Connect with us

News

Easter carnage: One of those who allegedly failed to prevent it, turns state witness

Published

on

‘We still do not know what had happened to Sarah’

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Director General, Legal Affairs at the Presidential Secretariat, Attorney-at-Law Harigupta Rohanadeera Monday night (30) revealed that former Director of the State Intelligence Service (SIS) Senior DIG Nilantha Jayawardena would be a key witness in the State’s 2019 Easter Sunday case against former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando as well as then IGP Pujith Jayasundera.

Rohanadeera also made reference to another case also in the High Court, in which Jayawardena would be a major witness. The top Presidential Secretariat official said so appearing on Salakuna live TV programme, a nearly two-hour interview telecast on Hiru.

Rohanadeera explained how a person against whom accusations had been made become a State witness. The panel of journalists comprised Chamuditha Samarawickrema, Madushan de Silva and Kalindu Vidanage. The explanation was provided when the panel of journalists pointed out the failure on the part of the then government to thwart the suicide bombings in spite of specific intelligence received from India, regarding impending attacks.

Eight separate blasts, including three targeting churches at Katuwapitiya, Colombo Kochchikade and Batticaloa claimed the lives of 270 and wounded over 400.

The Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) Final Report, Vol. 1-p 287-288 handed over to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa in Feb 2021 recommended to the Attorney General criminal proceedings against SDIG Jayawardena “under any suitable provision in the Penal Code”

At the onset of the interview, Rohanadeera acknowledged that he was the first DG, Legal Affairs, at the Presidential Secretariat and his responsibilities included examination of international agreements.

Responding to growing criticism that the incumbent government had reneged on repeated assurances of punitive action against all responsible regardless of their status, Rohanadeera emphasised that action couldn’t be taken only on the basis of PCoI recommendations. The panel of journalists asked why the government justified the inordinate delay in taking tangible action against former President Maithripala Sirisena, who also held the Defence portfolio as well as the then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. The panel of journalists pointed out that the PCoI had clearly commented that then Premier Wickremesinghe’s soft approach towards extremism facilitated the Easter attacks.

The panel of journalists also sought Rohanadeera’s response to Church’s accusation that the government sought to protect Sirisena, now a member of the ruling SLPP representing the Polonnaruwa district.

Pointing out that lawmaker Sirisena in terms of 35.1 of the Constitution enjoyed immunity to a certain extent, Rohanadeera stressed that it would be the prerogative of the Attorney General to move court against those who had been named by the P CoI. Rohanadeera repeatedly explained how findings made by the P CoI may not be sufficient in a criminal case.

Commenting on the continuing controversy over the fate of Pulasthini Rajendran alias Sarah Jesmine, the wife of Katuwapitiya bomber Hastun, Rohanadeera insisted the government wasn’t aware of what really happened to her though aware of her presence at Sainthamaruthu at the time the military surrounded their hideout about a week after the April 21, 2019 blasts. The panel of journalists pressed Rohanadeera over claims by Opposition lawmakers based on statements made by law enforcement officers regarding Sarah Jasmine managing to secure refuge in India having fled the country in a boat.

Responding to former Attorney General Dappula de Livera’s claim that the Easter Sunday carnage was a grand conspiracy, Rohanadeera questioned the rationale in that particular statement as he could have dealt with the so-called grand conspiracy during his tenure as the AG. Rohanadeera pointed out that the former AG made the claim just two days before his retirement in May this year. Rohanadeera asserted that the former AG could give a statement to the CID in that regard and, the police too could seek clarification from the former Chief Legal Officer of the government.

Rohanadeera dealt with the deterioration of national security in the wake of Maithripala Sirisena’s triumph at the 2015 presidential election. Having described the yahapalana administration an abnormality, Rohanadeera asserted that handing over the government to the UNP with just 40 odd members of parliament was constitutionally flawed. Rohanadeera recalled how the then CJ was unceremoniously sent home by PM Wickremesinghe who just commanded 40 odd lawmakers. Reference was also made to the power struggle between the yahapalana President and the Prime Minister, Treasury bond scams perpetrated in 2015 and 2016 and the failure on the part of the AG’s Department to advice the Terrorist Investigation Department (TID) as regards Zahran Hashim in the run-up to the Easter blasts. Rohanadeera declined to comment on the conduct of the officers of the AG’s Department.

