Connect with us

Foreign News

Trump hush money trial: Michael Cohen admits to stealing

Published

on

Former President Donald Trump attends his New York hush-money trial on May 20 at the Manhattan Criminal Court (Aljazeera)

Disbarred lawyer Michael Cohen has completed his testimony before a New York criminal courtroom, as the case against his boss, former United States President Donald Trump,  approaches its likely end.

Monday marked Cohen’s fourth and final day on the witness stand.  His words were the last witness testimony the prosecution called before resting its case.

Now, the trial shifts towards the defence, as it seeks to rebut allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal a hush-money payment to a former adult film actress – and thereby bolster his chances in the 2016 presidential election.

In October 2016, Cohen transferred $130,000 to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels to buy her silence about an affair she alleged she had with then-candidate Trump.

Cohen has maintained that he made the payment at Trump’s command, and that Trump then reimbursed the payment through surreptitious means, filing it under “legal expenses”.

But on Cohen’s last day on the stand, the defence sought to puncture that narrative, attacking Cohen’s credibility by drawing attention to instances where he lied and stole.

The defence has consistently maintained that Trump had nothing to do with the payment. Trump himself has denied any wrongdoing and refuted Daniels’s allegation of an affair.

Day 19 of the New York hush-money trial also marked the start of a short week. Not only is the witness list for the defence expected to be relatively brief, but the court is scheduled to break early this week, to accommodate the Memorial Day holiday in the US.

Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the case. Here are the takeaways from Cohen’s final day of testimony.

Donald Trump points with a finger as he speaks outside the Manhattan courtroom.

Former President Donald Trump told reporters outside the Manhattan Criminal Court on Monday that the prosecution has ‘no case’ (Aljazeera)

Cohen admits to stealing from Trump Organization

Before ending its cross-examination of Cohen on Monday, the defence landed a significant blow to his credibility, getting him to admit that he had stolen $30,000 from Trump’s namesake company.

Defence lawyer Todd Blanche asked Cohen outright: “You stole from the Trump Organization, right?”

Cohen offered his standard response, “Yes, sir.”

The theft came after Cohen hired the technology company Red Finch to help boost Trump’s numbers in an online poll from CNBC, ranking the best businessmen of the past half-century.

Cohen testified that Trump was “upset” that he had landed towards the bottom of the poll. By hiring Red Finch, Cohen explained that he and Trump could manipulate the poll: The tech company would cast false votes on Trump’s behalf using different IP addresses.

Red Finch was originally slated to be paid $50,000 for its services, Cohen explained.  But he told the jury that he instead paid Red Finch $20,000 to “placate” its owner and then pocketed the rest, after Trump decided to reduce his holiday bonus.  “I was angered because of the reduction in the bonus, and so I just felt like it was self-help,” Cohen said.

Blanche pressed the issue during his cross-examination: “Have you paid back the Trump Organization the money you stole from them?”

“No, sir,” Cohen said.

Trump’s entourage in the courtroom took the admission as a major coup for his defence.

“This just got interesting: Michael Cohen is now admitting to stealing money from our company,” Trump’s second son Eric posted on social media.

Kash Patel, an official under Trump’s administration, told reporters outside the courtroom that “we finally have a crime”.  “We also have a victim,” he added. “That victim is Donald J Trump.”

Kash Patel stands behind a row of microphones and a metal barricade as he speaks to the press outside the Manhattan Criminal Court.
Kash Patel told reporters that Cohen’s testimony shows Trump to be a ‘victim’ in the case (Aljazeera)

Cohen reveals he made millions from media appearances

The defence has long maintained that Trump himself is not guilty of falsifying business records — but that figures like Cohen and the Trump Organization’s former chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, were responsible for any misdeeds.

As the defence team brought its cross-examination of Cohen to a close, it sought to paint a portrait of Cohen’s alleged greed, highlighting the ways he profited from his association with Trump.

Cohen testified that, after Trump was elected president in 2016, he made about $4m from consulting contracts, including with AT&T, a telecommunications company seeking a merger at the time.

In 2018, however, Cohen pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations and other federal crimes, including lying to Congress. He was sentenced to prison as a result.

But when he was transferred to home confinement in 2020, he took on an increasingly public role as a Trump critic. Cohen testified that, starting in 2020, he made approximately $4.4m from tell-all books and podcast appearances.

