News
‘War crimes’: Not only individuals but also entire fighting divisions ‘blacklisted’ – Foreign Minister
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Foreign Minister, Ali Sabry, PC, yesterday (05) said entire fighting divisions which had been deployed on the Vanni front during Eelam War IV (2006-2009) had been ‘blacklisted’ on the basis of findings made by the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).
Minister Sabry called it a move to tarnish Sri Lanka’s image. He said so when The Island asked him how President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s government intended to counter an attempt by a section of the international community to adopt punitive measures against senior military personnel such as Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka, MP, Chief of Defence Staff General Shavendra Silva, and Maj. Gen. (retd.), Chagie Gallage, on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations.
The issue came up at a media briefing called by the Foreign Ministry to explain the current state of affairs with the focus on staff-level agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) with regard to USD 2.9 bn loan facility and the forthcoming Geneva sessions.
Minister Sabry will lead the delegation for the 51 sessions next week. Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, PC will be among the delegates.
Foreign Secretary Aruni Wijewardane, a retired member of the Sri Lanka Foreign Service, too, responded to some of the issues raised by the media.
Minister Sabry said that in addition to the individuals mentioned, the entire Divisions had been targeted. The President’s Counsel also made reference to obstacles faced by the military in undertaking missions under UN command due to unsubstantiated allegations directed at them.
When The Island questioned the reluctance on the part of the Foreign Ministry to properly defend the war winning armed forces, particularly the inordinate delay in exploiting disclosures made by Lord Naseby in the UK House of Lords, Minister Sabry emphasized that the ministry hadn’t been hesitant. The Minister explained that they had addressed this issue at different levels.
An explanation was also sought as to why UN accusations pertaining to the massacre of as many as 40,000 Tamil civilians on the Vanni east front couldn’t be countered on the basis of exposed classified UK diplomatic dispatches.
Lord Naseby made the shocking disclosure in the House of Lords in Oct 2017.
Asked whether the US denied visa to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa over his role as the wartime Defence Secretary, Minister Sabry said that he was not aware of such a situation.
President Gotabaya Rajapaksa had to seek shelter in Male in mid-July before flying to Thailand after the US refused to issue him a visa. Responding to another query, Minister Sabry said that he didn’t inquire from the former President about the circumstances he was denied the visa.
Responding to other print and electronic media, the former Justice Minister stressed that Sri Lanka was ready to form a Truth Seeking Commission to address the grievances of those who suffered during the conflict. The President’s Counsel said there was a responsibility on the part of the government to ensure that the armed forces, too, get an opportunity to answer accusations directed at them.
Minister Sabry reiterated the stand taken by his predecessor Prof. G. L. Peiris that whatever the solution that couldn’t be outside the Constitution under any circumstances. The minister stressed that President Wickremesinghe’s government was prepared to set up a domestic mechanism (Truth Seeking Commission) in line with the Constitution.
Minister Sabry said that an external mechanism established to gather evidence pertaining to alleged war crimes was not acceptable to Sri Lanka.
At the onset of the briefing, Minister Sabry explained that the staff level agreement with the IMF entirely depended on the success in working out debt restructuring plan with Sri Lanka’s creditors. Referring to President Wickremesinghe policy statement and the interim budget, Minister Sabry explained measures taken by the government to improve the ground situation.
The Foreign Minister strongly defended measures taken by President Wickremesinghe to restore law and order. Acknowledging that those who had been struggling to make ends meet launched street protests, Minister Sabry alleged that certain elements exploited the situation. The failure to take countermeasures would have plunged the country into a vicious circle of violence, Minister Sabry said, alleging a section of the foreign media of giving only one sided story.
Minister Sabry said that if the anarchic situation was allowed to continue we would have ended up like Libya, Iraq or Venezuela. In spite of them having quite extensive natural resources, they still couldn’t recover as their institutions had been destroyed, the minister said.
Latest News
Sun directly overhead Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura at about 12.10 noon today (31)
The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from 28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.
The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (31) are Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura about 12.10 noon.
News
BASL takes exception to Justice Ganepola being denied a place in SC
… highlights injustice caused to Justice R. Gurusinghe
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has alleged that due to the failure on the part of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to fill the existing vacancies in the Supreme Court, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled. The BASL pointed out at the time of Ganepola’s retirement there were four vacancies in the Supreme Court.
In a letter dated 17 August, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake, the BASL declared that the failure to promote and recognise Ganepola’s distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.
A top BASL spokesman told The Island yesterday (30) that the Bar Council, over the weekend, had decided to release the hitherto confidential letter.
The official said that they also wanted to remind the President of his assurance given to BASL, on 12 August, 2026, that vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal would be filled as soon as possible, within a month.
The following is the text of the BASL letter, signed by Rajeev Amarasuriya, President, BASL, and its Secretary Nalin De Silva: “We write further to our letters dated 29th December 2025 and 30th June 2026 in relation to the above, to which we have not received any response.
