Features
Red lining; snipping off; banning
What my title means is censorship which when actually carried out could be using a red pen to delete sections of writing; cutting off parts of film and banning if the spoken word is censored which means suppressing and prohibiting speech. The definition of the term censorship is: “The suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security.” And now censorship covers all media: written, spoken via appliances and depicted in films, videos et al, and electronic.
History of censorship
I read with interest a long Britannica article in Internet which traces the history of the banning of the written and spoken word. All countries have descended to censorship, very markedly Russia and China. During Confucius’ time (551-479 BC), deference to elders and authority was insisted upon and so those who broke these norms were censored and punished.
A detailed account was given of censorship within the Grecian Civilization – 900 BCE to 600 CE. Although Greece initiated the earliest of democracies where citizens ruled the country and open debate was encouraged, censorship came in when a refusal to conform arose, outwardly to recognized worship. The community subjected such irreligious persons to hardships.
If a person spoke improperly, legal sanctions were forthcoming. Athens particularly, more than other States of the Grecian Empire, allowed freedom of speech, particularly political. However we have the case of one of its most wise and freely speaking philosophers – Socrates – being tried, convicted and executed in 399 BC; accused of corrupting youth mainly because he did not acknowledge gods and expressed it.
Rome had its golden times when anybody could speak openly in the period between the leadership of Nerva (30-98 CE) and Marcus Aurelius (121 -180 CE). Tacitus wrote that a citizen could hold and defend whatever opinions he wished to.
Christendom and the rise in power and influence of the Catholic Church brought in severe censorship and excommunication from the Church. Consider what happened to Galileo Galilei of Pisa, Italy, 1564-1642. He declared “And yet it moves”; it being the Earth. The Christian and European belief was that Earth was at the centre of the universe and therefore stood still. Galileo was convinced that model was wrong, although he could not prove it. He was censored but punishment was comparatively mild. His book was banned; and he was sentenced to light penance and imprisonment, commuted to ‘villa arrest’.
Medieval Europe where religion closely influenced politics had witch hunts and the trial of Joan of Arc and her being burnt at the stake. The Age of Enlightenment -17th and 18th centuries – ushered in a freer time.
A great landmark in freedom from censorship was the promulgation of, and ratification of the US Constitution in 1791. “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for redress of grievances.”
Very much in mind is George Orwell’s 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty Four with reference to the future of the world according to what was prevalent in Russia where suppression and government prying reached a crescendo to the point of making human life worthless living.
Also Oscar Wilde (1854-1900), Irish writer, clever wit, Victorian celebrity for his elegant appearance, was banned and hounded out of Britain by government decree in 1895 at the height of his theatre success. He was censored for his behavior – ‘gross indecency’ consequent to being reported as indulging in homosexual acts, though consensual. He moved to live in a hotel in France and died at age 47 of an infected ear causing meningitis.
The most infamous and ludicrous act of governments’ censorship was banning D H Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover for explicitness in description and obscenity of language– the use of the f word which is so freely used now by even kids. The UK brought a case against publisher Penguin in 1928. The US banned the book in 1929 and many other countries followed. Ban was lifted in the US in 1959 and UK in 1960.
You will note I have touched on only early Western censorship; nothing on Indian or Sri Lankan. My reference was the Britannica article, and matters I had in mind. I am not competent to write about early censorship in my country and India.
Latest Indian Ban
The above was by way of introduction to the subject of censorship and banning. My main story is centered on Arundathi Roy who two weeks ago was charged by Indian government announcement and may face imprisonment. “She is accused of provocative speech and promoting enmity between different groups merely for comments made in 2010 that questioned the Indian Government’s claims to the disputed, restive region of Kashmir. But the real reason she is targeted now – 13 years later – is surely her courageous criticism of the intolerance and violence unleashed under Mr Modi. People like her are among India’s greatest assets because they stand for truth and decency, but they are being cast as enemies of the state.
India is devouring its best and brightest.” The woman writer in a recent New York Times (apologies for not noting down her name) went on to say: “Charges against Ms Roy are typically absurd. She has been a voice for truth, tolerance and sanity in India for decades. Her books and essays record the utter apathy of the post-independence ruling class as India descends into the chaos of Mr Modi’s right wing politics. Jailing Ms Roy would be not unlike America imprisoning a writer of the moral stature of Toni Morrison or James Baldwin.”
