News
GL: ‘Aswesuma’ flawed, fresh scheme needed
frowns on privileged status to wealthy investors, bid to restore dissolved LG bodies
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Top Opposition Spokesman Prof. G. L. Peiris yesterday (02) demanded that the government cancel, what he called, the deeply flawed ‘Aswesuma’ social security project, to pave the way for a fresh scheme. Addressing the media at the Nawala Office of the breakaway SLPP faction, Nidahasa Janatha Sabhawa, the former External Affairs Minister dealt with the passage of the resolution on the ‘Domestic Debt Optimisation’ (DDO) in Parliament, the previous day, a move to amend three Acts in order to give the subject Minister (Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena) powers to restore dissolved local government authorities and ‘Aswesuma’
that caused countrywide turmoil.
Pointing out that several SLPP members had skipped Saturday’s vote on the resolution on DDO, National List lawmaker emphasized that the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government unfairly burdened the Employees Trust Fund (EPF). Having repeatedly assured that the EPF with funds amounting to Rs 3 trillion wouldn’t be undermined in the DDO process, the government had targeted the country’s largest fund, Prof. Peiris said. That was nothing but a cruel attack on those struggling to make ends meet, the academic said.
The resolution received 122 votes while 62 voted against. Forty-two MPs abstained.However, the government conveniently left out wealthy investors who had no hesitation in taking advantage of the country’s predicament, the former minister said.
After Governor of the Central Bank Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe declared bankruptcy in April 2022, wealthy financiers had invested in sovereign bonds at extortionate rates of interest. “Their motive was to make use of the perilous state of our economy to make a killing. They sought unconscionable profits in as short a time as possible. While the rates payable to these wealthy investors are left untouched, interest to be earned by the working people who are beneficiaries of the EPF has been reduced by the rate of income tax payable by the EPF being increased from 14 pc to 30 percent if fund declined to participate in the seriously flawed DDO exercise,” Prof. Peiris said.
The people should realise that the EPF’s participation was therefore not voluntary but enforced Prof. Peiris said. Therefore, the government strategy is not consistent with social equity, the dissident SLPPer said.
Prof. Peiris said the DDO process had been placed under the control of Finance Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe.Commenting on the raging controversy over the ‘Aswesuma’ programme, Prof. Peiris said that disruption that had been caused by ill-advised government was so much, the project couldn’t be repaired under any circumstances. There couldn’t be any other option than cancelling the announced list of beneficiaries and launching a fresh initiative as soon as possible to identify those who really required government assistance.
Pointing out that there had been well over half a mn public appeals and complaints in this regard, Prof. Peiris asked the government not to shift the blame to officials but to accept responsibility and initiate what he called a scientific examination of the poor with required technical expertise.
Those who planned to replace ‘Samurdhi’ with ‘Aswesuma’ ended up with egg on their face for want of a cohesive plan to identify the needy. The ex-minister dismissed a recent government declaration that remedial measures would be taken once appeals and complaints were received by July 10 as propaganda. “The system is so inconsistent with requirements, it cannot be salvaged by patchwork,” the MP said.
The senior politician said that the SLPP should be ashamed that one of its National List MPs, Jayantha Kategoda proposed to empower the Minister of Local Government to restore dissolved Local Government authorities. Declaring SLPP rebels’ intention to challenge the government move in the Supreme Court, Prof. Peiris said that the ruling SLPP and UNP with just one MP in parliament were trying to skip elections at all levels.
News
Showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.
WEATHER FORECAST FOR 11 MAY 2026
Issued at 05.30 a.m. on 11 May 2026 by the Department of Meteorology
The low-level atmospheric disturbance in the vicinity of Sri Lanka is likely to develop into a low-pressure area around the next 36 hours. Therefore, the prevailing showery conditions over the island are expected to continue during the next few days.
Showers or thundershowers will occur at times in most parts of the island and Cloudy skies are expected, under the influence of the aforementioned system. Heavy showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.
The general public is kindly requested to take adequate precautions to minimize damage caused by temporary localized strong winds and lightning during thundershowers.
News
Treasury theft: Speaker’s conduct brought to IPU’s attention: SJB
SJB MP Dayasiri Jayasekera has sought the intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) to pressure the JVP-NPP government to respect the rights of the Opposition.
MP Jayasekera told The Island that they wouldn’t allow the NPP to suppress the truth regarding the theft of Treasury funds amounting to USD 2.5 million. He accused Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne of depriving the Opposition of its legitimate rights, at the behest of the government.
Jayasekera said that the Speaker’s conduct regarding the action taken against Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, too, had been brought to the notice of IPU and other international associations.
