Connect with us

News

SC ruling on economic crisis: Parliament also responsible, says Foreign Minister

Published

on

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Foreign Minister Ali Sabry, PC, yesterday said that Parliament like other institutions should bear responsibility for the unprecedented economic crisis caused during President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s administration.

Minister Sabry said so when The Island sought his response as regards the responsibility of Parliament for the developing situation against the backdrop of the country being bankrupted mainly due to overall mismanagement of the economy.

At the time of the eruption of public protests in early 2022, Minister Sabry served as the Foreign Minister of the Gotabaya Rajapaksa government.

Addressing the media at the President’s Media Centre (PMC), the SLPP National List MP dealt with the 2024 Budget presented by President Ranil Wickremesinghe, in his capacity as the Finance Minister.

Having compared the period leading to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ouster with the significant improvements made under incumbent President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s resolute leadership, the top lawyer explained how successive governments ruined the economy by resorting to utterly irresponsible strategies.

The first time entrant to Parliament, following the last general election held in Aug. 2020, Minister Sabry emphasized how flawed tax strategies over the years caused the economic ruination. The Minister questioned the rationale in 80:20 ratio in indirect and direct taxes when the acceptable radio was 60:40 world over. The Minister went on to highlight the circumstances that led to the drop in revenue to just over 8 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from 23% to 25% ahead of 2019/2020 crash.

Asked whether he had been present in the parliamentary chamber when a section of the ruling SLPP went berserk over a statement made by SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa in respect of the landmark Supreme Court judgment on economic crisis and what was his response to such unruly behaviour, the Minister said that he was there.

The SC on Nov 14 in a 4 to 1 verdict declared that former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, former Finance Ministers Mahinda Rajapaksa and Basil Rajapaksa, ex-Governors of the Central Bank Prof. W.D. Lakshman and Ajith Nivad Cabraal, ex-Finance Secretary S.R. Attygalle, Presidential Secretary Dr. P.B.J. Jayasundera and the then Monetary Board were responsible for the economic collapse.

They were directed to pay Rs 150,000 each to those who filed fundamental rights applications.

The Minister emphasized that he never condoned such conduct and he never behaved that way or intended to do so in the future. “That was one side of the issue. We see various interested parties interpret the SC ruling the way they want. I read this judgment entirely. The ruling doesn’t say there had been fraud and money robbed. Funds had been sent overseas and measures should put in place to recover the money. It doesn’t say so. The SC found fault with the respondents for their failure to take timely action to avert the crisis. One specific issue artificial measures to control Rupees. I have pointed this out even last year. The other issue was the tax cut. They were policy decisions. The third issue was the timing of the IMF intervention. The fallout of those decisions should be political.”

The Minister said that there was no harm in prosecuting if there were fraud and robbery. But the Rajapaksas had already taken responsibility for those decisions, Minister Sabry said, pointing out that Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who won a five-year term, had to quit, and the Prime Minister, too, had to go. The entire government had to be handed over. They have to face the people, the Minister said.

“We genuinely believed the government should have sought the IMF intervention at that time, the depreciation of the Rupee should have been allowed to some extent. Perhaps those who decide on policy may have felt they were right,” Minister Sabry, said reminding that Sri Lanka sought IMF interventions on 16 previous occasions.

Minister Sabry insisted that no one would come into politics if those who had been found fault for lapses on their part in respect of policy decisions were dealt with in terms of criminal liability. Reiterating that the fallout should be solely political, the Foreign Minister said, adding that in case someone engaged in fraud, corruption and crime he should bear criminal responsibility.



News

JSA opposes move to extend retirement ages of superior court judges

Published

on

Dr. Rajitha Senaratne

The Judicial Service Association (JSA), which represents the country’s magistrates and district judges, has unanimously adopted a resolution opposing the government’s proposed extension of the retirement age of superior court judges.

The resolution was passed at a special general meeting held at the Kaduwela Magistrate’s Court premises, attended by 65 magistrates and district judges from across the country.

