Connect with us

Features

Trump accepts gift (grift) of $400 million flying palace from QATAR to replace “dilapidated” Air Force One

Published

on

China calls Trump’s bluff on tariffs

At a recent interview with Kristen Walker on NBC’s Meet the Press, President Trump was asked, when the subject of due process was being discussed, “Don’t you, as the President of the United States, need to uphold its constitution?”

Trump, who had taken the oath to uphold the constitution on two presidential inaugurations, said, amazingly, “I don’t know”.

The foreign emoluments clause of Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 8 of the Constitution states: “No title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no person holding any office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the consent of Congress, accept any present, emolument, office, or any title, of any kind whatsoever, from any King, Prince or foreign state”.

Trump is at present on the first overseas trip of his second term, covering Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, nations where he has significant private business interests worth billions of dollars, in Trump Towers, golf courses and cryptocurrency deals; where the necessity of personally maintaining the geopolitical balance of these corrupt business deals, which have more than tripled since his first presidential term, takes precedence over any matters of national interest.

Matters of national interest like the pursuit of a peace process which will bring about the cessation of hostilities between Israel and the terrorist groups of Hamas and the Houthis, ending the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza. A humanitarian crisis surely of more urgency than meetings with sponsors of international corruption and terrorism, or a gift of a palace in the sky.

On the eve of the first overseas trip of his second term, Trump confirmed, once again, his apathy towards the constitution, when he decided to accept a $400 million luxury airplane as a gift from the Qatari royal family. A 13-year-old plane, hitherto used by the Emir of Qatar, touted as a palace in the sky. A palace, though considered not good enough for the Qatar royalty, and gifted basically as a 13-year-old hand-me-down to the President of the United States of America.

The gift is from Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al Thani, a scion of the same royal family of Qatar Trump denounced in 2017 as the largest funder of terrorism in the middle east. Qatar has been a key supporter of terrorist groups, the Houthis and Hamas, giving them political and financial aid in excess of an estimated $1.8 billion during the past decade.

Trump justified the White House decision to accept the gift of the Jumbo Jet, to be used in place of the United States Air Force One, on the ingenuous argument that the gift was made to the United States Air Force, and not personally to him. Converting the Qatar-owned 747 Jet into a new Air Force One for President Trump would involve, according to aviation experts, stripping the plane to its foundations to ensure that it is security-bug free, and the installation of multiple top-secret security systems, that will cost the American taxpayer over one billion dollars and take years to complete. The installation of these new systems will cost far more than the estimated value of the “gift” of $400 million, and probably will not be completed before the end of Trump’s final, presidential term.

So why should Trump act against the constitution and accept a gift of a plane he probably will not be able use during his final presidential term? Because, according to the terms of this gift, the plane will be presented as an exhibit to the yet-to-be-built Trump Presidential Library at the end of his presidency. It will then be available for his personal use until his long-awaited demise, after which it will revert to the possession of the Trump family, ad infinitum.

Unlike the current Air Force One presidential plane, which will be used by his successor, if and when he leaves the White House.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, who follows her boss in thumbing her nose at the constitution, said that “any gift given by a foreign government is always accepted in full compliance with all applicable laws. President Trump’s administration is committed to full transparency!” Attorney General Pam Bondi agrees, confirming that the Qatar gift is “legally permissible and not a bribe, because President Trump is not giving Qatar anything in return”.

Both Leavitt, Bondi and their boss do not seem to understand the significance of that age-old truism – “There’s nothing called a free lunch”. When a sponsor of terrorism gifts the United States a $400 million airplane, he surely would expect more than a sandwich in return!

However, there are rumblings of complaints from even the usually sycophantic Republican members of the House and Senate that may make Trump’s dream of owning a personal palace in the sky after his presidency most unlikely to result in a happy ending.

Prescription drugs

Trump has also decided to reduce the cost of prescription drugs to the levels of prices in every other developed nation. The idea came to him after a telephone call from London from a seriously overweight and highly neurotic business friend, a billionaire, who complained, “What the hell is going on, Mr. President? I am in London, and I just took my ‘fat-shot drug’, as he called it; and it cost me just $88. I pay $1,300 for the same drug in New York – same box, made at the same plant by the same manufacturer. You have to do something about it, Sir”.

