Features
30% OF AMERICANS BELIEVE TRUMP WAS SENT BY GOD
THIRD ANNIVERSARY OF JANUARY 6, 2021 INSURRECTION/TOURIST VISIT/FAMILY PICNIC
by Vijaya Chandrasoma
Donald Trump held a “Commit to Caucus Rally”, in Newton, Ohio yesterday, to memorialize the third anniversary of the failed Stop the Steal assault on the Capitol by his white supremacist supporters on January 6, 2021.
An in-depth report from the Economist cites a survey conducted by Denison University political scientist Paul Djupe, that around 30% of Americans believe that Trump was sent by God to save America.
According to white Evangelicals, God had played a part in the election of all past US presidents, except for President Obama, who was a Satan appointee. Americans believed that God had specifically chosen Trump for the presidency in 2016, because he seemed to be the perfect choice to guide His thrice-blessed nation to its manifest destiny of a white Christian haven. However, He appears to have made a divine miscalculation in his choice of Trump, who has proved to be a whining loser since 2020.
Or have we been unable to comprehend the ultimate divine wisdom of God’s Plan? Only time will tell.
The violence unfolding during the January 6, 2021 assault on the Capitol, as seen live on TV by everyone whose eyes were connected to their brains instead of Trump’s ass, was a savage insurrection of white supremacists, wearing horned headdress and Trump T-shirts, carrying confederate and TRUMP flags. Terrorists threatening to hang Vice-President Pence, having already built a gallows for the purpose on the premises, to kill Speaker Pelosi and all the lawmakers the mob was able to get their hands on.
A riot that resulted in five deaths and hundreds of injuries; millions of dollars’ damage to the Capitol, the seat of the nation’s government and one of its most iconic buildings; and the arrest, conviction and imprisonment of more than 1,100 rioters, most of whose defense was that they had been incited to attack the Capitol by Trump.
The week after the insurrection was repulsed, Senior Republicans, whose very lives had been threatened, had a vivid memory of the violence of that terrible day. They accused Trump, from the floor of the Congress, of inciting the brutal insurrection to prevent the constitutional transfer of power to President-elect Biden. They demanded accountability from Trump in the face of his evident guilt of incitement to violence. Those who so excoriated Trump included then Republican Senate and House leaders, Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy, current Speaker, Mike Johnson, Senator Leslie Graham and several other prominent Republicans.
Then the recollections of these craven Republicans had a miraculous transformation of memory.
They became terrified that their public opposition to Trump and his base, attacking him for his treason on January 6, may cost them what is most dear to their hearts – re-election. Their commitment to the truth, their oath to uphold the Constitution, be damned.
The current whitewashed recollections of the January 6 insurrections are best described by Republican Congressman Andrew Clyde: “Watching the TV footage of those who entered the Capitol and walked through Statuary Hall showed people in an orderly fashion staying between the stanchions and ropes and taking videos and pictures”.
Trump has since been found guilty of sedition for incitement to an insurrection against the United States after a year-long Congressional inquiry. He has also been indicted, arrested and on bail on four indictments and 91 felonies, including sedition, espionage and obstruction of justice, inter alia, in four separate jurisdictions.
The aftermath of the January 6 events has not brought the action immediately expected of any civilized country governed by the Rule of Law – the swift prosecution and imprisonment of all those responsible for an act of treason against a legally elected government.
The outcome in the USA has been the complete opposite. The former president, the leader of the insurrection to overthrow a legally elected government and to cling to power, walks free three years later, disgraced, impeached, indicted, arrested and on bail on 91 felonies, but still free. Free to spew his vitriolic, Hitler-like rants before adoring crowds of white supremacist neo-Nazis. Incredibly, this vulgar criminal remains a primary candidate to win re-election of the presidency, which he attempted to violently overturn in 2021, come November 2024.