The meeting was convened following the resignation of JSA President Pasan Amarasena, who stepped down in protest over the holding of the meeting.

According to the resolution, all members present voted in favour of opposing the proposed extension of the retirement age of Supreme Court and Court of Appeal judges.

Amarasena resigned after facing criticism for unilaterally expressing support for extending the retirement age of the Chief Justice. Following his resignation, JSA Secretary Suranga Munasinghe issued a statement to members rejecting the allegations contained in Amarasena’s resignation letter.

Meanwhile, former Health Minister Dr. Rajitha Senaratne claimed the government’s attempt to extend the tenure of superior court judges was aimed at securing their support in pursuing what he described as a campaign of political revenge against Opposition members.

Addressing a meeting at the Sri Lanka Freedom Party headquarters on Darley Road, Colombo, Senaratne argued that if the government’s justification was to retain experienced judges and avoid vacancies, similar retirement age extensions should also be granted to other professions, including university academics.

“The judges themselves have now unanimously opposed the government’s move, as reflected in the outcome of the Judicial Service Association’s special general meeting at Kaduwela,” he said.

by Chaminda Silva

Continue Reading

News

Next two weeks critical as dengue risk soars

Published

on

Mosquito larvae density in Sri Lanka’s Western Province has increased significantly, making the next two weeks an extremely high-risk period for dengue transmission, according to Consultant Physician Dr. Ananda Wijewickrama, a member of the Expert Committee on Dengue Management.

Speaking during a television programme, Dr. Wijewickrama warned that based on the current trend of dengue transmission, the situation could become more serious than the country’s 2017 dengue outbreak.

He said hospitals in the Western Province have already exceeded their capacity due to the sharp increase in patient admissions, with some facilities being forced to accommodate two or even three patients in a single hospital bed.

Also speaking during the programme, Prof. Neelika Malavige of the University of Sri Jayewardenepura said early signs of the current outbreak had been visible as far back as December and January.

“We could already see indications of this in December and January. With the current changes, the trend is not encouraging. We usually see an increase in dengue cases during the Southwest Monsoon period from May to July, and again during the Northeast Monsoon from November to January. When such conditions are expected, we need to be prepared in advance. After that, from February to April, we experienced extremely high temperatures, and mosquito breeding tends to slow down during periods of excessive heat,” she said.

Professor Malavige also noted that three dengue vaccines have been approved in various countries and are currently being used in several Asian nations, including Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia.

“However, there are many factors Sri Lanka would need to consider before introducing a dengue vaccine. It would not have an immediate impact on reducing an epidemic. The vaccine requires two doses, and it takes time for immunity to develop after vaccination. However, for people who have previously been infected with dengue, the vaccine has shown very good effectiveness,” she said.

Sri Lanka has so far reported 66,064 dengue cases this year, while the death toll has risen to 46.

A total of 10,685 cases were reported during the first nine days of July alone, including 1,030 new infections reported yesterday.

Of the total number of cases, 52.7% have been reported from the Western Province. Gampaha District has now overtaken Colombo District as the area recording the highest number of dengue infections.

Meanwhile, amid the heightened risk, special dengue control operations involving members of the armed forces were carried out today in several parts of the country.

by Pradeep Prasanna Samarakoon

Continue Reading

News

Budget 2027 on Nov. 12

Published

on

The second reading of the 2027 Appropriation Bill will be presented in Parliament on November 12, the Ministry of Finance announced.

The Ministry said the Bill will be published in the Government Gazette on September 18 and presented for its first reading in Parliament on October 7.

The draft Appropriation Bill for 2027, which sets out the proposed expenditure allocations for each Ministry, is scheduled to be submitted to the Cabinet for approval on September 14.

According to the Ministry, the second reading debate on the Budget will be held from November 13 to 20, while the Committee Stage debate is scheduled from November 21 to December 14.

Continue Reading

Trending