News
‘One-Country-One-Law’ PTF will serve no useful purpose – BASL
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) says no useful purpose would be served by the creation and appointment of the Presidential Task Force (PTF) to facilitate the implementation of the “One Law, One Country” concept. The BASL asserts that the proposed PTF would carry out the functions of many institutions established under the Constitution and the law, including Parliament and the Ministry of Justice.
The following is the text of the letter sent by the BASL to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa: “The Bar Association of Sri Lanka notes that Your Excellency has appointed a Presidential Task Force for One Country, One Law, by virtue of the powers vested under Article 33 of the Constitution.
“The proclamation published in the Gazette under the hand of the Secretary to the President states that the appointments are being made focusing on the fact that the administration of justice, its implementation and protection under the law should be fair by all as set out in the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. The proclamation notes that under fundamental rights that no citizen should be discriminated against in the eye of the law or meted out special treatment on grounds of nationality, religion, caste, or any other grounds. It further states that the implementation of the concept; ‘One Country, One Law’ within Sri Lanka is reflected as a methodology of ensuring nationally and internationally recognized humanitarian values and the fact that all citizens are treated alike in the eye of the law should be further ensured.
“The Task Force is required to make a study of the implementation of the concept; ‘One Country, One Law’ within Sri Lanka and to prepare draft legislation for the said purpose and to study the draft legislation that has already been prepared by the Ministry of Justice in relation to this subject and their appropriateness and to submit proposals for any amendments thereto.
“Your Excellency is no doubt aware that the preparation of draft legislation and the study of existing legislation are tasks of a serious nature involving several institutions of the State. Legislative power is one of the aspects of the sovereignty of the people.
“The Constitution itself provides a framework for the legislative process which is supplemented by other laws and by the Standing Orders of Parliament. There already exist within the framework of the Constitution, the law and Standing Orders and adequate mechanisms for this purpose.
“The Sectoral Oversight Committees of Parliament as well as Standing Committees and Select Committees which can be constituted as per the Standing Orders of Parliament, the Law Commission which is an institution established by law are among these mechanisms. In addition, during the last year the Ministry of Justice has appointed several committees to propose reforms to various laws.
“Whilst the Sectoral Oversight Committees are chaired by members of the legislature, the Law Commission is presided over by a senior President’s Counsel. Many of the Committees appointed by the Minister of Justice consist of senior members of the legal profession and of senior academics. Some of these Committees are chaired by Judges of the Superior Courts.
“Apart from these mechanisms, the Attorney General and his Department also play a key role in the law-making process and is recognized by the Constitution. Given that the Department of the Attorney General too plays a key role in this process, questions arise of the role the Task Force will play vis-a-vis the Attorney General and his officers.
“In these circumstances, the appointment of a Task Force to oversee the work of the Ministry of Justice is in view of the BASL improper and outside the accepted framework for lawmaking. Any alienation of what are properly functions of the duly elected legislators and proper legally mandated executive functionaries by relocating their functions elsewhere involves erosion of the Sovereignty of the People.
“The BASL further observes that the Task Force itself is not a representative body, given that it has no female representation nor representation from several ethnic groups and religious groups in the country. Serious doubts also exist as to the qualifications, expertise, and suitability of the Chairperson of the Task Force and of many of its members to engage in the functions described in the Gazette.
“Whilst there is no doubt that the concepts of equality, fairness, non-discrimination, the protection of the law and nationally and internationally recognized humanitarian values are all laudable principles, it is doubtful if the process set out in the Gazette and the creation of the Task Force can make any meaningful contribution in upholding these values.
“What is of utmost importance at present is that the State and the organs of the government including the Executive of which Your Excellency is the head, upholds the rule of law and moves to protect and safeguard the fundamental rights of the people as described in Article 4(d) of the Constitution. In fact, the best way to ensure the objectives set out in the proclamation are by upholding the rule of law and respecting the fundamental rights of the people.
“In the past few months, the BASL which is committed to the Rule of Law has drawn the attention of Your Excellency and to the Government on several instances where the Rule of Law and the Fundamental Rights of the people have been violated. However, the BASL notes with regret that no remedial measures have been taken in this regard.
In the above circumstances the BASL is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by the creation and appointment of the aforesaid Task Force, which in view of the BASL would usurp the functions of many institutions established under the Constitution and the law, including Parliament and the Ministry of Justice.”
News
Creditor receives USD 2.5 mn as Lankan public bears loss from theft of Treasury funds
Amidst ongoing accusations that the theft of USD 2.5 mn (nearly 1 bn Rupees) from the Treasury hadn’t been properly investigated, The Island learns that the relevant payments had been made to the actual creditor on the instructions of the Finance Ministry.
