Connect with us

Latest News

Israel’s new Gaza evacuation zones leave Palestinians few places to go

Published

on

People leave Khan Younis for Rafah after the Israeli military told people to leave (pic BBC)

Aid agencies are warning that Palestinian civilians are running out of places to flee to, after the Israeli military first ordered tens of thousands to evacuate part of the main city in the south ahead of an assault by tanks and troops.

A map posted on social media on Monday told people in northern and central Khan Younis to leave immediately to “preserve your safety and security”. Arrows directed them to move to three already overcrowded areas to the south and west.

On Tuesday however, the Israeli military said its forces had already entered the city and it was now too dangerous to leave.

“Don’t get out. Going out is dangerous. You have been warned,” new leaflets said, warning people to stay inside designated shelters and hospitals.

The evacuation of specific areas marked on online maps is part of a new approach the military says it is taking to avoid civilian casualties in its eight-week war with Hamas, following heavy pressure from the United States.

But there is concern that the strategy is too complicated, too dependent on technology, and too likely to cause panic to be a workable solution.

BBC Gaza correspondent Rushdi Abu Alouf, who is currently in Istanbul, said he had spoken to relatives and other people in the affected areas who were not aware of the IDF’s map or could not see it because of patchy internet access and no regular supply of electricity.

“This is a joke, not a map, because we don’t know where to go,” a displaced person who was sheltering in Khan Younis told him. There is also no guarantee they will be safe from bombardment if they flee.

The main Palestinian telecommunications firm meanwhile said that all phone and internet services were cut once again.

Before a temporary truce collapsed last Friday, the Israeli ground operation was focused on the north of Gaza.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued a blanket order to all 1.1 million people living there to move south of the Wadi Gaza river for their own safety. Hundreds of thousands heeded the call as Israeli troops penetrated deep into Gaza City – with many of them eventually ending up in Khan Younis.

The IDF also repeatedly urged civilians across Gaza to move to al-Mawasi, a thin strip of territory along the Mediterranean coast which officials described as a “humanitarian zone”.

During a visit to Israel on Thursday while the fighting was paused, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said he had told Israeli leaders that they had to “put in place humanitarian civilian protection plans that minimize further casualties of innocent Palestinians”. These included “clearly and precisely designating areas and places in southern and central Gaza where they can be safe and out of the line of fire”, he added.

The IDF’s response was to publish on its Arabic-language website on Friday an ‘Evacuation Zone Map’ that divided Gaza into more than 600 numbered blocks, ranging in size from about 0.03 to 25 sq km (0.001 to 9.6 sq miles).

Jets also dropped leaflets with QR codes, allowing people with a working smartphone and an internet connection to access the map – and also asking them to share their location.

Displaced Palestinians living in tents in the al-Mawasi area, on the Mediterranean coast near Rafah, in the south of the Gaza Strip (5 December 2023)
Palestinians living in tents in the IDF-designated al-Mawasi “humanitarian zone” say there is no food or water (pic BBC)

Asked about this approach on Monday, US state department spokesman Matthew Miller said it had “seen improvements”. “We have seen them evacuate specific neighbourhoods, rather than entire areas, so the number of displaced persons will hopefully be lower in southern Gaza than it was in the north,” he added.

However the IDF’s order for civilians to move from Khan Younis to Rafah was condemned by the head of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, Unrwa, which runs the biggest humanitarian operation in Gaza and has 958,000 displaced people sheltering at 99 facilities in the south.

“The order created panic, fear and anxiety,” warned Philippe Lazzarini on Monday evening. “At least an additional 60,000 people were forced to move to already overcrowded Unrwa shelters, with more asking to be sheltered.” “The evacuation order pushes people to concentrate into what is less than one-third of the Gaza Strip,” he added.

Lazzarini also stressed that “no place is safe in Gaza, whether in the south, or the south-west, whether in Rafah or in any unilaterally called ‘safe zone'”.

Unicef spokesman James Elder, who was recently in Gaza, told the BBC on Tuesday that the idea of a “safe zone” was a “dangerous false narrative”. He said that under international law Israel had to ensure places of evacuation had conditions for people to survive.

In an apparent reference to al-Mawasi, he added: “These are tiny patches of barren land. They have no water, no facilities, no shelter from the cold, no sanitation.”

A senior adviser to Israel’s prime minister rejected such criticism in a BBC interview on Monday.

“I don’t believe that nowhere is safe,” Mark Regev said. “We’ve designated safer zones for people to go to. If you believe the Hamas propaganda, we’re just hitting innocent buildings, right? But if we’re hitting a structure, it’s because there’s Hamas either in or under the structure.”

Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry says 70% of the almost 15,900 people killed there since the start of the conflict have been women and children.

Israel launched a military campaign in response to a cross-border attack by Hamas gunmen on 7 October, in which at least 1,200 people – including many women and children – were killed and about 240 others taken hostage.

Map showing Israeli-declared evacuation zones in southern Gaza (4 December 2023)


Latest News

China’s Xi hails ‘new golden era’ with Malaysia during trade tour

Published

on

By

Malaysian King Sultan Ibrahim (R) stands next to Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim (C), during an official welcoming ceremony at the national palace in Kuala Lumpur, April 16, 2025 [Aljazeera]

Chinese President Xi Jinping has met Malaysia’s King Sultan Ibrahim in Kuala Lumpur as part of a regional push to shore up Beijing’s trade relationships.

