Features
A massive mill becomes a mini-city
by Sumi Moonesinghe narrated to Savitri Rodrigo
Believing strongly in the Premadasa ideology of sustainable development long before it became a buzzword, I began working even more closely with him once he was elected President. I had erected a statue in memory of Dr. C W W Kannangara, the Father of Free Education in Sri Lanka, in Matugama. It was Kannangara, as the Minister of Education in the State Council in the 1940s, who introduced extensive and very progressive reforms to the education system which included universal education. I was one who had benefited from his free education policy from my primary and secondary schooling, all the way until earning my degree at a prestigious university. This statue was a debt of gratitude to him.
I had been working on the Trincomalee Development Plan, my pet subject then and now. When the statue was ready in April 1993, I invited President Premadasa to unveil it and also presented him with the Plan. Having read the plan, he summoned me for a meeting on Monday morning at 9 am at his home, Sucharita. Chairing the meeting, he introduced me to everyone in the room and then asked his long-time confidante and Secretary R. Paskaralingam to continue the meeting, while he left to administer his political agenda.
The President’s methodology in running the country was to leave the administration of the Government to the bureaucracy. He never interfered with daily operations. Paskaralingam was the perfect foil for the President’s strategy as, having bees a civil servant all his life, he was well versed in administrative procedures and was known to take immediate decisions.
Just before leaving the meeting, the President told Paskaralingam to appoint me Chairman of the National Development Bank (NDB). NDB was a State-owned development finance institution founded in 1979 but changed course in early 199L The bank was privatized and debuted on the Colombo Stock Exchange in February 1993 with a very successful IPO. It was while NDB was on the cusp of this change that President Premadasa wanted me appointed as the bank’s Chairman.
However, prior to my appointment being made official, President Premadasa was killed on May 1. With the various administrative changes that ensued, I was instead appointed a Director of the Board. The CEO of NDB was Ranjit Fernando – who had been at the bank from its inception in 1979 – and by 1989, had gained a seat on the Board of Directors as well. Into our board formula was added a mix of Government and private sector experts. From the private sector were industry captains S K Wickremesinghe, Sri Nagendra, Hemaka Amarasuriya and Ravi Thambiayah, and Central Banker Manik Nagahawatte and Treasury Secretary Baku Mahadeva representing the Government. As is evident, I was once more the only woman in that male-dominated boardroom.
It was at an NDB Board meeting that I first met Dhammika Perera, who through the years built one of the largest business conglomerates in Sri Lanka, and is one of the richest men in country today. NDB was one of his initial forays into Sri Lanka’s corporate boardroom.
While the IPO had been successful, sometime in 1993, the NDB share dropped to Rs. 45 and Dhammika approached General Manager of Seylan Bank Rohini Nanayakkara with a request for a loan to purchase 10% shareholding in NDB. The loan was granted and as a result, he became NDB’s largest shareholder. However, despite being the single largest shareholder, there was no move to appoint him to the Board. I found this unfair and vociferously campaigned to get him a seat on the NDB Board. It was an uphill task fighting the old boy’s club but I appealed to the principle of being just and fair and Dhammika was appointed to the Board.
When he arrived for his first Board meeting, I went up to the door, welcomed him and gave him a seat next to me. After the meeting, I invited him home for a meal and on the way, relived the time he came to Colombo as a very poor young man. “There were days I had no money to buy lunch and I walked miles because I had no bus fare.” We struck a chord because his hard life and his hard work to climb the ladder, resonated with me.
We shared stories and developed a cordial friendship that lasted far beyond our days at NDB. A very smart man who absorbed information like a sponge, he read every single board paper before he came for a meeting, knew the list of debtors by heart and would come up with practical solutions for various problems. Many years later, when he moved to his home at Albert Crescent, he telephoned me and said, “I am now your neighbour. Come over for dinner.” Anarkali and I joined his wife and three daughters for dinner one evening.
Dhammika is a man with no airs, speaks his mind and is a wealth of information. I was very impressed by him, because he is a person who, though amassing plenty of wealth, knows the value of education and hasn’t forgotten what it’s like to go hungry. He has worked on that promise he made to himself to make education accessible to everyone, very similar to Kannangara’s policy, by adding various initiatives into the education system. DP Education which he launched as an educational television channel is one such.
