Connect with us

News

Prez polls: Lawyer asks EC to reject proxies

Published

on

Proxy candidate Siripala Amarasinghe (former JVP MP) in conversation with Minister Susil Premjayantha at the inauguration of the 'People's Front' at a Colombo hotel yesterday(Pic by Jude Denzil Pathiraja)

Rejected MPs dominate nominations

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Attorney-at-Law Dasun Nagasena said that the Election Commission (EC) should reject nominations of proxy candidates for the 2024 presidential poll.

Lawyer Nagasena, who campaigns for Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, PC of the National Democratic Front (NDF) candidate, said that the EC should prevent inexcusable waste of public funds by proxies joining the fray.

Nagasena said so in response to The Island query soon after the EC announced that 40 probable candidates paid the stipulated cash deposit by noon yesterday (14).

According to the lawyer, regardless of them paying cash deposits, the EC could refuse to accept their nominations. “Of the 40 candidates, the vast majority are either proxies or those who contest for personal benefits,” Nagasena said. The EC is scheduled to accept nominations today (15).

At the last presidential election, held in Nov 2019, 35 candidates contested the election that was won by Gotabaya Rajapaksa. Nagasena said unless the EC at least acted now, the number of candidates could be even higher than at the previous election.

According to EC Chairman R.M.A.L. Ratnayaka altogether 40 persons, 22 representing recognised political parties, one representing yet to be recognised political party (Ruhunu Janatha Peramuna) and 17 independent candidates paid cash deposits. According to the country’s supreme law, only sitting and former parliamentarians can obtain the services of unrecognized political party or any voter to pay cash deposit for them.

For the first time in presidential election history, a main candidate is contesting as an independent. UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe declared his intention to contest as an independent after failing to reach a consensus with the SLPP on a common agenda.

Lawyer Nagasena said that he raised the contentious issue of proxies in the fray with the EC. Asked to explain, Nagasena said that though he only named former Hambantota District parliamentarian K. Ananda Kularatne as being a proxy of President Wickremesinghe, in his letter to the EC, there were many others.

Examination of past presidential election results proved that except the two top candidates, all others had been dismal failures.

The EC said the following paid cash deposit: Ranil Wickremesinghe (Indpendent), Sarath Keerthiratne (Ind.), Oshala Herath (Abhinawa Niwahal Peramuna), A.S.P. Liyanage (Sri Lanka Kamkaru Pakshaya), Sajith Premadasa (Samagi Jana Balawegaya), P.W.S.K. Bandaranayake (Jathika Sanwardhana Peramuna), Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe (Jathika Prajathanrawadi Peramuna), K.K. Piyadasa (Ind), Sirithunga Jayasuriya (Eksath Samajawadi Pakshaya), Ajantha de Zoysa (Ruhunu Janatha Peramuna), K. Ananda Kularatne (Ind), Sarath Manamendra (Nawa Sihala Urumaya), Ven. Battaramulle Seelarathana Thera (Janasetha Peramuna), Ven. Akmeemana Dayaratne Thera (Ind.), Siripala Amarasinghe (Ind.), K.R. Krishan (Arunalu Janatha Peramuna), Sarath Fonseka (Ind.), Anura Kumara Dissanayake (Jathika Jana Balawegaya), Pani Wijesiriwardena (Samajawadi Samanatha Pakshaya), Anthony Victor Perera (Ind.), A.M. Illiyas (Ind), Marakkarala Manage Premasiri (Ind.), Anura Sydney Jayaratne (Ind.), D.M. Bandaranayake (Ind.), Priyantha Pushpakumara Wickramasinghe (Nawa Sama Samaja Pakshaya), M. Thilakaraja (Ind.), J.D.K. Wickremaratne (Ape Jana Bala Pakshaya), Roshan Ranasinghe (Ind.), Mahinda Dewage (Sri Lankawe Samajawadi Pakshaya), Anoj de Silva (Prajathanrawadi Eksath Janatha Peramuna), P. S. Ariyaneththiram (Ind.), A.M. Infas (Eksath Prajathanrawadi Sandhanaya), Dilith Jayaweera (Communist Party), Nuwan Bopage (Samajawadi Janatha Sansadhaya), Namal Rajapaksha (Samabima Pakshaya), Anuruddha Polgampola (Ind.), Namal Rajapaksa (Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna), Janaka Ratnayake (Eksath Lanka Podujana Pakshaya), Lalith de Silva (Eksath Jathika Nidahas Peramuna) and Sarath Kumara Gunaratne (Ind.).

