Connect with us

News

Training is territorial policing in Kandy and learning from early bona fide mistake

Published

on

P/ASPP & P/SII Trainee Batch - 1963 With Director Training T. B. Werapitiya, ADT A.M.E. Jayasena, Chief Lecturer CI Peter, Inspector L Boyagoda, S. I. Somapala etc

Excerpted from the memoirs of Rtd. Senior DIG Kingsley Wickramasuriya

G.A.D.E.A. Seneviratne (known to many as Ana) was the Superintendent in charge of the Kandy Police Division. When I reported to him his first task, after a pep talk as to how I should get about my work, was to find me suitable lodgings. ASP Leo Perera who I replaced was boarded close to the Police Station. That seemed to be a suitable place and he suggested that I try it. Soon I moved there and started my work, although I changed the lodging later.

Ana was a straight officer and a disciplinarian, a tough customer to deal with. He expected hard work from us young officers and saw to it that we carried out our duties according to the book – The Departmental Orders (DO). He would scrutinize our Weekly Diaries and pull us up on the diary itself if we slacked and failed to carry out our duties according to instructions in the DO. His remarks would draw the attention of our Range Deputy Inspector-General who in turn would give a few hard knocks. So, we had to be careful not to earn his wrath. He was hard to please.

He had a program drawn up for our training. Accordingly, I was attached to the Kandy HQ station for a couple of weeks. During this period, I had to do my Night Rounds at the Kandy HQ station going around to various points where men were deployed on duty and checking those points. One night when I visited the Supreme Court judge’s bungalow to check the sentry on duty around -11.00 pm, he was found fast asleep with his weapon unattended.

I removed the weapon and took it to my lodgings intending to return it to the police station the next morning and take the Sentry to task later. The next day early morning, HQ Inspector Kadigawa called over at my lodgings and informed me of the furor and the excitement that the missing weapon had caused and inquired whether I knew anything about the missing rifle. When I told him, what happened and produced the rifle, there was a sigh of relief. The Supreme Court Judge had complained angrily to the Superintendent about his security being compromised when he had learned about the missing rifle.

The Sentry Constable had cooked up a story to cover up his negligence and made entries in his Pocket Note Book. There was a lot of excitement at the Police Station as well over the incident. The Superintendent had ordered an immediate inquiry and asked the HQI to report what had happened. The HQI was aware from the entries I had made in the Officers’ Visiting Book (OVB) that I had been around on Night Rounds. So that is why he decided to check with me. They were almost on the verge of reporting the missing weapon to Police HQ when the HQI came to me.

I of course did it with the good intention of instilling discipline and that the sentries are kept alert, but realized the gravity of what I had done only later after the incident. I learned my lesson. So, did the Sentry Constable. He escaped with only a red entry in his recruit file.

Later the SP carved out a small district for me with two ‘C’ Grade police stations – Talatuoya and Hanguranketa. I gradually learned the routine of visits to and inspections of police stations while managing this district. At the beginning of each month, an inspection program was sent to the OIC of the Police Station giving notice of formal regular monthly inspections while I made surprise visits during the day as well as at night. That kept the police stations alert as they had no previous notice of my visits or night rounds. I attended the weekly parade at the Kandy HQ Station with the Superintendent taking the salute on horseback.

As part of the training, I had to accompany the SP on one of his half-yearly Inspections at Hasalaka Police Station. He proposed that we do a hike through the jungle from Hanguranketha to Hasalaka. He was fond of hiking and familiar with the route. Sc we went to Hanguranketha in his car and from there we proceeded, on foot through the jungle. We reached Hasalaka by the evening and lodged at the Rest House for the night. The next day we were at th police station by 6.30 am for the Inspection, starting with the parade.

I observed the entire procedure followed by him which I was to adopt at my inspections later for many years to come. At these inspection: he would keep the OIC on pins going into every detail in the book and satisfying himself that everything was in order. The OIC heaved a sigh o relief only at the end of the Inspection when the inspecting officer would make his remarks that the “Station is in Order”.

The style of inspection, the SP would later explain, came down long line of inspecting officers who had established a reputation for conducting tough inspection procedures. There were several schools of Inspection methodology that came to be named after those officer for instance, the Leembruggen School, L.I. De Silva School, and Sydney de Zoysa School. These were the legacies left behind by those officers who had picked it up from the British. There were many interesting legends built up around those inspection methods and their authors which I was to learn later.