The panel of journalists raised the negligence on the part of State Counsel Malik Azeez and Deputy Solicitor General Azad Navavi on the basis of the recommendations made by the PCoI. The P CoI recommended the Public Service Commission (PSC) consider disciplinary action against both.

Samarawickrema reminded how the then government arrested DIG Nalaka Silva who sought the AG’s advice regarding Zahran Hashim over unsubstantiated accusations made by Namal Kumara regarding an alleged plot to assassinate President Sirisena and wartime Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

Rohanadeera also explained how the government addressed contentious issues on the basis of the P CoI recommendations that largely dealt with two areas and the Sectoral Oversight Committee chaired by MP Malith Jayatilleke during the previous administration. Responding to a spate of questions regarding the suspicious conduct of the SIS and Directorate of Military Intelligence and direct links between Zahran Hashim and some of his followers with the intelligence services before the change of government in 2015, Rohanadeera emphasised those who propagated various theories and gave credence to unsubstantiated accusations were not aware of the whole picture. Rohanadeera explained intelligence services followed various strategies therefore it wouldn’t be fair to judge them on wrongful assumptions and misinterpretations of events.

Asked whether the Easter Sunday carnage was meant to facilitate SLPP candidate Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s victory at the 2019 presidential poll, Rohanadeera dismissed such claims declaring that it was a blatant lie. Referring to the SLPP’s unprecedented victory at the Feb 2018 Local Government polls, Rohanadeera declared that the then administration was so unpopular as a result of Treasury bond scams and political turmoil the presidential poll victory was already a foregone conclusion.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Removing monk’s robes matter for Sangha to decide: Mahanayake Theras

Published

on

Ven. Gnanasara

The Mahanayaka Theras of all Nikayas have protested against Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who is serving a prison sentence for contempt of court, being produced before court in civilian attire.

In a letter to the Commissioner General of Prisons, the Mahanayaka Theras have said they were surprised and concerned by the decision to remove the monk’s robes.

The letter has been signed by Most Ven. Thibbotuwawe Sri Siddhartha Sumangala Thera of the Malwatu Chapter, Most Ven. Warakagoda Sri Gnanarathana Thera of the Asgiri Chapter, Most Ven. Karagoda-Uyangoda Maithri Murthi Thera of the Amarapura Maha Nikaya and Most Ven. Makulawe Sri Wimala Thera of the Ramanna Maha Nikaya.

The Mahanayaka Theras have said they respect the Constitution and the judicial process, but maintained that removing a monk’s robes or ending his status as a member of the Buddhist Order is a matter that should be decided by the Maha Sangha.

They have said the relevant Sangha Council has not determined that Ven. Gnanasara Thera committed a Parajika offence or any other offence warranting his removal from the Buddhist Order.

The Mahanayaka Theras have also referred to Regulation 550 of the Prison Standing Orders, which they say stipulates that convicted prisoners should not be taken to court in prison uniform and should be allowed to wear the type of clothing they normally wore before their conviction. In the case of a Buddhist monk, they have said, this means his monastic robes.

They also referred to the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which provide for prisoners taken outside prison to be allowed to wear their own clothing or other unobtrusive clothing.

The Mahanayaka Theras have requested the Commissioner General of Prisons to allow Ven. Gnanasara Thera to wear his robes when appearing in court and to maintain his status as a monk while he remains in prison.

Prisons authorities have said that the clothing decision was made under prison regulations, and the Prisons Department has stated that prisoners serving sentences of more than three years are required to wear prison-issued clothing when produced before court.

Continue Reading

News

NDB fraud Rs 60mn more than reported

Published

on

The Committee on Public Finance has said that the actual losses suffered by the NDB bank are much more than what was initially reported. When compared with the initial disclosure made by NDB on 6 April 2026, the reported amount of the fraud had increased by Rs. 0.4 billion, from Rs. 13.2 billion to Rs. 13.6 billion, the committee said.

When compared with the amount disclosed by NDB on 26 June 2026, based on the interim report dated 22 June 2026, the additional amount of fraud is Rs. 60 million.

The has committee issued the following statement: The Committee on Public Finance recently summoned officials of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka to Parliament to inquire into the financial irregularities identified at NDB Bank and the final audit report relating to the matter.