Blessed with the svelte six-foot-three, 210-pounds figure of his dreams, Trump nevertheless shared the pain of his neurotic and obese friend. He decided to immediately address the issue, which he was surprised no one had thought of before. Only Trump pretended to be ignorant of the efforts of Democratic Senators Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and a host of progressive “woke” political leaders before them, who have been demanding the reform of the nation’s healthcare system, including the lowering of pricing of prescription drugs, for decades.

“I called the CEOs of some of the top drug companies, and asked them why drug prices are so high. They said, ‘Sir, it’s all the costs of research and development on which only American companies spend, and marketing costs; that’s why drugs cost so much in America’.

“So I told them – I suddenly thought of the word “equalization” – I bet no one has thought of this word before – I told them “You have to keep drug prices equal to those paid in other developed countries, get them to share in these research and development costs. I don’t care how you do it, but you have to sell these drugs at the same prices they are sold in other developed nations”.

Last Monday, Trump signed, with much fanfare, an Executive Order, instructing drug manufacturers to cut prices of their drugs from 58% to 90%, within six months. Unfortunately, although Trump is already calling this a fait accompli, a big win for an administration desperate for a win, there is no “or else” to this Executive Order. At the end of six months, nothing would have changed, no penalty levied.

Trump is fully aware that other administrations have made similar efforts to reduce drug prices, that the pharmaceutical companies will never reduce their prices – in six month or six years – as long as their lobbyists maintain control of the Republican politicians, who enjoy the majority in both the House and the Senate. Who, in turn, are controlled by Trump and the MAGA (Make America Great Again) cult.

In six months, Trump would have manufactured hundreds of new lies, addressing new scandals, and the public would have forgotten all about the lie of reduced drug prices. They would continue to pay the same high prices for drugs. And so the tried and proven Trump game of Deny, Distract and Delay will continue, until Americans wake up to the 21st century.

Citizens in other developed nations, who do live in the 21st century, often pay less than a tenth of the prices paid for the exact same drugs in the United States, because their governments manage universal healthcare systems. These governments negotiate the cost of drugs directly with the manufacturers, without having to contend with the enormous profits of the middlemen, the insurance and pharmaceutical companies, and, of course, bribes to crooked politicians.

Trump announces triumph in trade war by repudiating tariffs he had himself imposed on “Liberation Day”

Trump claimed yet another big win after his team led by Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary, held negotiations with officials of the Chinese government over the weekend in Geneva, Switzerland. Secretary Bessent said. “We have reached agreement on a 90-day pause and substantially moved down tariff levels; both sides will move their reciprocal tariffs down by a whopping 115%”.

Given Trump’s mercurial personality, no one can be sure what new trade policies he will conjure up in 90 days.

The Chinese government has successfully called Trump’s “Liberation Day” bluff when he increased tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%. They have done so by ignoring Trump’s unilateral announcements of increased tariffs, but threatening retaliation to the bitter end. The Chinese do not make empty bluffs. The largest American retailers like Walmart and Target took the defiant attitude of the Chinese most seriously, and warned Trump that they will be facing empty shelves within weeks; smaller retailers were already consulting with bankruptcy lawyers in the full knowledge that they would have to close down their businesses by Christmas, if not sooner. Economists were predicting a 60% possibility of a recession within six months, entirely caused by the declaration of Trump’s trade war on April 2, now generally recognized as the “dumbest economic policy in decades”.

So Trump is now renegotiating tariffs, many at a disadvantage to the US from the rates that existed before Trump’s Liberation Day, when he announced the beginning of “trade independence that would make America rich again”. He is touting the reversal of his tariffs, a return to the status quo, having caused immense losses in the stock markets in the interim, as a tremendous win for his unparalleled excellence in the Art of the Deal.

Which takes us back to the tale of political satirist, Jon Stewart’s dog, who poops all over the carpet, and returns after a few days and eats the poop, leaving an indelible stain and a noisome stink. But he looks proudly at Stewart, as if to say, “Haven’t I been a good dog, the greatest dog you have ever seen?” This pathologically narcissistic, triumphant expression on the face of Jon Stewart’s dog, having partially cleaned up a mess of his own making, is the expression I see on Trump’s face whenever he announces his phony “accomplishments” on TV.