Added in the article are these facts. Since 2014 when Modi came to power, the Hindu nationalist mob has targeted Muslims, students, activists, opposition politicians and Dalits. We in Sri Lanka have had less mob violence except among the drug mafia, but the police have been increasingly using strong arm tactics against protesters, peaceful though they be. However, we will never forget the white vans during Mahinda – Gotabaya Rajapaksa regime and the number of journalists who were kidnapped, assaulted, killed too, and one woman journo whose life was in danger and was spirited away. She dared to bare MIG business and quoted word for word an interview she conducted.
Going back to the latest and best known censored person in India, Arundathi Roy, in September this year she won the prestigious European Essay Prize for, as the jury stated: “Using the essay as a form of combat, analyzing fascism and the way it is being structured.”
In 1997 Arundathi Roy won the Booker Prize for her first novel God of Small Things. She stopped writing fiction and concentrated on political protests such as against the five dams of the Damodar Valley Corporation which dislocated hundreds of poor families. She undertook lecture tours in the US and did not mince her words criticizing the host country. In 2017, after a lapse of 20 years fiction writing, she published her second novel Ministry of Utmost Happiness in which almost a quarter of the book is a political diatribe on the suffering of the people of divided Kashmir. Her collection of essays she titled My Seditious Heart.
Thus it appears that in addition to other negatives like religious conflict and Hindu supremacy in India, censorship and banning of criticism of government is coming in strong.
Over here
The most pertinent question to us is: Are we imitating or following Big Brother across the Palk Straits? This burning question is consequent to a most troublous, ominous move of President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s SLPP dominant government in presenting on October 3 in Parliament the ‘Online Safety Bill’. The first question that surfaced in my mind was: whose safety is being ensured? Not the general public’s by any means. The government is bringing in draconian restrictions to safeguard itself.
According to the Bill, “A commission of five individuals appointed by the President will be empowered to block any social media account, prosecute, fine and even imprison individuals.”
Now if this Bill is not the forerunner, harbinger and warning sign of censorship, what is? It has been protested against. It must not be allowed to become an Act.
Postscript
BBC News on Wednesday November 1 announced the first ever Artificial Intelligence Safety Summit convened by leading AI nations, businesses, civil society and AI experts, to discuss the global future of AI and to share understanding on the risks it poses.
On October 15 in this column I wrote about AI. What caught my fancy in the news of the Summit starting on November 1 is that the venue is Bletchley Park, Buckinghamshire. Here it was that in1935 crypto analyst Alan M Turing and other experts were closeted and given the task of decrypting WW II German intelligence messages. Turing built a machine to do the decoding which, it is said to be, the forerunner of all computers.
His inventive idea of “a machine of limitless memory, scanner that moves symbol by symbol reading what it finds and writing further symbols was the first beginning of AI.” The AI Summit venue is so appropriate and an indirect sign of respect to those earliest in the field of AI though they had not even the use of a computer then. Turin’s theoretical design, vague though it was, is accepted as the first original forerunner of artificial intelligence.
Features
The challenge of being positive about SAARC
It was a few years back that a former President of Sri Lanka took it on himself to pronounce SAARC ‘dead’. Since then there have been other sections of Sri Lankan opinion that have joined the critics of SAARC and taken the solemn stance that SAARC has indeed died what may be called a natural death.
Their fatalism is understandable. SAARC has failed to meet at heads of government or state level for the past several years to take the SAARC process notably forward. Regional cooperation has more or less been only an appealing idea. No substantive concrete projects have taken off to make the idea a hard reality. ‘Inner paralysis’ seems to be SAARC’s lot. Hence the fatalism in these circles.
However, being one of the worst cash-strapped regions of the world and a teemingly populated one with people virtually left to their devices, what choices do the ‘SAARC Eight’ have other than to try their best to band together and continue with their cooperation efforts, however small they may be?
There is no escaping the mounting debt trap for many of these countries and bankrupt Sri Lanka is a glaring example, but ‘throwing in the towel’ and abandoning themselves entirely to the diktats of the strongest economies and their agencies will prove a ‘living death’ for many countries in the SAARC fold.
The gains may be meagre but giving-up on SAARC cooperation in full would prove self-defeating for the organization and South Asia. Right now, the collective intention ought to be to salvage what the region could from the tenuous cooperative efforts. Moreover, such initiatives could go some distance to generate a degree of goodwill among the Eight and help in sustaining a dialogue process.