Hanguranketha was an area where coconut toddy tapping was aplenty. There were toddy-collecting centers and toddy tope ( from where the main toddy tope in Ragala was fed. These were supposed to be under the supervision of the Excise Department/my inspections /visits to Hankuranketha Police Station, One thing noticed was the high incidence of crimes of violence caused by liquor. From the petitions I received much of this was attributed to the sale of illicit liquor. It was also obvious that coconut toddy was available from small retail points selling toddy illicitly.

Having studied the problem, I got the police station to concentrate on these illicit centers at first but soon found the effort futile as long as the retailers got their supp from the Toddy Tope at Hanguranketha. So, the problem persisted. Finally, I decided that the solution to the problem lay with the Toddy Tope at Hanguranketha and organized a raid through the Vice Branch of the Kandy Police.

The raiding party consisted of Sergeant 4464 Sakalasuriya in charge of the Vice Branch and several constables attached to the branch. On the appointed day the raiding party proceeded to the Toddy Tope in a hired van. I accompanied the party in my private car driven by the police driver assigned to me. On arrival, we divided ourselves into two groups. One party conducted the raid at the Toddy Tope and the other proceeded to the main premises of the Tope owner where some transactions were being conducted.

The owner was a person of Indian origin living on a temporary residence permit. With the wealth he had collected through the toddy business this TRP holder was a very influential person in the area. I confronted him personally and informed him of the raid that we were conducting at both places and went on to question those who had gathered there to buy toddy illicitly. For the Toddy Tope owner, this was a very embarrassing situation whereas he had been carrying on business unhindered and enjoyed a prominent social status.

After the raid, we collected all the productions and arrested those who were culpable under the provisions of the Excise Ordinance gathered at the Tope and were ready to leave when an Inspector of the Excise Department appeared and raised objections stating that he had come to measure the toddy that was to be sent to the Toddy Collection Center at Ragala.

When I informed him that was not possible as we have already conducted a raid for the illicit sale of liquor, he appeared to be angry and questioned my competency about what I was doing.

I returned with the party after the raid to Kandy Police and got about my business trusting that the Senior Sergeant from the Kandy Vice Branch would attend to the nitty-gritty of note writing and reporting to courts. Sometime in the afternoon when ASP Navaratnam of Kandy District (1) and HQI Kadigawa came to my lodgings raising the alarm that no notes have been written by the raiding party and as such no proper legal action could be taken against the culprits. That was when I started getting the jitters. The ASP and the HQI had been instructed by the Superintendent to go into the matter and take remedial action.

After going into the pros and cons of the case it was decided on the advice of ASP Navaratnam to present all the productions taken to custody during the raid including some cash collection on an ‘A Report’, and not to enter any prosecution against the Toddy Tope. This advice was to later save me and the raiding party from being questioned in the Kandy Magistrate’s Courts about the propriety of our actions.

With the matter at that stage, the next day the Toddy Tope owner came to the SP’s office to make a complaint against me. The SP who by then was aware of what had taken place and my bona fides asked the complainant to produce his TRP before entertaining the complaint. That was the end of that. But what was still worse was that he filed a case against me and the raiding party in Magistrate’s Court, Kandy alleging some serious criminal charges arising out of the raid.

He had retained an eminent criminal lawyer from Colombo for the case. Once again, my brother came to my aid and retained an equally eminent lawyer, Eardley Perera, from Colombo. But I had to do the preparation of the brief for the counsel and meet the legal expenses. The case went to trial and at the end of the prosecution, my counsel called me to the witness box for the defense. I faced the cross-examination confidently convincing Magistrate Udalagama of the bona fides of our action. He finally acquitted us of all charges and dismissed the case specially remarking at the end of the case that ‘he had no doubt whatsoever about the bona fides of the action of the young ASP.

The Tope owner was bent on revenge because he had lost face over this raid and his ego was hurt. The allegations were serious and an exaggeration of what took place. I realized that by trying to do my duty I had placed not only myself but several others in a very awkward position. I had not only to defend myself but others who too were doing their duty. I also learned that complaints entertained must be bona fide and investigations completed as soon as possible. This experience in my early professional life taught me how to protect myself and others, against acting on impulse and attendant pitfalls.

All these events and the routine were reported in the Weekly Diaries. They were forwarded to the Deputy Inspector-General of Police of the Range with the Superintendents remarks and came back with praise where praise was due to encouragement/guidance or with knocks at the blunders or shortcomings. The Weekly Diary was a good management tool — by remote control -one of the best practices the Britisher had invented.

