Connect with us

News

Violence: HRW urges world to pressure Sri Lanka to respect fundamental freedoms

Published

on

The Human Rights Watch (HRW) has urged foreign governments and international institutions, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, which are offering assistance, to address Sri Lanka’s economic crisis, to insist that the government respect fundamental freedoms.

The following is the text of a New York date-lined statement issued by HRW on May 10: Clashes broke out in Sri Lanka on May 9, 2022 after government supporters attacked peaceful anti-government protest sites in Colombo, the capital, and elsewhere. The government should uphold the right to peaceful protest, ensure that the security force response to public disorder is proportionate and rejects excessive force, and promptly investigate and appropriately prosecute acts of violence.

Several hundred people, identifying themselves as supporters of Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, arrived by bus, in Colombo, on May 9, and advanced to the Galle Face Green, where protesters, calling for the resignation of the government, have been peacefully camped for several weeks. Witness accounts and video footage show government supporters attacking the protesters with clubs and other weapons and setting fire to tents. Hours later, Mahinda Rajapaksa resigned as Prime Minister.

“The attack on peaceful protesters by Sri Lankan government supporters has sparked a dangerous escalation, increasing the risk of further deadly violence and other abuses,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia Director at Human Rights Watch. “It is vitally important for the security forces to fully respect the right to peaceful assembly, and for those responsible for violence to be held to account.”

Kasumi Ranasinghe Arachchige, a protester who was at Galle Face Green, when the attack occurred, said that police forces at the scene, which included a water cannon truck, “retreated” when government supporters attacked protesters with knives and sticks. “They [government supporters] started destroying everything,” she said, describing damage to tents and other facilities, including temporary showers and a small library. “It seemed as if they knew what and who to look for.”

Over 150 people have been reported injured and at least five dead in different incidents, including the attack on Galle Face Green, and the government has imposed a nationwide curfew. The Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka and the Bar Association, as well as foreign diplomats, condemned the attack on protesters and called for an impartial investigation.

In recent months, Sri Lanka’s economic crisis has provoked widespread protests calling for political reform and for the resignation of the President, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, and his brother Mahinda, the Prime Minister. On April 1, President Rajapaksa imposed a State of Emergency, lifting it five days later. The government reimposed a State of Emergency on May 6 after police fired teargas and arrested students protesting near Parliament, which was adjourned until May 17. Although the protests have been overwhelmingly peaceful, the police fatally shot a protester on April 19, and on several occasions have used teargas and water cannon against protesters. The authorities have made numerous arrests and repeatedly imposed curfews.

Following the attack on the protesters’ camp at the Galle Face Green, there were numerous violent incidents in Colombo and elsewhere in the country, including clashes between government supporters and anti-government protesters, and attacks on the property of ruling party politicians. In Nittambuwa, 50 kilometers from Colombo, police said that Amarakeerthi Athukorala, a government member of Parliament, opened fire on protesters blocking his car, wounding one and killing another, then fatally shot himself.

Concerned governments and international institutions, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, which are offering assistance to address the country’s economic crisis, should insist that the government respect fundamental freedoms, Human Rights Watch said.

The latest State of Emergency was imposed on May 6, but the government did not immediately publish the emergency regulations laying out the special powers assumed. Under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Sri Lanka is a party, certain rights may be derogated, or restricted, under a State of Emergency, while other rights, including the right to life and prohibition of torture, may not under any circumstances be limited. Any derogation must be limited and proportionate. Foreign governments, including the United States and Canada, as well as the European Union, have questioned President Rajapaksa’s decision to assume emergency powers.

Sri Lanka has a poor record under successive administrations of investigating and prosecuting countless grave violations of human rights. During a previous government between 2005 and 2010, Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Mahinda Rajapaksa, as well as other senior figures in the current administration, were implicated in the killing and enforced disappearance of journalists and political activists and in numerous war crimes during the civil war that ended in May 2009.

“In recent weeks, thousands of Sri Lankans have peacefully protested against corruption and called for accountable governance and respect for human rights,” Ganguly said. “Pro-government supporters have responded to those calls with violence, which those in authority need to stop.”



News

Questions raised over Govt.’s U-turn on Indian digital ID deal

Published

on

Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa

Questions were raised yesterday over the government’s move to award Sri Lanka’s proposed digital identity card project to an Indian company despite strong objections previously voiced by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake while in the Opposition.

