Features
When Passion Became Profession: My Consulting and Training Journey
LESSONS FROM MY CAREER: SYNTHESISING MANAGEMENT THEORY WITH PRACTICE – PART 25
A Review of the Past
Looking back, I realise how each phase of my career quietly shaped the consultant and trainer I would later become. In my previous articles, I spoke about the lessons I drew from every workplace I passed through — lessons that went far beyond technical knowledge. My journey began humbly at the State Engineering Corporation as a trainee, where curiosity and enthusiasm were my greatest assets. Before long, I found myself entrusted with the Building Research Centre, later known as the National Building Research Organisation. That early responsibility taught me how knowledge and leadership could combine to create impact.
From there, my path took me to the Tyre Corporation as an Industrial Engineer, then to the Sri Lanka Institute of Co-operative Management as General Manager, and later to the Ceylon Ceramics Corporation, again as General Manager. Each move added a new layer of understanding — of people, systems, and how organisations could be guided to perform better. My education in Engineering and Accountancy, complemented by my CIMA and MBA, gave me the frameworks. But it was the experiments, challenges, and day-to-day realities of those workplaces that gave me true insight.
So when I was appointed Chairman of the Employees’ Trust Fund Board at the age of 39, I didn’t feel overwhelmed. Instead, I sensed continuity — as though all my past experiences had prepared me for what lay ahead. The knowledge I had gathered from such diverse environments allowed me to approach problems with a calm sense of foresight. My three-month training in Japan added another dimension, deepening my appreciation of discipline, efficiency, and participative management — lessons that would later influence my consulting style profoundly.
Fate, however, had more lessons in store. The ETF held a substantial shareholding in Dankotuwa Porcelain, a company struggling to survive. Since no other Board member showed much interest, I was nominated to represent the ETF — and soon found myself serving as Chairman there as well. It was an unexpected turn, but one that taught me some of the most powerful lessons of my career: how to manage transformation, build morale, and navigate the complexities of privatisation — one of Sri Lanka’s first at the time. Looking back, that experience was a bridge — from managing organisations to understanding them deeply enough to guide others.
A New Chapter Begins
By 1994, I knew my days as Chairman of the Employees’ Trust Fund Board were numbered. The political winds were shifting — the incumbent government had already lost the Southern Provincial Council, and a change at the top seemed inevitable. I had often been invited to deliver lectures and conduct seminars — usually free of charge — and I realised how much I enjoyed the process of sharing knowledge and motivating others. So, even before the elections, I made up my mind: once my tenure ended, I would take a leap into consultancy and training.
That is how Productivity Techniques (Pvt) Ltd was born — a modest beginning, but one filled with excitement and purpose. When the elections were over and my resignation duly requested, I was already prepared to embark on this new adventure with optimism and energy.
My first series of seminars
Productivity improvement techniques at the enterprise level were one of my pet subjects. I booked a hall at the Colombo Hilton and advertised a seminar on the subject. I was also involved with the Japan-Sri Lanka Technical & Cultural Association (JASTECA) at the same time. I was nominated to attend a seminar in Japan, and left for the seminar after sending out circulars for my seminar. This was the first time Sri Lanka had a seminar of this nature on productivity. While I was in Japan, my wife, who was also a director of the new company and assigned to register participants and related matters, called me and said the registrations are now well over the hall’s capacity. We booked the hall for an extra date two weeks hence and informed the overflow participants. By the time I returned, we had enough participants for three seminars on that single advertisement.
Adapting to Technology
I gradually learned PowerPoint and even bought a digital camera to take pictures for my presentations. I migrated from packages such as WordStar, dBase, and Harvard Graphics to the new Microsoft packages. Although my first productivity seminars used transparent slides on overhead projectors, the latest PowerPoint programme was a hit. Many of the middle-level participants would stare in awe at the colourful slides projected onto the screen. Hitherto, they had only seen transparencies on overhead projectors. Laptops were not standard at the time, and I remember having to cart my desktop and monitor in suitcases to the hotels where I was holding the seminars.