Although I was occupied with various projects, I did have bad days when I realized that Susil was no more by my side. Sri Lanka held many memories for me and my escape route was London. After our separation, I spent an inordinate amount of time in that city, because it was my second home, embracing me with a familiarity that made me feel secure.
Having relied on Susil for nearly every major decision in my life, the shock of the separation and consequences had sapped some of my confidence. Ranil Wickremesinghe, who was by then Prime Minister and knew me from J R’s days, may have had some intuition about how I vacillated from good days to bad days, and that my confidence teetered more often than not. He also knew my capabilities and my educational background. He asked me to take over as Chairman of the Ceylon Electricity Board.
I’ll always be grateful to Ranil for the offer because it really did give me a confidence boost.
I was well qualified for the job, there was no doubt about it and the engineers at the CEB wanted me to take on the post of Chair. The CEB was a loss-making entity and I was very confident that I could turn it around. I didn’t waste a day after I was offered the job and started reading up the various plans and papers to get myself up to speed.
In fact, I even met the Country Head of the IMF at the time, Nadeem Ul Haq, and had some informal discussions with the trade unions about turning the CEB around. The plan was to connect the Indian and Sri Lankan grids, with funding of USD 75 million from the IMF. We would purchase electricity during peak hours, but sell our excess to India. Plans were in motion and I assumed my appointment was a done deal.
However, what I didn’t realize was that cogs had begun turning elsewhere to halt my appointment. The General Manager of the CEB at the time, who was a batchmate of mine in the university, was not in favour of having me as his boss. There was no reasoning, just that he didn’t want me there. I didn’t know about this spoke in the wheel and was readying to sign on the dotted line no sooner I returned from my holiday to Prague and Budapest with Rohini Nanayakkara.
It was Karu Jayasuriya who was tasked with confirming my appointment but when I did meet Karu on my return, he explained the conflict that had arisen. I was truly surprised because I didn’t think any of my batchmates would have a problem having me there. Karu made excuses for the GM’s inanity and I walked away thinking, “What a shame. The country could really benefit if this plan was brought into play.”
Ranil had obviously been informed of the developments because a few days later, his close friend Malik Samarawickrama telephoned me. “The Prime Minister wants you to take over the chairmanship of Bank of Ceylon,” he said. I wondered if this would be yet another CEB fiasco and asked him so, to which he replied that the appointment was already official.
I had been on the Board of NDB since 1993, something I thoroughly enjoyed and reluctantly resigned from that due to a conflict of interest. In December 2002, I took over as Chairman of Bank of Ceylon reporting to President’s Counsel K N Choksy who was Finance Minister. When I met the Minister, he made one thing clear. “Mrs. Moonesinghe, this is a non-executive post but I want you in the bank full time, which means the whole day. I need someone to be hands-on.”
As was my habit, I always did my homework on any undertaking. When I walked into my office at BOC, I had already studied the workings of the largest State bank in the country with its 525 branches. There were anomalies I wanted to rectify. The first was efficiency. I commissioned a tender to network all 525 branches around the country. I wanted the whole process to be open and transparent.
After the bids were called, I shared all the proposals with each bidder. I was also aware of how tenders worked, having been in the tender business most of my life. I let it be known to the bidders that while the software was cheap, companies charged high for ownership and maintenance. So the evaluation process had to be done with great clarity. The tender was awarded to Fiserv Inc, a Fortune 500 company renowned for their cutting-edge technology in financial services.
When the minutes of the previous meeting were read at my first Board meeting, the minutes stated that the BOC non-performing loans from the Government amounted to a considerable Rs. 13 billion. After some discussion, the Board had decided to sue the Government. I was quick to point out however that this would be a futile exercise.
“How can we sue the owner?” I asked. “The Government owns the BOC.” But I also had a solution. “The Wellawatte Spinning & Weaving Mills land is lying abandoned and has not been used for 20 years. Shall we try and recoup our money using that?” I had a multi-pronged plan.