On 1st February 1965, I suddenly got transfer orders to the Gampaha Division. I paid my courtesies to SP Kandy and departed with his blessings. He was very appreciative of the work I did during my tour of duty and predicted that I would do well in the Service.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Plans to open underutilised state land for new investment opportunities

Published

on

By

A discussion between President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and the Circular Revision Committee appointed to review and update circulars issued under the State Lands Ordinance and the Land Development Ordinance was held on Tuesday  (16)  afternoon at the Presidential Secretariat. The Committee has been mandated to recommend to the Cabinet the cancellation of out-dated circulars, the issuance of new circulars, and the revision of existing circulars to ensure alignment with current requirements.

The Committee is chaired by the Secretary to the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation, D.P. Wickramasinghe. Its other members include the Senior Additional Secretary to the President (Constitutional and Statutory Affairs Division), Legal Adviser to the Presidential Secretariat, an Additional Solicitor General from the Attorney General’s Department, the Additional Secretary (Lands) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation, the Additional Director General of the National Budget Department, the Western Province Land Commissioner, the Divisional Secretary of Nuwaragampalatha East, the Deputy Chief Valuer of the Valuation Department and the Director (Lands) of the Mahaweli Authority.

The Commissioner General of Lands serves as the Convener of the Committee.

The Committee’s responsibilities include establishing a reliable, uniform and regularised system of land taxation within the existing legal framework, ensuring state revenue optimisation without prejudice to lessees. This includes reviewing annual lease rentals charged on long-term leases and grants, aligning related circulars with current requirements, and amending or formulating new provisions and directives where necessary.

During the meeting, detailed discussions were held on the proposals submitted by the expert committee in relation to the revision of these circulars.

The President emphasised that a new, time-appropriate policy should be formulated to address the underutilisation of State lands and to ensure their more efficient use.

Deputy Minister of Lands and Irrigation Aravinda Senarath, Secretary to the President Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, Legal Adviser to the President, Senior Attorney-at-Law J.M. Wijebandara, Secretary to the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation D.P. Wickramasinghe, Additional Solicitor General of the Attorney General’s Department, President’s Counsel Ravindra Pathiranage, Commissioner General of Lands Chandana Ranaweraarachchi, Director General (Institutional Affairs), Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development J.G.L.S. Jayawardena, Additional Director General (National Budget Department) D.A. Asantha Gunasekara, and Commissioner of Lands (Leasing Division) P.K.C. Nilani Mahindaganamage, together with members of the Committee, were also present.

Senior officials from the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation also attended the meeting.

(PMD)

Continue Reading

Business

National Export Development Plan (2026–2030) presented to the President

Published

on

By

Marking an important milestone in Sri Lanka’s economic development, the National Export Development Plan (NEDP) for the period 2026–2030 was presented to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on Tuesday morning (16) at the Presidential Secretariat.

The 2026–2030 National Export Development Plan (NEDP) is a key national programme formulated in line with the Government’s policy direction under the 2025 Budget. It aims to strengthen the country’s export sector and achieve export-led sustainable economic growth.

The strategic plan has been developed under the guidance of the Ministry of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development and the leadership of the Sri Lanka Export Development Board (EDB), with technical assistance provided through the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Policy-Based Lending (PBL) programme. It is the result of an extensive consultative process carried out in close collaboration with key government institutions, private sector stakeholders, and development partners.

The proposal submitted by the Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development to recognise the “Sri Lanka National Export Development Plan 2026–2030” as the official strategic framework for export development and promotion in Sri Lanka was approved by the Cabinet of Ministers on 4 May 2026. The Plan reflects a broad consensus among government institutions, private sector experts, and international development partners.

In line with the national vision of “A Thriving Nation – A Beautiful Life”, the Plan has been formulated to enhance Sri Lanka’s export competitiveness and achieve an export revenue target of USD 36 billion by 2030.

The core vision of the Plan is to transform Sri Lanka into a competitive logistics and knowledge-based export hub serving regional and global markets. The strategy is based on two key interconnected pillars: “horizontals” and “verticals”, which together provide the foundation for strengthening export competitiveness, diversification, and sustainable growth.

The horizontal enablers, which support the growth and expansion of all priority sectors, include logistics and integrated hub operations, trade facilitation, trade finance and reforms in the business and investment environment, trade promotion and market linkages, quality management, standards, environmental, social and governance (ESG) capacity development, as well as entrepreneurship and innovation.