In a mere 100 days, Trump has transformed the economy he inherited from the Biden administration, headlined by The Economist of October 2024 as “The Envy of the World” to an economy of increased prices and rising rates of inflation, teetering on the brink of a recession.

by Kumar de Silva



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Arctic link discovered: Lankan scientists trace 8,000 km seabird migration route

Published

on

By Ifham Nizam

Sri Lankan scientists have uncovered a remarkable long-distance migration route used by seabirds, linking the island’s shores with the Arctic—an achievement that is expected to reshape global understanding of bird movement and highlight Sri Lanka’s importance in the natural world.

The discovery, led by Professor Sampath S. Seneviratne of the University of Colombo, shows that Heuglin’s Gulls travel nearly 8,000 kilometres from Sri Lanka to breeding grounds in northern Russia, following a carefully chosen path that combines coastal travel with long inland journeys.

Prof. Seneviratne told The Island that the finding challenges the long-standing belief that seabirds depend mainly on ocean routes.

“For a long time, we assumed seabirds would stay close to the sea throughout their migration. What we are seeing here is very different. These birds are moving across land as well, using a route that connects Sri Lanka directly with the Arctic,” he said.

Brown headed gull- migrating from Himalayas to Mannar

The birds begin their journey from the northwestern coast of Sri Lanka, especially around Mannar—an area known for its rich birdlife and coastal habitats. From there, they cross over to India and move along the western coastline before turning inland.

Their journey then takes them through Pakistan and Afghanistan, across parts of Central Asia, and onwards to the Arctic region, where they breed during the northern summer.

What has drawn particular attention from scientists is the route chosen by the birds.

Instead of attempting to cross the world’s highest mountain ranges, or taking a much longer path over the open ocean, the gulls appear to follow a middle course that allows them to avoid harsh conditions while still maintaining a steady journey.

Map 1 &2 birds moving through the continent to reach the Artctic

“They are not simply taking the shortest distance,” Prof. Seneviratne explained. “They are choosing a route that gives them the best chance of survival. Along this path, they are able to find food, rest, and avoid extreme environments.”

The birds travel long distances each day, covering hundreds of kilometres, but they do not do it all in one stretch. Their journey depends heavily on stopovers—places where they pause to rest and rebuild energy.

“These stopovers are critical,” Prof. Seneviratne said. “If the birds cannot find suitable places to feed and recover, they will not be able to complete the journey.”

Co-researcher Dr. Gayomini Panagoda said the discovery sheds light on a route that had remained largely hidden until now.

“We always knew these birds were leaving Sri Lanka during certain times of the year, but we did not fully understand where they were going or how they got there,” she said. “Now we have a much clearer picture of their journey.”

Awareness among schoolchildren

She added that the findings show how closely connected different parts of the world are through nature.

“A bird that spends part of its life in Sri Lanka ends up in the Arctic. That tells us how linked these ecosystems really are,” she said.

The findings also underline the importance of Sri Lanka’s coastal areas, which serve as vital feeding and resting grounds for migratory birds before they begin their long journey north.

Veteran ornithologist , Professor Emeritus Sarath Kotagama said these habitats are of international importance and must be protected.

“These coastal regions, especially places like Mannar, provide the food and shelter these birds need before migration. If those areas are damaged, it will affect bird populations far beyond Sri Lanka,” he said.

Professor Seneviratne with Dr. Gayomini Panagoda

Kotagama warned that increasing pressure on coastal ecosystems—from development, pollution, and climate change—could pose serious risks.

“We are already seeing changes in many of these birds. If we are not careful, we could lose habitats that are essential not just for local wildlife, but for species that travel across continents,” he said.

The discovery also draws attention to the wider network of migration routes that connect countries across Asia and beyond. Birds do not recognise national borders, and their survival depends on conditions in many different places along their journey.

Prof. Seneviratne stressed that protecting these birds will require cooperation between countries.

“These birds travel across several regions, and each of those regions plays a role in their survival. Conservation cannot be done by one country alone,” he said.

A GPS tagged Crab Plover

He added that more work is needed to understand how other species use similar routes and how changes in climate and land use may affect migration patterns in the future.

“There is still much we do not know. This is just one piece of a much larger picture,” he said.