I spoke with Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and told him about the Rs. 13 billion NPL in our portfolio owed to us by the Government, as well as the Rs. 1.5 billion which the Shipping Corporation owed BOC. I suggested that the Spinning & Weaving Mills land be handed over to BOC in lieu of the Rs. 1.5 billion. We had already done the valuation of the land and although it was worth only Rs. 750 million, I surmised it was something better than nothing. He gave the green light and I put the next phase of my plan into place.
I wanted to develop the land, which meant I needed a real estate developer. From our days in Singapore, I had always kept abreast of that country’s developments and an individual who continually showed up on my radar was real estate developer Tao Shing Pee or S P Tao as he was known. I had followed his career primarily because he was a keen investor in Sri Lanka. S P Tao is internationally renowned in real estate development and founded Singapore’s Shing Kwan Group.
When the Singapore government encouraged Singaporeans to invest outside of their country, S P Tao was the only investor who saw potential in Sri Lanka. He is famously known to have said that he looked for two ingredients in the countries he invested in: “The rule of law applies and there is freedom to express oneself. And in Sri Lanka that is the greatest sovereign value.” This was S P Tao’s rationale for setting his investment roots down in Sri Lanka way back in the 1960s when he shipped rice from Burma to Sri Lanka, fell in love with Sri Lanka and made his first million in US Dollars, in that order.
He also had a 25% stake in the Ceylon Shipping Corporation. Unfortunately, Finance Minister N M Perera in Mrs. Bandaranaike’s Cabinet told Tao he was not suited to the workings of a socialist set up. Tao didn’t hesitate. He got rid of his 25% stake and left Sri Lanka for a while.
On President Premadasa’s diktat, his trusted emissary Paskaralingam was dispatched to Singapore to persuade Tao to return. Tao’s love for Sri Lanka was so strong that despite a raging war, he needed little persuasion. Shin Kwan acquired Overseas Realty Ceylon and began the development of the World Trade Center in Fort.
S P Tao was also a customer of BOC. He had placed USD 6 million, his family’s cash assets, in a fixed deposit at Bank of Ceylon which was earning a very high interest rate. The Bank had structured an RCCPS loan — Redeemable Convertible Cumulative Preferential Shares against that FD – which was a first for Sri Lanka at the time. The structure was such that if there was no capital repayment or interest for the tenure of this instrument and the loan remained unpaid on maturity, BOC would receive ORCL preference shares, valued on the day of conversion. When I checked, the share price was less than Rs. 5 and ORCL owned 95% of the shares. In the larger scheme of things, the RCCPS loan was useless to BOC.
I asked the General Manager to arrange a meeting with S P Tao, who flew down from Singapore for the meeting with me. I introduced myself and with my usual forthrightness said, “Mr. Tao, I’m a businesswoman; not a banker. I don’t want your stocks and shares. Your loan is a distressed loan and it is non-performing, which means we can take over your property. But I’m not going to do that. My inquiries reveal that you are selling your floors at the World Trade Center at USD 160 per square foot. So here’s how we’ll move forward.” I told him I want the floors at the distressed value of half the price – USD 80 per square foot.
The amazing characteristic of great business leaders is they take calculated risks, which was evident in how Tao had invested in Sri Lanka. These leaders also know when to cut their losses and make a deal to trigger a win-win formula. He agreed to my price of USD 80 per square foot and BOC took over eight floors of the WTC in lieu of the loan. We rented it out to the Board of Investment. I also had plans to open a Premier Centre for BOC on the ground floor.
I knew S P Tao was a man I could work with and it wasn’t just the floors at the World Trade Center that I wanted. It was now time to set the next phase of my plan in motion. I telephoned him again, this time with an investment prospect for the Wellawatte Spinning & Weaving Mills land which was an idle asset, unused for over 20 years and not even used as a car park.
“The BOC has 18 acres of undeveloped land in an excellent location in Wellawatte,” I said. “Would you like to take it over for a mixed development project like those projects in Singapore? Sri Lanka doesn’t have any project resembling one and yours will be the first.”
I had does my homework and knew the visibility Tao had in property development in Singapore, specifically having developed famous hotel complexes including the Marina Mandarin and Pan Pacific. This was his strength. He accompanied me to see the land and once he saw the location, I knew he was in and thus began the genesis of Havelock City.