A significant part of the nation has been corrupted by this white supremacist maniac, who will keep on fanning the racist flames while he keeps on pouring gasoline to keep them afire. A strategy which seems to be working, bringing to the surface the vast majority of white supremacists in fear of losing their white privilege with the invasion of brown-skinned vermin. Hitler may have failed, but his anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant white supremacist movement has been reborn throughout the western world, very much so in the greatest democracy the world has seen, the United States of America.
The corrupt, six/three Rublican majority Supreme Court of the United States was scheduled to rule, on January 5, 2024, on the extent of immunity available to a sitting president from prosecution for any crime committed during his incumbency.
This is a ruling that could enable any future president, who, having lost the election, could go berserk, commit any crime, including an attempt to topple the government, during his Lame Duck period – the 12-week period between the day of his defeat at the November election and the Inauguration of the President-elect on January 20 the following year. Over 12 weeks with the awesome powers of the presidency, in spite of having been roundly rejected by the electorate, with total immunity for any crimes committed throughout the term of presidency.
These changes represent a total repudiation of the original reason for the Revolutionary War (1775-83), when patriots in the original 13 colonies waged war against the cruel yoke of King George III of Great Britain, resulting in the formation of an independent American nation.
The American Revolution was waged against the rule of a foreign monarchy. And the Constitution of the new and independent nation was drafted as “The Great Experiment of Democracy”.
The presidency of Donald Trump has highlighted the obvious flaws in this Great Experiment, especially a total lack of public confidence in its elections, the cornerstone of any vibrant Democracy.
Perhaps the time is ripe, as suggested by Trump and his cult, to terminate an outdated Constitution, replace it with the Bible and establish an alternate form of government more in keeping with the nation’s white Christian traditions, especially in the face of an insidious invasion of brown-skinned immigrants.
Perhaps the United States is ready to maintain its status of white supremacy, for a system of government with a King, beholden not to the rule of earthly law but to the heavenly commandments of the Christian God. A Monarch of the home-grown variety, the head of a form of divine government of white Christians, devoid of petty restrictions like free speech and press, environmental protections, term limits, even the rule of law.
Much like the ancient British House of Windsor, America will have its own Orange Dynasty of Trump. After the job of Making America Great Again, Americans can rename their nation “Great America”, and change their national anthem to “God Save The Donald”, with appropriate lyrics; to be performed at the coronation of King Donald I by the January 6 Jailhouse Choir, sung in the background of Trump taking the Oath of Allegiance, waving an upside down Bible he has never read.
Post-Trump Republicans have become most adept at rewriting the history of the nation, especially whitewashing its history of genocide, slavery and the current infestation of immigrants. We are all aware of Trump’s conviction that brown-skinned immigrants, vermin who poison the blood of white people, are the cause of all that ails the nation – crime, drug addiction, murder and rape, which Trump will eradicate by closing the nation’s borders and enforcing mass deportation of all illegal immigrants. Hitler’s concept of the Final Solution is also not off Trump’s table.
Trump’s two leading rivals for the Republican nomination, Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley, have their own uniquely imaginative versions of the nation’s chequered and violent past. They had both been tiptoeing around Trump’s criminal past, and have only during the past week have been criticizing Trump on his indictments and 91 felonies. If they were serious opponents, they should have been shouting about these serious criminal charges from the rooftops, right from the beginning of their presidential campaigns,
They both seem to be either playing for the VP spot (Haley), 2028 or more likely, the hope that the Trump candidature will implode and burst into criminal flames.
During the 11 months left before the election, Trump will have a busy schedule. Besides running a presidential election campaign, he will have to present himself in court in four jurisdictions to defend himself on 91 serious felonies. An impossible schedule, which, with the help of a compliant Supreme Court, will enable him to delay a conviction, which is the real victory he is seeking. If he wins re-election, as seems likely now, all these criminal trials would automatically disappear, by self-pardon or dismissal.