The defence also asked Cohen about a reality TV show called The Fixer he had been shopping to networks, though he said no studio has picked it up yet.

Michael Cohen, wearing a suit and pink tie, walks outside his apartment building in New York.
Michael Cohen leaves his New York City home to attend his fourth day of testimony at the Manhattan Criminal Court on Monday (Aljazeera)

Cohen cross-examination ends, prosecution rests

In the final minutes of Cohen’s cross-examination, the defence tried to impress upon the jury that there were holes in the former lawyer’s testimony.  While Cohen has maintained that the hush-money payments were falsely logged as “legal expenses”, the defence has maintained the label is accurate, as Cohen was in fact Trump’s personal lawyer.

The defence also questioned whether Cohen could accurately recollect his conversations with Trump from October 2016, the month when the hush-money payment was made.

“Notwithstanding everything you’ve said over the years, you have specific recollection of having conversations with then-candidate Donald J Trump about the Stormy Daniels matter?” Blanche, the defence lawyer, asked.

Cohen answered his usual “yes, sir”.

“No doubt in your mind?” Blanche asked again. “No doubt,” Cohen responded.

The cross-examination ended shortly thereafter, and the prosecution briefly stood to question Cohen one last time.

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger took the opportunity to point out that Trump’s actions were on trial, not Cohen’s.  “I know you might feel like you’re on trial here after cross-examination, but are you actually on trial here?” she asked Cohen.

“No, ma’am,” he replied.

The prosecution also asked Cohen to reflect upon what speaking out against Trump has cost him.

“My entire life has been turned upside down as a direct result,” Cohen responded, citing a decline in his family’s wellbeing as well as his professional prospects.  “I lost my law license, my businesses, my financial security, which I was fortunately enough early to have been able to obtain.”

With that, the prosecution rested its case.

A protester in New York holds up a sign that reads, "Slept with a porn star, screwed the voters."
A protester holds up a sign on Monday denouncing Donald Trump’s behaviour during the 2016 election (Aljazeera)

Defence calls its first witnesses, including feisty Costello

With the prosecution’s case at an end, it was time for the defence to take its turn to call witnesses.

The first was a paralegal named Daniel Sitko, who works for Blanche, the defence lawyer.

Sitko presented a chart that gave an overview of the phone calls between Cohen and Robert Costello, a lawyer who previously offered to transmit messages between Cohen and Trump.

The defence only questioned Sitko long enough to establish that Cohen’s communications with Costello were frequent, particularly in 2018 when he faced legal troubles.

Then, the defence’s second witness took the stand: Costello himself.

The decision to call Costello was not without controversy. The prosecution objected to his inclusion: Cohen has admitted to lying to Costello, and for his part, Costello has taken a prominent public role in questioning Cohen’s credibility.

Costello was also a late addition to the defence’s list of possible witnesses, and Judge Juan Merchan was forced to rule quickly about how much of Costello’s testimony he would allow.

Merchan said Costello could “offer some rebuttal” to Cohen’s testimony, but the judge added he would not allow the situation to become a “trial within a trial”.

But right away, Costello’s appearance on the witness stand was tense: The lawyer audibly reacted when the prosecution raised objections to his testimony, saying “jeez” and calling the situation “ridiculous”.

It was enough to earn a stern rebuke from Judge Merchan, who briefly cleared the courtroom to address Costello directly.

“Mr Costello, I want to discuss proper decorum in my courtroom. When there’s a witness on the stand, if you don’t like my ruling, you don’t say ‘jeez’,” Merchan said. “You don’t give me side eye, and you don’t roll your eyes.”

Costello was ultimately allowed to resume his testimony, which centred on allegations that Cohen lied about Trump’s knowledge of the hush-money payments.

“Michael Cohen said numerous times that President Trump knew nothing about those payments, that he did this on his own, and he repeated that numerous times,” Costello said.

Illinois Representative Mary Miller speaks to the press in an outdoor news conference in New York, as a Trump supporter waves a flag reading, "Trump won."
Illinois Representative Mary Miller joins Trump supporters outside the Manhattan Criminal Court on May 20 to speak to the press (Aljazeera)

Trump’s court entourage includes Hells Angels

The day ended with Costello’s fiery appearance on the witness stand and the prospect of further questioning from prosecutors on Tuesday.