Unfortunately, my tenure at BOC ended rather abruptly. The uneasy alliance between President Chandrika Kumaratunga and Prime Minister Rand Wickremesinghe’s government ended in 2004 when Chandrika hijacked the government with JVP support, resulting in all Ranil’s appointees vacating their official posts.
However, I learned much from my discussions with S P Tao a visionary human being whose thought process was way ahead of his time. Even though he left an indelible presence in the landscape of Colombo with the World Trade Center and Havelock City, his business path in Sri Lanka was not easy, continually fraught with challenges. In 1997, he had weathered his World Trade Center towers being blasted by two truck bombs detonated by the LTTE, but the quality of workmanship and construction was proven when the towers showed minimal structural damage.
Much later, long after my tenure as Chairman of BOC, he also had issues with the subsequent management of BOC which owned 40% of Havelock City. Continued spokes resulted in the project being unduly delayed. As a last resort, he acquired the BOC shares so he wouldn’t be encumbered with continuing problems, although that buy-out gave BOC a hefty profit, way above market value.
He wrote a letter to me once, stating, “Sumi, had you remained the Chairperson of BOC, I would have completed the entire project in three years. Instead it took over a decade to complete.”
An investor of lesser grit would not have remained in Sri Lanka but he did. Such was his loyalty and love for this island. China, Hong Kong and Singapore had so much more to offer with an enabling policy and environment. In fact, Tao’s first foray into China was in Nanjing, the capital city of China’s Juangsu province where he developed the 800-room Jinling Hotel, and this city conferred on him the status of Honorary Citizen of Nanjing for his business achievements and philanthropic initiatives. It was also in this city that Tao spent his last days before his demise on August 24, 2021. He was 105 years old.
My heart was filled with sorrow when I heard of him passing away. Besides being the Chairman of Shing Kwan Group at the time of his death, he was also the founder and patron of Jiangsu Tao Shing Pee Education Foundation and Jiangsu Charity Foundation. This grand old man had lived his life to the fullest, doing what he loved best and being in places he loved, dark times notwithstanding. I felt truly blessed to have known a man of his stature in my lifetime, a man who was a true friend to Sri Lanka, who took a gamble on a war-ravaged underperforming country and created wealth and iconic real estate value.
Features
Putting people back into ‘development’ – a challenge for South
Should Sri Lanka consider an 18th IMF programme? Some academicians exploring Sri Lanka’s development prospects in depth are raising this issue. It is yet to emerge as a hot topic among policy and decision-making circles in this country but common sense would sooner rather than later dictate that it be taken up for discussion by the wider public and a decision arrived at.
The issue of an 18th IMF programme was raised with some urgency locally by none other than Dr. Ganeshan Wignaraja,Visiting Senior Fellow, ODI Global London, one of whose presentations, made at the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Colombo, was highlighted in this column last week, May 7th. An IMF programme is far from the ideal way out for a bankrupt country such as Sri Lanka but a policy of economic pragmatism would indicate that there is no other way out for Sri Lanka. Such a programme is the proverbial ‘Bird in the hand’ for Sri Lanka and it may be compelled to avail of it to get itself out of the morass of economic failures it is bogged down in currently.
While local economic growth possibilities are far from encouraging at present, such prospects globally are far from bright as well. Some of the more thought-provoking data in the latter regard were disclosed by Dr. Wignaraja. For example, ‘The IMF’s April 2026 World Economic Outlook projects global growth slowing to 3.1 percent in 2026; with downside risks dominating: prolonged conflict, geopolitical fragmentation, renewed trade tensions, bearing down hardest on emergent and developing economies.’
However, as is known, an ‘IMF bailout’ is fraught with huge risks for the people of a developing country. ‘The Silver Bullet’ brings hardships for the people usually and they would be required by their governments to increasingly ‘tighten their belts’ and brace for perhaps indefinite material hardships and discontent. For Sri Lanka, the cost of living is unsettlingly high and 20 percent of the population is languishing below the poverty line of $ 3.65 per day.
