Features
Largest nation-wide protests in history against Trump on Saturday, March 28
Iran war escalates despite Trump’s claims about negotiations for peace
Donald Trump is now pretending to negotiate a peace on the war against Iran he declared on February 28. A war for no reasons, with no provocation from Iran. A war Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu had been planning against Iran for decades.
Trump posted a threatening message on Truth Social in the wee hours on Sunday, March 22, that, unless Iran opens the strait of Hormuz within 48 hours, he will obliterate the nation.
Donald J. Trump @ real Donald Trump
“If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the strait of Hormuz within 48 HOURS, from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST. Thank you for your attention to this matter. President Donald Trump”.
Then, on Sunday evening, Trump said he had received a very valuable gift, worth a ton of money from Iran, which made him realize that he was not talking to the “right people”. The present, a couple of oil tankers. produced a change of Trump’s heart regarding the war. Presents, technically bribes, like the $400 million flying palace he received from Qatar, are the only direct line to Trump’s heart.
So, less than 24 hours after his “obliteration” threat, Truth Social carried the following post:
Donald Trump @real Donald Trump
“I AM PLEASED TO REPORT THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE COUNTRY OF IRAN, HAVE HAD, OVER THE LAST TWO DAYS, VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS ASSURING A COMPLETE RESOLUTION OF OUR HOSTILITIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST. BASED ON THE TENOR AND TONE OF THESE IN-DEPTH, DETAILED AND CONSTRUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS, WHICH WILL CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE WEEK, I HAVE INSTRUCTED THE DEPARTMENT OF WAR TO POSTPONE ANY AND ALL MILITARY STRIKES AGAINST IRANIAN POWER PLANTS AND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A FIVE-DAY PERIOD, SUBJECT TO THE SUCCESS OF THE ONGOING MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP.
At a press conference, Trump said that he’s giving Iran five days to negotiate a deal that will benefit everyone. When asked what he would do if no deal was worked out in five days, he said he would have no option but to annihilate Iran. So Iran would be annihilated in five days, (now increased to ten), as the 15-point conditions US by submitted by Trump during these “negotiations” were totally unacceptable to Iran. And vice versa. But in the highly unlikely event that agreement was reached, Trump was asked who would run the strait of Hormuz, his response: Me, maybe me, with an Ayatollah whom they hadn’t killed, as yet.
As expected, Trump’s post about peace negotiations caused a tumble in the price of a barrel of oil from $100+ to $84 within hours, with the corresponding optimism in the stock market. But the continuing hostilities after Trump’s peace message during the week pushed the price of a barrel of oil back to $100+. There was a flurry of trading of nearly $500 million in the hours between these two contradictory posts – and someone (I wonder who) made a killing on the stock market with obvious insider knowledge.
There has been complete silence from Iran to Donald’s empty threat. Iran’s Foreign Ministry confirmed that no such negotiations had taken place between Teheran and Washington. Iran refused to take Trump’s threats seriously and its collective middle finger towards the White House was clearly visible over the oceans.
Prime Minister of Canada, Marc Carney, has taught smaller nations being intimidated by Trump that the only way to handle him is to call his bluff. To paraphrase Shakespeare, to ignore Trump’s meaningless bluster, “told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing”.
Until 2016, the USA was considered the leader of the free world, not because it had the largest economy, not because they had the most powerful military in history, but because the post WW2 US treated other nations, especially its NATO allies, with respect. And all the nations which had dealings with the USA, appreciated that, and competed against each other to deliver the best deal to the USA.
Trump had recently been insulting Canada, its closest ally of over 300 years and largest economic partner with $800 billion of annual trade, sharing the longest border in the world. Canadians and Americans had fought side by side in World War II, and Canadians were the first to join the Americans in their war against Afghanistan after 9/11. Trump, to whom loyalty and friendship is a one-way street, had been stating that Canada was dependent on the USA, and should really be its 51st state, with Carney as its Governor. He made this belittling statement at a meeting with Carney at the Oval Office.
