Connect with us

News

Speaker reaffirms rejection of no-faith motion against Deputy Minister of Defence

Published

on

Speaker Dr. Jagath

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday (25) informed the Houset that he was not in a position to accept the no-confidence motion submitted by the Opposition against Deputy Minister of Defence, Major General (retd.) Aruna Jayasekara by a group of MPs. He claimed parliament procedures did not provide for such a motion.

The motion was signed by the Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and 31 other members representing the opposition.

At the commencement of the House sittings yesterday, Speaker Wickramaratne said he had already announced his decision pertaining to the no-confidence motion and his decision could not be challenged according to Standing Order 76(1).

 The Speaker said he had decided to clarify his decision on the motion again.

Text of the Speaker’s statement: “I wish to make this announcement in furtherance to the announcement made by me on 08.09.2025 on the Motion titled the ‘No-Confidence Motion’, submitted by a group of 32 Members of Parliament in the Opposition including the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament, on 12.08.2025 against Major General (retd.) Aruna Jayasekera, MP, Deputy Minister of Defence.

“At the outset, I wish to remind this House the Standing Order 76(1) which states that the Speaker in Parliament shall be responsible for the observance of the rules of order in Parliament and his/her decision upon any point of order shall not be open to appeal and shall not be reviewed by Parliament except upon a substantive motion made after notice.

“However, considering the queries raised in Parliament, I wish to further substantiate the factors highlighted in the previous announcement for ruling the said Motion out of Order.

“The 1978 Constitution of Sri Lanka and the Standing Orders of Parliament are silent on moving a No-Confidence Motion against an individual Cabinet Minister, Deputy Minister or any other holder of portfolios. The only existing provision on No-Confidence Motions is the Article 49(2) of the Constitution which provides only to move a No-Confidence Motion against a Government.

“However, No-Confidence Motions have been moved against the Prime Minister, Individual Ministers of the Cabinet of Ministers, notwithstanding the said silence in the Constitution and the Standing Orders, thus questioning the legal basis of such precedence.

“It is noted that, in the parliamentary context, the Speaker, Deputy Speaker, Deputy Chairman of Committees, Leader of the House of Parliament, Chief Government Whip, Leader of the Opposition, and Chief Opposition Whip are considered Parliamentary office-bearers, and that a substantive Motion of this nature may appropriately be brought against them.

“I wish to emphasize that in the international context, No-Confidence Motions have been allowed only in respect of the Government/ Council of Ministers as a whole (Erskine May, ‘Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament’, 25th Ed. and M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher, ‘Practice and Procedure of Parliament’, 8th Ed.). Further M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher highlight that a Motion of No-Confidence can be moved only against the Council of Ministers as a whole and not against any individual Minister as per the Indian constitutional provisions regarding the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Lok Sabha.

“Similarly, the Articles 42, 43 and 44 of the Constitution of Sri Lanka, provides for the collective and individual ministerial responsibility of the Cabinet of Ministers.

“In Sri Lanka at present, Deputy Ministers have been appointed under Article 46(1) of the Constitution to assist the Ministers of the Cabinet of Ministers. However, the Ministers of the Cabinet of the present Government acting under Article 46(2) of the Constitution, have not delegated any power or duty pertaining to any subject or function to the Deputy Ministers. Nevertheless, I wish to place on record that the Deputy Ministers function in terms of Standing Order 32(2) on behalf of the Ministers, in compliance of Article 46(1) of the Constitution and read with Article 74 of the Constitution.

“Due to aforesaid reasons, I rule that the Motion is out of order in terms of Standing Order 27(3).

“In the alternate, I wish to note that incidental criticism of conduct of Members of Parliament or particularly to Members in their capacity as office holders in the House of Commons including the Speaker is permitted only through a substantive Motion (Erskine May, ‘Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament’, 25th Ed.), and in the UK practice censure Motions can be tabled criticizing a Government policy or a Minister. M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher (‘Practice and Procedure of Parliament’, 8th Ed.) states that Censure Motions can be moved against the Council of Ministers or an individual Minister or a group of Ministers for their failure to act or not to act or for their policy and may express regret, indignation or surprise of the House at the failure of the Minister or Ministers.

“Accordingly, I wish to inform this House to explore the possibility of submitting a substantive Motion instead of the current Motion in issue, in view of the national importance of the matters relating to the Easter Sunday Attack stated therein and as opined by the Attorney General, the specific facts in the Motion has no direct bearing to the cases pending before Courts.”



News

Compensation payments and reconstruction activities related to the Ditwah relief measures must be expedited with special attention at the district level – PM

Published

on

By

Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya emphasized that compensation payments and reconstruction activities related to the Ditwah relief measures must be expedited with special attention at the district level. She further stated that all necessary allocations have already been made to Provincial Councils and instructed that the progress of disaster damage assessments and reconstruction efforts be closely monitored at the provincial level.

The Prime Minister made these remarks at a discussion held on Tuesday  (21) at Temple Trees under her patronage, aimed at informing Chairpersons of District Coordination Committees and public representatives from disaster-affected districts, in order to accelerate the implementation of the “Rebuilding Sri Lanka” programme. The discussion focused on expediting disaster relief and compensation payments, as well as the swift restoration of infrastructure damaged by the disaster.