These statistics should help put the spotlight on the people of a country, who are theoretically the subjects and beneficiaries of development, and one of the main reasons, in so far as democracies are concerned, for the existence of governments. Placing people at the centre of the development process is urgently needed in the global South and shifting the focus to other considerations would be tantamount to governments dabbling in misplaced priorities.
Technocrats are needed for the propelling of economic growth but a Southern country’s main approach to development cannot be entirely technocratic in nature. The well being of the people and how it is affected by such growth strategies need to be prime focuses in discussions on development. Accordingly, discourses on how poverty alleviation could be facilitated need urgent initiation and perpetuation. There is no getting away from people’s empowerment.
In the South over the decades, the above themes have been, more or less, allowed to lapse in discussions on development. With economic liberalization and ‘market economics’ being allowed to eclipse development, correctly understood, people’s well being could be said to have been downplayed by Southern governments.
The development issues of Southern publics could be also said to have been compounded over the years as a result of the hemisphere lacking a single and effective ‘voice’ that could consistently and forcefully take up its questions with the global powers and institutions that matter. That is, the South lacks an all-embracing, umbrella organization that could bring together and muster the collective will of the South and work towards the realization of its best interests.
This columnist has time and again brought up the need for concerned Southern sections to explore the potential within the now virtually moribund Non-Aligned Movement to reactivate itself and fill the above lacuna in the South’s organizational and mobilization capability. In its heyday NAM not only possessed this institutional capability but had ample ‘voice power’ in the form of its founding fathers, with Jawaharlal Nehru of India, for example, proving a power to reckon with in this regard. The lack of such leaders at present needs to be factored in as well as accounting for the South’s lack of power and presence in the deliberative forums of the world that have a bearing on the hemisphere’s well being.
The Executive Director of the RCSS, Ambassador (Retd) Ravinatha Aryasinha, articulated some interesting thoughts on the above and related questions at a forum a couple of months back. Speaking at the launching of the book authored by Prof. Gamini Keerewella titled, ‘Reimagining International Relations from a Global South Perspective’, at the Bandaranaike Centre for International Studies, Colombo, Amb. Aryasinha said, among other things: ‘Historically, there is a precedent that has been realized by the Non-Aligned group of countries – unfortunately, rather than being reformed and modified at the end of the Cold War, it has been tossed away.’
The inability of the nominally existent NAM to come out of its state of veritable paralysis and voice and act in the name of the South in the current international crises lends credence to the view that the organization has allowed itself to be ‘tossed away.’ The challenge before NAM is to prove that it is by no means a spent force.
As indicted, NAM needs vibrant voices that could advocate value-based advancement for the global South. Moral principles need to triumph over Realpolitik. Such transformative changes could come to pass if there is a fresh meeting of enlightened minds within the South. Pakistan by offering to mediate in the ongoing conflict between the US and Iran, for instance, proved that there are still states within the South that could look beyond narrow self-interest and work towards some collective goals. Hopefully, Pakistan’s example will be emulated.
Along with Pakistan some Gulf states have shown willingness to work towards a de-escalation of the present hostilities in West Asia. This could be a beginning for the undertaking of more ambitious, collective projects by the South that have as their goals political solutions to current international crises. These developments prove that the South is not bereft of visionary thinking that could lay the basis for a measure of world peace. That is, there are grounds to be hopeful.
NAM needs to see it as its responsibility to make good use of these hopeful signs to bring the South together once again and work towards the realization of its founding principles, such as initiating value-based international politics and laying the basis for the collective economic betterment of Southern people.
Features
Artificial Intelligence in Academia: Menace or Tool?
(The author is on X as @sasmester)
I have often been told by university colleagues how soulless and dangerous ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) is to academia and humanity. They lament that students no longer read anything as they can now get various AI programmes to summarise what is recommended which is mostly in the English language to Sinhala or Tamil or get easier versions in English itself. They get their assignments and even dissertations fully or partially written by AI. And I am led to believe that universities do not have reliable detection software to assess plagiarism and academic fraud that have been committed using AI beyond the software freely available on the internet with their own limitations. This is due to financial restrictions in these institutions. Even these common malpractices have been done mostly with the aid of free AI programmes which are readily available, which means cheating in this sense is free and mostly safe. For teachers, this is a ‘menace’ in the same way ‘copying’ once was. But its implications are far worse.