While much of the court’s attention was focused on the final witnesses in the trial, members of Trump’s entourage also caught the media’s eye.

Seated among Trump’s inner circle was Chuck Zito, the former president of the New York chapter of the Hells Angels bikers club.

Now an actor, Zito faced his own criminal charges and served a prison sentence from 1985 to 1991.

Also in the audience were Congress members like Representative Andrew Clyde of Georgia.  “What needs to happen is this particular judicial-type system needs to be defunded,” Clyde said, calling for federal funding to be cut to Manhattan’s courts.

Trump himself spoke to the press outside of the courtroom, revisiting familiar themes that the prosecution was politically motivated, and complaining about the “freezing cold” setting.

“They have no case. They have no crime,” Trump said, adding that the judge was “corrupt” and “interfering with an election”.

Trump is expected to face President Joe Biden, a Democrat, in November’s presidential race.

(Aljazeera)



Foreign News

Ireland among countries boycotting Eurovision after Israel allowed to compete

Published

on

By

Singer Yuval Raphael, who survived the 7 October Hamas attack in 2023, represented Israel at this year's Eurovision [BBC]

Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands and Slovenia will boycott the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest, after Israel was allowed to compete.

They were among a number of countries who had called for Israel to be excluded over the war in Gaza, as well as accusations of unfair voting practices.

Spanish broadcaster RTVE led calls for a secret ballot on the issue at a meeting in Geneva. It said organisers denied that request – a decision that “increased [our] distrust of the festival’s organisation”.

Ireland’s RTÉ said it felt that its “participation remains unconscionable given the appalling loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there which continues to put the lives of so many civilians at risk.”

Spain is one of Eurovision’s “Big Five” countries along with France, Germany, Italy and the UK.

Their artists are allowed straight into the final, as their broadcasters provide the largest financial contribution to the EBU.

Approximately 50 broadcasters, including the BBC, attended a meeting of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) on Thursday to discuss the future of the contest, which is watched by more than 150 million people each year.

They were asked to back new rules intended to discourage governments and third parties from organising voting campaigns for their acts, after allegations that Israel unfairly boosted its entrant, Yuval Raphael, this year.

BBC News understands that voting to accept those measures was tied to a clause whereby members agreed not to proceed with a vote on Israel’s participation.

“This vote means that all EBU Members who wish to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 and agree to comply with the new rules are eligible to take part,” the EBU said.

[BBC]

 

Continue Reading

Foreign News

Oil, defence and geopolitics: Why Putin is visiting Modi in Delhi

Published

on

By

Modi and Putin share a warm relationship [BBC]

Russian President Vladimir Putin is starting a two-day visit to India, where he will meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi and attend an annual summit held by both countries.

Delhi and Moscow are expected to sign a number of deals during the visit, which comes months after the US increased pressure on India to stop buying Russian oil.

It also comes as US President Donald Trump’s administration holds a series of talks with Russia and Ukraine in an attempt to end the war.

India and Russia have been close allies for decades and Putin and Modi share a warm relationship. Here’s a look at why they both need each other – and what to watch for as they meet.

Why are relations with India key for the Kremlin?

Well, for a start, look at the numbers:

  • a population of nearly a billion and a half.
  • economic growth exceeding 8%. India is the world’s fastest growing major economy.

That makes it a hugely attractive market for Russian goods and resources – especially oil.

India is the world’s third largest consumer of crude oil and has been buying large volumes from Russia. That wasn’t always the case. Before the Kremlin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, only 2.5% of India’s oil imports were Russian.

That figure jumped to 35% as India took advantage of Russian price discounts prompted by sanctions against Moscow and Russia’s restricted access to the European market.

India was happy. Washington less so.

Earlier this year, the Trump administration slapped an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, arguing that by purchasing oil from Russia, India was helping to fund the Kremlin’s war chest. Orders from India for Russian oil have since dropped. President Putin will be keen for India to keep buying.

For Moscow, weapons sales to India are another priority and have been since Soviet times. Ahead of Putin’s visit, there were reports that India plans to purchase state-of-the-art Russian fighter jets and air defence systems.

Russia, hit by a labour shortage, also sees India as a valuable source of skilled workers.

But there’s geopolitics at play, too.

The Kremlin enjoys demonstrating that Western efforts to isolate it over the war in Ukraine have failed.

Flying to India and meeting Prime Minister Modi is one way of doing that.

