Opinion
More participatory democracy, less burden on rulers
by Susantha Hewa
A Shramadana (collaborative work) in a village is a good example of participatory democracy in action, where it is “of the villagers, by the villagers, for the villagers”. Of course, a few would organize and lead but they don’t stand to benefit more than the others. The coordinators would get their due praise for leading but they are not any more materially benefitted than the rest of the villagers.
They organize it for the common good and, as such, they want the whole village to participate and contribute so that there wouldn’t be idlers or freeloaders who would thrive on the sweat of the others.
The general principle of this kind of Shramadana – the participation of all for the benefit of all, seems to be the better alternative to the ‘representative’ democracy in our country, which has thus far amply benefitted the representatives and deluded the masses. Our brand of representative democracy has slowly and unmistakably empowered the representatives and weakened the masses that are said to be supreme. The empowerment of the representatives is good in so far as their power is used for the betterment of the masses.
However, as we can see today, the empowerment of the politicians has been inversely proportional to that of the masses, which is a travesty of true democracy, which, after all, is expected to empower people. Democracy is said to work better when the rulers are held accountable for their actions, instead of people being made to pay for the sins of the former, as it is happening today.
Our rulers breezily invite people to ‘join hands’ with them, but can they be more explicit about what they mean by that? Surely, if what they mean is more participatory democracy- allowing more space for people to participate in deciding on important national policies, they would have wished people to be more active rather than confining themselves to voting at the next election.
However, our rulers have never shown any interest in considering the views of the public in decision making. However, their inclination to sternly distance the public from the realms of active politics, curtail freedoms of expression, bring in repressive laws to stifle social media, etc., can only mean that what they mean by joining hands is mere rhetoric.
If joining hands is to be understood as “working harder” in their respective fields, all we can say is that people have already been working hard enough, many of them, merely to eke out an existence and that they have never been the beneficiaries of their hard work. All their work has ended in making them poorer by the year while those who have come to politics to ‘serve the masses’ have always been living in grand style.
In other words, our democracy, in its existing form, which bars people from gaining reasonable space for participating in decision making, has served only the politicians, plentifully at that.
Thus far, voting every five years or so has been, more or less, an act of revenge; to ‘punish’ the incumbent regime. This may not be the best version of democracy in an informed and proactive society. Asking people to join hands with them every time they have ruined the economy seems to have only one meaning and that is “be ready to suffer more”.
Allowing people to take a more active role in democratic politics instead of just consigning them to be voters as they have been all these years, would save our politicians from the unpleasant task of explaining why people should suffer further. After all, there can be a more people-centred democracy where more citizens are made to be active in politics – if politics were to mean the active participation of as many citizens as possible in working towards the wellbeing of all – not the usual stuff of power games and plundering of national wealth with impunity – politicians’ job wouldn’t be to explain every now and then why things are going bad. Instead, it would allow politicians to apportion to the public their share of responsibility in governance.
Today, the incumbent regime is telling us that it is taking unpopular decisions, as if nobody would know it unless it is announced! However, they don’t tell us that those “unpopular decisions” (a) are unpopular only among the masses and not among political parasites and sycophants (b) are taken for no fault of the people (c) are taken so as to make the people pay for the sins of the crooks (d) shouldn’t be misread as ‘bitter now but beneficial in the long term’ as many people would tend to interpret it, and, last but not least, (e) would eventually turn out to be unwise, unproductive and unsustainable. In short, taking “unpopular decisions” will not merit adulation, if those unpopular decisions are likely to give added license for the selfsame politicians to justify taking still more unpopular decisions with no benefits to the people.
The reality is that all these years, our politicians have gradually distanced themselves from the common people, relying on the police to handle those who dare come out for street protests as a result of their being denied of involvement in “active politics”- which, incidentally, is not the same as ‘party politics’, which we have very little to thank for considering the present crisis.
Democratic politics have to be more proactive and civilian friendly, where the citizens, without being passive, can indirectly participate in governance without allowing our representatives to become more and more aggressively empowered. We can see what the country has come to as a result of this total faith in what we have understood as representative parliamentary democracy, which has gradually deteriorated by strengthening the hands of the rulers and disempowering the citizens whose sovereignty is said to be inviolable.
In a strong and healthy democracy where people can live a decent life with dignity, they may, instead of protesting against taxes, ask for tax increases to ensure more comfort, better facilities and cleaner environment that will enhance the overall feeling of a contented life. The idea of people demanding tax increases isn’t mere fiction. George Monbiot, writer, environmental and political activist reports an instance where people in Porto Alegre- city, capital of Rio Grande, southern Brazil, where a large number of people had asked the city council to raise their taxes (Out of the Wreckage).
Sri Lankans would love to pay more taxes if they know how to manage it with their monthly income and if they know that such taxes will be used for their benefit and not as an easy alternative to let the tax evading sharks off the hook.
