Connect with us

News

MR blames economic crisis on Yahapalana leaders

Published

on

Mahinda Rajapaksa

SLPP leader Mahinda Rajapaksa yesterday (28) hit back at critics, claiming that a robust economy had been built under his presidency. He said the UNP-SLFP government which ruled the country during the 2015-2019 period should be held responsible for the current economic crisis.

The following is the text of a statement, titled ‘the origins of Sri Lanka’s economic crisis’ issued by former President Rajapaksa: “A heated discussion is now taking place about those responsible for the present economic crisis. The Central Bank reports will show that during my nine years as President, economic growth averaged 6% a year during the four war years, from 2006 to 2009, and it increased to 6.8% in the five post-war years, from 2010 to 2014. Hence Sri Lanka’s per capita GDP increased threefold from USD 1,242, at the end of 2005, to USD 3,819 by the end of 2014. The contribution that my government made to Sri Lanka’s per capita GDP was well over twice that of all other post-independence governments, from 1948 to 2005, put together. Though the per capita GDP came down to USD 3,474 in 2022 as the pandemic caused the economy to contract, that statement remains valid to this day.

The debt to GDP ratio was a very healthy 69% at the end of 2014 having being brought down from 90% at the end of 2005. The All Share Price Index rose from 1,922, at the end of 2005, to 7,299 by the end of 2014. This economic boom was achieved despite the war, the global food crisis of 2007, the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the highest crude oil prices in world history. Crude oil cost an average of USD 74 per barrel throughout the entire period from 2006 to 2009 and an average of USD 103 from 2010 to 2014. The IMF Country Report No. 14/285 of September 2014 stated firstly that Sri Lanka’s “Macroeconomic performance has generally exceeded expectations”. Secondly that “Sri Lanka has made notable advances in recent years, and appears to be on its way to joining the ranks of upper middle income countries”. Thirdly that “Sri Lanka’s economic growth has been among the fastest in Asia’s frontier and developing economies in recent years”.

Hence the fact that I left behind a very robust economy in January 2015 is well documented. After I was voted out, the economic growth rate dropped to 4.2% in 2015 and ended up in the negative range at 0.2% below zero by 2019. Sri Lanka’s total outstanding external debt had increased by nearly 28% from USD 42,914 million at the end of 2014, to USD 54,811 million by the end of 2019. The debt to GDP ratio which had been brought down to 69% by the end of 2014, had increased to nearly 82% by the end of 2019. The All Share Price Index declined from 7,299 at the end of 2014 to 5,990 by the end of October 2019. Yet during the entire five-year period from 2015 to 2019 the average price of crude oil was USD 60 per barrel – the lowest in recent history.

There were no external reasons for Sri Lanka’s economic decline between 2015 and 2019. India and Bangladesh experienced average growth rates in excess of 7% and the Maldives over 6% during this period. Even developed countries like the USA and Germany experienced robust economic performance during those years. However, Sri Lanka’s average growth rate between 2015 and 2019 was just 3.5%, equal to the growth rate recorded in 2021 at the height of the pandemic. The accumulation of foreign commercial debt between 2015 and 2019 particularly in the form of International Sovereign Bonds (ISBs) was by far the worst disaster to befall us during that period.

When I was defeated in January 2015, outstanding ISBs amounted to USD 5,000 million and it was amply covered by our foreign reserves of USD 8,208 million. However, between 2015 and 2019 outstanding ISBs increased threefold to USD 15,050 with borrowings of USD 2,150 million in 2015, USD 1,500 million in 2016, USD 1,500 million in 2017, 2,500 million USD in 2018 and USD 4,400 million in 2019. Of this, USD 2,000 million was used to rollover ISB’s taken during my tenure, thus the total amount in new ISB’s issued between 2015 and 2019 is USD 10,050 million. Despite the build-up of the stock of outstanding ISBs to USD 15,050, Sri Lanka’s total foreign reserves was just USD 7,642 million at the end of 2019.