The hotels told me that carrying these suitcases through the lobby was too ugly, and I had to use the service entrance to take them in. It was hard work. My wife handled all the hand-outs, logistics, and registrations. Hardly a participant realised that it was a husband-and-wife operation, and would refer to my wife as “your secretary”, “your girl”, or “your assistant” and so on. I maintained it the same way, being distant while giving her instructions, lest they conclude that my relationship with my “secretary” was a little too intimate.
I recommend to my participants that the most effective way to implement what they learn is to do it the very next day. My lessons were broken into small, manageable chunks. I was mainly teaching practical stuff and very little theory. My recommendations had some effect, as I recall that after one 5S seminar, the Chairman of a group who had sent participants from his garment factory called me to say that, the very next day, these participants were clearing up and arranging the workplace according to 5S principles. He also commented that this was the first seminar his people had attended where they actually implemented what they learned. This boosted my enthusiasm to continue with seminars and consultancy.
The Rise of 5S
To those unfamiliar with “5S”, it is a five-step programme to improve productivity, quality, reduce costs, improve on-time delivery, and improve safety and worker morale. It originated in Japan. It ranges from simple methods to more advanced techniques and could be implemented anywhere, even in homes. It creates a better-organised individual, too. 5S was soon becoming a hit.
I was invited by one of the garment factories in a group with several factories to deliver an in-house seminar on 5S. Fortunately, I made the presentation on PowerPoint. At the end, the CEO told me that their staff were very sophisticated and would not have even bothered to listen to me if I had used the old-fashioned overhead projectors and transparencies. I was invited to many of their other factories, and this group is still one of the best in Sri Lanka for 5S.
A great success was a ceramics ornamental company where I assisted in implementing 5S. In fact, the first sight one encountered upon entering the gate before 5S was the overflowing garbage bin. All these were changed, and the factory looked beautiful and well organised after 5S. A few weeks later, I arrived at a council meeting of the Employer’s Federation when I spotted some of the union leaders from this same factory. They had come to resolve a labour dispute with the management. Despite this issue, as they saw me, they came running up to me. They told me how excellent the factory was now, and that, most of all, they feel so relaxed and less tired compared to the previous scene, when the mess and disorderliness were the first sight in the morning and caused stress and tiredness even before they started work.
At another factory in Biyagama, where I addressed their 3,000 workers on 5S, I got a call from the management representative about three weeks later. He said the workers had implemented many of the 5S elements and, being proud of what they had done, wanted me to come and see their progress. I willingly obliged and noticed their unbelievable enthusiasm. The CEO and the senior management had implemented many novel initiatives to encourage implementation and motivate the staff. Leadership was the key.
Not All Were Successful
Not all my training was successful, though. At one factory in the Panadura industrial zone where I addressed all their staff, I found that many of them had glum faces. Still, I thought some elements of the 5S concepts would sink in. About two months later, the CEO called me and complained that nothing had happened after my training. I asked him what initiatives he took to promote and implement 5S, and he said, “I did nothing. I expected them to implement” I had to advise him politely that the responsibility to implement and make it successful is his, and it is his job to make it happen. He wasn’t very pleased. I suspected it right along when I first saw the glum faces. It wasn’t a very happy workplace. The leadership was poor.
I could see this right at the start from the participants’ faces in some of the places where I undertook training. They all look glum, they never ask questions, and it seems they were brought into the training hall like ‘lambs to slaughter’. It never would take root in such an environment. I could spot the vibrancy in others, how they joke, ask for clarifications, and make comments. The most vibrant organisation I addressed was a multinational, followed by the large garment group.
I was invited to address many elite Colombo schools on 5S, but there were no results. Perhaps it was because the elite schools offered many other sports and extracurricular opportunities and other distractions, and because they came from homes with servants and ayahs, and therefore had a mentality that they have the privilege to be disorganised and messy because 5S would be done by the servants. On the other hand 5S was taken up very well in rural schools an even spread to children’s homes..
Managing Change
I always advocated that the organisation implement a change management process before suddenly calling in an expert for a seminar or training programme. Senior management should paint a future vision for the organisation and surface what is lacking and what needs improvement. The lecture or seminar should be a remedy for the gaps identified, and the staff at every level must be involved in the exercise to implement and achieve the vision.