The diplomatic stop on Wednesday marks the second leg of Xi’s three-nation tour, which also includes Vietnam and Cambodia, and comes amid sharp tariffs imposed by the United States that are reshaping the global economic landscape.

Sultan Ibrahim welcomed Xi in a colourful ceremony at the golden-domed Istana Negara palace before his meeting with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim at the administrative capital of Putrajaya.

Xi touted a “new golden era” of Chinese-Malaysian relations, following the 50th anniversary of diplomatic ties last year. The king announced new cooperation between the countries in various fields, including artificial intelligence.

Chinese President Xi Jinping inspects an honour guard during the official welcoming ceremony at the national palace in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Wednesday, April 16, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS REFILE - QUALITY REPEAT
Chinese President Xi Jinping inspects an honour guard during the official welcoming ceremony at the national palace in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, April 16, 2025 [Aljazeera]

“This is a hugely significant visit,” said Al Jazeera’s Rob McBride, reporting from Putrajaya. “It takes place during this unprecedented trade war that is developing with the United States, with both Malaysia and China finding themselves in the middle.”

Khoo Ying Hooi, an associate professor in the department of international and strategic studies at Malaya University, said the visit offered a chance to “test the waters for regional solidarity” amid the US trade disruptions.

“It’s not just about friendship, it’s about realigning the regional centre of gravity towards Beijing,” she said.

Malaysia is the current chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) bloc, whose members are among the hardest hit by new US tariffs.

ASEAN member Vietnam, a manufacturing powerhouse, was slapped with 46 percent tariffs, and Cambodia, a significant producer of low-cost clothing for big Western brands, was hit with a 49 percent duty.

Malaysia, Southeast Asia’s third-largest economy, was hit with a lower tariff of 24 percent. Though the measures have been paused for 90 days, President Donald Trump has warned that no country is “off the hook”.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Severe traffic reported on Ella-Wellawaya road due to inclement weather

Published

on

By

Police urge motorists who intend to use the Ella – Wellawaya Road to use alternative roads as there is a severe vehicle congestion due to inclement weather condition.

 

Continue Reading

Latest News

UK Supreme Court backs ‘biological’ definition of woman

Published

on

By

The Supreme Court case follows years of legal arguments over the definition of a woman under the law [BBC]

The UK Supreme Court has unanimously backed the biological definition of “woman” under the 2010 Equality Act.

It marks the culmination of a long-running legal battle which could have major implications for how sex-based rights apply across Scotland, England and Wales.

Judges sided with campaign group For Women Scotland, which brought a case against the Scottish government arguing that sex-based protections should only apply to people that are born female.

Judge Lord Hodge said the ruling should not be seen as a triumph of one side over the other, and stressed that the law still gives protection against discrimination to transgender people.

The Scottish government argued in court that transgender people with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) are entitled to the same sex-based protections as biological women.

The Supreme Court was asked to decide on the proper interpretation of the 2010 Equality Act, which applies across Britain.

Lord Hodge said the central question was how the words “woman” and “sex” are defined in the legislation.

He told the court: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

“But we counsel against reading this judgement as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another, it is not.”

He added that the legislation gives transgender people “protection, not only against discrimination through the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, but also against direct discrimination, indirect discrimination and harassment in substance in their acquired gender”.

Campaigners who brought the case against the Scottish government hugged each other and punched the air as they left the courtroom, with several of them in tears.

The Equality Act provides protection against discrimination on the basis of various characteristics, including “sex” and “gender reassignment”.

Judges at the Supreme Court in London were asked to rule on what that law means by “sex” – whether it means biological sex, or legal, “certificated” sex as defined by the 2004 Gender Recognition Act.

The Scottish government argued the 2004 legislation was clear that obtaining a GRC amounts to a change of sex “for all purposes”.

For Women Scotland argued for a “common sense” interpretation of the words man and woman, telling the court that sex is an “immutable biological state”.

EPA Women hold flags and signs saying "women are adult human females" in an outdoor demonstration.
Campaigners gathered outside the Supreme Court for the verdict [BBC]

Outside the Supreme Court, For Women Scotland co-founder Susan Smith said: “Today the judges have said what we always believed to be the case, that women are protected by their biological sex.

“Sex is real and women can now feel safe that services and spaces designated for women are for women and we are enormously grateful to the Supreme Court for this ruling.”

A UK government spokesman said: “This ruling brings clarity and confidence, for women and service providers such as hospitals, refuges, and sports clubs.

“Single-sex spaces are protected in law and will always be protected by this government.”

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described the ruling as a “victory for all of the women who faced personal abuse or lost their jobs for stating the obvious”.

But Scottish Green MSP Maggie Chapman, a prominent campaigner for trans-rights, said: “This is a deeply concerning ruling for human rights and a huge blow to some of the most marginalised people in our society.

“It could remove important protections and will leave many trans people and their loved ones deeply anxious and worried about how their lives will be affected and about what will come next.”

The Scottish government has not yet commented on the ruling.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Trending