News
Sajith expresses concern over Sri Lanka’s ability to honour agreement with IMF
Vows to implement controversial 13 Amendment
SJB leader Sajith Premadasa has asserted that the National People’s Power government has not been able to create conditions for the country to start repaying lenders in 2028 in terms of the agreement with the IMF.
Premadasa, who is also the Opposition Leader expressed that view in an interview with Sidhant Sibal of the Indian media outlet WION.
Asked whether the NPP government would be able to fulfill the key mandate, key demand, key pledges made during the elections and able to find the money that needs to be returned to the international lenders beginning 2028, the SJB leader said: Well, I can say quite openly that there is a mismatch between declarations that were made and actions that are taking place. I will confine myself to that. 2028 is the year that brings us towards the decision day. That’s when our foreign debt obligations have to be fulfilled on a mass scale, on a large scale. In order to do so, we have to have fast economic growth, better foreign exchange reserves, vast improvements in export led growth and export led income, ensure our remittances at a very high level. And most important of all, we need to have mass scale foreign direct investment. So in all of those aspects, we seem to not be achieving according to the requisite targets, and 2028 should not be a repetition of 2022. So we all have to unite as a country to ensure that that social debacle is not repeated, but it’s very challenging. The path is full of obstacles, but with a determined approach, with the correct approach, with an authentic economic and development policy, we can achieve our objectives. Those challenges and obstacles are not insurmountable.
Sidhant Sibal:Do you have any sense why this region, the Indian subcontinent, has witnessed these protests which have toppled governments? What’s your sense like as a leading politician, as a statesman of this region?
Sajith Premadasa:I think it’s different from country to country. I think the economic disaster, coupled with pressures and distress that were put on people due to the consequences of terrorist bombing, Easter Sunday bombing, the covid-19 crisis, all these came together and created a very, very propitious environment for dissenting opinions to come onto the streets. You had large queues for fuel, for bread, consumer items, gas and various other items that are needed to fulfill basic human needs. So Sri Lanka’s case, primarily, was predicated upon the economic situation. So it changes from country to country. I think in democracies, this should not be the case. Primarily this takes place because we don’t have sound policy making structures and processes that give out positive policy results, because the democracy, the democratic nature and democracies have to be protected. It cannot be subjugated to mob violence or mob rule.
However, if the very same democratic systems result in constraining the democratic space. If the youth are not given their proper right to voice their opinions in the democratic structures, then we will have a problem. So it’s very important that the democratic structures are strengthened, strengthened to such an extent that we have sound policy making that results in good policies.
Sidhant Sibal: How do you see India’s support to your country during the economic crisis?
Sajith Premadasa:Sri Lanka went through triple tragedies, the Easter Sunday terrorist attack, the Covid health disaster, the bankruptcy situation due to ill-devised economic policies. When Sri Lanka was in trouble, when the people were in distress, India supported us, and India continues to support us. India has been the single largest donor to the tune of 4.2 billion US dollars in providing support that has provided some relief to the people of our country, so we are extremely grateful. I think we should base our relationship on authentic understanding of our own diversities in our countries, of our own national identities, and ensure that our roadmaps go hand in hand to bring about prosperity for the people, prosperity for the country, engage in constructive manner in all of the sectors, economic, political, social, educational, health, industrial. Ensure the connectivity is strengthened, and we will support that approach.
Sidhant Sibal: What’s your sense on the security dimension? In the past, there have been concerns in Delhi over visits of research vessels, especially from China to Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka introduced a moratorium as well. So what’s your sense like if we have a potential government led by you in the future? What will be your message to New Delhi?
Sajith Premadasa: From our perspective, security is established through perpetuation of peace. We need to have peace building. We need to cooperate, and we must have a much broader definition of security. It is not just political, military security, it spans other sectors, economic security, social security. So we have a very broad definition of security. Within that broad definition, if all of the countries that have misunderstandings, that have differing opinions on a variety of global issues, regional issues, in the name of peace building, if one can cooperate, come to understandings, as I see it from recent events, we see that there has been some normalization of relations between India and China. So that is good. That is good for peace. But as far as Sri Lanka and India are concerned, we have a special relationship. That special relationship has to be enhanced, has to be promoted and built upon. But working with India as a special friend, but also working with others, ensure that the security interests of all are protected through peace, through peace building, through peacemaking. That’s the approach that we will take.
Sidhant Sibal:What’s your sense like when it comes to your country’s relationship with China, your country’s relationship with India? I know it’s a tricky balancing act.