The Committee meeting, chaired by Member of Parliament Dr. Harsha de Silva, discussed irregularities identified in NDB Bank’s financial statements, shortcomings in the audit process, and the relevant audit reports.

The meeting was attended by Deputy Ministers Chathuranga Abeysinghe, Dr. Kaushalya Ariyaratne, and Nishantha Jayaweera, as well as Members of Parliament Attorney-at-Law Rauff Hakeem, Ravi Karunanayake, Ajith Agalakada, Nimal Palihena, Wijesiri Basnayake, M.K.M. Aslam, Champika Hettiarachchi, and Attorney-at-Law Lakmali Hemachandra.

The Committee also focused on the findings of the investigation conducted by the Sri Lanka Accounting and Auditing Standards Monitoring Board (SLAAMB), as well as the findings revealed through the investigation conducted by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP. In particular, the Committee inquired into the failure of the external auditors to identify irregularities in NDB Bank’s financial statements.

The accountability of senior management with regard to corporate governance and risk management in relation to the financial irregularities was also discussed.

As a significant proportion of NDB Bank’s shares are held by institutions representing public and state funds, the Committee also considered the potential impact of such financial irregularities on public funds and the general public.

The Committee also discussed the progress made by LankaPay in establishing a centralized fraud monitoring system to prevent fraud within the financial system. The need to strengthen fraud monitoring systems at the individual bank level to monitor transactions carried out within each bank was also emphasized.

Accordingly, the following observations are included in the final audit report concerning the financial irregularities at NDB Bank:

1. The audit covers the period from 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2026. The audit report specifically identifies the financial impact arising from fraudulent transactions amounting to Rs. 13,639,664,684 (Rs. 13.6 billion).

2. According to the disclosure made on 29 September 2026, the financial impact arising from the fraudulent transactions is as follows:

· Rs. 1.5 billion for the period prior to 1 January 2025;

· Rs. 9.6 billion during 2025; and

· Rs. 2.5 billion for the quarter ended 31 March 2026.

3. Compared with the initial disclosure made by NDB on 6 April 2026, the reported amount of the fraud has increased by Rs. 0.4 billion, from Rs. 13.2 billion to Rs. 13.6 billion. Compared with the amount disclosed by NDB on 26 June 2026, based on the interim report dated 22 June 2026, the additional amount of fraud is Rs. 60 million.

4. The final audit report has also confirmed the previous disclosures that no customer accounts were affected as a result of the fraud incident.

5. The report has identified several governance failures at NDB relating to the processing of CEFT transactions, user-level activities within the Core Banking System, and the management of user credentials and access information. In addition, shortcomings have been identified in several operational areas, including transaction monitoring, daily account reconciliation, financial compliance, internal audit, branch network management, and operational risk management.

The audit report has made comprehensive recommendations to strengthen the control mechanisms, governance structures, and processes relating to the above-mentioned activities of the bank.

Continue Reading

News

President orders review of laws on treatment of imprisoned monks

Published

on

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has ordered the formation of a committee to review the laws and regulations on how Buddhist monks serving prison sentences are treated, including the procedures that apply when they are taken out of prison.

He revealed this at a special meeting with Maha Sangha representatives held yesterday (8) at the Presidential Secretariat. The meeting was called after concerns were raised over how Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera was treated when he was taken from prison to court.

The committee will recommend amendments to existing laws and, where needed, new prison standing orders and regulations. Its members will be drawn from the Attorney General’s Department, the Ministries of Justice, Public Administration, and Buddha Sasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs, and the Department of Prisons, including the Commissioner General of Prisons. It has been given two weeks to review the current legal provisions and submit its recommendations. The President added that any changes specific to Buddhist monks would be made in consultation with the Maha Sangha.

Outlining the legal background, the President said prison administration was governed by the Prisons Ordinance of 1877, along with the regulations and standing orders issued under it. That framework mostly addressed prisoners in general, he said, and had few provisions dealing specifically with Buddhist monks.

The meeting was attended by senior Maha Sangha members representing the Siyam, Amarapura and Ramanna Nikayas, along with Minister of Buddhasasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs Hiniduma Sunil Senevi and Minister of Justice Harshana Nanayakkara.

Continue Reading

Trending