We also refer to our meeting with Your Excellency on 12th August. As discussed during the meeting, there have been vacancies in the Supreme Court since May 2025, and the number of vacancies has now increased to four (04). There are also four (04) vacancies in the Court of Appeal. These are all matters we have already written to Your Excellency about.
Your Excellency informed the BASL Delegation when we met that you would be taking steps to make recommendations to fill these vacancies as soon as possible, within a month.
We write to reiterate the importance of giving due consideration to the criteria set out in our aforesaid letter dated 29th December 2025. We also wish to emphasise that, in making judicial appointments and promotions, seniority should be given due priority, in keeping with longstanding practice, until such time there are objective and defensible guidelines governing the assessment of merit.
The only justifiable departure to this criterion would be where there exists a specific and recognized demerit in respect of the particular Judge concerned or such other known compelling circumstances that are objectively identifiable such as where a Judge has previously been overlooked for promotion unfairly or conversely, where a Judge has been unfairly previously granted promotions above others.
This approach will safeguard both the integrity of the Judiciary and the trust reposed in it by the public.
Further, while there has been considerable discussion and representation by the Government regarding the importance of retaining experienced judges, as reminded to Your Excellency at our said meeting that, only a few months ago on 8th May 2026, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled, and in which there were four vacancies at the time.
The failure to promote and recognise his distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.
We also drew Your Excellency’s attention at the said meeting to the fact that the Senior-most Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice R. Gurusinghe, who joined the Judicial Service in 1996, who also Acted in the Office of President of the Court of Appeal (appointed by Your Excellency) on 11th May 2026, is due to retire at the end of this month. In fact, we learnt through the Media that Her Ladyship then Chief Justice Justice Murdu Fernando, PC, had previously in July 2025 recommended to Your Excellency the promotion of Justice R. Gurusinghe to the Supreme Court, but the same is pending from that time.
He too is well deserving of promotion to the Supreme Court and has already been recommended by the former Chief Justice, and his case must also receive due and urgent consideration before his impending retirement.
We hope that Your Excellency will take due note of and give due regard to the concerns of the Bar, as well as to the established principles, practices and conventions governing judicial appointments, when taking steps to fill these vacancies.
On this, Your Excellency is already open to the accusation that these vacancies have been kept open, to fill with favourites of the Government which is yet another serious indictment on the independence of the judiciary which accusation would be confirmed if recommendations are made outside established practice.
Moreover, the BASL expresses grave concern that withholding promotions of Judicial Officers for extended periods of time places undue pressure on Judicial Officers in the discharge of their duties and constitutes both directly and indirectly, interference with the independence of the Judiciary, in addition to the strain obviously caused to the dispensation of justice in other Courts and the stifling and delay of career progression of Judges legitimately entitled to promotions.
We do hope that Your Excellency would take due note and cognizance of the foregoing when effecting these judicial promotions which have been long overdue and which have already adversely impacted the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration of justice.”
The BASL has copied the letter to Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and all members of the Constitutional Council.
News
Sajith challenges govt. to hold PC polls
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa on Saturday (29) challenged the government to hold the long-delayed Provincial Council elections, saying the polls would provide an opportunity to gauge the level of public support enjoyed by the administration.
Addressing a farmers’ meeting in Tissamaharama, Hambantota, Premadasa also criticised the latest Rs. 17 per kilogram increase in wheat flour prices, warning that it would push up the prices of bread, bakery products and other flour-based food items and place further pressure on households already struggling with the rising cost of living.
He said Sri Lanka ranked 120th among 130 countries in an international comparison of minimum wages, arguing that wages remained inadequate to meet the escalating cost of living.
Premadasa also questioned official assessments of living standards, asking whether a person could survive for an entire month on Rs. 17,315, a figure he attributed to the Department of Census and Statistics.
He claimed that between 30 and 40 percent of the population was living in poverty and called for a clear programme to help affected families improve their economic conditions.
Turning to the proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which seeks to increase the retirement age of superior court judges, the Opposition Leader accused the government of attempting to undermine judicial independence and interfere with democratic institutions.
He also criticised the government’s handling of poverty, employment, agriculture, healthcare and investment, saying more effective measures were needed to provide relief to people facing economic hardships.Premadasa called for stronger policies to attract foreign direct investment and urged the government to formulate a national strategy for developing the tourism industry.
-
News6 days agoMissing doctor’s body found in Mahiyanganaya
-
News6 days agoAustralia declines to release Finance Secy Suriyapperuma’s citizenship details
-
News3 days agoEight politicians in drug kingpin probe
-
News6 days ago22A: BASL suggests CJ recuse himself from hearing petitions
-
Features2 days ago“Wrap Me Up in My Blazer”— A Gentlemanly Bradby Reminiscence
-
Business4 days agoSri Lanka opens up: A new season of direct connectivity
-
Features3 days agoRedefining ageing in Sri Lanka
-
Features5 days agoInsights from Chieftains of Uva: Genealogy of two Kandyan Families – Part II