I do not intend to repeat the qualifications of Prime Minister Carney, which I have extolled before. Suffice to say he holds the highest degrees in Economics from Harvard and Oxford, and served as the Governor of the Central Banks of both Canada and the United Kingdom, the only non-Brit to hold that post in history. An added qualification: he has never been a politician, had never held elected office.
Carney showed no indignation at Trump’s “offer”. He most politely told Trump that the people he represents will never agree to such a proposal, that Canada will never be for sale.
Carney had been expecting this increase in taxes for months, and had already successfully negotiated alternative trade deals for Canadian products with other nations, members of NATO, Japan and Australia. And more importantly, he had shown smaller nations, which had hitherto been intimidated by the power of the USA, how to deal with Trump. Instead of individually toadying to Trump’s America, smaller nations could work together instead of competing against each other. This policy may cause temporary economic hardship, but would have the luxury of maintaining their self-respect.
Trump realized that his economic policies, especially on tariffs and his wars were dragging the US economy to a recession. His approval ratings, with the crucial midterm elections just a few months away, were at 36%, the lowest levels in presidential history. Even his Republican base was turning against many of his policies, especially the latest illegal war against Iran. An “excursion”, as he called it, draining the economy with no objective in sight, had already caused the loss of 13 American lives. His public comment that there will be more losses of thousands of lives as the war progresses, especially if he carries out his plan of putting boots on the ground in Iran, infuriated Americans of all stripes. And the “most unkindest cut of all”: his pet Supreme Court ruled against him, with a 6/3 majority, that the power to levy taxes and tariffs lay, according to Article 1 Section 8 of the constitution, exclusively with Congress. All tariffs levied by Trump without even consultation with Congress, from April 2, 2025 (“Liberation Day”) to date were unconstitutional and had to be refunded to the importers and consumers.
J. A. Baker, in The Peregrine, said that “the hardest thing of all is to see what is really there.” Perhaps, as incredible as it may seem, Trump has seen the light, he may have seen what is really there, the chaos he has wrought, with inflation at third-world levels, gas and grocery prices out of control, the wait-time at most airports longer than the actual flight time, his illegal immigration policies resulting in arrest, imprisonment and even killing two American peaceful protesters without due process, has infuriated the American people. His ratings are in the pits and the United States has become the Most Hated Nation in the Free World. America First is now America Alone, embraced only by past adversaries, who are taking full advantage of his narcissistic stupidity.
Time will tell if the impossible has happened, that Trump has realized that he has lost the confidence of his base, and would be forced to abandon his dictatorial ambitions, if only to survive.
Iran’s Fars News Agency claimed that there have been no direct, or even indirect communications between Tehran and Washington. Fars also said “Trump backed down on targeting Iran’s power plants after Iran warned it would target power plants across West Asia in response”. Iran’s Tasnim News Agency confirmed that no negotiations are under way with the United States.
Now we are in a quandary. Who are we to believe? A leader of a theocratic, corrupt, authoritarian regime (I mean Iran, of course) or, well, the leader of our own theocratic, corrupt, authoritarian regime? My money is on Trump, if only because, when asked with whom in Iran he was negotiating, his answer was “a tip-top person”. Also, why did he post the “annihilation” message on Truth Social on Sunday, referred to above, if negotiations were in progress. He also is supposed to have accepted a valuable gift from Iran while Iran was under heavy bombing.
Every word Trump has uttered after declaring an illegal war against Iran has been a lie. Now he’s trying to pass the buck to Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth and Joint Chief of Staff, “Raizin” Cane, for “persuading” him to wage war against Iran. A war entirely of his own making, perhaps with a little push from Netanyahu, the war criminal who has been responsible for all the violence in the Middle East during the past few years, who has been dreaming of a war against Iran for decades,
There is no real hope that this war will end in the near future. Remember that the last illegal war to promote US and Israeli interests against Iraq took eight years for the greatest army the world has ever seen to retreat, with the loss of 4,600 lives and trillions in losses of infrastructure. Somehow, even though Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, Americans, in their grief and anger at the worst terrorist attack on their shores, needed someone on whom they could wreak revenge. They gave Bush their full support at the start, although they were killing the wrong terrorist and causing chaos in the wrong country.