Unless President Biden (whose current approval ratings in the polls are in the low 30s and is losing to Trump or any other Republican candidate by significant margins, if the presidential election were held today) and the Democratic Party make a startling comeback, King Donald I will be primed to destroy America’s Great Experiment of Democracy, come January 2025.
So I have a question for Republican Trumpers, which has baffled me over the years. Trump has always whined that every charge against him is a part of the greatest witch hunt in history, that he has committed no crime, and to use his own words, he is “the most innocent man in history”.
Seeing as he has been indicted and facing trial on several counts of sedition, obstruction of justice and espionage perhaps leading to treason, these protests come without a vestige of proof of his innocence.
Even Section 3, Amendment 14 of the Constitution specifies that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president for inciting, and providing aid and comfort, to insurrectionists, just as surely as he would be disqualified if he were 25 years old and born in Sri Lanka.
If he is so innocent, why does he keep on insulting and threatening the lives of those who criticize him, why does he vilify his judges and prosecutors as partisan fascists and leftists, out to imprison him on purely political grounds?
If he is so innocent, that the Constitution itself is unconstitutional and should be “terminated”, then why has his legal strategy over 40 years of criminal acts always been to deny, distract and delay, never to provide proof?
If his innocence was so self-evident, then wouldn’t he and his Republican supporters want this proven in a court of law as quickly as possible, so that he can face the electorate with an unblemished reputation? Obviously a rhetorical question.
However, I do agree with the 30% of Americans who believe that God sent Trump to America. However, white Americans may have miscalculated the real motive behind God’s decision, their belief is that Trump was sent to save white America.
My belief is that God’s real plan to send Trump to America was to punish Americans for all the carnage, genocide, slavery, racism and crimes they have committed in the past, often in His name. A divine motive far more in keeping with the final plan of an all-knowing, all-merciful God.
Trump is God’s retribution.
Features
Complexities in global politics deepen as economic pressures intensify
The present offer by the UK to strengthen Ukraine’s defense capabilities in the missile technology field in particular comes as ‘a stitch in time’ and the initiative is also likely to be appreciated considerably by democratic opinion world wide for the possible morale-boosting effect it would have on Ukraine. Besides continuous arms support, the conviction that the world’s frontline democracies are behind it would prove a huge plus in Ukraine’s eyes in its grinding fightback against the Russian invasion.
While continued US support for Ukraine could not be considered ‘a given’ any more, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s words during a recent visit to Kyiv that the UK would stand by Ukraine ‘for as long as it takes’ is the kind of assurance that Ukraine needs at present. For, the conflict in Ukraine is essentially a war of liberation conducted by the latter against an invader and deeply at issue here is the upholding of International Law and its foundational concepts, such as national sovereignty and a nation’s right to political self-determination. The world of democracy is of the firm view that the latter ideals cannot be compromised, come what may.
The UK has its work cut out in this connection. It would find it difficult to convince the Trump administration that it should staunchly stand by Ukraine but it could campaign vigorously with the rest of the West and the EU fold in particular to unflaggingly support the embattled and over-run country.
Ukraine has shown an impressive adeptness in using drone technology in particular against her enemy and has even manufactured her own hardware in this respect but using the relevant blueprints handed over by the UK for the manufacture of more sophisticated cruise missiles, for instance, may prove financially difficult, going forward. It is left to be seen whether the UK and the rest of the West who are with Ukraine will continue to be with her, considering their own rising financial constraints.
The latter impediments could only multiply in the future. Oil, gas and energy prices are on the rise and the latter costs are glaringly reflected in kitchens and meal tables the world over. As we go along consumer discontent would steadily intensify and governments, East and West, would need to figure out with considerable rigour and foresight how such disaffection could be ably managed. Failing which, in most democratic societies, the chances are that publics would be out on the streets demanding that their grievances be redressed forthwith.