Thus, when I became Prime Minister again in November 2019, our government inherited an economy that was already on its last legs. It was in this weak and vulnerable situation that the Covid-19 pandemic hit Sri Lanka in early 2020 – the consequences of which needs further discussion. In any discussion of the economy, it is vital to note that the per capita GDP is the most fundamental economic indicator used to judge the economic situation of a country and the contribution of my 2006-2014 government to increasing Sri Lanka’s per capita GDP is more than double that of all other post- independence governments put together. The people of this country should base their decisions on proper data and facts and not on noise, lies and propaganda. Sri Lanka cannot afford another political mistake like that of January 2015. “



News

Harsha flays govt. over plan to pass coal, Treasury losses to public

Published

on

Harsha de Silva

Chairman of the Public Finance Committee Dr. Harsha de Silva, MP, yesterday (31) said that the National People’s Power (NPP) government was going ahead with a controversial move to pass on the massive losses caused by the coal scam to the public. The government also intended to recover USD 2.5 (approximately Rs 800 mn) lost by the Treasury from the people by introducing an amendment to the Budget, the Opposition lawmaker alleged.

Dr de Silva said that the government had been compelled to increase the supply of diesel for the oil-fired power plants to meet the Norochcholai generation shortfall due to the use of substandard coal.

Responding to The Island queries, the former State Minister said that regardless of repeated assurances that electricity consumers wouldn’t be burdened for the lapse on their part, the government, in writing, has assured the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to recover the losses from the public. This came to light after the IMF released the Letter of Intent submitted by the government following the completion of the combined Fifth and Sixth Reviews under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) programme to receive USD 695 mn.

Commenting on the specific assurance as regards the upward revision of fuel prices and electricity tariffs, MP de Silva pointed out the government’s assurance of its commitment to cost-recovery pricing for fuel and electricity meant that subsidies provided to ease the burden on households and businesses would remain within budgeted limits and be phased out by the end of September 2026.

Welcoming the USD 695 mn IMF loan, MP de Silva said that in terms of the agreement between the government and the IMF, the relief would end once Rs 100 bn allocated to provide relief was spent on subsidies on fuel (Rs 57 bn), electricity (Rs 15 bn) and the rest on ‘Aswesuma’ social welfare scheme and fertiliser.

MP de Silva said that the crisis should be examined taking into consideration that Sri Lanka paid very high prices to procure fuel in the wake of the continuing turmoil in West Asia. He noted that having perpetrated a coal scam the government could not under any circumstances absolve itself of responsibility for the skyrocketing electricity tariffs.

Commenting on the Sri Lanka-IMF agreement, lawmaker de Silva lambasted the government for utterly chaotic and poor management of the economy. Severe criticism was directed at the government over the rapid depreciation of the rupee against the USD and the NPP’s pathetic performance. Amidst speculation that De Silva may switch allegiance to the NPP, the MP also posted a video in which he flayed the government alleging the NPP couldn’t take forward measures taken by former President Ranil Wickremesinghe.

MP de Silva explained how the people would end paying for the theft of USD 2.5 by way of an amendment to the Budget. The MP told The Island that assurance meant that the government acknowledged that there was no hope of recovering USD 2.5 mn though they talked of investigations and progress being made. De Silva called for a combined Opposition effort to pressure the government to act responsibly in the face of growing challenges.

The government couldn’t lie as the relevant IMF report and the government letter of intent were in the public domain, Dr de Silva said.

by Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

PM opens Vesak pandals

Published

on

The PM opening a Vesak pandal

Two Vesak pandals erected in the Colombo area to mark Vesak Poya were ceremonially opened under the patronage of Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya.

The Prime Minister first opened a pandal depicting the Sambula Jataka, constructed by the Sri Vaishakya Society of the Borella Magazine United Traders’ Association. She subsequently attended the opening of another pandal at the Grandpass Kosgas Junction, which portrays the Samudra Vanija Jataka tale, and ceremonially inaugurated it by lighting a traditional coconut-oil lamp.

The event was attended by members of the Maha Sangha, clergy of other faiths, Members of Parliament Dr. Najith Indika, Attorney-at-Law Lakmali Hemachandra and Dilith Jayaweera, Deputy Inspector General of Police Nihal Thalduwa, former Member of Parliament Thilanga Sumathipala, and President of the Magazine United Traders’ Association Palitha Herath, among others.

Continue Reading

News

UNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act

Published

on

The UNP yesterday said that the government did not have the power to establish a Dharma Court. According to the Constitution, neither the executive, the legislature nor the judiciary had the power to interpret the Dharma, it added. The power to pass laws on disciplining the clergy had been granted to Parliament in terms of Article 105 of the Constitution, the UNP said, emphasising that the ultimate powers lay with the committees of the respective sects.