Trump does not have that luxury. Americans in a large majority, Republicans, Democrats and Independents, are all against this unnecessary Iran war with neither reason nor anything but a tragic end, with the loss of millions of lives and devastation of property.
Trump will see evidence of his disapproval of the people with the largest protests in the nation’s history. Officially titled as The No Kings Protests, with thousands of scheduled events across all 50 states, in major cities as well as in rural suburban areas. It is estimated that more than 3,000 local events have been planned, bringing together millions of people in one of the largest days of political organization in the nation’s history. These protests will show not only Americans disapproval of another unnecessary war with no end in sight, but with the economy reaching recession levels, with inflation out of control and gas and consumer goods rising daily. Americans are also incensed at the administration’s Draconian immigration policies, with Americans arrested and imprisoned without due process, even two American peaceful protesters murdered by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for no reason whatsoever.
Hopefully, Saturday’s No Kings nationwide protests will at last turn the tide, but violence by Trump’s white supremacist base may be inevitable, before the United States resumes its destined path to democracy.
By Vijaya Chandrasoma
Features
Peace march and promise of reconciliation
The ongoing peace march by a group of international Buddhist monks has captured the sentiment of Sri Lankans in a manner that few public events have done in recent times. It is led by the Vietnamese monk Venerable Thich Pannakara who is associated with a mindfulness movement that has roots in Vietnamese Buddhist practice and actively promoted among diaspora communities in the United States. The peace march by the monks, accompanied by their mascot, the dog Aloka, has generated affection and goodwill within the Buddhist and larger community. It follows earlier peace walks in the United States where monks carried a similar message of mindfulness and compassion across communities but without any government or even media patronage as in Sri Lanka.
This initiative has the potential to unfold into an effort to nurture a culture of peace in Sri Lanka. Such a culture is necessary if the country as the country prepares to move beyond its history of conflict towards a more longlasting reconciliation and a political solution to its ethnic and religious divisions. The government’s support for the peace march can be seen as part of a broader attempt to shape such a culture. The Clean Sri Lanka programme, promoted by the government as a civic responsibility campaign focused on environmental cleanliness, ethical conduct and social discipline, provides a useful framework within which such initiatives can be situated. Its emphasis on collective responsibility and shared public space makes it sit well with the values that peacebuilding requires.
government’s previous plan to promote a culture of peace was on the occasion of “Sri Lanka Day” celebrations which were scheduled to take place on December 12-14 last year but was disrupted by Cyclone Ditwah. The Sri Lanka Day celebrations were to include those talented individuals from each and every community at the district level who had excelled in some field or the other, such as science, business or arts and culture and selected by the District Secretariats in each of the 25 districts. They were to gather in Colombo to engage in cultural performances and community-focused exhibitions. The government’s intention was to build up a discourse around the ideas of unity in diversity as a precursor to addressing the more contentious topics of human rights violations during the war period, and issues of accountability and reparations for wrongs suffered during that dark period.
Positive Response
The invitation to the international monks appears to have emerged from within Buddhist religious networks in Sri Lanka that have long maintained links with the larger international Buddhist community. The strong support extended by leading temples and clergy within the country, including the Buddhists Mahanayakes indicates that this was not an isolated effort but one that resonated with the mainstream Buddhist establishment. Indeed, the involvement of senior Buddhist leaders has been particularly noteworthy. A Joint Declaration for Peace in the world, drawing on Sri Lanka’s own experience, and by the Mahanayakes of all Buddhist Chapters took place in the context of the ongoing peace march at the Gangaramaya Temple in Colombo, with participation from the diplomatic community. The declaration, calling for compassion, dialogue and sustainable peace, reflects an effort by religious leadership to assert a moral voice in favour of coexistence.