Many of the organisations I worked with were dynamic, constantly dissatisfied with the current state of affairs, and highly motivated to adopt new concepts and techniques. Some organisations that had tried many western-oriented concepts soon found that, though they were suitable at the strategic level, they failed to impress at the operational level. The Japanese concepts and techniques were not fads but very sound concepts and techniques that could be adapted and adopted after removing the Japanese culture-specific parts, such as lifetime employment and seniority-based promotions, and strengthening the culture-free parts and techniques that fit Sri Lanka’s socio-cultural milieu. Direct transplanting may be a disaster.
Those organisations that succeeded had several common characteristics, such as strong leadership, modern human resource practices, treating employees as partners with brains rather than mere pairs of hands, and respecting employees at all levels. In fact, during a course I followed at the Toyota Institute of Management in Nagoya, the lecturers kept repeating the need to respect employees at every level.
Facing Unethical Practices
I had my share of bad experiences. I had a full repertoire of seminars, ranging from Japanese techniques such as Quality Circles, 5S, Total Productive Maintenance, and Kaizen, to others such as designing Incentive Schemes, Benchmarking, Productivity Techniques, and Ergonomics.
There was one foreign organisation which wanted me to conduct all my seminars within a few months for the benefit of their clientele. Later, I found that it was the idea of their Sri Lankan coordinator. I had no reason to suspect, and besides, I was getting paid. Later, I found that the coordinator had resigned from this organisation, set up his own training outfit, and was conducting seminars on the same subjects using all my content and hand-outs. I had spent years developing these hand-outs, using my personal experiences as examples, too. He had everything tailor-made, copying all my hard work. The worst was when I was conducting a seminar; one participant accused me of plagiarism, and I had no choice but to enlighten him that it was the other way around.
Even if I repeat a seminar a few months later, I always search the internet for new material and new concepts. While perusing the internet one day, I suddenly stumbled across a complete hand-out for my Productivity seminar, including my graphics and images, intact on one of the productivity sites. I recognised the slides at once, but only my name was missing. A well-known consultant had inserted his name after removing mine. I knew him, and he was at that time a consultant to an international organisation too. My initial fury made me prepare a letter to the international organisation. Still, later, I decided to let it pass and drop the matter. I had mentioned this to some of my friends. This hand-out was later removed from the site. Since then, I only provide PDF versions for making copies. It was a shock to learn the hard way that even the so-called respectable trainers would resort to such unethical practices.
Laughter Along the Way
I have had many humorous experiences, which made my lectures even livelier. Addressing a group of plantation managers one day, I explained the first step of 5S: the advanced concept is to reduce working capital, but the simple idea to start with is to reduce clutter and get rid of unwanted items. The first step to calming and relaxing your mind is to have an organised wallet, with only currency bills, arranged in order of denominations, and no unwanted chits or bills. I exhorted the participants to “always keep your wallet clean and organised”, whereupon one participant raised his hand and said, “My wallet is always clean, Mr Wijesinha. My wife cleans it regularly, but there is only one problem, she cleans out the cash and leaves the chits behind”.
At another seminar, I was talking about cleaning of machines and equipment daily and how that concept originated in Japan after World War 2. The war had destroyed most of the factories. When it ended, the Japanese government instructed the factories to preserve the remaining machinery and treat them like family treasures, because the population would otherwise starve. Don’t let there be breakdowns, the instructions said. Their reputation for one of the lowest machine breakdown rates in the world stemmed from this initiative.
The story goes that Japanese factory workers would clean and lubricate the machines, just as they would look after their wives. Some would even go so far as to give the machine the wife’s name and paste it on the machine. Every morning, the operator would worship the machine and look after it with tender loving care. When I told this story, one participant raised his hand and says “I would not encourage it in my factory, sir, because what if the operator has had a fight with the wife in the morning and comes to work furious with the wife, and sees the machine with the wife’s name, I am sure my machine would be in for some rough treatment“. Another participant says he, too, has reservations about this method and explains that if the regular operator is on leave and a relief operator works on the machine, it will be a problem, especially on the night shift when the regular operator would be having nightmares thinking about who is working the machine with his wife’s name on it!