The Plan also identifies eight priority export sectors to enhance export diversification and value addition, and to position Sri Lanka more competitively in global markets. These include automotive components, mineral-based industries, rubber-based industries, maritime industries (including boat and shipbuilding), spices and concentrates, digital products and services, electrical and electronic equipment, and processed food and beverages.

The preparation of the Plan involved contributions from over 300 stakeholders, including government institutions, the private sector, civil society organisations and international development partners. Broad consensus was achieved through consultations held from October to December 2025 and workshops conducted in January 2026.

The Government expects that, with implementation supported by strong governance and monitoring framework, the Plan will elevate local products to international standards and ensure long-term economic stability and growth. It is further anticipated that the National Export Development Plan will serve as a key driver of Sri Lanka’s economic progress in the years ahead.

Minister of Labour and Deputy Minister of Finance and Planning Dr. Anil Jayantha Fernando, Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development Sunil Handunnetti, Senior Additional Secretary to the President and Secretary to the Ministry of Energy Russell Aponso, Secretary to the Ministry of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development Thilaka Jayasundara, and Chairman of the Sri Lanka Export Development Board Mangala Wijesinghe were also present at the event.

[PMD]

Continue Reading

News

Complaint of custodial deaths and torture submitted to UN

Published

on

Senaka and Aisha

The Committee for Protecting Rights of Prisoners (CPRP) has complained to the UN regarding custodial deaths.

Executive Director of the Committee, Attorney-at-Law Senaka Perera told The Island that they had submitted written submissions to the visiting UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) on Monday (15). “We are confident that they’ll take up the issues at hand with the government and take tangible measures to improve the conditions in prisons and detention facilities,” Perera said.

The SPT is here from 15 to 24 June. The visiting delegation consists of Aisha Shujune Muhammad, Head of Delegation (Maldives), Jakub Julian Czepek (Poland), Nika Kvaratskhelia (Georgia), Anica Tomsic (Croatia) and two human rights officers from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

Claiming that there had been 184 prison deaths in 2024, the Committee asserted that though there was a drop in the number of cases, the deaths caused by underlying health complications and systemic issues weren’t available at the moment.

According to a copy of the submissions made to the SPT, received by The Island, there had been seven custodial deaths this year alone, reported from various parts of the country.

The Committee took a very critical position, while Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath assured the visiting delegation that the government didn’t tolerate torture at all.

The Ministry statement Monday night quoted Herath as having described the government response as zero tolerance policy.

The Committee for Protecting Rights of Prisoners also dealt with several other contentious issues, including special treatment granted to those with political connections and privileged backgrounds. Perera alleged that in spite of a change of government, in 2024 September, the much anticipated improvements failed to materialise and the continuing custodial deaths highlighted the crisis in the prisons and detention facilities.

According to the Committee, the situation was so bad and further deteriorating in overcrowded prisons, the national overcrowding rate has reached an unsustainable 286.6%, with some facilities, like the Vavuniya Remand Prison, exceeding capacity by 300%.

A significant portion of this population (65.4%) consists of persons not convicted awaiting trial, the Committee said, urging the SPT to look into the pathetic situation.

The Committee also complained of torture and ill-treatment at some detention facilities. There had been cases of lawyers, visiting detention centres at Welisara and Boossa, been subjected to degrading and humiliating searches, including forced removal of clothing.

The Committee also brought to the SPT’s notice how the Supreme Court, on 14 December, 2023, held the former Inspector General of Police (IGP), Deshabandu Thennakoon, personally responsible for torture. The failure on the part of prison authorities to grant inmates a fair hearing during internal investigations, too, has been raised by the Committee.

Among the other issues that had been raised were enforced disappearances, health and medical conditions, food, water and sanitation, corporal punishments and the operation of detention facilities within military bases.

Referring to the enforced disappearance of Gonapinuwala Kapila Kumara de Silva on 27 March, 2024, the Committee alleged that the Attorney General failed to take action against the perpetrators, believed to be members of the Special Task Force (STF)

The Committee alleged that in spite of them submitting formal complaints and an urgent letter to the Attorney General demanding prosecution under the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearances Act, No. 5 of 2018, the AG took no meaningful action.

Consequently, CPRP filed a Writ of Mandamus petition in the Court of Appeal (CA/WRIT/185/26) against the Attorney General and other officials, seeking judicial intervention to compel investigation and prosecution. The case remains pending

by Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Trending