These rising concerns are reflected in a recent move by some EU governments to consider imposing what is described as ‘a windfall tax’ on the profits specified major oil companies operating within their shores have made in the wake of the US-Israel war on Iran. The rationale apparently is to use such tax earnings to cushion the rising cost of living of their publics and bolster the respective countries’ social expenditure.
In a recent letter to the president of the EU Council the EU governments referred to said, among other things, while drawing attention to the ‘discontent that is growing over the rising cost of living’: ‘A common approach’ is needed that ‘ensures those who profit from the crisis contribute their share to reducing the burden on the general population.’ Meanwhile, Oxfam with reference to the above development is on record as calling for a ‘permanent windfall tax of at least 50% on profits exceeding a 10% return on investment.’
Such are the rising economic pressures on the majority of Western governments. The question to be posed is how consistent they would be in their assistance to Ukraine if they decide consensually to stand by her. The soaring cost of living in the West compels the conclusion that there could be no guarantee that Western assistance to Ukraine, particularly in the defense and security fields, would be of a longstanding kind.
Of particular concern would be the fact that the weapons systems on offer from the UK to Ukraine could be increasingly costly to manufacture going forward. Besides they would need to be manufactured and put into action without delay.
However, these considerations should in no way deflect Ukraine’s supporters from the principled policy stance of defending her to the extent possible. Because at issue is the defense of International Law and the democratic system of government from their enemies; fascism and authoritarian rule.
While during World Wars 1 and 2 the US was with the major democracies of the West, this time around with regard to Ukraine, the US has chosen to be at cross-purposes with them. For instance, in relation to tariff matters and defense expenditure, in the NATO context, the US is pursuing a hard line which puts it at polar opposites with the West. Thus it is no longer possible to talk unreservedly of a ‘Western democratic alliance’. Put plainly, the cause of democratic development has been weakened.
A measure of relief for the supporters of Ukraine in the West could come by way of the upcoming mid-term polls in the US. If the Democratic Party fares well in them the pressure would be on the Trump administration to defer to opposition opinion at home, accommodate the best interests of Ukraine in its West European policy and perhaps even work towards a diplomatic solution to the Ukraine crisis in cooperation with Russia. Accordingly, the Democratic Party would need to put the Trump administration on the defensive, so to speak.
Until such time Ukraine’s Western supporters have no choice but to remain committed to it, ensure its steadfast defense against the invasion and work judiciously towards keeping the economic pressures at home in check.
Interestingly, at the present juncture in international politics the US could be said to be more weak than strong. For example, it has to some extent been militarily humbled by Iran; so much so it is resorting to economic means to keep Iran in check.
In keeping with this strategy, the US has launched ‘a new big wave of anti-Iran economic sanctions’ at the time of writing, aimed at cutting Iran away from all its major income sources. Some of these relate to digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping. The hoped for result is the complete severance of Iran from the US dollar system.
However, while the UK and EU have no choice but to adhere to their policy of backing Ukraine, going forward they would need to dialogue more closely with the US and ensure that it cooperates with them on outstanding questions, such as Ukraine and the strengthening of democracy. The well being of the world is served when the latter aim is pursued.
Features
“Envisioning Sri Lanka: Beyond Recovery”
OPA 39th Annual Conference calls for Sri Lanka to move Beyond Recovery towards Sustainable Transformation
The Orgnisation of Professional Associations (OPA) successfully concluded its 39th Annual Conference, held recently at the Cinnamon Grand Colombo, under the theme “Envisioning Sri Lanka: Beyond Recovery”.
Held under the patronage of Jayantha Gallehewa, President of the OPA, with the leadership and guidance of Tisara De Silva, President-Elect and Chairman of the 39th Annual Conference, the Conference brought together leading professionals, academics, business leaders and representatives of the public and private sectors to deliberate on Sri Lanka’s next phase of national development.