The UNP said so in response to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s recent speech that a concept paper had been submitted for amending the Vihara – Devalagam Act and the Cabinet had approved it. The President further stated that he had held a discussion with the Registrar, the Commissioner for Buddhist Affairs and the Attorney General. It is not known whether he discussed the matter with the Buddhist MPs in the Opposition.

Excerpts of the statement issued by former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Office: ” President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has recently publicly agreed to a call to take the same measures as previous kings in cases where the Buddhist religion is distorted under the guise of Dhamma.

Over our history we have seen some kings kill the Sangha during their reigns. The JVP also killed the Sangha in the same way during the years 1987-89.Kotikawatte Saddhatissa, Weltota Pangnadassi, Beligalle Mahinda, Kumbagoda Gnanaloka, Athurugiriya Pangnatissa, Soragune Pangnasara, Pelpola Dharmapala, Kandy Dhammarakkhitha and many other monks are included in the list of the JVP’s assassinations.

Apart from shedding the blood of the Buddha, the greatest sin that Buddhists can commit is the killing of the Sangha.  The JVP has not apologised for the killings. Is it moral for the President to accept this invitation without first taking this step?

In addition to killing the Sangha, the JVP also looted valuable historical items from the monasteries and temples.

The JVP has never accepted that Buddhism should be given priority politically. The JVP has always acted against Buddhism.

A major question that arises from this is whether the JVP, which has a history of killing monks, can do such a thing after taking power. What is the hidden motive here?

Mr. J. R. Jayewardene took steps to include a separate chapter in the 1978 Constitution to take necessary measures for monks who behave undisciplined and engage in crimes.  Provisions were made for the establishment of a Sangha Court to decide on the discipline of monks.

What did the NPP government done during the Sinhala and Tamil New Year? It disrupted all the auspicious signs. While the whole world was celebrating Vesak Poya on May 1st, the Vesak Poya day in Sri Lanka was postponed to a later date in order to hold political rallies.

There is no objection to taking action against unruly monks. But there is a procedure for how to discipline monks. Cabinet papers related to this should be prepared and presented to the Maha Sangha led by the Mahanayaka Theros and then a decision should be taken. Everything should be carried forward according to the existing tradition in the country.

The President has also expressed his views on taking monks to court. He has expressed such views without understanding the tradition. Taking wrong-doing monks to court in their robes is not something that only happened yesterday. Thalduwe Somarama and Mapitigama Buddharakkhita were presented to court wearing their robes for the assassination of Mr. Bandaranaike and later their robes were removed. This is not limited to monks. Father Mathew Peiris first came to court for legal proceedings wearing his robe. Accordingly, the monks who are currently acting in an undisciplined manner must also follow the same procedure that was implemented earlier.

The President mentioned in his speech that a concept paper was submitted for amending the Vihara – Devalagam Act and the Cabinet agreed to it. The President further stated that he had held a discussion with the Registrar, the Commissioner for Buddhist Affairs and the Attorney General. It is not known whether he had discussed this matter with the opposition Buddhist parliamentarians. This work has all been done only by the government without any consultation.

The government does not have the power to establish a Dharma Court. According to the Constitution, neither the executive, the legislature nor the judiciary have the power to interpret the Dharma. The power to pass laws on disciplining the clergy has been given to Parliament under Article 105 of the Constitution. However, the final powers lie with the committees of the respective sects. At present, this work has been done by the cabinet, officials and a handful of monks of a government that does not accept Buddhism.

The temples with the most assets and properties today are in the monasteries and temples that fall under the Vihara – Devalaya Village Act.  It is no secret that the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) is taking the position that these temples should be taken under government control. There is a strong suspicion that the Dharma Court is being created for this purpose.

An organized program to destroy Buddhism is being implemented today through government-affiliated social media. A section of civil society is also involved in it. What is always happening today is the marginalization of the Buddhist monastic-lay opinion.In the President’s speech, a reference was also made to the holding of the World Buddhist Congress in this country under the current government.

Such a situation is also indicated in the Vasala Sutta.

“Na jaccha vasalo hoti,

Na jaccha hoti brahmano;

Kammana vasalo hoti,

Kammana hoti brahmano”

Its Sinhala meaning is as follows.

“One is not a householder by birth.Nor is one a Brahmin by birth.One becomes a householder or a Brahmin by one’s actions.”

Continue Reading

Trending