Given this backdrop it proved ‘a stich in time’ for the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Colombo, to recently host the SAARC Secretary General Ambassador Md. Golam Sarwar to a round table discussion on the unifying potential of SAARC and its future possibilities, besides other related issue areas.
Held on June 24th and moderated by RCSS Executive Director and former ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha, the forum brought together a vibrant, wide ranging audience comprising academicians, diplomats, senior public servants, civil society activists and many others. Following the presentation by Ambassador Golam Sarwar titled, ‘Reigniting SAARC: Achievements, Challenges and the Way Ahead’, a lively Q&A followed.
The above forum could be described as an act of lighting the proverbial ‘candle’ rather than ‘cursing the darkness.’ It surely is a ‘darkness’ that could be seen as daunting considering that the region’s pivotal powers, India and Pakistan, are failing to act in a spirit of accord but are engaged in bitter finger-pointing on a number of questions of vital importance to SAARC.
On the other hand, what is the rest of the region doing to bring the above sides together? It is disappointing that to date the rest of SAARC has failed to launch a major diplomatic drive to bring peace between the feuding regional heavyweights. It needs to act without delay and establish its earnestness and this effort would need to prove SAARC’s staying power in the unfolding months and even years.
In assessing SAARC’s seeming failure local opinion in particular has failed to factor in what could be described as weak leadership. Since Sheikh Mujibur Rahman of Bangladesh, the founding father of SAARC, the region has failed to produce a visionary leader who could advance the SAARC cause with charisma and drive.
Among other reasons, weak leadership accounts considerably for the faltering and stuttering status, as it were, of SAARC. Badly needed are leaders who could go the extra mile, think less of narrow national interests and work diligently towards the collective well being of the region but SAARC’s millions of ordinary people have been made to wait in vain for leaders of such stature. Instead, they have been burdened with politicians who seem to be relishing the apparently moribund state of SAARC.
Looking back, it could be said that it was the dynamic leadership factor that led to the launching of the Non-Aligned Movement and for its sustenance for a few decades. True, it could be seen in some quarters that NAM is no more, but as in the case of SAARC, the former too has been unfortunate to be burdened over the years with politicians who lack the vision and drive to unflaggingly advance the fortunes of the South. NAM and SAARC lack the dynamism and vision of leaders of the stature of Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, to give them the required guidance and intellectual depth.
The reasons are complex for there not being among us currently political leaders with the vision and the steadfast commitment to advance the legitimate interests of the South. However, it could be stated with conviction that the majority of Southern leaders have too easily caved in to the demands of the global North and its financial agencies.
These leaders have failed to see, for instance, that the largely market economy oriented Northern governments would not view with favour a centrist economic model that attaches priority to the interests of the dis-empowered publics of the South. This realization ought to have dawned on the current government in Sri Lanka, for instance, some while ago but it has no choice but to abide by IMF dictates since economic survival at present is unthinkable without the latter’s succour.
Accordingly for SAARC this should be the time for some soul-searching. Priority needs to be attached to ending the feuding between India and Pakistan since at present the material fortunes of the region hinge largely on these regional giants giving peaceful relations among them a try. This is no easy challenge to meet but some daring, visionary diplomacy needs to take hold among the rest of SAARC.
There is some sense in SAARC bringing the peoples of the region together through programs that address their best collective interests. A meeting of minds among SAARC nations could enable SAARC and its agencies to build a region-wide people’s movement for progressive political and economic change that could in turn lead to the region’s political leaders sensitizing themselves more to the neglected needs of their publics.
However, the time is ‘now’ for the initiation of these progressive changes and the voice of SAARC well wishers would need to drown out those of their critics.
Features
OPA seminar examines Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and growth pathways
A seminar, “Sri Lanka’s Economic Crossroads: Navigating Recovery, Resilience and Growth” was recently held by the Organisation of Professional Associations of Sri Lanka (OPA) at the OPA Auditorium, bringing together economists, OPA members, and professionals from diverse fields for an insightful discussion on Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and future growth prospects.
The event was held under the patronage of Jayantha Gallehewa, President of the OPA, and was jointly organised by the National Issues Committee (NIC) and the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee of the OPA. The event reaffirmed the organisation’s commitment to advancing professional excellence, fostering insightful intellectual engagement, facilitating interdisciplinary knowledge exchange and creating a constructive platform for informed dialogue on issues of national importance.
The panel of speakers comprised Dr. Harsha Aturupane, Lead Economist and Programme Leader for Human Development at the World Bank for Sri Lanka and the Maldives; Dr. Achinthya Koswatta, Senior Lecturer in Economics at the Open University of Sri Lanka, and Anushan Kapilan, Lead Economist at Verité Research.