The Inaugural Session, on August 2026, was graced by Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, as the Chief Guest; Andrew Patrick, British High Commissioner to Sri Lanka, as the Guest of Honour; and Murtaza Jafferjee, Chairman of the Advocata Institute, Sri Lanka, as the Keynote Speaker.
In her address, Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya emphasised that overcoming the economic crisis alone should not be Sri Lanka’s ultimate objective, stressing that recovery must serve as the foundation for a broader economic and institutional transformation necessary for sustainable national progress. Reflecting on the difficult period experienced by the country, the Prime Minister noted that Sri Lanka had faced significant economic, social and institutional challenges, which had weakened public confidence and created uncertainty about the country’s future.
She stressed that “recovery only provides the foundation” and that Sri Lanka can move forward sustainably only by using that foundation to bring about meaningful transformation.
The Prime Minister observed that the theme of the OPA’s 39th Annual Conference, “Envisioning Sri Lanka: Beyond Recovery,” aptly encapsulated these national aspirations. She emphasised that Sri Lanka’s objective should not merely be to return to the conditions that existed before the crisis, but to forge a stronger national foundation characterised by robust institutions, a resilient economy, high-quality public services and an enabling environment in which every citizen has the opportunity to thrive.
She further underscored that Sri Lanka’s future development cannot be secured through economic growth and physical development alone. She emphasised that the effective mobilisation of the country’s knowledge, skills and professional expertise, is equally essential to achieving sustainable and inclusive national progress
The Technical Sessions held on 12 August 2026 brought together 19 distinguished experts and professionals representing academia, industry, banking and finance, public health, technology, management and business leadership. Their diverse expertise provided a multidisciplinary platform to examine the critical challenges, emerging opportunities and strategic choices that will shape Sri Lanka’s next phase of development, with particular emphasis on economic transformation, institutional strengthening, digitalisation, private-sector growth, human capital and sustainable development.
The deliberations were structured around four principal sub-themes: “Resilient Recovery and Sustainable Economic Development”; “Future Readiness: Innovation & Transformation”; “Policy for Impact: Advancing Equity, Sustainable Living, and National Well-Being”; and “Leadership, Governance and National Responsibility.”
Across these thematic areas, the sessions explored the structural reforms, institutional requirements and policy choices necessary to move Sri Lanka beyond economic stabilisation towards a more productive, competitive, resilient and inclusive economy. The discussions brought together diverse professional perspectives, enabling participants to examine national priorities through economic, technological, industrial, financial, social and governance lenses.
Particular emphasis was placed on the need to move beyond the diagnosis of problems towards pragmatic, evidence-based and implementable solutions. The deliberations recognised that sustainable national progress requires not only sound policies, but also effective institutions, professional competence, innovation, responsible leadership and the capacity to translate policy into tangible outcomes.
The sessions further underscored the importance of collaboration across sectors, recognising that Sri Lanka’s complex development challenges cannot be addressed in isolation. Stronger engagement among Government, private sector, professional associations, academia and civil society was identified as essential to fostering a coherent national response and ensuring that professional knowledge and expertise are effectively translated into policy and action.
Collectively, the Technical Sessions provided a substantive platform for knowledge exchange, critical reflection and forward-looking dialogue, reinforcing the OPA’s commitment to bringing the country’s professional expertise to bear on the task of building a resilient, innovative, equitable and prosperous Sri Lanka.
The OPA expressed its sincere appreciation to Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, the Chief Guest; Andrew Patrick, British High Commissioner to Sri Lanka and Guest of Honour; and Murtaza Jafferjee, Chairman of the Advocata Institute, Sri Lanka and Keynote Speaker, for their distinguished contributions to the Conference.