The text of MP Jayasekera’s letter to the Secretary general of IPU: “I respectfully submit this petition seeking the attention and intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union concerning a matter affecting parliamentary accountability, the rights of elected representatives, and the proper functioning of constitutional oversight within the Parliament of Sri Lanka.
On 06 May 2026, I Dayasiri Jayasekara MP submitted a formal request to the Hon. Speaker of Parliament seeking permission, under the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act No. 21 of 1953 and Standing Order 29(1), to raise a question of privilege regarding alleged constitutional and parliamentary violations by Mr. Harshana Suriyapperuma, Secretary to the Treasury of Sri Lanka.
The proposed privilege motion raised matters including:
1. Alleged violations of Articles 148, 149, and 150 of the Constitution of Sri Lanka concerning parliamentary control over public finance;
2. Alleged failure to report to Parliament concerning a controversial and unlawful transfer of approximately USD 2.5 million from the Treasury;
3. Alleged non-compliance with parliamentary committee procedures under the Standing Orders of Parliament;
4. Questions relating to constitutional eligibility under Article 91(1)(d)(xiii) of the Constitution concerning dual citizenship and qualification to sit and vote in Parliament;
5. A request that the matter be referred to the Parliamentary Ethics and Privileges Committee established under Standing Order 118.
Despite the seriousness of the constitutional and parliamentary issues raised, the Hon. Speaker declined permission for the privilege issue to be raised in Parliament.
It is respectfully submitted that this refusal has the effect of:
• Preventing an elected Member of Parliament from exercising his parliamentary oversight function;
• Restricting parliamentary scrutiny over matters involving public finance and constitutional accountability;
• Undermining the privileges of Members of Parliament to raise matters of urgent public importance;
• Limiting institutional transparency concerning allegations involving senior state officials.
The right of parliamentarians to raise questions of privilege and matters relating to constitutional governance is an essential component of parliamentary democracy and legislative independence. The refusal to permit even the presentation or preliminary consideration of such a matter raises serious concerns regarding parliamentary accountability mechanisms in Sri Lanka.
Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:
1.Take cognizance of this matter as one affecting the rights and functions of Members of Parliament;
2.Seek clarification from the relevant parliamentary authorities in Sri Lanka regarding the grounds upon which the privilege motion was disallowed;
3.Consider whether the refusal is compatible with internationally recognised principles of parliamentary democracy, accountability, and freedom of parliamentary speech;
4. Encourage the Parliament of Sri Lanka to ensure fair and transparent procedures governing parliamentary privilege motions and constitutional oversight.
I further request that this communication be placed before the appropriate committee or mechanism within the IPU dealing with the rights and duties of parliamentarians.”
News
Navin calls for formal alliance between UNP and SJB
UNP Vice President and Kandy District Leader, Navin Dissanayake, on Saturday, stressed that any proposed merger between the UNP and the SJB must be carried out formally rather than in an ad hoc manner.
Addressing a media briefing in Kandy, Dissanayake said a structured framework was essential to ensure the successful reunification of the two parties ahead of future elections.
“A formal mechanism must be established for the unification of the UNP and the SJB. This process cannot be confined to personal verbal assurances given to suit individual interests. We must build a strong framework to contest future elections as a united force,” he said.
He added that the UNP could only regain political strength by reuniting with factions that had broken away from the party.
Dissanayake also claimed that the Government would be compelled to hold Provincial Council elections amid mounting international and domestic pressure.
“India is exerting pressure to conduct these elections, while the people in the North are also demanding governance under the Provincial Council system. They are awaiting the polls,” he said.
Announcing his own political intentions, Dissanayake said he hoped to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province at the next Provincial Council election.
“I intend to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province. Having served as a Governor, I understand the extent of service that can be delivered to the people through a Provincial Council,” he said.
Recalling the history of constitutional devolution, Dissanayake said his late father, Gamini Dissanayake, had played a significant role in the introduction of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.
by SK Samaranayake
-
News5 days agoMIT expert warns of catastrophic consequences of USD 2.5 mn Treasury heist
-
News7 days agoCJ urged to inquire into AKD’s remarks on May 25 court verdict
-
News2 days agoLanka Port City officials to meet investors in Dubai
-
Editorial5 days agoClean Sri Lanka and dirty politics
-
Opinion7 days agoSecurity, perception, and trust: Sri Lanka’s delicate balancing act
-
Editorial4 days agoThe Vijay factor
-
News3 days agoSLPP expresses concern over death of former SriLankan CEO
-
News6 days agoDevelopment Officer bids Rs. 48 mn for CPC’s V8 at auction