Sajith Premadasa: This word balance that comes about if we have these relations at a lower level. No, our relationship with all these countries is at a much higher level, common security, common prosperity, benefit for our peoples. So it’s an overarching approach that we have that does not go into petty political issues. We should look at the common interests. Common interests are best served by peace building, by prevalence of peace and security that will result in economic growth, prosperity and prosperity for our people. So what is of utmost importance is to reduce suspicion, have mutual respect, mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity, sovereignty, political independence and its political character.If countries work on those principles in their international state relations, the world would be a better place.
Sidhant Sibal:In terms of the 13th Amendment as the leader of the opposition, what’s your sense like? What’s your view like?
Sajith Premadasa: All I can tell you is our position. Our position has been as always, as mentioned in our manifestos, that we will implement the 13th Amendment. People expect the implementation, not just the north and east. It covers all nine provinces of our country. It has provided political, economic, and social empowerment through provincial governments, and we must ensure that the present law of the land is part of the supreme law of the land, and part of the Constitution is implemented. So there is no need to speculate about our position. We are crystal clear about the fact that we have to implement the 13th Amendment, and we have said so, and we have done so through our pronouncements, our declarations, our proclamations, interviews, and most importantly, through our social contract with the people. That’s a political manifesto, and we will continue.
Sidhant Sibal:There is a joint opposition protest that is being planned later this month in your country, but your party is perhaps not taking part in it, any reason, any specific reasons,
Sajith Premadasa:What happens in our country as far as governance and opposition politics is concerned, I don’t think it’s right for me to come to India and have discussions regarding those things, but all I can say is, as a proactive opposition, we have addressed the shortcomings of the present policies, policies that have been anti-people, and of course, we will stand by the people and ensure that people’s rights, human rights, in its broad definition, political, civic, economic, social, cultural, religious and all other rights are protected. It’s very important that when we embark on programs, that those programs are done in a coherent manner.
What’s important is to have a common approach, a coherent strategy. And people want to see the viable alternative, and that viable alternative has to be formulated. It has to be coherent, and that ideology has to be accepted by the people, so at the end of the day, it’s the wish of the people, and we will mobilize the forces, the People’s forces, at the right time, to ensure that people’s grievances are addressed. That the national policies are formulated to serve the interests of the people, rather than the political hierarchy, and we will work according to our own political strategies to achieve those ends.
Sidhant Sibal:
Are Trump’s tariffs a worry for you?
Sajith Premadasa: Certainly, the reciprocal tariff efforts by the United States has created uncertainty, global uncertainty, uncertainty in the economic sectors and uncertainty in the business sectors. So Sri Lanka, for one, needs to approach, and needs to formulate an approach, to work with the US government to ensure that our tariff rates are further reduced.
As you may know, a vast majority of our garment exports go to limited destinations, of which the United States is one, along with, the UK and the European Union. So we have a problem having not diversified our trade destinations.
So we as a country should ensure that we promote a policy of export market diversification in terms of destinations are concerned, while at the same time working with the US administration and working in a constructive, progressive and productive manner to get the tariff rates that have been imposed, which I believe are 20% to a lower level.
News
India should be kept out of PC polls, matters related to 13 A – Mano
Leader of the Tamil Progressive Alliance (TPA), Mano Ganeshan, MP, said that India shouldn’t intervene here regarding the long-delayed Provincial Council polls.
The former Yahapalana Minister of National Co-existence, Dialogue and Official Languages (2015-2018), Ganeshan, who represents the main Opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) in the current Parliament, stressed that New Delhi’s intervention wouldn’t do any good for them or for us.
Lawmaker Ganeshan said so when The Island asked him whether the TPA would ask India to pressure the NPP government to conduct PC polls, last held in 2014, during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s second term. Ganeshan said: “India shouldn’t get involved in the issue at hand . Such a strategy is also in their interest, particularly in the context of the evolving global order. India should not be perceived as a pro-Tamil state, but rather as a state that supports Sri Lanka as a whole.”
Ganeshan said that the Indian state bears a moral responsibility in this matter. “That responsibility arises from the fact that India’s diplomacy and military intervention played a decisive role in neutralising the Tamil armed struggle in Sri Lanka. Although India’s mission remained unfinished, it nevertheless lost nearly two thousand soldiers in the process. There was also a prelude to this involvement, when Tamil militant groups received training in India. Consequently, the Indian connection became a sensitive issue for both the Sinhalese and Tamils of Sri Lanka.”