Much of what the 39th Annual Conference achieved would not have been possible without the leadership, commitment and generous contributions of Jayantha Gallehewa, President of the OPA; Tisara De Silva, President-Elect and Chairman of the 39th Annual Conference; Eng. Ravi Rupasinghe, General Secretary; Dharshana Wijemanne, Treasurer; Bhanu Wijayaratne, Convener & the Chairman of the Session Planning Committee of the 39th Annual Conference Committee, Past Presidents and Office Bearers; Presidents and representatives of Member Associations; members of the Executive Councils and General Forum; and the distinguished Session Chairmen, Resource Persons and professionals who shared their time, expertise and insights in pursuit of the Conference’s shared vision. The OPA remains immensely grateful to all those whose collective contributions enriched the 39th Annual Conference and strengthened its role as a meaningful platform for professional exchange, informed dialogue and national reflection.
Features
Nostalgia for Lankans in Toronto …
For Sri Lankans living 14,000 kilometres from home, the sound of home has never felt closer — and that’s thanks to one man and his band.
Since stepping into the spotlight, Gamini Hemalal and the Ceymphony Band have turned into the heartbeat of the Sri Lankan community in Toronto.
Their mission is simple: bring the music, bring the memories, bring the people together. And it’s working.
What turned out to be the talk-of-the-town was their intimate musical evening with Sri Lanka’s legendary crooner Sohan Weerasinghe.

Sohan Weerasinghe: Had
everyone on their feet at the
Angus Glen Golf Club, in
Toronto, Canada
It was a ‘full house’ long before the big date. Tickets vanished within days — demand was that overwhelming.
According to those who were there, it was a truly amazing evening. The hall was packed, the energy electric. Sohan didn’t just sing — he owned the stage.
With his velvet vocals, his charm, and that signature style, he had everyone on their feet. The ladies, especially, couldn’t get enough. No wonder they call him “The Ladies’ Man!”
One attendee summed it up perfectly:
“We had so much fun. It is truly a blessing to have our kids around us, enjoying these beautiful moments together. Thank you, Gamini Hemalal, for such a wonderful evening, with an amazing crowd and an incredible atmosphere. Your hard work and dedication truly made it a special night.
“We also need to say a big thank you to the Ceymphony Band for delivering such an outstanding performance. You all were absolutely amazing! Our entire family had a fantastic time, and we truly enjoyed every moment.

Ceymphony Band: Extremely popular in the scene in Toronto
“Wishing you all continued success. Keep up the amazing work, we can’t wait for the next.”
And the next is already on the cards: ‘Halloween Pissu Baila Party 2026,’ on Friday, 30th October, at the famous Angus Glen Golf Club.
Gamini promises a crazy night of baila, music, dancing and Halloween vibes with the Ceymphony Band. Action runs from 8:00 PM to 12:00 midnight, with plenty of prizes to be won.

Gamini Hemalal: Amazing work for the Sri Lankan community,
in Toronto, Canada
Gamini is also putting together a special event, connected with the 2027 Avurudu celebrations — ‘Avurudu Musical Show 2027,’ a uniquely styled musical Avurudu celebration … Ceymphony Band style.
It’s scheduled to be held on Saturday, 10th April, 2027, also at the Angus Glen Golf Club.
Through music, Gamini Hemalal and Ceymphony are doing what diaspora bands do best — they’re shrinking the distance between two worlds.
One baila beat at a time, one full house at a time, they’re making sure that even in Canada, Sri Lankans feel like home.
Yes, there is plenty of action, indeed, for the Sri Lankan community in Toronto, Canada.
-
News7 days agoCountry’s first woman Surveyor General appointed
-
Business6 days agoSriLankan Airlines makes ShakthiSAT Mission possible for talented Sri Lankan student
-
Features7 days agoMedical education in Sri Lanka: Then and now
-
Latest News6 days agoImran Khan moved to private hospital amid deteriorating health
-
Latest News6 days agoGovernment has declared 21, 22 and 23 August 2026 as national days of mourning
-
Features5 days agoMy secondary schooling after Royal Primary
-
Latest News5 days agoTharanga edges out Chopra in 88m javelin battle
-
News7 days ago22A: Opp. demands all available SC judges hear petitions