In his welcome address, the President of the OPA emphasised that Sri Lanka was at a critical juncture in its economic recovery journey where sustained reforms, effective implementation, and collective national commitment are essential to achieving long-term stability, resilience and inclusive growth. He noted that the country had experienced one of the most severe economic crises in its history with the economy contracting by 7.8 percent in 2022 and a further 11.5 percent in 2023, resulting in significant economic and social challenges.
Delivering his introductory remarks Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee, underscored the need to move beyond short-term economic stabilisation towards a comprehensive agenda of structural transformation. He observed that the economic crisis had revealed deep-rooted weaknesses within the economy, including persistent fiscal pressures, rising public debt, foreign exchange limitations, and insufficient diversification of the export base. He stressed that addressing these challenges through strategic reforms, institutional strengthening and long-term economic planning would be essential to establishing a more resilient and competitive economy.
While acknowledging recent positive developments, including improved inflation management, tourism recovery and signs of economic stabilisation, Wijeyaratne stressed the need to advance reforms aimed at strengthening fiscal discipline, enhancing productivity, improving competitiveness, developing human capital and reinforcing governance and institutional effectiveness.
He further highlighted the important role of professionals, businesses, academia and other stakeholders in contributing to evidence-based dialogue and supporting Sri Lanka’s journey towards a resilient, inclusive and sustainable economic future.
Delivering the keynote presentation, Dr. Harsha Aturupane provided a comprehensive assessment of Sri Lanka’s economic prospects within the broader context of global economic transformation. He argued that Sri Lanka functioned as a small open economy whose performance is significantly influenced by developments in the global marketplace. External factors could not be controlled, and the country must strengthen its domestic capacity and resilience to respond effectively to international economic shifts, he noted.
Tracing the evolution of global economic systems, Dr. Aturupane highlighted the transition from ideological divisions between state-controlled and market-oriented economies towards increasingly pragmatic approaches focused on growth, competitiveness and development. He noted that Sri Lanka’s own economic journey reflects a similar evolution, with contemporary policy debates now centred on practical solutions for sustainable economic progress.
The presentation also examined the transformative impact of globalisation. Dr. Aturupane observed that global economic integration had enabled several East Asian economies, including South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong, to achieve remarkable economic advancement through export-led growth strategies. Sri Lanka similarly benefited from this process through the expansion of its apparel industry and increased integration into global value chains.
Turning to Sri Lanka’s recovery programme, Dr. Aturupane emphasised that the ongoing stabilisation process should be viewed as a national programme supported by the International Monetary Fund rather than solely as an IMF initiative. He observed that strong worker remittances, improved tourism earnings, enhanced government revenue mobilisation and prudent import management have contributed significantly to economic stabilisation.
Despite this progress, he cautioned that rebuilding foreign exchange reserves and meeting future debt obligations remain major challenges. He underscored the need to strengthen export performance, attract investment and generate sustainable foreign exchange earnings to ensure long-term economic resilience.
The discussion also focused on monetary stability, inflation management and exchange-rate policy. Dr. Aturupane stressed that maintaining price stability was fundamental to sustainable growth and household welfare, while sound monetary policy remains essential for preserving economic confidence.
Looking beyond stabilisation, he argued that Sri Lanka must transition towards a broader economic transformation agenda. Sustainable growth, he noted, will depend on expanding productive capacity through investment, technological advancement, innovation, skills development and structural reforms.
Among the key constraints identified was the high cost of energy, which continues to affect competitiveness and investment attractiveness. Dr. Aturupane emphasised the importance of improving efficiency and affordability within the energy sector to enhance Sri Lanka’s business environment.
He further highlighted the social dimensions of the crisis, noting the rise in poverty and economic vulnerability among households. Strengthening social protection systems and ensuring inclusive growth, he argued, must remain central components of the national development agenda.
Another critical challenge identified was Sri Lanka’s demographic transition. With an ageing population, outward migration and evolving labour market dynamics, the country is increasingly confronting labour shortages in several sectors. Dr. Aturupane suggested that greater automation, increased labour-force participation and strategic workforce planning would be necessary to address these emerging realities.
Concluding his presentation, he emphasised the need to improve governance, strengthen institutions, enhance competitiveness and create an enabling environment for private sector investment. Sri Lanka’s future success, he noted, will depend on its ability to move decisively beyond crisis management towards a development model founded on resilience, innovation, productivity and inclusive growth.