But, whatever had happened, the national issue should be settled among us. ” The solution must be found and settled within Sri Lanka itself. We do not need Western interventions in this regard.”
” In recent years, whenever we in the Tamil Progressive Alliance (TPA) have met Indian dignitaries—including the Prime Minister, the External Affairs Minister, and, most recently, the Vice President—the subjects of the 13th Amendment and Provincial Councils have never featured on our agenda.”
The 13th Amendment is part of Sri Lanka’s Constitution. Therefore, it is for Sri Lankans themselves to decide whether to retain, improve, fully implement, reform, or even repeal it, Ganeshan said.
MP Ganeshan found fault with those who represented the Northern and Eastern provinces for failing to utilise the goodwill and influence India enjoyed with successive Governments of Sri Lanka to pursue an amicable political settlement. The parliamentarian said that they should acted after the end of the war in May, 2009. Unfortunately, they failed to effectively use the Provincial Council framework to consolidate their political position and advance further, thereby earning the confidence of both India and successive Sinhala-majority governments, MP Ganeshan said.
Responding to another query, MP Ganeshan said: “
We should keep the ethnic issue separate from bilateral relations with India, while deepening economic connectivity and cooperation on the basis of mutual benefit and a win-win partnership.”
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
US boost for SLAF
Sri Lanka has taken delivery of 10 TH-57 ‘Sea Ranger’ multi-role helicopters provided by the United States of America to the Sri Lanka Air Force. Air Forces headquarters said that the helicopters arrived here by sea.
The SLAF has said: “The arrival of these aircraft marks a significant milestone in the longstanding defence cooperation between Sri Lanka and the United States and represents a valuable contribution towards enhancing the operational and training capabilities of the Sri Lanka Air Force.
“The helicopters are currently undergoing configurations and technical preparations at SLAF Base Ratmalana. Following the completion of requisite inspections, acceptance procedures and test flights, the aircraft will be inducted into service and deployed for operational duties.
“The TH-57 fleet is expected to significantly strengthen the Air Force’s aviation training capacity while enhancing the ability to support a broad spectrum of national requirements. The aircraft will primarily be employed for pilot training, humanitarian assistance and disaster response (HADR) operations, search and rescue (SAR) missions and other public service commitments undertaken by the Sri Lanka Air Force.”
News
TPA demands House committee to probe Tilvin’s claim PC polls cannot be held due to fund constraints
Referring to the recent declaration made by JVP General Secretary Tilvin Silva that the Provincial Council elections couldn’t be held this year as funds allocated for that purpose were utilised to provide Ditwah cyclone relief, Tamil Progressive Front (TPA) leader Mano Ganeshan, MP, has asked Dr. Harsha de Silva, MP Chairman, Committee on Public Finance, to inquire into the issue at hand and take action deemed appropriate.
The text of MP Ganeshan’s letter: “I write with reference to a statement reportedly made by Tilvin Silva, General Secretary of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), the principal constituent party of the National People’s Power (NPP) Government.
According to media reports, Silva stated, in substance, that funds allocated and set aside for the conduct of Provincial Council Elections had been utilised by the Government for disaster-rebuilding and related purposes.
While he is reported to have made further remarks, I confine my attention to the above statement, which raises a serious matter concerning public finance and parliamentary oversight.
To the best of my knowledge, Parliament has not approved any transfer or reallocation of funds, earmarked for Provincial Council Elections, to any other expenditure head or purpose. If the statement, attributed to Mr. de Silva, is accurate, it may indicate that such funds have been utilised without the requisite parliamentary authorisation.
In view of the above, I respectfully request that the Committee on Public Finance inquire into this matter and ascertain whether any transfer, reallocation, or expenditure of funds allocated for Provincial Council Elections has occurred in a manner inconsistent with parliamentary approval and financial regulations.
I would be grateful if the Committee could examine the facts and take any action deemed appropriate within its mandate.”
-
News4 days agoIMF urges Lanka not to meddle with exchange rate
-
Business5 days agoSri Lanka’s construction industry losing ground while no one watches
-
Business2 days agoIMF’s unstated rate:Sri Lanka’s $695m loan costs about 5.33% per annum
-
News4 days agoState of emergency extended
-
Features5 days agoThe Division Bell Mystery
-
News2 days agoUNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act
-
News6 days agoRTI query of Ditwah funds: Presidential Secretariat mum on key questions
-
Features3 days agoAre threats to Buddha Sasana external or from within?