So is travelling to China and holding talks with Xi Jinping, as Putin did three months ago. He met Modi on the same trip. The image of the three leaders smiling and chatting together sent a clear message that, despite the war in Ukraine, Moscow has powerful allies who support the concept of a “multi-polar world”.

Russia lauds its “no limits partnership” with China.

It is just as vocal about its “special and privileged strategic partnership” with India.

That is a stark contrast to Moscow’s strained relationship with the European Union.

“I think the Kremlin is sure that the West, including Europe, totally failed,” believes Novaya Gazeta columnist Andrei Kolesnikov.

“We are not isolated, because we have connections to Asia and the Global South. Economically, this is the future. In that sense Russia returned as the main actor in these parts of the globe, like the Soviet Union. But even the Soviet Union had special channels and connections to the US, West Germany and France. It had a multi-vector policy.

“But now we are totally isolated from Europe. This is unprecedented. Our philosophers always said that Russia was a part of Europe. Now we’re not. This is a big failure and a big loss. I’m sure that part of Russia’s political and entrepreneurial class is dreaming of returning to Europe and of doing business not only with China and India.”

This week, though, expect to hear about Russia-India friendship, trade deals and increased economic cooperation between Moscow and Delhi.

Getty Images Russian S400 drives on their way to Red Square during the general rehearsal of Victory Day military parade marking the 80th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany in World War II, at Red Square in Moscow, Russia on 7 May 2025
Weapon sales to India are a priority for Russia [BBC]

Putin’s visit to Delhi is coming at a crucial time for Modi and India’s global ambitions.

India-Russia ties go back to the Soviet era and have endured irrespective of the changing geopolitical landscape.

Putin has arguably put more time and energy into this relationship than other Russian leaders before him.

As for Modi, despite coming under intense pressure from Western governments to criticise Russia over its war in Ukraine, he maintained that dialogue was the only way to resolve the conflict.

This was India’s “strategic autonomy” at play – with Modi occupying a particular place in the geopolitical order where he held close ties with Moscow while maintaining his relationship with the West at the same time.

That worked – until Trump returned to the White House. India-US ties have hit an all time low in recent months as the two countries have failed to resolve the tariff deadlock.

In this context, Putin’s visit assumes more significance for Modi than ever before because it will test India’s geopolitical autonomy. He will be walking the proverbial diplomatic tightrope here.

Modi would want to show Indians at home and in the wider world that he still counts Putin as his ally and hasn’t given into pressure from Trump, whom he has earlier called his “true friend”.

But he has also faced pressure from his allies in Europe – just this week, the German, French and UK ambassadors in India wrote a rare joint article in a major newspaper criticising Russia’s stance on Ukraine.

And so, Modi will have to ensure that the strengthening of India-Russia ties does not overshadow ongoing trade talks with the US and his partnership with Europe.

“For India, the challenge is strategic balance – protecting autonomy while navigating pressure from Washington and dependence on Moscow,” said the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a Delhi-based think-tank.

Getty Images U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a meeting with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani in the Oval Office of the White House on November 21, 2025 in Washington, DC
President Trump has imposed an additional 25% tariff on India as penalty for buying Russian oil [BBC]

Modi’s other priority will be to unlock the potential of bilateral trade between India and Russia.

Analysts have often said that the economic relationship between the two strong allies has underperformed for decades.

Their bilateral trade rose to $68.72bn at the end of March 2025, up from just $8.1bn in 2020. This was largely due to India sharply increasing discounted Russian oil purchases. This has skewed the balance heavily in favour of Russia and that is something Modi would want to correct.

With Indian firms already reducing oil purchases from Russia to avoid sanctions from Washington, the two countries will look at other areas to boost trade.

Defence is the easiest pick. India’s defence imports from Russia reduced to 36% between 2020 and 2024, from the peaks of 72% in 2010-2015 and 55% between 2015 and 2019, according to Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

This was largely due to India’s attempt to diversify its defence portfolio and boost domestic manufacturing.

But a closer look at these numbers tells a different story. Several Indian defence platforms still rely heavily on Russia. Many of its 29 air force squadrons use Russian Sukhoi-30 jets.

India’s limited armed conflict with Pakistan in May this year proved the indispensable role of Russian platforms like the S-400 air defence systems in its armed forces but it also showed the vulnerabilities that the country urgently needs to fix.