The popular response to the peace march has also been striking. Large numbers of people have been gathering along the route, offering flowers, water and support to the monks. Schoolchildren have been lining the roads, and communities from different religious backgrounds extend hospitality. On the way, the monks were hosted by both a Hindu temple and a mosque, where food and refreshments were provided. These acts, though simple, carry a message about the possibility of harmony among Sri Lanka’s diverse communities. It helps to counter the perception that the Buddhist community in Sri Lanka is inherently nationalist and resistant to minority concerns that was shaped during the decades of war and reinforced by political mobilisation that too often exploited ethnic identity.
By way of contrast, the peace march offers a different image. It shows a readiness among ordinary people to embrace values of compassion and coexistence that are deeply embedded in Buddhist teaching. The Metta Sutta, one of the most well-known discourses in Buddhism, calls for boundless goodwill towards all beings. It states that one should cultivate a mind that is “boundless towards all beings, free from hatred and ill will.” This emphasis on universal compassion provides a moral foundation for peace that extends beyond national or ethnic boundaries. The monks themselves emphasised this point repeatedly during the walk. Venerable Thich Pannakara reminded those who gathered that while acts of generosity are commendable, mindfulness in everyday life is even more important. He warned that as people become unmindful, they are more prone to react with anger and hatred, thereby contributing to conflict.
More Initiatives
The presence of political leaders at key moments of the march has emphasised the significance that the government attaches to the event. Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya paid her respects to the peace march monks in Kandy, while President Anura Kumara Dissanayake is expected to do so at the conclusion of the march in Colombo. Such gestures signal an alignment between political authority and moral aspiration, even if the translation of that aspiration into policy remains a work in progress. At the same time, the peace march has not been without its shortcomings. The walk did not engage with the Northern and Eastern parts of the country, regions that were most affected by the war and where the need for reconciliation is most acute. A more inclusive geographic reach would have strengthened the symbolic impact of the initiative.
In addition, the positive impact of the peace march could have been increased if more effort had been taken to coordinate better with other civic and religious groups and include them in the event. Many civil society and religious harmony groups who would have liked to participate in the peace march found themselves unable to do so. There was no place in the programme for them to join. Even government institutions tasked with promoting social cohesion and reconciliation found themselves outside the loop. The Clean Sri Lanka Task Force that organised the peace march may have felt that involving other groups would have made it more complicated to organise the events which have proceeded without problems.
The hope is that the positive energy and goodwill generated by this peace march will not dissipate but will instead inspire further initiatives with the requisite coordination and leadership. The march has generated public discussion, drawn attention to the values of mindfulness and compassion, and created a space in which people can imagine a different future. It has been a special initiative among the many that are needed to build a culture of peace. A culture of peace cannot be imposed from above nor can it emerge overnight. It needs to be nurtured through multiple efforts across society, including education, religious engagement, civic initiatives and political reform. It is within such a culture that the more difficult questions of power sharing, justice and reconciliation can be addressed in a constructive manner.
by Jehan Perera
Features
Regional Universities
The countryside and peripheral regions have been neglected in the national imagination for many decades. This has also been the case with regional universities which were seen as mere appendages to the university system, and sometimes created to appease political constituencies in the regions. The exclusion of the rural world and the institutions in those regions was not accidental nor inevitable, but the consequence of conscious policies promoted under an extractive and exploitative global order. Neoliberalism globalisation, initiated in the late 1970s with far-reaching policies of free trade and free flow of capital, or the “open economy,” as we call it in Sri Lanka, is now dying. The United States and the Western countries that promoted neoliberalism, as a class project of finance capital to address the falling profits during the long economic downturn in the 1970s, are themselves reversing their policies and are at loggerheads with each other. However, those economic processes will continue to have national consequences into the future.
At the heart of such policies is the neoliberal city, which has become the centre of the economy with expanding financial businesses and a real estate boom. Such financialised cities also had their impact on universities, in lower income countries, where commercialised education with high fees, rising student debt, research for businesses and transnational educational linkages with branch campuses of Western universities, have become a reality.