Can our rulers convince the people that their taxes will pay dividends one day?
Opinion
Lankan hotels and price discrimination
In planning a long trip to Sri Lanka from the UK, I was disappointed to see different hotel pricing for foreign visitors when compared to local rates. Like many travellers, I prefer to book directly with hotels, rather than international hotel consolidators, as more money goes to local businesses. But the assumption that foreigners should pay more is simply distasteful. As such, I’ve chosen another long-haul destination that does not follow such practices, and hope that Sri Lanka will change its approach to overseas visitors in the near future.
Neil Roskilly Wetherlee UK
Opinion
When will this craziness end?
We are living in ‘Trump times’ characterised by never ending craziness but it is not confined to the USA alone. I will come to our part of the world later. As a large part is due to Trump, perhaps, normalcy may return when he ends his second term on 20th January 2029, at 12.00PM Eastern Standard Time. We cannot be sure of that either because the ‘Great man’ may decide to govern the world for ever, after having purchased Greenland and forcing Canada to be the 51st state of the US!
Trump had an unprecedented opportunity, being only the second to be elected to a non-consecutive second term as the US President, the other being Grover Cleveland at the tail end of the nineteenth century. If only he kept to his campaign promises, his name would have been written in history in golden letters but the complete transformation, following the election, is likely to make his name go down as one of the craziest!
It is a moot point whether even Trump knows what he is going to do that day, when he wakes up, considering the illogicality of some actions, best illustrated by the ad-hoc imposition of tariffs without any discussions or negotiations. The adverse effects of these, to the world economy, is yet to be seen compounded, of course, by the continuing war with Iran. He promised to be a ‘Peace-maker’ but turns out to be a war-monger, like many of his predecessors! His excuse was that he went to war because he was denied the Nobel Peace Prize.
Well, he got the FIFA Peace Prize from FIFA President Gianni Infantino, another shameless leader who is ruining the ‘Beautiful Game’. When a US team member was given the red-card, Trump, who claims to know better than referees, decided it was not so, with a successful appeal to Infantino. During the next World Cup match, Belgium, supercharged with this injustice, thrashed the USA team 4-1.
Even the Semiquincentennial celebration of the US was not about the country but about himself! In fact, a cynic may point out that most of what the US has left behind, over the 250 years, is death and destruction. Paradoxically, whilst fighting a war with Iran to prevent it acquiring nuclear capabilities, the US is the only country to have dropped Atom Bombs, not one but two. Even though Japan was on the verge of admitting defeat, ‘Little Boy’, a uranium-based bomb, was dropped over Hiroshima on 6th August, 1945. Not giving time for Japan even to consider surrender, the second ‘Fat Man’, a plutonium implosion bomb, was dropped over Nagasaki, just three days later. Why did the US drop two A-bombs in rapid succession? It was to test the two different types of bombs they had.
Over the past 250 years, the US has started wars in many countries and, in most instances, lost leaving behind a trail of devastation and destruction. In spite of all that, it is continuing its war with Iran, a war that was started with false intelligence supplied by the war-monger Netanyahu who predicted the instantaneous fall of the Clerical regime in Iran. This war has turned out to be a blessing in disguise for Iran, as it realised the economic value of the Strait of Hormuz. The language Trump uses in reference to Iran is despicable. What sane person, nay a world leader, refers to flattening of a country and erasure of a civilisation?
Back in Sri Lanka, we know that most of our modern-day politicians are also self-serving. They are also very good at amassing wealth, when in power, just like the Trump family had done. However, what is of concern is the rapid decline in the standards of some vital professional classes. Special reference has to be made to the Attorney-General’s Department. Perhaps, the present holder is a decent man but some of his predecessors brought the high position into disrepute.
Dappula Livera allegedly concocted a conspiracy theory about the Easter Sunday terror mastermind as President Gotabaya Rajapaksa denied him an extension in service as the Attorney General. If he has any information about such a conspiracy, it is his bounden duty to come out with facts but has not done so.
A remark recently made by Deputy Solicitor General Dileepa Pieris about gallantry medals awarded to military personnel is said to have caused an affront to the dignity of Air Force officer Shantha Jayathilleke, who has received the highest decoration awarded to a living officer and sought to represent the interests of former Director of State Intelligence Service Maj. Gen. (retd.) Suresh Sallay as permitted by the Penal Code.
When political leaders and professionals holding high office behave in this manner, is there any hope for the nation?
By Dr. Upul Wijayawardhana
Opinion
Prime Minister’s contribution to education reforms
Education has always been one of the strongest foundations of Sri Lanka’s social and economic development. In today’s rapidly changing world, however, education must prepare students not only for examinations but also for life, employment, innovation, and responsible citizenship. Recognising this need, the government of Sri Lanka has introduced a new programme of education reforms. As Prime Minister and Minister of Education, Higher Education and Vocational Education, Dr. Harini Amarasuriya has played a leading role in guiding and promoting these reforms, with the aim of creating a more inclusive, modern, and student-centered education system.