Reports suggest that India wants to buy the upgraded S-500 systems and the Su-57 fifth-generation fighter jet. Pakistan’s purchase of the China-made J-35 fifth-generation stealth fighter has not gone unnoticed in Delhi, and it would want to secure a comparable jet as soon as possible.

But Russia is already facing a shortage of critical components due to sanctions and the war in Ukraine. The deadline to deliver some units of the S-400 have reportedly been delayed to 2026. Modi will seek some guarantees on timelines with Putin.

Modi would also want Russia’s economy to open space for Indian products to fix the massive trade imbalance.

“Consumer-oriented and high-visibility categories remain marginal: smartphones ($75.9m), shrimp ($75.7m), meat ($63m) and garments at just $20.94m underscore India’s limited penetration in Russia’s retail markets and electronics value chains despite geopolitical churn,” GTRI said.

Modi aims to position Indian goods in Russia’s market, especially once the war ends and Moscow is reintegrated into the global economy.

He would seek to lessen trade dependence on oil and defence, aiming for a deal that strengthens ties with Russia while leaving room to deepen relations with the West.

“Putin’s visit is not a nostalgic return to Cold War diplomacy. It is a negotiation over risk, supply chains and economic insulation. A modest outcome will secure oil and defence; an ambitious one will reshape regional economics,” GTRI said.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Foreign News

Pakistan to sell national carrier PIA for IMF loans, Munir’s Fauji firm among bidders

Published

on

By

Pakistan government has directed authorities to expedite and complete all phases of the privatisation of PIA with complete transparency

Pakistan’s sale of its flag carrier PIA is its first major privatisation in two decades. The divestment comes because of an IMF bailout condition. With four bidders, including military-led Fauji Fertiliser, the auction on December 23 is key for a debt-ridden economy and its crippled national carrier.

Pakistan, which has been surviving on loans and doles, will auction off its debt-ridden national carrier, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), on December 23, 2025, in a live-broadcast bidding process that the government describes as the “final step” to meet a key condition of its $7 billion IMF’s bailout package,  reported Geo TV.

The sale of between 51% and 100% of PIA shares — including full management control — is a formal structural benchmark under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF). The IMF’s Executive Board is scheduled to meet on December 8 to release the next $1.2 billion tranche ($1 billion EFF + $200 million climate facility); completion of the PIA bidding process by year-end is explicitly required for future disbursements.

Among the four companies that have pre-qualified for the bidding is Fauji Fertiliser Company Limited, part of the military-controlled Fauji Foundation.

“We’re targeting Rs 86 billion in privatisation proceeds this year. For PIA, in the last round of bidding, 15% of the proceeds were going to the government, with the rest staying within the company,” Pakistan’s Privatisation Minister Muhammad Ali told Reuters last month.

The divestment of PIA stakes would be Pakistan’s first major privatisation effort in two decades, according to Dawn.

“Four bidders have been pre-qualified for the sale: Lucky Cement Consortium, Arif Habib Corporation Consortium, Fauji Fertiliser Company Limited and Air Blue Limited,” it reported.

Fauji Fertiliser is part of the Fauji Foundation, which has emerged as one of the biggest corporate players in Pakistan, a country where the military has fingers in every pie.

Field Marshal Asim Munir, the most powerful person in Pakistan today, does not hold a direct position on the Central Board of Directors (CBDs) of Fauji Foundation. He appoints the Quartermaster General (QMG) who is part of the CBD of the Fauji Foundation.

Munir, as the head of the Pakistan Army, and now the unified defence forces, also exerts indirect influence over Fauji Foundation through the military’s institutional control, including appointments to key positions and alignment with national security and welfare priorities.

Government rules mandate that majority ownership must remain with Pakistani nationals; foreign entities are barred from acquiring controlling stakes.

The PIA divestment is crucial for Pakistan as it takes loans to refinance loans. In 2023, Pakistan was on the brink of defaulting on its debts, a result of its years of financial mismanagement. One of its major expenditure is on defence forces.

The $7-billion loan programme of the IMF for Pakistan was approved in September 2024 While $1 billion was  given immediately, the rest of the money was to be disbursed over a period of 3 years.

Pakistan, whose economy is in tatters, is the IMF’s fifth-largest debtor. It has taken more than 20 loans from the IMF since 1958.

(India Today)

 

Continue Reading

Trending