I recall the first “5S” seminar I had at the Hilton. It was attended by many CEOs and other senior executives from the private sector. After the seminar, I was relaxing at home after dinner when the phone rang. It was the wife of a participant. Of course, I knew this family well. She asked me, “My husband came for your seminar today. What on earth did you teach him? Since he arrived home, he has been clearing out the cupboards and throwing out his old clothes, keeping his shoes and slippers in a particular corner. He was such a disorganised man earlier, and now he is totally transformed.
A senior administrator was appointed chairman of a government entity and I was asked to address the staff on 5S which I did. The staff received my lecture well. A week later he called me and said he had been asked to resign by the Minister after a dispute, and then he jokingly said “It’s all your fault. Remember you said the first step is to get rid of unwanted things. The Minister implemented it to the letter and got rid of me“.
I enjoyed my consultancy and training, and I am so proud that these small efforts have spread like wildfire, making many government and private-sector organisations more productive and competitive. Today, 5S is very popular nationwide.
My next episode will feature more stories about how I became involved with the government in its National Productivity drive.
by Sunil G Wijesinha
(Consultant on Productivity and Japanese Management Techniques
Retired Chairman/Director of several Listed and Unlisted companies.
Awardee of the APO Regional Award for promoting Productivity in the Asia Pacific Region
Recipient of the “Order of the Rising Sun, Gold and Silver Rays” from the Government of Japan.
He can be contacted through email at bizex.seminarsandconsulting@gmail.com)
Features
Combining local resources,traditional knowledge and science to build a food-secure Sri Lanka
World Food Day 2026: Innovating today for a better food future
by Dr. Kaushalya Wijayasekara
What will be on the Sri Lankan dinner table ten years from now? Will our children be able to get nutritious food at a price their families can afford? Will farmers be able to grow enough despite changing weather and rising costs? And how much of the food we produce will actually reach the consumer, instead of being lost or wasted along the way?
These questions can’t wait. A farmer faces unpredictable weather. A family faces rising food costs. Fruit goes unsold after a good harvest. Some children do not get enough nutrition. The future of food is tied to the future of Sri Lanka itself.
World Food Day 2026 is a chance to look beyond the immediate problems and ask whether we can build a food system that feeds our people well, gives farmers better opportunities, protects the environment and makes better use of what we already have. The answer can be yes, but we will have to think differently.
We are not starting from zero. Sri Lanka has diverse crops, fisheries, traditional food knowledge, indigenous varieties, research institutions, universities and a young generation able to create new solutions. What we need is to bring these together and act. Producing more will not secure our food future on its own. It will depend on how intelligently we produce, process, preserve, distribute and consume food.
Making more of what we already have
Innovation does not always mean inventing something new. Often it means finding better uses for the resources we have.
Sri Lanka grows traditional rice varieties, kurakkan, green gram, cowpea, jackfruit, breadfruit, cassava, sweet potato, coconut and palmyrah. All of them have great potential for modern, nutritious, value-added foods. Jackfruit and breadfruit can be made into flour and other convenient products. Traditional rice varieties can go into new foods that suit changing consumer needs. Palmyrah, with its strong cultural heritage, can create new income through better processing, packaging, quality assurance and market development.
The aim is to connect our traditional food knowledge with modern consumer needs and technology, while keeping our food heritage.
Stop wasting the food we produce
Reducing food loss and waste should be a major priority. Seasonal fruits such as mango, banana, papaya and pineapple can be lost in large quantities when production exceeds demand or when storage, transport and processing facilities are inadequate. With suitable technology, these fruits can become dried products, pulps, powders, beverages and other shelf-stable foods.
Agricultural and fisheries by-products are resources too. They could be turned into food ingredients, animal feed, bio-based products and other useful materials, which would move us toward a more circular food economy.
Technology alone is not enough. We need stronger local processing facilities, cold storage, efficient transport, collection centres and market information systems, especially close to where food is produced. Cutting food loss raises the value of what our farmers and fishers already produce.
Nutrition and food safety come first
Food security means more than having enough food. People also need food that is safe and nutritious.