One of the Prime Minister’s most significant contributions has been providing a clear vision for transforming the education system. Rather than focusing only on examination results, the reforms seek to develop students’ creativity, critical thinking, communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and emotional well-being. This approach recognizes that success in the twenty-first century requires a broad range of skills that go beyond memorisation.
A major feature of the reforms is the introduction of a new curriculum. The Prime Minister has emphasised that revised syllabuses will be introduced in stages, beginning with Grades 1 and 6, before expanding to other grades over the following years. The updated curriculum is designed to make learning more engaging, practical, and relevant to modern society. It encourages inquiry-based learning, teamwork, creativity, and the application of knowledge to real-life situations rather than relying solely on textbook learning.
Teacher development has also been identified as a key priority. The Prime Minister has repeatedly stressed that meaningful reforms cannot succeed without well-trained and motivated teachers. As a result, the government has planned professional development programmes to help teachers understand the new curriculum, adopt modern teaching methods, and integrate digital technology into classroom instruction. Strengthening teachers’ skills ensures that students receive a higher quality education and are better prepared for future challenges.
Improving school infrastructure is another important contribution under the Prime Minister’s leadership. Many schools across Sri Lanka continue to face shortages of classrooms, laboratories, libraries, and digital learning facilities. The reform programme aims to reduce these disparities by giving priority to improving physical infrastructure, upgrading learning environments, and ensuring that children from rural and urban areas have more equal educational opportunities. These investments are expected to create safer, more effective, and more inclusive learning spaces for all students.
The reforms also place strong emphasis on digital education. As technology continues to shape every aspect of modern life, students need digital literacy to succeed in higher education and future careers. The Prime Minister has supported initiatives to expand the use of digital tools in teaching and learning while encouraging schools to make greater use of educational technology. By promoting digital learning, the reforms seek to narrow the technological gap between schools and prepare students for a knowledge-based economy.
Another noteworthy contribution is the promotion of vocational and skills-based education. Traditional education has often placed greater emphasis on academic achievement, while practical skills received less attention. The new reforms aim to change this balance by introducing vocational subjects within the school system and creating clearer pathways for students who wish to pursue technical and vocational careers. This approach helps students develop employable skills while supporting the country’s economic growth and workforce needs.
The Prime Minister has also encouraged a more balanced approach to student assessment. Instead of measuring success only through final examinations, the reforms seek to include continuous assessment, classroom activities, projects, and practical learning experiences. Such an approach recognises different learning styles and provides students with more opportunities to demonstrate their abilities. It also reduces excessive pressure associated with high-stakes examinations and supports the overall development of children.
Inclusivity is another important aspect of the Prime Minister’s contribution. The reform process has involved experts, educators, and advisory committees representing diverse communities. The government has emphasised that curriculum development should reflect fairness, inclusiveness, and respect for Sri Lanka’s multicultural society. By involving different stakeholders in the planning process, the reforms aim to build a national education system that serves all children equally.
Despite these promising initiatives, implementing large-scale education reforms is not without challenges. Teacher training, infrastructure development, adequate funding, and effective monitoring are essential for the long-term success of the programme. Public awareness and cooperation among parents, teachers, school administrators, and policymakers will also play a vital role in ensuring that the reforms achieve their intended outcomes. Sustained commitment from the government and continuous evaluation will be necessary to address emerging issues and improve implementation over time.
The Prime Minister of Sri Lanka has made a significant contribution to the country’s new education reforms by promoting a modern, inclusive, and future-oriented vision for education. Through curriculum modernization, teacher development, improved infrastructure, digital learning, vocational education, and better assessment methods, the reforms seek to prepare students not only for examinations but also for lifelong learning and responsible citizenship. If implemented successfully, these reforms have the potential to strengthen Sri Lanka’s education system, reduce inequalities, and equip future generations with the knowledge, skills, and values needed to contribute positively to national development in an increasingly competitive global environment.
Saumya Aloysius
saumyaaloysius@gmail.com
-
News5 days agoHerath warns prospective migrant workers not to get fleeced by racketeers
-
Features3 days agoPrison riots and politics: NPP’s biggest challenge and Sri Lanka’s biggest opportunity
-
Editorial4 days agoWhat’s the world coming to?
-
Foreign News5 days agoTensions erupt in Indian state after 11-year-old raped and murdered
-
Features5 days agoDevanesan Annan – in Memoriam
-
News6 days agoNegombo Prison riot: Ensuring protection of prisoners fundamental responsibility of the state – UN
-
Editorial5 days agoPunishment in hellholes
-
News6 days agoRepresentatives of the Organization of Professional Associations (OPA) of Sri Lanka meet the Prime Minister