In the case of Sri Lanka, while neoliberal policies began with the IMF and World Bank Structural Adjustment Programmes, in the late 1970s, the long civil war forestalled the accelerated growth of the neoliberal city. I have argued, over the last decade and a half, that it is with the end of the civil war, in 2009, coinciding with the global financial crisis, that a second wave of neoliberalism in Sri Lanka led to global finance capital being absorbed in infrastructure and real estate in Colombo. The transformation of Colombo into a neoliberal city was overseen by Gotabaya Rajapaksa as Defence Secretary with even the Urban Development Authority brought under the security establishment. While Colombo was drastically changing with a skyline of new buildings and shiny luxury vehicles drawing on massive external debt, there were also moves to promote private higher education institutions. The Board of Investment (BOI) registered many hundred so-called higher education institutions; these were not regulated and many mushroomed like supermarkets and disappeared in no time when they incurred losses.
In contrast to these so-called private higher education institutions that proliferated in and around Colombo, Sri Lanka, drawing on its free education system, has, over the last many decades, also created a number of state universities in peripheral regions. However, these regional universities lack adequate funding and a clear vision and purpose. The current conjuncture with the neoliberal global order unravelling, and the immediate global crisis in energy and transport are grim reminders of the importance of local economies and self-sufficiency. In this column I consider the role of our regional universities and their relationship to the communities within which they are embedded.
Regional context
The necessity and the advantage of robust public services is their reach into peripheral regions and marginalised communities. This is true of public transport, as it is with public hospitals. Private buses will always avoid isolated rural routes as their margins only increase on the busy routes between cities and towns. And private hospitals and clinics flock to the cities to extract from desperate patients, including by unscrupulous doctors who divert patients in public hospitals to be served in the private health facilities they moonlight. Similarly, it is affluent cities and towns that are the attraction for private educational institutions.
Public institutions, including universities, can only ensure their public role if they are adequately funded. Over the last decade and a half, with falling allocations for education, our state universities have been pushed into initiating fee levying courses, both at the post-graduate level and also for undergraduate international students. These programmes are seen as avenues to decrease the dependence of universities on budgetary support. However, the reality is that it is only universities in Colombo that can draw in students capable of paying such high fees. Furthermore, such fee levying courses end up pushing academics into overwork including by offering additional income.
Therefore, allocations for underfunded regional universities need to be steadily increased. Housing facilities and other services for academics working in rural districts would ensure their continued presence and greater engagement with the local communities. Increased time away from teaching and research funding earmarked for community engagement will provide clear direction for academics. Indeed, such funding with a clear vision and role for regional universities can provide considerable social returns. In a time when repeated crises are affecting our society, agricultural production to bolster our food system as well as rural income streams and employment are major issues. Here, regional universities have an important role today in developing social and economic alternatives.
Reimagining development
In recent months, there have been interesting initiatives in the Northern Province, where the Universities of Jaffna and Vavuniya have been engaging state institutions on issues of development. In an initiative to bring different actors together, high level meetings have been convened between the staff of the Agriculture Faculty and officials of the Provincial Agriculture Ministry to figure out solutions for long pending agricultural problems. Similar meetings have also been organised between provincial authorities and the Faculties of Technology and Engineering in Kilinochchi. These initiatives have led to academics engaging communities and co-operatives on their development needs, particularly in formulating new development initiatives and activating idle projects and assets in the region. Such engagement provides opportunities for academics to share their knowledge and skills while learn from communities about challenges that lead to new problems for research.
One of the most rewarding engagements I have been part of is an internship programme for the Technology Faculty of the University of Jaffna, where four batches of final year students, from food technology, green farming and automobile specialities, have been placed for six months within the co-operative movement through the Northern Co-operative Development Bank. This initiative has created a strong relationship between the Technology Faculty and the co-operative movement, with a number of former students now working fulltime in co-operative ventures. They are at the centre of developing solutions for rural co-operatives, including activating idle factories and ensuring quality and standards for their products.
I refer to these concrete initiatives because universities’ role in research and development in Sri Lanka, as in most other countries, are often narrowly conceived to be engagement with private businesses. However, for rural regions, the challenge, even with technological development, is the generation of appropriate technologies that can serve communities.