Sri Lanka can develop affordable, nutritious foods from local pulses, grains, vegetables, fruits and fish. Children and other vulnerable groups should get particular attention. Schoolchildren in particular deserve a focus: safe, nutritious, locally sourced products for school feeding programs would support child nutrition, local farmers and domestic food industries at the same time.
Food safety must stay at the centre of food innovation. Good hygiene, quality control, laboratory testing, traceability and appropriate food safety systems are what make new products safe as well as attractive and nutritious.
A food system that can cope with climate change
Climate change is already affecting agricultural production, water availability, crop yields and food prices. We need food systems that can handle changing conditions. That means climate-resilient crops, efficient water use, soil and water conservation, better storage and resource-efficient food processing.
Traditional knowledge matters here. Generations of Sri Lankan farmers have developed practices suited to local climates and ecosystems. Combining that experience with modern science can give us solutions that fit local conditions and are sustainable. Technology alone will not build the future of food. Science, experience and local knowledge together can.
Give young people a bigger role
Sri Lanka’s universities have an important part to play in shaping our food future. Young people should be encouraged to identify real problems in the food system and work on practical solutions in areas such as food waste, sustainable packaging, nutrition, food safety, modernising traditional foods and digital technologies.
A good research project should not always end as a research paper. Where appropriate, research should be supported to move on to products, technologies, enterprises and community solutions. That needs stronger partnerships between universities and industry, along with mentoring, research funding, business support and market connections. If young researchers and entrepreneurs can turn their ideas into viable food innovations, both consumers and producers will benefit.
A pathway designed for Sri Lanka
We do not need to copy food-system models from other countries. We can build a pathway that suits our own resources, culture and needs. It would bring together local resources, traditional knowledge, scientific research, appropriate technology and entrepreneurship, with farmers, fishers, universities, research institutions, food industries, entrepreneurs and policymakers working side by side.
The goal goes beyond selling raw materials. We need to create more value, reduce waste, improve nutrition, generate jobs and strengthen rural livelihoods. This matters especially for small and medium-scale food enterprises, which can drive local economic development when they get the right technical, financial and market support.
The choices we make today
The food future will not create itself. It will be shaped by what we grow, what we research, what we process, what we consume and what we choose not to waste.
So, the question for World Food Day 2026 is this: what can we do today so that every Sri Lankan has safe, nutritious, affordable and sustainable food tomorrow?
The answers are already around us, in our farms, fisheries, food businesses, universities, laboratories and communities. We have the resources, the traditional knowledge, the scientific expertise and talented young people. What we need now is to connect them and act.
A better food future begins with the choices we make today.
Dr. Kaushalya Wijayasekara
Senior Lecturer, Department of Biosystems Technology, Faculty of Technology, University of Ruhuna
Features
20th Anniversary of Digampathana blast – the day Sri Lanka Navy cried
By Admiral Ravindra C Wijegunaratne
WV, RWP and Bar, RSP, VSV, USP, NI (M) (Pakistan), ndc, psn, Bsc
(Hons) (War Studies) (Karachi) MPhil (Madras)
Former Navy Commander and Former Chief of Defence Staff
Former Chairman, Trincomalee Petroleum Terminals Ltd
Former Managing Director Ceylon Petroleum Corporation
Former High Commissioner to Pakistan
The Digampathana suicide truck attack on 16th October 2006 remains the deadliest single strike in Sri Lanka Navy history, leaving scars that time cannot erase.
It was a seemingly ordinary Monday morning on 16 October 2006, but the calm of that day would soon be shattered in a way none of us could have imagined. As the Commandant of the Naval and Maritime Academy and Flag Officer Commanding Naval Fleet at Trincomalee, I was aware that a number of my cadets were travelling that morning, part of a convoy of fifteen buses carrying naval personnel from Trincomalee, Colombo, and other bases, heading toward Dambulla to rendezvous with another group. The convoy also included trucks and escort vehicles, a routine movement planned and coordinated with the army to ensure the roads were clear. The morning started quietly. Some personnel greeted friends, handed over their weapons, or strolled to a nearby tea shop. It all seemed so ordinary—too ordinary for what would come next.