Confirming the inquiries made by us, authoritative sources said that payments had been made to several accounts through the US banks. Earlier, Sri Lanka released funds to fake foreign accounts in spite of warnings regarding the suspicions about the process.
The funds were part of a bilateral debt repayment to Australia with a settlement due in September 2025. The payment was part of a $ 22.9 million debt settlement.
The lapses occurred in the wake of far reaching changes regarding the debt management functions. In terms of a particular condition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Sri Lanka’s debt management functions that had been previously handled by the Central Bank were transferred to a new institution established under the General Treasury—the Public Debt Management Office (PDMO).
Sources said that regardless of the loss of USD 2.5 mn, Sri Lanka couldn’t have defaulted and therefore payments had been made.
Sources who closely followed the issue said that the government owed an explanation and public apology regarding the loss of USD 2.5 mn and how fresh payments were made.
Sources said that the USD 2.5 mn paid to fake accounts had been lost and could never be traced. CoPF Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva has said that the NPP government has told the IMF that stolen USD 2.5 mn would be recovered from the public by introducing an amendment to the budget.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Former Minister Nalin raises defence of double jeopardy
The Court of Appeal yesterday (18) postponed until June 25 the hearing of a petition filed by former Minister Nalin Fernando seeking the dismissal of an indictment brought against him by the Attorney General in connection with the controversial ‘Carrom Boards’ case.
The petition was taken up before a bench comprising Justices P. Kumararatnam and Pradeep Hettiarachchi.
Appearing for the petitioner, President’s Counsel Ali Sabry, instructed by Attorney-at-Law Ramzi Bacha, informed court that Fernando had already been convicted and sentenced to 30 years rigorous imprisonment in a case instituted by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arising from the same incident.
Counsel argued that the Attorney General had subsequently filed a separate case based on the same set of charges and maintained that subjecting an accused person to a second prosecution for the same offence was contrary to law.
He submitted that preliminary objections on the issue had been raised before the Colombo High Court but were dismissed by the trial judge.
The petitioner has therefore sought a declaration from the Court of Appeal that the indictment filed by the Attorney General is unlawful and requested that the charges be set aside.
The court directed that the matter be called again on June 25, when the Attorney General is expected to present submissions on the petition.
The case stems from allegations that during the 2015 presidential election campaign, 14,000 carrom boards and 11,000 checkers boards were imported and distributed through Lanka Sathosa outlets for allocation to political offices of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, resulting in an estimated loss of Rs. 39 million to the State.
Based on those allegations, the Attorney General has instituted proceedings against Fernando before the Colombo High Court under the Public Property Act.
News
UNP asks whether govt. obtained findings of FBI probe into 2019 Easter Sunday carnage
The UNP yesterday called on the government to clarify whether it had sought access to evidence and documents gathered during a United States investigation into the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.
In a statement, the UNP has recalled that then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe requested the U.S. government to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the attacks immediately after they occurred, citing limitations in local investigative capacity. A similar request was also made during a telephone conversation with then U.S. President Donald Trump on April 22, 2019, the statement said.
According to the UNP, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subsequently carried out an extensive investigation in collaboration with Sri Lankan agencies, including the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Military Intelligence and the State Intelligence Service. The findings were later submitted to the Sri Lankan authorities and accepted by the relevant institutions.
The party noted that FBI Special Agent Merrilee R. Godwin had filed a 71-page affidavit before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in November 2020 following a two-year investigation. A criminal case was later instituted in Los Angeles naming suspects who had already been taken into custody in Sri Lanka.
Pointing out that material collected during the U.S. investigation remains in the possession of the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, the UNP has asked the government whether it formally requested access to those records after reopening investigations into the attacks.
The UNP has stressed the importance of making the documents available to Sri Lankan judicial authorities, arguing that they could assist efforts to establish the full circumstances surrounding the Easter Sunday attacks.
-
News4 days agoRelease of 2025 O/L results likely to be delayed
-
Sports4 days agoTharanga set for high-profile javelin clash in Ostrava
-
Features5 days agoPolitics of protected species
-
News3 days agoBeijing Capital Airlines to resume flights to Colombo signalling boost to tourism
-
News4 days agoTheft of USD 2.5 mn from Treasury: CoPF accused of complicity in NPP cover-up
-
News6 days agoCommonwealth lawyers urge Lanka to uphold rule of law
-
Opinion4 days agoDecoding Trump’s 12.5% “Forced Labor Tariff” on Sri Lanka
-
Features2 days agoKilling of Colombo’s ancient trees — a warning on UN’s World Desertification Day – 17 June