Environmentalists say the findings should encourage stronger action to protect wetlands and coastal ecosystems in Sri Lanka, many of which are under increasing threat.

“These areas are not just important for birds,” Dr. Panagoda said. “They support fisheries, protect coastlines, and are part of our natural heritage. Protecting them benefits both people and wildlife.”

She noted that conserving these habitats will also help ensure that future generations can continue to witness the arrival and departure of migratory birds.

For Sri Lanka, the discovery is both a moment of pride and a reminder of responsibility.

It highlights the role the island plays in supporting wildlife that travels across vast distances and connects different parts of the world.

It also shows that even a small country can have a big impact when it comes to global biodiversity.

As Prof. Seneviratne put it, “What happens in Sri Lanka does not stay in Sri Lanka. These birds carry that connection across continents.”

The discovery is expected to encourage further research into bird migration in the region, as scientists continue to explore how different species move across landscapes and adapt to changing conditions.

It also reinforces the need to protect the natural environments that make such journeys possible.

In the end, the story of these birds is not just about distance. It is about survival, connection, and the delicate balance of nature.

From the shores of Sri Lanka to the frozen Arctic, their journey is a powerful reminder that the natural world is far more connected than we often realise—and that protecting one part of it helps protect the whole.

Continue Reading

Features

Why the promotion of drone warfare is unconscionable

Published

on

A drone strike on an oil facility in the Middle East in the current war.

For the morally-conscious, the tendency among some sections in Sri Lanka to promote the production of drones for national defence purposes could be deeply worrying. Besides, this proposition flies in the face of common sense and disregards the relentlessly increasing harsh economic realities coming in the wake of the current wars that could push many a southern country into beggary. In fact even the West is facing an economic recession.

To begin with the latter issues, it is a proved reality that the majority of Southern countries are descending further into poverty at present. The FAO has the ‘bleeding statistics’ . For instance, food insecurity in Asia is of such disquieting proportions that the region accounts for ‘ approximately half of the world’s 370.7 million undernourished people’.

It is against such a bleak economic backdrop that countries of the South are being called on to pump money into the production or importing of drones. Pointed reference needs to be made here to the South because drones are peddled as cutting-edge defence systems that are comparatively economical to acquire and relatively easy to operate. It is even voiced that with time drones could enable even smaller countries of the South to acquire ‘strategic parity’ with the major powers of the North and middle level powers.

Meanwhile, no thought is spared for the poor of the South who would sink steadily into poverty and powerlessness. Because more defence spending by southern countries only entrenches the ruling classes of those countries, and in some cases their military high commands, further in the systems of governance and repression.

This has essentially been the experience of the majority of post-colonial states. As aptly phrased by economic and political analyst Susan George in the seventies, it has always been a case of ‘The Other Half Dying’.

Accordingly, it cannot be perceived as to how more defence spending by the South on drones could help alleviate the latter’s principal problem of deepening poverty. As for the perceived escalating insecurities of the South, these problems are of such complexity that drones could never be seen as offering a quick fix for them. They need patient, multi-pronged managing, mainly at the negotiating table with the powers that matter. These are long- gestation projects that need to be compulsorily undertaken in view of the fact that the alternative could be indefinite conflict and war.

Since Sri Lanka too is mentioned as one of those countries that needs to look at the drone proposition with some seriousness, it is relevant to underscore that Sri Lanka is second in a list of countries that are described as facing acute material hardships at present in the wake of the economic instability bred by the Hormuz crisis. The source of such information is no less than the respected Kiel Institute for the World Economy. The first 10 such gravely affected countries are: Zambia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Pakistan, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Bangladesh, Vietnam, the Philippines and Thailand.

It is thought-provoking that among the above countries are not only those that have been traditionally seen as experiencing severe underdevelopment but also up-and-coming middle income countries that have been hitherto described as being on a fast track to development. The interesting mix proves that no country at present could consider itself immune to current economic shocks originating mainly in the Middle East that could plunge it dramatically into acute poverty virtually overnight.

We are left to conclude that ‘Bread’ or the economic well being of people could in no way be sacrificed for ‘Drones’ in democratic countries whose governments are obliged to be accountable to the people. Considering the phenomenal hardships that could be waiting to happen worldwide, the world could very well do without more ‘Guns’ or ‘Drones’.