Sri Lanka Navy sunk LTTE Ships carrying arms, ammunition and warlike materials thousand miles away from Sri Lanka in Indian Ocean in September and October 2007.
By late morning, both convoys had reached the small ground at Digampathana, near the Sigiriya junction, and personnel mingled briefly, unaware that a carefully orchestrated act of terror was waiting. Then, suddenly, an empty half-truck veered directly into the convoy. It exploded with a ferocity I can still recall as if it were yesterday. Nuts, bolts, and high explosives tore through the air. Pandemonium erupted instantly. I later learned that 107 of our naval personnel were killed on the spot and another 153 critically injured. The scene was indescribable—bodies scattered, vehicles mangled, personal effects strewn across the ground. I remember later hearing that the head of the suicide bomber was recovered more than 100 meters away from the blast, a grim testament to the sheer force of the explosion.
I was in my office at the Naval and Maritime Academy when my mobile phone rang. A young midshipman from the 21st intake called, his voice trembling: “Sir, there was a huge explosion at the convoy point! Many are dead … my batch mate Wijesundara is among them.” I immediately jumped into my jeep with my escort Chief Petty Officer and driver and rushed to Digampathana, relying on every ounce of my driving skill to reach the scene. The journey, which usually took little more than an hour, felt endless that day, each passing mile weighed down by dread.
When I arrived, I was confronted with a sight that no training can prepare you for. The injured were being rushed to Dambulla Hospital, where doctors and nurses worked tirelessly, improvising in ways that saved lives despite the overwhelming chaos. I went back to the site after visiting the hospital. The remains of our naval personnel were scattered across the ground, and someone had begun collecting weapons and protective gear. I immediately contacted Surgeon Rear Admiral Nico Jayasekara and received his instructions: collect all body parts in separate bags and transport them to the Trincomalee Naval Hospital mortuary. This gruesome work had to be done with care and dignity, and it filled the icebox in my vehicle. Through DNA testing initiated by Rear Admiral Nico, we were able to identify every naval personnel lost that day, bringing some closure to grieving families.
The Navy Commander at the time, Vice Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda, was devastated. I had worked closely with him and knew how deeply he cared for his men. He ensured that the fallen were honoured with full ceremonial naval funerals at Welisara Naval Base, attended by families and comrades. Sixty-seven funerals were conducted in a single day—a number that still haunts me.
The Digampathana attack remains the largest single loss of naval life in our history. It was a day of sorrow, but also a day that reinforced our resolve. The tragedy galvanized the Navy to target the LTTE Sea Tiger wing with renewed determination and reshaped our maritime operations forever. Every time I think of that day, I remember not just the lives lost, but the courage, professionalism, and dedication of those who survived, those who treated the injured, and those who ensured the fallen were honored properly. May the souls of our naval hero’s rest in peace, their sacrifice guiding us and inspiring generations of naval personnel to come.
Features
‘Murder at Whitby Abbey’
Tales of Mystery and Suspense – 24
I was intrigued by the title of a book I found in a book drop at the condominium of a friend, Murder at Whitby Abbey, and I brought it home with me though I will not be able to return it in the near future. It was described on the cover page as ‘a standout in the crowded medieval mystery field’, though I fear I do not know of other books in this field, apart from the Cadfael series, which I have dealt with earlier.
The book, by Cassandra Clark, is set during the reign of Richard II and has as a backdrop his precarious position, which led to his being replaced, and murdered, by his cousin Henry, who reigned as Henry IV. It is a gloomy book, the action taking place in the twelve days of Christmas leading up to the Epiphany. And the gloom is pervasive, even though this is supposed to be a time of festivity, with mummers performing, and many of those in the guest house where the heroine stays going to town to enjoy themselves, with much drinking and much music, which also fills the guesthouse.
The heroine Hildegarde is a nun, sent to try to acquire a relic being sold by Whitby Abbey, though this was also a penance set by the Abbot of the monastery that governed her abbess because she had had sex with a man. Soon after she and her companions reach the Abbey set high on a cliff, she finds that there are other bidders, and soon suspects that the hierarchy, not perhaps the Abbot who seems a weakling, but his rapacious bursar, is determined to make money, and not above creating false relics to sell to several aspirants.