But given the global investments made over AI, it cannot be wished away despite the enormous negative impact its use has on the environment, particularly due to its massive demand for energy. So, AI is with us to stay, and it has a considerable role to play in human civilisation even though like most innovations and inventions, this too carries its own burden of negativity. In this context, instead of demonising AI and lamenting its replacement of human agency and ingenuity, one needs to think seriously about how to deal with and engage with it reflectively and pragmatically as there is much it can offer if people are intelligent enough to make rational and sensible choices.
When I am making these observations, I am restricting myself to a handful of practices involving only writing both in university-based examination processes and in the fields of creative writing.
My initial introduction to AI was through the Research Methods class I used to teach in New Delhi. In 2022, this class was supposed to go to Dharmshala in Uttar Pradesh for fieldwork training, and we needed to write a funding proposal quickly. One of the students in the class, already familiar with ChatGPT introduced by OpenAI as a free programme in 2022, did the proposal with its help before the two-hour class was over. I edited it soon after and sent it off to the university administration for funding which we received. That stint of field work was completed in five days and was the most detailed work undertaken as a training programme up to that time in the university which had considerable output ranging from a documentary film to a detailed ethnography based on the findings.
While the technical details, the format of the proposal and its basic writing were done by AI due to the time constraints the class faced, its fine-tuning was done by me and a few students. AI could not then and even now cannot undertake that level of specificity without close human intervention. But the film, the ethnography and the actual process of research had nothing to do with AI. It was the result of human labour, thinking, planning and at times creativity and ingenuity. This was an early example of how AI could coexist in an academic environment if its technical usefulness was clearly understood and potential for excesses was also understood. But this was a time, easily accessible AI was just emerging, and we did not know much about it. But I was fortunate enough to have intelligent students in my class who gave me a crash course into this kind of AI use, which I followed up with my own reading and experimentation later on. As a result, I am keener now to see how it can be used for the betterment of academic practice rather than taking an uncritically demonising position, which I know will not lead anywhere.
But how is this possible? The lamentations of my colleagues about the abuse of AI in academic practice is not unfounded. It is a serious threat that remains mostly unaddressed not only in our country but almost everywhere else in the world too. This is mostly because the advancements of AI even in day-to-day free usage have far exceeded any thoughts for actionable codes of ethics to ensure its practice is sensible and ethical. At the same time, I cannot see why a student should not use AI to correct his spelling and grammar in assignments. I also cannot see why a student cannot seek AI’s help to secure research material from secondary sources available online which I have been doing for years. For instance, the originals of specific books and rare manuscripts might not be available in any repositories in our part of the world. In such situations, what AI might find us is all we have access to in a world where we are restricted in our mobility due to semi-racist visa regimes of failed empires and former superpowers as well as our own lack of ability to travel due to our own unenviable economic conditions. But unfortunately, the materials we need are often only available in research centers and libraries in those nations.
Similarly, when it comes to academic prose, it makes no sense now to take years to translate works from multiple languages to Sinhala and Tamil. This has always been a time-consuming, cumbersome and expensive process. Non-availability of Sinhala and English translations of core originals in languages such as English, French, German and so on has been a long-term problem for our country. But this can now be done well – at least from English to our languages – quite quickly and with a very low margin for error by using specific AI programmes which are meant to do precisely this. What this means is a quick expansion of knowledge in local languages which would have ordinarily taken years to achieve or might not have been possible at all. But still, this needs significant human intervention and time towards perfection. However, I do not think AI-based translations work as well for fiction and poetry or creative works more generally. But the ability for AI to emulate nuance and feeling in language is fast emerging. These are two clear examples of improving technical abilities in research and writing in which AI can be of help.
But looking for sources of information with help the help of AI or using it as a tool to undertake essential translations from one language to another is quite different from simply using it without ascertaining the accuracy of collected information, getting AI to do all your work without any reflection or without any hard work at all, including engaging AI to do the final product in a writing assignment — be that a term paper or a work of fiction. If one proceeds in this direction, as many unfortunately do nowadays, then, our ability to think and be creative as a species will become diminished over time and our sense of humanity itself will take a toll. This is what my colleagues worry about when they say AI is making younger generations soulless.