National Trade Union and Civil Front Convener Specialist Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa, addressing a media briefing in Colombo, called on the Government to immediately clarify reports on the tender process and the alleged involvement of a foreign company in handling sensitive biometric data of Sri Lankan citizens.

Dr. Sanjeewa claimed that the project involved the collection of highly sensitive personal information, including fingerprints, iris scans and other biometric details, warning that transferring such data to an external entities posed serious national security and privacy risks.

“The world today runs on data,” he said,recalling statements previously made in Parliament by President Dissanayake himself when he was in the Opposition. According to Dr. Sanjeewa, the President had at the time expressed serious reservations over foreign involvement in the digital identity card initiative and warned of the dangers of surrendering citizens’ data to outside parties.

However, Dr. Sanjeewa alleged that the current administration was now proceeding with the same project and taking steps to award the contract to a selected Indian company.

He further asked whether the tender had been awarded to a company previously linked to controversial transactions and alleged tax-related irregularities in Sri Lanka, claiming that investigative reports had identified the firm as a “questionable” entity.

Dr. Sanjeewa warned that data trafficking had emerged as one of the world’s most lucrative illegal industries and stressed that any misuse of biometric data could have irreversible consequences for national security.

He also argued that Sri Lanka possessed sufficient technical expertise to implement the project independently through local professionals and institutions.

Claiming that the overall project value exceeded Rs. 40 billion, Dr. Sanjeewa urged the Government to make an official statement clarifying the tender process, the identity of the selected company and the safeguards in place to protect citizens’ personal data.

By Chaminda Silva

Continue Reading

News

Ex-SriLankan Chief faces arrest warrant over unsuitable sureties

Published

on

Colombo Chief Magistrate Asanga S. Bodaragama yesterday issued a warrant for the arrest of former SriLankan Airlines Chief Executive Officer Kapila Chandrasena over alleged violations of court-imposed bail conditions in connection with the production of allegedly unsuitable sureties.

The move came after the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) requested the court to revoke Chandrasena’s bail and remand him until the conclusion of trial, arguing that the conditions under which bail was granted had been breached.

The Commission told court that two individuals produced as sureties for Chandrasena were later found to be unsuitable and had allegedly been presented in a manner that undermined the court’s trust.

The matter was taken up when a motion seeking the issuance of a warrant to arrest and produce Chandrasena was called before Magistrate Bodaragama. Chandrasena had earlier been released on bail in connection with the controversial 2013 procurement of a fleet of 10 Airbus aircraft for SriLankan Airlines.

Meanwhile, Additional Magistrate Lahiru Silva remanded two suspects, identified as Mohamed Rizwan and Mohamed Irshan, until May 13 after they were produced by Keselwatte Police in connection with furnishing sureties for Chandrasena.

Police told court that the two men, residents of Sanchi Arachchiwatte near the Hulftsdorp court complex, had acted as sureties in exchange for Rs. 15,000 each despite having no personal connection to the accused.

Continue Reading

News

SC orders EC to conduct elections for Kalmunai MC and Sainthamaruthu UC

Published

on

The Supreme Court yesterday directed the Election Commission to take necessary steps in accordance with the law to conduct elections for the Kalmunai Municipal Council and the Sainthamaruthu Urban Council.

A three-judge bench comprising Janak de Silva, Priyantha Fernando and Sampath Abayakoon delivered the ruling in a Fundamental Rights petition filed by two residents of Sainthamaruthu.

The petitioners said they were residents within the Sainthamaruthu Urban Council area and the area had not been included in a 2020 gazette notification calling for nominations for the local government elections. They contended that the omission amounted to a violation of their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

In its judgment, the Court also directed the President, represented by the Attorney General, to issue a gazette notification specifying the number of wards, their boundaries, names, numbers or alphabetical designations assigned to each ward, based on recommendations of the National Committee for the Kalmunai Municipal Council and the Sainthamaruthu Urban Council.

The Court held that such steps were necessary to ensure that the electoral process proceeded in accordance with the legal framework governing local government elections.

Counsel Suren Gnanaraj appeared with Rashmi Dias for the petitioners.

Continue Reading

Trending