After Hildegarde and her Cistercian companions – Whitby is a Benedictine Foundation – two monks, Gregory and Egbert, and a young priest Mark, reach the abbey, they find that Aelwyn, a monk they had met on their way to the guesthouse had died. This was in the apple store, and they realize, when they find the surplices of novices stuffed into the air vents, that he had been left to suffocate in the overwhelming scent of apples.
The Cistercians are asked to look into the death, perhaps because they are likely to get no cooperation from the Abbey folk, but perhaps because those in charge are keen to know what happened. And the infirmarer, an old monk, suggests Hildegarde talk to a man called Edred who worked for the bursar, and had been a friend of Aelwyn’s. But Edred too is killed, before he can keep an appointment he had made with Hildegarde, drowned in a pool near the farmhouse of the Abbey.
Meanwhile tensions arise between the fisherfolk and the abbey for the bursar wants to charge them for using the beach that technically belongs to the abbey to dry their fish and their nets. This leads to physical battles, when the guards used by the abbey, under the command it seems of the bursar whose determination to make money is not resisted by the abbot and the prior, try to storm the area where the fishermen live.
Hildegard finds out more about what had happened through two youngsters, one of whom Torold is the son of Aelwyn by a woman who worked as a prostitute for a cartel, and with whom Mark fell in love. The other works on the farm and had seen Edred meet someone near the pool, after which that someone left the place by himself. And the boy had also found in the pool a sort of dagger with the seal of the abbey.
He and his dog, and Torold who follows her, rescue Hildegarde from a man at arms who has waylaid her and tries to rape her earlier. Escaping into the abbey she was nearly been raped then by the bursar, but she managed to escape, in the process setting fire to him and the muniments room, which led, when he was rescued, to the discovery of a box with the money he said had been stolen, blame being cast on both Aelwyn and Edred.
Matters come to a head when the fisherfolk try to storm the abbey, being resisted by the men at arms stationed on the towers. But then Hildegarde realizes that behind the murders was the bursar’s clerk, whom she pursued to the cathedral. There is great drama then as she escapes from him when he tries to kill her, and then from the man at arms who had tried to both rape and kill her, but they both fall from the scaffolding she had climbed, the latter coming from a tower where he had been stationed.
Both of them think they run the rapacity of the abbey, the latter claiming to work for the nobles opposed to Richard, who is presented throughout the book as devoted to his subjects, not to power or money. But though the villains die, the bursar continues, having got over the hysteria the fire had caused and his acknowledgment then of guilt – and though the abbot and the prior seem less vicious, whether they will be able to assert themselves is questionable.
Before the climax, when the others in the guesthouse were leaving, Hildegarde found that two of them were in possession of the relic, for which they seem to have paid well. Hildegarde herself had made a derisory offer, but before she leaves the abbot gives her the relic, perhaps in gratitude for what she and her fellow Cistercians had discovered, the abbey having made as much money as it needed and more from the gullible other buyers.
Mark’s inamorata is saved from the stews because she moves in with Edred’s widow whom the bursar had thrown out of the rooms he occupied when her husband was found dead. Hildegarde had paid for lodgings, in a house run by the man who ran the brothels, but he had a kindly side and was going to finance them to make nets for the fishermen.
So, the Cistercians set off for their home as swiftly as they can to get there on the day of the Epiphany, having stopped en route to pray for King Richard whose birthday it was.
-
News5 days agoSri Lanka escalates anti-graft drive with Shiranthi’s jailing
-
News6 days agoNPP govt. reminded of its responsibilities as US warship leaves Colombo
-
Latest News6 days agoFarhan, Sadaqat help Pakistan ace 183 chase to go 1-0 up
-
Latest News4 days agoFarhan and Sadaqat help Pakistan seal series in style
-
News5 days agoIranian ships stranded, Lanka fears US sanctions
-
Latest News3 days agoNissanka’s return headlines Sri Lanka’s Test squad against Pakistan
-
News6 days agoInterdicted top House official Kularatne receives special recognition in Mexican Parliament
-
Features4 days agoIntake 16: 45 years of duty and honour