It is here that ethical practices on how to use AI responsibly without compromising our sense of humanity must play a central role. But these ethical practices must be formally written and taught, followed by viable programmes for detection and publication if unethical practices are followed. This needs to be the case particularly in teaching institutions as well as the broader domain of creative writing. After all, what is the fun in reading a novel or a collection of poetry written by AI?
It is time people began to think about what AI can do in their own fields without falling prey to its power and their own laziness. This brings to my mind Geoffrey Hinton’s words: “There is no chance of stopping AI’s development. But we need to ensure alignment; to ensure it is beneficial to us …” Similarly, as Yann LeCun observed, “AI is not just about replicating human intelligence; it’s about creating intelligent systems that can surpass human limitations.” In this sense, it is up to us to find our edge in creativity and common sense to find the most sensible way forward in using AI.
Features
Engelbert’s 90th birthday bash
The legendary Engelbert Humperdinck, who is known for his hit songs such as ‘A Man Without Love’, ‘Release Me’, ‘Spanish Eyes’, ‘The Last Waltz’, ‘Am I That Easy To Forget’, ‘Ten Guitars’ and ‘I Can’t Stop Loving You’, turned 90 on 02 May, 2026, and there were some lovely Hollywood-related celebrations.
Before his birthday, Engelbert’s new single ‘I’ve Got You’ was released – on 23 April – and Engelbert had this to say: “‘I’ve Got You’ is especially close to my heart. It speaks to love, loyalty, and the quiet strength we find in one another”.
The main birthday event was held at The Starlight Cabaret, in Los Angeles, California, and Sri Lankan Raju Rasiah, now based in the States, and his wife Renuka, who are personal friends of Engelbert, were invited to participate in the celebrations, along with Ingrid Melicon – also a Sri Lankan, now domiciled in America.
The invitation said “An evening of music, memories and celebration. Let’s make it a night to remember!” And it certainly turned out to be a night never ever to be forgotten!

Invitees experienced a “magical entrance” with Engelbert’s name lighting up the screen and showing him performing his hit songs.
The invitees were also presented with a unique gift – a necklace with Engelbert’s face, engraved with the words “Remember, I Love You.”
Engelbert’s son, Bradley Dorsey, sang a tribute song ‘Only You’ for his dad, while Eddy Fisher’s daughters, Tricia and Joely, also got on stage to entertaining the distinguish gathering.
Engelbert didn’t perform but got on stage for the cutting of the birthday cake.
There was also a video compilation of birthday wishes from fellow celebrities, and the lineup included Gloria Gaynor, Micky Dolenz, Wayne Newton, Pat Boone, Lulu, Judy Collins, Deana Martin, Angélica María, Rupert Everett, Matt Goss, and more.

Birthday boy Engelbert Humperdinck
At 90, Engelbert is still performing. He’s on THE CELEBRATION TOUR for his 90th year, with over 50 international dates in 2026, including Australia, Germany, the US, and Canada. He’ll be at Massey Hall in, Toronto, on 06 October, 2026. He said: “The stage is my home… Canada has always been a highlight”.
He performed 60+ concerts, worldwide, in 2025, and says karaoke keeps his songs fresh: “Most of my songs are on karaoke because people love to sing them”.
-
News5 days agoLanka Port City officials to meet investors in Dubai
-
News2 days agoEx-SriLankan CEO’s death: Controversy surrounds execution of bail bond
-
News6 days agoSLPP expresses concern over death of former SriLankan CEO
-
Editorial7 days agoThe Vijay factor
-
News6 days agoPolice inform Fort Magistrate’s Court of finding ex-CEO of SriLankan dead under suspicious circumstances
-
Features3 days agoWhen University systems fail:Supreme Court’s landmark intervention in sexual harassment case
-
Features3 days agoHigh Stakes in Pursuing corruption cases
-
Features7 days agoPalm leaf manuscripts of Sri Lanka – 1
