Connect with us

News

Easter attacks: State Minister alleges sinister attempt to discredit SL forces

Published

on

Pramitha Bandara

says FBI, Australian Federal Police have concluded their probes with no new findings

By Rathindra Kuruwita

State Minister of Defence Pramitha Bandara Tennakoon said in Parliament on Thursday (21) that ‘Sonic-Sonic’ was the code name given to a local intelligence official, who was entrusted with extracting information from the National Thawheed Jamma’ath (NTJ).

Abu Hind was an official attached to a foreign intelligence service.Sonic-Sonic and Abu Hind were individuals who had been in contact with NTJ and ISIS, according to previous investigations into the Easter Sunday attacks.

Archbishop Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith and the Catholic Church had been misled by certain groups about the Easter Sunday attacks, and there was a sustained effort to discredit the security forces, Tennakoon said.

The State Minister said that by 2018, there had been two arrest warrants against National Thawheed Jamma’ath (NTJ) leader Zahran Hashim, but police had not arrested him.

“Let’s talk about some other matters. In recent times, the name ‘Sonic’ has come up many times in Parliament. This is a code name. The intelligence services need to find out information about various groups that pose threats to Sri Lanka. Our intelligence services are on it 24/7. Sonic is an intelligence officer. There is nothing to hide. He entered the terrorist ring and extracted information. Sonic pretended to be a terrorist because that is the way one inserts oneself into terrorist groups,” he said.

Tennakoon said that an intelligence officer who is trying to win the trust of a terror group can’t reveal what his real purpose is.

“Intelligence agencies will do this again if there is a future threat. How can you ask an intelligence officer to undertake such an assignment again? This is a country that wants to slander and arrest such people.”

The State Minister said some MPs have asked how intelligence officials visited the house of Abdul Latheef Mohamed Jameel aka Abu Hamsa, who blew himself up at the Dehiwala Tropical Inn, prior to his suicide.

“Officials went to every place they have any inkling of. Jameel went to Turkey in 2014, planning to go to Syria. However, he couldn’t make it to Syria. He returns and makes contact with Australian ISIS members.”

There are many stories about Sara Jasmine, the wife of Hastun, too, he said. From 02 February 2019 to 19 April 2019, she was with Zahran’s group, and on 26 April she was at the NTJ safe house in Sainthamaruthu raided by the security forces, Zahran’s wife has told courts, the State Minister said.

“On three separate occasions, DNA tests were carried out to identify those who were killed at Sainthamaruthu. On 28 April 2019, samples were taken from 16 bodies for DNA testing. On 07 June 2019, the government analyst said that four samples had expired, and samples were taken again from these bodies. There were rumours that this was not Sara’s body and that she escaped the raid on the safe house.

Issues like the neglect of investigators, the fact that they had not taken samples from body parts strewn about, and the expiration of samples led to these rumours. There was an explosion, and there were body parts everywhere. We couldn’t initially find Sara’s body from the samples we had taken. But later, 83 samples were taken, and we found a match for Sara. We must admit that there has been professional negligence by investigators,” he said.

Tennakoon also spoke about Abu Hind, a person who played a similar role as Sonic-Sonic. A lot of terrorist organizations have now shifted their operations online, he said. Abu Hind is the code name given to an official of a foreign intelligence service who engaged NTJ through digital means, he said.

“We have also exposed foreign intelligence assets. We expect these agencies to help us in the future, too. Various parties are demanding foreign investigations. The FBI and Australian Federal Police (AFP), with the help of the Maldives, have carried out an investigation and handed over a report to the IGP. So, already, two international agencies have concluded their investigations here.

The FBI has identified Nawfer Moulavi as the mastermind of the attacks. They informed us in April 2022, that they had concluded the investigations. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) last year told IGP C.D Wickramaratne that they also do not have any pending reports or conclusions on the attacks. AFP said they have concluded the investigations,” he said.The State Minister said that his address was one of the last of the day, and only one Opposition MP and one government MP were present at the time he made the speech.



News

INS Airavat makes port call in Colombo

Published

on

By

The Indian Naval Ship (INS) Airavat arrived at the Port of Colombo for Operational Turnaround on 01 Jun 26. The visiting ship was welcomed by the Sri Lanka Navy (SLN) in compliance with time-noured naval traditions.

INS Airavat is a Landing Ship Tank, commanded by Commander IP Patil.

During their stay in the island, the ship’s crew is scheduled to take part in a series of professionally enriching events and camaraderie-building programmes organised by the Sri Lanka Navy.

The Indian naval personnel will also tour several historic and prominent tourist attractions across the country before the ship concludes her deployment.

Continue Reading

News

BASL asks govt. to abandon plan to raise retirement ages of CA and SC judges

Published

on

… tells Prez such arbitrary change neither necessary nor desirable

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has urged President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to abandon the controversial plan to increase the retirement age of the judiciary, including the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

In a statement issued by the BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya and its Secretary Nalin de Silva, the BASL pointed out that the proposed increase of the retirement age of the judiciary would undermine the independence, integrity, dignity, and public confidence in the Judiciary, which is essential for the maintenance of the Rule of Law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.