In Sri Lanka, we have for long emulated the major Western universities and in the process lost sight of the needs of our own youth and communities. Rethinking the development of our universities may have to begin with an understanding of the real challenges and context of our people. Our universities and their academics, if provided with a progressive vision and adequate resources and time to engage their communities, have the potential to address the many economic and social challenges that the next decade of global turmoil is bound to create.
Ahilan Kadirgamar is a political economist and Senior Lecturer, University of Jaffna.
(Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies)
by Ahilan Kadirgamar
Features
‘Disco Lady’ hitmaker now doing it for Climate Change
The name Alston Koch is generally associated with the hit song ‘Disco Lady.’ Yes, he has had several other top-notch songs to his credit but how many music lovers are aware that Alston is one of the few Asian-born entertainers using music for climate advocacy, since 2008.
He is back in the ‘climate change’ scene, with SUNx Malta, to celebrate Earth Day 2026, with the release of ‘A Symphony for Change’ – a vibrant Dodo4Kids video by Alston.
The inspiring musical video highlights ocean conservation and empowers children as future climate champions, honouring Maurice Strong’s legacy through education, creativity, and global collaboration for a sustainable planet.
The four-minute animated musical, composed and performed by platinum award-winning artiste Alston Koch, brings to life a resurrected Dodo, guiding children on a mission to clean up marine environments.
With a catchy melody and an uplifting message, the video blends entertainment with education—making climate awareness accessible and engaging for the next generation.
SUNx Malta is a Climate Friendly Travel system, focused on transforming the global tourism sector that is low-carbon, SDG-linked, and nature-positive.
Professor Geoffrey Lipman, President of SUNx Malta, described the project as a joyful collaboration with purpose:
“It’s always a pleasure to produce music with Alston for the good of our planet. And this time, to incorporate our Dodo4Kids in the video urging the next generation of young climate champions to help save our seas.”
For Alston, now based in Australia, the collaboration continues a long-standing journey of climate-focused creativity:
Says Alston: “I have been working on climate songs since the first release, in 2009, of the video ‘Act Now.’ Since then, I’ve performed at major global events—from Bali to Glasgow. I wrote this song because the climate horizon is darkening, and our kids and grandkids are our best hope for a brighter future.”
Alston’s very first climate song is ‘Can We Take This Climate Change,’ released in 2008.
It was written by Alston for the World Trade Organisation presentation, in London, and presented at ‘Live the Deal Climate Change’ conference in Copenhagen.
The Sri Lankan-born singer was goodwill ambassador for the campaign, and the then UK Minister Barbara Follett called it a “gift in song to the world suffering due to climate change.”
Alston said he wrote it after noticing butterflies, birds, and fruit trees disappearing from his childhood days.
In 2017, his creation ‘Make a Change’ was released in connection with World Tourism Day 2017.
Alston Koch’s work on climate advocacy is pretty inspiring, especially as climate change is now creating horrifying problems worldwide, and in Sri Lanka, too.
Alston also indicated to us that he has plans to visit Sri Lanka, sometime this year, and, maybe, even plan out a date for an Alston Koch special … a concert, no doubt.
Can’t wait for it!
-
News5 days agoLanka faces crisis of conscience over fate of animals: Call for compassion, law reform, and ethical responsibility
-
News4 days agoWhistleblowers ask Treasury Chief to resign over theft of USD 2.5 mn
-
News4 days agoNo cyber hack: Fintech expert exposes shocking legacy flaws that led to $2.5 million theft
-
News1 day agoBIA drug bust: 25 monks including three masterminds arrested
-
Business2 days agoNestlé Lanka Announces Change in Leadership
-
News1 day agoBanks alert customers to phishing attacks
-
News5 days agoUSD 2 mn bribe: CID ordered to arrest Shasheendra R, warrant issued against ex-SriLankan CEO’s wife
-
News2 days agoHackers steal $3.2 Mn from Finance Ministry