Dr. Achinthya Koswatta reiterated the importance of policy consistency and predictability in fostering investment and industrial development. She observed that frequent policy changes create uncertainty and discourage long-term investment decisions, whereas stable and coherent policy frameworks build confidence and support sustainable economic transformation.
Meanwhile, Anushan Kapilan highlighted the substantial progress achieved in restoring macroeconomic stability following the recent crisis. He noted significant improvements in fiscal performance, including increased government revenue, reduced reliance on debt financing and a historically low fiscal deficit.
He further observed that public debt levels are declining faster than anticipated, economic growth has exceeded expectations and inflation has been brought under control more rapidly than forecast. Nevertheless, he cautioned that the recovery remains uneven, particularly within the industrial sector and that many households have yet to experience a meaningful improvement in living standards.
The seminar was expertly coordinated by Eng. Chamil Edirimuni, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee, while the technical moderation and interactive discussion session were facilitated by Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee.
The event was attended by Tisara De Silva, President-Elect of the OPA, Eng. Ravi Rupasinghe, General Secretary, Past Presidents, members of the Executive Council, representatives of the General Forum and professionals representing a wide range of disciplines.
The seminar concluded with a vibrant exchange of ideas and perspectives, reaffirming the importance of evidence-based policy dialogue, institutional collaboration and collective national commitment in advancing Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and sustainable growth.
Features
Her roots run deep in Sri Lanka
Yes, for UK-based presenter and artiste Samantha Kay, home is where the heart – and the roots – are. And her roots run deep in Sri Lanka.
In an exclusive interview with The Island, Samantha says “I’m proud to be Sri Lankan. My mum is from Kandy and my dad is from Colombo, so Sri Lanka has always held a very special place in my heart.
“Whenever I visit Sri Lanka, I love spending time on the beautiful south coast, especially Hikkaduwa and Mirissa. It’s somewhere I always feel connected to my roots and completely at peace.”
Now living in Bournemouth, on the south coast of England, where, she says, she is lucky to be close to some of the UK’s most beautiful beaches, including the iconic Sandbanks, Samantha has built a career that refuses to fit into one box.
She is a radio presenter, podcast host, singer-songwriter, personal trainer and life coach.
“I genuinely love the variety because every role allows me to connect with people and, hopefully, make a positive difference in someone’s day.”
Of course, music has taken her far.
One of her proudest achievements, she says, was releasing a song with 90s music icon Angie Brown, which reached No. 9 in the UK Club Charts.
She also reached the final stages of The X Factor and performed at Wembley Stadium in front of thousands.
Beyond music, Samantha competed in bikini bodybuilding across the UK, winning several titles. “It taught me discipline, resilience and self-belief,” she recalls.
Today, her focus is on radio, podcasting and coaching women. Her podcast encourages people to live life on their own terms rather than feeling pressured to follow society’s expectations.
Says Samantha: “Whether someone is single, changing careers, travelling solo or simply trying to find their purpose, I want them to know that it’s never too late to create a life that feels authentic. If you’ve ever felt like you don’t fit into the box, maybe you were never meant to.”
Samantha Kay also spent a year in Dubai, performing at five-star hotels, including FIVE, and coaching at the iconic outdoor gym on Palm Jumeirah.
“I taught strength and conditioning classes, and hosted wellness retreats, combining my passion for music, health and inspiring others.”
However, with family matters calling her back to the UK, she made the choice to return. “Family comes first,” she says.
Looking ahead, Samantha plans to grow her radio and podcast work, release more music, and expand her wellness retreats.
“My biggest passion is helping people, especially women, build confidence and believe in themselves,” she says.
“Wherever my career takes me, I hope to continue inspiring others to live with courage, kindness and authenticity, while never forgetting my Sri Lankan roots.”
-
News7 days agoHerath warns prospective migrant workers not to get fleeced by racketeers
-
Features5 days agoPrison riots and politics: NPP’s biggest challenge and Sri Lanka’s biggest opportunity
-
Editorial6 days agoWhat’s the world coming to?
-
Foreign News7 days agoTensions erupt in Indian state after 11-year-old raped and murdered
-
Features7 days agoDevanesan Annan – in Memoriam
-
Editorial7 days agoPunishment in hellholes
-
Features2 days agoDirty Money
-
Editorial5 days agoMuch ado about crime: Fish or cut bait