However, if southern governments in particular opt for ‘Drones’ or an accumulation of ‘Guns’, the chances are that there could be overwhelming tides of social discontent in their countries, bred by economic want, that could then ignite indefinite war and repression. That is, a ‘No-Win’ situation for all concerned.

Ukraine has been spiritedly and admirably taking the fight back to the invading Russian forces over the past few years but its skillful use of sophisticated drones of its own making has in no way decreased the human costs the war has been incurring for itself. Ukraine has no choice but to continue with all the weaponry at its command to beat back the Russian invader but sooner rather than later it would need to take into account the immense suffering the war has been inflicting on its people and focus on the fact that the Russians are not backing down but using equally lethal weaponry against it.

The above are some of the dilemmas of the present wars that call for urgent resolution. Warring countries are obliged to address on a priority basis the misery and destruction their actions incur for their publics and consider deploying diplomacy, preferably under the aegis of the UN, to work out peaceful solutions to their enmities and differences. Considering the futility of their war Russia and Ukraine are obliged to think on these lines.

No less a power than the US should be considering deeply right now the advisability of continuing with its military interventions in the South in particular to achieve its self interests. The rising loss of American lives and the economic costs of war in the Middle East will be weighing heavily with the Trump administration and it shouldn’t come as a surprise if negotiations are given a serious try, going ahead. Ground realities in the region moreover indicate that the US ‘has bitten off more than it could chew’ and that Iran is remaining hostile and unyielding despite being bloodied.

For both sides to the war what should be inescapable is the harsh reality of continuing human suffering on a chilling scale. Sophisticated and increasingly destructive weaponry such as drones and missiles are being used but they have not brought either side any closer to victory. Instead human misery is being perpetrated mindlessly with a steady deadening of consciences and a flagrant abandoning of reason.

Accordingly, what perceived legitimate aims could drone warfare, for instance, help achieve? It is quite some time since sections of the world community came to realize the futility of violence and war. There is no choice but for humans to recognize and revere the principle of the sacredness of life. A return to fundamentals is imperative.

Continue Reading

Features

Unforgettable experience …

Published

on

The committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK, who made Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance a total success (Photographs by: Praneeth Hettiarachchi)

Singer Rajiv Sebastian has the unique ability to woo an audience and he did just that on his recent trip to London, performing at the Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance.

This particular event of music, nostalgia, and celebration, was organised by the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya Old Girls’ Association – UK, and held at the DoubleTree by Hilton London Elstree, in Borehamwood, on 28th February.

They say the success of the evening was made possible through the dedication and hard work of President Devika Arrawwalage and the committed committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK.

Rajiv Sebastian was in top form, delivering an engaging performance that took the audience on a nostalgic musical journey through the iconic sounds of the’70s.

Doing the first set in full suit, with a fan joining in the action

He did three sets, appearing in three different outfits – suit, the normal shirt and trouser, and the sarong – and the crowd loved it.

Adding to the energy of the event, I’m told, was the music provided by the band Hasthi, made up of Sri Lankan musicians based in the UK.

At the end of a truly enjoyable and memorable event, the organisers had this to say about Rajiv Sebastian’s performance:

“On behalf of the entire team, I want to extend our heartfelt thanks to you for travelling all the way from Sri Lanka to perform at our first ever ABV dinner dance in the UK.

“Your performance was truly the highlight of the night. You have a superb talent for captivating an audience; from the moment you took the stage, your vibrant energy and incredible vocal range completely transformed the atmosphere.

“It was wonderful to see how effortlessly you engaged the crowd, keeping the dance floor packed and everyone in high spirits throughout the evening. You have graced the stage as a guest artiste on three separate occasions, delivering exceptional performances that set you apart from your peers.

“We feel incredibly privileged to have had an artiste of your calibre and charisma join us. You didn’t just provide music; you created an unforgettable experience that people are still talking about.

Surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, as well

“Thank you for sharing your immense gift with us. Hope to see you back on a UK stage very soon!”

Yes, and it’s happening soon; Rajiv says he is off to London again, in mid-April, and will be performing at four different venues.

He also mentioned that he has some surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, when he and his band, The Clan, present their 35th Anniversary concert … in June, this year.

Continue Reading

Trending