The Prime Minister emphasized that Rs. 500 billion has been allocated for damages caused by the Ditwah cyclone, and that all relevant development activities must be completed before the end of 2026. The Prime Minister also instructed officials to pay special attention to resolving issues at the local level that are causing delays in compensation payments.

Senior Additional Secretary to the President, G.M.R.D. Aponsu, stated that the estimated cost for reconstruction following the Ditwah cyclone is approximately USD 3.4 billion. Accordingly, funds have been allocated for compensation across several sectors including housing and social infrastructure, agriculture and livestock, fisheries, industry and livelihoods, and irrigation. He further noted that 99% of the Rs. 25,000 allowance has already been disbursed, while 95% of the Rs. 50,000 resettlement allowance has been paid. Compensation for fully and partially damaged houses is still ongoing, and 99% of temporary relief centres have been closed.

Additionally, attention was drawn to several other measures, including providing Rs. 25,000 to affected schoolchildren, paying Rs. 1 million as compensation for each deceased individual, compensation for children who lost one or both parents, support for persons with disabilities affected by the disaster, compensation for agricultural losses, and expediting resettlement of displaced families. Measures such as allocating land for new housing construction and accelerating the issuance of reports from the National Building Research Organization were also discussed.

Focus was also placed on the reconstruction of affected schools, hospitals, and daycare centres, improving the accuracy and speed of data collection at the local level, and accelerating infrastructure development.

The event was attended by Minister of Plantation and Community Infrastructure Samantha Vidyarathna,  Minister of Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government Dr. Chandana Abayarathna,  Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Livestock Namal Karunaratne,  Deputy Minister of Trade, Commerce, Food Security and Cooperatives R.M. Jayawardena,  Deputy Minister of Education Dr. Madhura Senevirathna,  Members of Parliament,  Chairpersons of District Coordination Committees,  Chief of Staff to the President and Commissioner General of Essential Services Prabath Chandrakeerthi, Additional Secretary to the President Jayantha Bandara; and officials of the Prime Minister’s Office.

[Prime Minister’s Media Division]

Continue Reading

News

Parliament urged to probe questionable payment of USD 2.5 mn from Treasury

Published

on

… five senior officials suspended

President’s Counsel Maithri Gunaratne has urged the Parliament to intervene in an ongoing investigation conducted by the Treasury into the wrongful payment of USD 2.5 mn loan instalment to a third party instead of the country that gave the loan to the Government of Sri Lanka.

Gunaratne, in a letter addressed to Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne copied to leaders of all political parties represented in Parliament, General Secretaries of those political parties, Committee on Public Finance, Auditor General and National Audit Office, has stated the payments were made between December 2025 and January 31, 2026.

Lawyer Gunaratne took up the issue on behalf of civil society grouping ‘Free Lawyers’ after gathering information related to the alleged payments. Spokesman for ‘Free Lawyers’ Keerthi Tennakoon told The Island that they expected the Parliament to act swiftly and decisively. Pointing out that the ‘disappearance’ of USD 2.5 mn took place amidst the massive National Development Bank (NDB) fraud, amounting to Rs. 13.2 bn, Tennakoon emphasised the responsibility of the Parliament to take charge of the investigation.

According to Gunaratne’s letter, seen by The Island, following an international investigation carried out by a technical committee, two Treasury Directors, two Deputy Treasury Directors and a senior official responsible for IT had been interdicted.

As the relevant payments amounted to USD 2.5 mn, the process couldn’t have been completed without the involvement of the Deputy Secretary, Treasury and Treasury Secretary, Gunaratne stated.

According to him, the Central Bank had been responsible for loan payments until recently but the alleged irregularities happened after that task was brought under the Department of External Resources and Public Debt Management Office.

The Free Lawyers said that as the Secretary to the Treasury, Harshana Suriyapperuma, was also the Secretary to the Finance Ministry, the Parliament should intervene to establish a suitable mechanism to investigate this.

Former NPP National List lawmaker Harshana Suriyapperuma succeeded Mahinda Siriwardena in late June 2025.

Tennakoon said that they felt the need to bring the shocking development to the public domain as those who knew of the incident remained silent.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

USD 2 mn bribe: CID ordered to arrest Shasheendra R, warrant issued against ex-SriLankan CEO’s wife

Published

on

Colombo Fort Magistrate Isuru Neththikumara has directed the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) to arrest former SriLankan Airlines board member Shasheendra Rajapaksa and produced him in court in connection with the ongoing probe into the Airbus deal during his uncle President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s second term.

The Magistrate sought an explanation from the CID regarding the delay in executing the arrest warrant in respect of Shasheendra Rajapaksa when the case was taken up yesterday (22).

Neththikumara issued a warrant on Priyanka Nayomali Wijenayake, the wife of former SriLankan Chief Executive Officer Kapila Chandrasena, over the investigations into the Airbus transaction.

The Chandrasenas have been accused of receiving US 2 mn bribe to facilitate the transaction.

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) is also inquiring into the Airbus deal. The Magistrate further ordered that the case pending before the Court be called again on May 20.

Continue Reading

Trending