News
Lawyers must be able to carry out their duties and functions freely: BASL
Lawyers should be able to discharge their professional duties without any fear or hindrance, the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has said.
The BASL has, in a media statement, said there have been several instances where law enforcement agencies and prosecuting authorities sought to obtain access to information in the possession of Attorneys-at-Law in relation to the professional duties they discharge.
The BASL said that legal practitioners acting on the lawful instructions of their clients are bound by professional duties of confidentiality adding that the duties are firmly established under the Supreme Court Rules and the Evidence Ordinance, which prohibit disclosure of privileged communications except with clients’ consent or as expressly required by Law.
Full text of the BASL statement: “In the recent past the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has received reports of several instances where Law Enforcement Agencies and Prosecuting Authorities have sought to obtain access to information in the possession of Attorneys-at-Law in relation to the professional duties they discharge.
“The BASL emphasizes that Legal Practitioners act on the lawful instructions of their clients and are bound by professional duties of confidentiality. These duties are firmly established under the Supreme Court Rules and the Evidence Ordinance, which prohibit disclosure of privileged communications except with clients’ consent or as expressly required by Law.
“The BASL considers it is inappropriate for Law Enforcement Agencies and Prosecuting Authorities to call upon Attorneys-at- Law to make statements concerning matters arising in relation to the discharge of their professional duties. Such actions risk violating ethical standards and compromising the independence of the Legal Profession.
“The BASL urges all such authorities and agencies to refrain from such actions that undermine the Role of Lawyers in the system of Administration of Justice.
“Interference of this nature threatens the Rule of Law and the Constitutional Protections under Article 14(1)(g) of the Constitution guaranteed to all citizens which includes Attorneys-at-Law as well. The BASL re-iterates that members of the legal fraternity should be able to discharge their professional duties without any fear or limitation subject to the provisions of Law including the Supreme Court Rules, which is an essential element to maintain a free and fair system in the dispensation of justice.
“The BASL further emphasizes that any limitation imposed on Attorneys-at-Law to discharge their professional duties towards a client, will curtail the right of citizens to have due and proper access to justice, which is also an indispensable element in the justice system of the Country.”
“The BASL remains resolutely committed to defending the rights and freedoms of Legal Professionals and to upholding the continued Independence, Integrity, and Dignity of the Legal Profession in Sri Lanka.”
News
Women’s T20 World Cup 2026 warm-up: Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helps Sri Lanka beat Pakistan
Captain Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helped Sri Lanka chase down 169 with ease against Pakistan. Athapaththu and Vishmi Gunaratne together started strongly, putting up a 159-run stand as Sri Lanka won with eight balls to spare.
With the ball, right-arm seamer Chethana Vimukthi, who was called up as the injured Shashini Gimhani’s replacement. for the T20 World Cup, made an impact for Sri Lanka, finishing with figures of 4 for 31. Vimukthi broke the 60-run stand between openers Muneeba Ali and Gull Feroza, following which Pakistan lost wickets regularly. Captain Fatima Sana top-scored for Pakistan from No. 7 with 37 to push the total past 150. In reply, Sri Lanka made easy work of the chase, with Athapaththu itting five sixes and nine fours in her 56-ball stay.
Scores:
Sri Lanka Women 169 for 1 in 18.4 overs (Chamari Athapaththu 94, Vishmi Gunaratne 63*; Fatima Sana 1-20 ) beat Pakistan Women 168 for 8 in 20 overs (Muneesha Ali 36, Gull Feroza 26. Ayesha Zafar 10, Saira Jabeen 12, Fatima Sana 37, Aliya Riyaaz 22; Sugandika Kumari 1-33, Chethana Vimukthi 4-31, Malki Madara 1-19, Nimasha Meepage 1-16) by nine wickets
(Cricinfo)
News
Open hearing on coal procurement inquiry set for July first week
Open hearing of evidence into alleged irregularities in coal procurement is scheduled to begin in the first week of July, while the Presidential Commission of Inquiry continues recording statements from relevant officials, investigators said.
So far, the Commission has recorded statements from around 40 government officials, including members of procurement committees and other personnel attached to institutions involved in coal-related transactions.
Officials said that, depending on evidence gathered during the ongoing inquiry, statements may also be obtained from former ministers if required.
The Commission has also received 28 complaints in connection with alleged irregularities in coal imports and related procurement processes.
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on April 17 appointed a three-member Presidential Commission of Inquiry under the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act No. 07 of 1978 to probe alleged malpractice in coal imports and electricity generation since the inception of coal-based power generation up to April 16, 2026.
The Commission is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gihan Kulatunga, with Court of Appeal Judge Aditya Patabendige and High Court Judge Sanjeewa Somaratne serving as members. Former State Ministry Secretary P.V. Bandulasena acts as Secretary to the Commission.
The inquiry covers alleged procurement irregularities, possible financial losses to the State, import of substandard coal, quality inspection failures, contractual breaches and operational issues in power generation, including whether corrective measures were taken where necessary.
It will also identify responsible political authorities, officials of Sri Lanka Coal Company (Private) Limited and suppliers, while recommending legal or administrative action and measures to prevent future lapses.
Meanwhile, the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) is also preparing to table its report on coal procurement in Parliament, with officials from relevant institutions having been summoned during its proceedings. COPE Chairman MP Dr. Nishantha Samaraweera said audit findings had also been considered, and any matters requiring further investigation would be referred to law enforcement and anti-corruption authorities.
News
TNA MP calls for complete repeal of PTA
Trincomalee District TNA MP Shanakiyan Rasamanickam has submitted a motion to Parliament calling for the immediate repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), arguing that the controversial law has enabled arbitrary detention, torture and the targeting of minority communities for more than four decades.
In his motion, now published in the Addendum to the Order Book of Parliament, the MP urged the Government to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act, No. 48 of 1979, in its entirety and refrain from introducing any replacement legislation containing similar provisions.
Rasamanickam contended that the PTA had been used for over 40 years to facilitate prolonged arbitrary detention and to obtain false confessions through torture. He further alleged that the law had disproportionately affected minority communities and civil society groups.
The motion states that there is no justification for maintaining a permanent counter-terrorism law that grants sweeping powers to the authorities.
The TNA legislator argued that existing legal provisions were sufficient to address security threats, noting that terrorism-related offences could already be prosecuted under the Penal Code.
He also pointed out that the Government retained the power to declare a state of emergency when circumstances warranted extraordinary measures, rendering a permanent anti-terrorism framework unnecessary.
Accordingly, the motion calls on Parliament to resolve that the Government take immediate steps to abolish the PTA without replacing it with legislation containing comparable powers.
The Prevention of Terrorism Act, enacted in 1979, has long been the subject of criticism from human rights organisations, civil society groups and international bodies, which have raised concerns over provisions relating to detention without trial and safeguards against abuse.
-
News5 days agoLankan duo emerge winners in Latin dance championship held in Blackpool, UK
-
Business6 days agoIMF’s unstated rate:Sri Lanka’s $695m loan costs about 5.33% per annum
-
Latest News3 days agoKusal Mendis, Pathum Nissanka, bowlers put Sri Lanka 1-0 up
-
News3 days agoNew US tariffs proposed on 60 countries, including Sri Lanka
-
Business6 days agoSri Lankan scientist-innovator Milinda Edirisinghe introduces AI-integrated gem testing system to gemological world
-
Features2 days agoPower crept into the Sangha and is now tearing it apart
-
News6 days agoUNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act
-
News5 days agoSri Lankan teen killed in Chennai clash; three arrested