Lawyer Nagasena said that each proxy cost the taxpayers as much as Rs 25 mn. It would be the responsibility of the EC to put an end to the nonsense caused by proxies, he said.



News

Members of Sri Lanka Cricket Transformation Committee Officially Appointed

Published

on

By

The official appointment letters for the members of the newly established “Cricket Transformation Committee” (CTC) were handed over on Monday (04) by the Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports,  Sunil Kumara Gamage.

The following members received their letters of appointment at the Ministry premises:

Sidath Wettimuny
Thushira Radella
Prakash Schaffter
Ms. Avanthi Colombage

The Ministry also noted that veteran cricketers Roshan Mahanama and Kumar Sangakkara, who are key members of the committee, are currently overseas. Their official appointments will be formalised immediately upon their arrival in Sri Lanka.

The Cricket Transformation Committee has been mandated to oversee the administration and drive structural reforms within Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) in accordance with the powers vested in the Minister under the Sports Act No. 25 of 1973.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Three prison guards arrested following the death of an inmate

Published

on

By

(File pic)

Three prison guards attached to the Welikada Prison have been arrested by Borella Police following the death of an inmate on Monday (04).

 

 

Continue Reading

News

CJ urged to inquire into AKD’s remarks on May 25 court verdict

Published

on

CJ Surasena

‘Bar Association must reveal its stand’

Civil society group ‘Free Lawyers’ has requested Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena to probe whether political pressure was brought on a Magistrate, or a High Court Judge, in respect of an ongoing high profile case.

Speaking to The Island on behalf of ‘Free Lawyers,’ Rajith Keerthi Tennakoon said that they felt the urgent need to seek the CJ’s intervention, following the May Day declaration by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake that the verdict of a case that was heard on 30 April would be given on 25 May. Tennakoon said that addressing the NPP’s main May Day rally at Maharagama, the President asked the people to be ready to celebrate that verdict. The President couldn’t have said so if he hadn’t been aware of the impending verdict, Tennakoon said, while emphasising the responsibility on the part of the Bar Association to state its position on the issue.

‘Free Lawyers’ recently captured pubic attention following its exposure of the theft of USD 2.5 mn from the Treasury.

Responding to a query, Tennakoon said that on behalf of ‘Free Lawyers,’ Maithri Gunaratne, PC, on Monday, 4 April, wrote to both CJ Surasena and President of the Bar Association Rajeev Amarasuriya.

Alleging that President Dissanayake’s declaration caused immense harm to the independence of the judiciary and raised controversy over the judgement that would be given on 25 May, ‘Free Lawyers’ organisation also asked the CJ to inquire into whether the entire judicial process was under political pressure.

Tennakoon said that they expect the Bar Association to reveal its position on President Dissanayake’s statement. Tennakoon pointed out that during the May Day address, President Dissanayake made reference to 15 cases that were to be taken up during this month, whereas Transport, Highways and Urban Development Minister, as well as Leader of the House Bimal Rathnayake, mentioned nearly 10 names of politicians, both sitting and former lawmakers, to be summoned beginning, May.

Tennakoon said that the NPP appeared to have used May Day to counter growing accusations over the Colombo port container controversy, coal scam, Rs 13.2 bn NDB fraud and theft of USD 2.5 mn from the Treasury and USD 625,000 from the Sri Lanka Postal Service.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Trending