own territorial waters.
“According to this convention, if a vessel, or its crew, encounters danger beyond our territorial limits, we are obligated to intervene and protect those lives on humanitarian grounds,” Minister Herath said, adding Sri Lanka had acted immediately to prevent loss of life and had taken all urgent and necessary measures as a responsible state.
The Minister noted that the incident highlighted broader regional security vulnerabilities in maritime safety amid escalating tensions in the region. “A regional military situation would also have an impact on our country. The government’s position is that a negotiated solution must be pursued,” he said.
He also disclosed that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake had held a telephone discussion on Tuesday night with the leadership of the United Arab Emirates regarding the evolving regional situation.
Rescue operations were continuing at the time of going to press.
By Saman Indrajith and Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Justice Kumudini complains of male domination at senior levels, absence of a woman head of BASL
Judge of the Supreme Court Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe has recently presented a stark analysis of the legal profession’s gender disparity, noting that in spite of women entering the legal field in substantial numbers, their representation dwindles at senior levels. She has highlighted critical statistics and the fact that only two women currently serve in the Supreme Court, none in the Court of Appeal, and that there has never been a woman President of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL).
“Inclusive leadership is not satisfied by entry-level participation,” Justice Wickramasinghe said. “It concerns who occupies the apex of institutional authority, who shapes doctrine, who speaks for the profession. These figures are not merely statistics; they are indicators of work yet unfinished.”
Justice Wickramasinghe said so at a seminar organised on the eve of International Women’s Day by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), in collaboration with the Sri Lanka Women Lawyers’ Association (SLWLA). She underscored the need to address the systemic barriers preventing women from reaching the apex of the legal profession. Justice Wickramasinghe addressed the gathering as the Chief Guest.
BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya, in his address, framed inclusivity not as charity or tokenism, but as “structural fairness.” He raised an important question being ‘who bears the responsibility of inclusivity’ and addressed the vital role of leadership in inclusivity. Furthermore, Amarasuriya challenged the profession to address the “gap between what we see coming into the profession and what we see at the top,” and clarified that such disparity did not stem from a lack of competence or commitment but from deep rooted practices and structural issues.
A dynamic panel discussion, moderated by Attorney-at-Law Tanushka Gunawardane, explored the multifaceted nature of inclusive leadership. The panel featured Justice Wickramasinghe, Constitutional Council Member Professor Wasantha Seneviratne (joining online), Senior Instructing Attorney Shiranthi Gunawardhana, and corporate leader Yanina Weerasinghe.
Professor Wasantha Seneviratne distinguished between mere representation and true participation, stating that inclusion becomes meaningful only when women have the “agency and authority to make decisions.” She emphasised that inclusive leadership is both a moral obligation and a pragmatic governance strategy.
Senior Instructing Attorney Shiranthi Gunawardhana shared personal anecdotes from her 50-year career, urging senior lawyers to act as mentors rather than gatekeepers. She stressed the importance of creating space for young female lawyers by offering flexibility and support to help them balance professional and personal responsibilities.
Yanina Weerasinghe, Head of Legal at Brandix, argued that true inclusion is measured by influence, not optics. “Diversity is being present; inclusivity is being influential,” she explained, warning against tokenism and calling for “cerebral opportunities” where women are selected, based on talent, and given a genuine voice in decision-making.
Justice Wickramasinghe addressed the relationship between judicial hierarchy and inclusion, asserting that authority and accessibility can coexist. “A judge can be firm in decisions while remaining approachable,” she said, adding that power exercised with transparency and humility strengthens, rather than weakens, institutional legitimacy.
The seminar also heard from Dilani Yatawaka, Managing Director/CEO of Ideal Motors, who shared her perspective as a female leader in the male-dominated automotive sector. She reinforced the critical role of supportive superiors and societal encouragement to enable women to ascend the career ladder while managing family responsibilities.
BASL Women Lawyers’ Professional and Career Development Committee Chair Indika Nagaratne Koththagoda in her welcome address said that the distinguished gathering was honoured to have Her Ladyship Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe, Judge of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, as the Chief Guest and a key panellist and also welcomed the other panellists Attorneys-at-Law Professor Wasantha Seneviratne, Ms. Shiranthi Gunawardena and Yanina Weerasinghe for agreeing to share their insights on the subject during the ensuing panel discussion to be moderated by Attorney-at-Law Ms. Tanushka Gunawardane.
In her closing remarks, Nalani Manatunga, Co-Chairperson of the BASL Women Lawyers’ Professional and Career Development Committee, challenged the audience to reflect on the true meaning of leadership. “A position gives authority, but leadership gives direction,” she said. “Inclusive leadership is not about occupying space; it’s about creating space. Let our leadership not be measured by the chairs we occupy, but by the doors we leave open.”
News
No qualified printer to head Government Printing Department
A crisis was prevailing at the Government Printing Department due to the absence of a permanent Government Printer, Parliament was told yesterday, raising concerns over confidentiality, quality control and national security.
NDF MP Ravi Karunanayake demanded to know what steps the government had taken to fill the long-standing vacancy at the department, describing the situation as a serious administrative lapse.
“The Government Printing Department is a very important and closed service category institution. However, it has been functioning without a permanent Government Printer for some time,” Karunanayake said.
The MP pointed out that the department handles highly sensitive material, including documents related to defence and national security, as well as other classified publications.
“The non-availability of a permanent Government Printer affects the quality, confidentiality and sustainability of the work there. Has the Government conducted an audit on the possible issues arising from this situation? What immediate action has been taken to resolve this crisis?” he asked.
Responding on behalf of the Government, Prime Minister Dr Harini Amarasuriya said the vacancy had been filled on a temporary basis following a Cabinet decision.
She said an experienced officer from the Sri Lanka Administrative Service had been appointed on contract as Acting Government Printer to ensure operational continuity and maintain security standards in relation to sensitive printing tasks.
The Prime Minister acknowledged that the issue reflected broader systemic weaknesses in public service recruitment and professional development that had persisted for years.
“To bridge these gaps, the Government is initiating specialised training programmes and offering international scholarships for high-performing students to build future technical capacity,” she said.
Chief Government Whip and Health and Mass Media Minister Dr Nalinda Jayatissa said that under existing service minutes, more than two decades of experience were required for an officer to qualify for the top post, and that there were currently no internal candidates eligible for appointment.
He said that the department was facing a leadership crisis and administrative instability due to the lack of a permanent, qualified Government Printer.
By Saman Indrajith
-
Features4 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more
-
Opinion7 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features7 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Opinion4 days agoSri Lanka – world’s worst facilities for cricket fans
-
Business7 days agoAn efficacious strategy to boost exports of Sri Lanka in medium term
-
Business1 day agoCabinet nod for the removal of Cess tax imposed on imported good
-
Features5 days agoOverseas visits to drum up foreign assistance for Sri Lanka
-
Features4 days agoA life in colour and song: Rajika Gamage’s new bird guide captures Sri Lanka’s avian soul