The text of the BASL statement: “The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (hereinafter referred to as “BASL”) notes with grave concern reports in the public domain that the Government is considering the introduction of an amendment to the Constitution to increase the age of retirement of Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

It is the considered view of the BASL that the age of retirement of the judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court which has stood at 63 years and 65 years respectively from the promulgation of the 1978 Constitution, should not be changed arbitrarily and that such a change is neither necessary nor desirable.

To do so will result in the loss of public confidence in the integrity of the legal system and of the Government’s commitment to preserve and protect the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. Members of the public are likely to question the motives of the Government in bringing in a Constitutional amendment solely for this purpose.

Your Excellency is no doubt aware that the cadre of the Judges of the Court of Appeal was increased from 12 to 20 Judges (including the President of the Court of Appeal) and that of the Supreme Court from 11 to 17 Judges (including the Chief Justice) by the 20th Amendment to the constitution certified on 29th of October 2020. With such enhancement, workwise, there cannot be a real requirement to extend the retirement ages of these judges.

Your Excellency is aware that altering the retirement age of judges of the apex courts would have to be done through a Constitutional amendment. For many years Sri Lanka’s Constitution has been subject to ad hoc amendments, sometimes in order to cater to the political needs of the government in power and often contrary to the interests of the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the judiciary.

Extending the retirement age of the sitting Judges of these Courts at this point of time is likely to be viewed by the public as a blatant attempt to interfere with the judiciary. We believe that to go ahead with such an ad hoc move will also be an affront to the Honourable Judges of those courts.

If the Government goes ahead with such a move it will set a dangerous precedent for future Governments too to introduce ad hoc amendments to the Constitution in respect of the functions of the Judiciary.

The independence of the Judiciary and the public confidence reposed in it, are indispensable pillars of the Rule of Law and the democratic framework of our Republic. In that regard, it is of paramount importance that the Judiciary must not only remain independent in fact, but must also be seen by the public to be wholly independent, impartial, and free from even the slightest perception of influence, favour, accommodation, or impropriety.

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka is therefore constrained, in the discharge of its duty to uphold and safeguard the Rule of Law and the independence of the Judiciary, to respectfully express its serious concern regarding any such proposed amendment, which is neither in the interests of the Judiciary and nor of the people.

In the circumstances, the BASL respectfully urges Your Excellency not to proceed with any proposed constitutional amendment seeking to increase the retirement age of the members of the Judiciary including Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

We remain confident that Your Excellency will give due consideration to the importance of preserving and protecting the independence, integrity, dignity, and public confidence in the Judiciary, which is essential to the maintenance of the Rule of Law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.”

Govt. declines to respond

A member of the Cabinet yesterday declined to comment on the BASL’s letter to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. The Minister said that he wouldn’t comment for the time being.

Continue Reading

News

New US tariffs proposed on 60 countries, including Sri Lanka

Published

on

12.5% additional duties on goods imported from Colombo

The US has proposed additional duties of 10% or 12.5% on imports from 60 economies, including Sri Lanka, over their alleged failure to curb trade in ‌goods made with forced labour.

The proposal made by US Trade Representative’s (USTR) office in terms of Section 301 unfair trade practices investigation to be released, news agencies reported, pointing out that the Trump administration was seeking to rebuild its emergency tariffs, which were struck down by a US Supreme Court decision in February.

The USTR said it determined that it would impose 10% duties related to ⁠the forced labour investigation on imports from Canada, Ecuador, the European Union, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan and Britain.

The trade agency said it would impose additional duties of 12.5% on the remaining 45 countries that were investigated.

“The failure of our most important trading partners to address the importation of goods made with forced labour is unacceptable,” US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement. “This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field.”

According to the trade agency, the USTR found that Sri Lanka has failed to impose and effectively enforce a forced labour import prohibition.

The USTR noted that the results of its investigation indicate that the acts, policies and practices of Sri Lanka related to the failure to impose and effectively enforce a forced labour import prohibition are unreasonable and burden or restrict US commerce.

Accordingly, it has proposed to impose 12.5% additional duties on goods imported from Sri Lanka.

The USTR said it also was proposing a textile mechanism that would allow for a certain volume of apparel and textile imports ‌to ⁠enter the US at a reduced tariff rate, though the duties and volumes were not disclosed.

The announcement comes ahead of the July 24 expiration of a 10% temporary tariff imposed by the Trump administration on February 20, the day the Supreme Court struck down US President Donald Trump’s tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

On Monday, the USTR proposed ⁠a 25% duty on many Brazilian goods as a result of a Section 301 investigation into the country’s digital trade practices and preferential tariffs. The trade agency is also expected to soon unveil the findings of another major Section 301 probe into ⁠the buildup of excess industrial capacity in 16 trading partners, including China.

In the forced labour findings, the USTR said it would exempt from the tariffs a number of products, including energy, rare earths and certain ⁠other metals, beef, coffee, certain fruits and vegetables, pharmaceuticals, organic chemicals and aircraft parts.

The USTR said it would accept public comments on the proposed tariffs and other remedies through July 6, with a public hearing scheduled for July 7.

Continue Reading

Trending