Connect with us

News

CoPF’s victory testament to the power of accountability- economist

Published

on

Harsha

Thwarting of corrupt online visa issuance process:

The suspension of a controversial online process introduced at the expense of transparency and accountability had proved that a parliamentary watchdog committee could thwart such an operation in spite of overwhelming political power exercised by those who arranged the deal.

Y. Karunaratne, who had been on the staff of the Committee of Public Finance (CoPF) during the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa administration explained the circumstances the committee derailed the corrupt deal. Karunaratne, who served as an economist at CoPF, when Dr. Harsha de Silva chaired it, said that in December 2023, a far-reaching agreement had been made between the Department of Immigration and Emigration and a foreign consortium. This consortium (GBS Technology Services & IVS Global-FZCO (IVS-GBS) and VF Worldwide Holdings LTD (VFS Global)), was given exclusive rights to process online visa applications.

The former official issued the following statement: “The decision was made without competitive bidding, which would typically ensure that the best deal is chosen for the country. Instead, the public found themselves facing a shocking increase in visa fees – from the previously affordable USD 1 fee charged by Mobitel to a staggering USD 25 per visa.

This move sparked outrage, especially when it became clear that cheaper, more efficient alternatives like Mobitel, which had been managing the service since 2012, were completely sidelined. Despite Mobitel’s proven track record and offers to upgrade the system at a fraction of the cost, their proposal was ignored.

The irregularities in the visa deal might have gone unnoticed if not for the Committee on Public Finance (COPF), led by its Chairman, (Dr.) Harsha de Silva. COPF is responsible for scrutinizing public spending, ensuring transparency in government deals, and protecting public funds. Dr. Harsha de Silva, along with his team, uncovered the truth behind the visa deal. It bypassed competitive bidding, lacked transparency, and failed to protect Sri Lanka’s financial interests.

Dr. de Silva was clear in his commitment to accountability, stating, “As Chairman, it is my duty to ensure that public funds are protected and that no deal, especially one involving public revenue, escapes scrutiny.”

In May 2024, another major issue arose. A massive data breach was reported by travel vlogger Will Davis, who revealed that personal information, including names, addresses, and passport numbers of visa applicants, had been mistakenly sent to unintended recipients. The breach exposed the private data of thousands of tourists, putting their security and privacy at risk.

COPF immediately flagged this breach, linking it to the rushed and poorly managed contract. It became clear that the mishandling of the visa system was not just a financial issue but a threat to the safety of those visiting Sri Lanka.

COPF’s investigation revealed that Mobitel, the previous visa service provider, had submitted several proposals to upgrade the system, all at a much lower cost – just USD 1 per visa. Despite this, the foreign consortium’s expensive proposal was chosen. The question remained: why was Mobitel ignored, and why did Sri Lanka end up paying so much more for a less secure system?

On 12 July 2024, the Report of the Committee on Public Finance on Outsourcing Online Visa and Passport Application Services between the Consortium and the Department of Immigration and Emigration of Sri Lanka was presented to Parliament by Dr. Harsha de Silva. The report is now available online, revealing the full scope of the visa scam and highlighting critical issues.

The concluding remarks of the report (Section 4) state:

•  The absence of a competitive bidding process in procuring the services of the Consortium prevented the Department of Immigration and Emigration (DOIE) from obtaining the best value for money.

•  The fees charged by competing destinations are significantly lower, and if the System Specification Requirement (SSR) had been finalized, DOIE could have conducted a truly competitive procurement process.

The report also identified several unresolved issues:

1.  Unclear Fee Structure: There are discrepancies in the service fees, with convenience fees lacking transparency.

2.  Data Breach and Termination: The existence of a data breach could trigger a termination clause, which requires further investigation.

3.  Conflicting Exclusivity: The exclusivity granted to the Consortium contradicts the presence of other existing service providers.

4.  Uninvested Funds: The reported USD 200 million investment remains unaccounted for and unexplained.

The COPF made several key recommendations (Section 5), including:

• A comprehensive forensic audit by the Auditor General into the entire procurement process, which was already initiated by the Auditor General as of June 4, 2024. COPF urged that this audit be completed promptly to determine the necessary actions, which could involve terminating the Consortium’s agreement or amending specific clauses.

•  Immediate actions by the Ministry of Public Security (MOPS), DOIE, and the Sri Lankan Data Protection Authority to review the data breach report by KPMG and ensure full data security for all Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA) applications.

Thanks to the efforts of COPF, the scandal caught the attention of the Sri Lankan judiciary. In August 2024, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling, suspending the controversial visa scheme. The court ordered the immediate restoration of the previous system run by Mobitel, which was known for its efficiency and lower costs.

The ruling marked a significant victory in the fight for transparency.

As Dr. de Silva pointed out, “This victory is a testament to the power of accountability. Without the diligent work of COPF, this injustice would have continued unchecked.”

However, the saga did not end there. On September 25, 2024, the Supreme Court ordered the remand of Harsha Ilukpitiya, the Controller General of Immigration and Emigration, for contempt of court. Ilukpitiya had failed to comply with the Supreme Court’s order to suspend the new visa system, deepening the scandal and showing the lengths to which those involved were willing to go to maintain control over the corrupt system.

With Ilukpitiya now facing legal consequences, the message was clear: no one, no matter their position, is above the law.

The fight for justice is far from over. The Supreme Court has scheduled the next inquiry for January 2025, and COPF continues to push for full transparency and accountability. Their work has set a precedent, showing that even the most powerful deals can be undone when public funds and integrity are at stake.

This case is not just about visas – it’s about upholding the rule of law and ensuring that public officials serve the people, not themselves. COPF’s relentless efforts have shown the power of accountability and how one committee’s determination can make all the difference.

As Sri Lanka’s citizens demand accountability and the restoration of transparency in government, COPF stands at the forefront of the fight. Dr. de Silva and his team have proven that with perseverance and leadership, corruption can be exposed, and justice can be served.

The work of COPF continues, and so does the battle for a fair and accountable government. Thanks to the relentless efforts of the Committee on Public Finance, justice is being served.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Sun directly overhead Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura at about 12.10 noon today (31)

Published

on

By

The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from  28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.

The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (31) are Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura about 12.10 noon.

Continue Reading

News

BASL takes exception to Justice Ganepola being denied a place in SC

Published

on

… highlights injustice caused to Justice R. Gurusinghe

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has alleged that due to the failure on the part of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to fill the existing vacancies in the Supreme Court, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled. The BASL pointed out at the time of Ganepola’s retirement there were four vacancies in the Supreme Court.

In a letter dated 17 August, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake, the BASL declared that the failure to promote and recognise Ganepola’s distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.

A top BASL spokesman told The Island yesterday (30) that the Bar Council, over the weekend, had decided to release the hitherto confidential letter.

The official said that they also wanted to remind the President of his assurance given to BASL, on 12 August, 2026, that vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal would be filled as soon as possible, within a month.

The following is the text of the BASL letter, signed by  Rajeev Amarasuriya, President, BASL, and its Secretary Nalin De Silva: “We write further to our letters dated 29th December 2025 and 30th June 2026 in relation to the above, to which we have not received any response.

We also refer to our meeting with Your Excellency on 12th August. As discussed during the meeting, there have been vacancies in the Supreme Court since May 2025, and the number of vacancies has now increased to four (04). There are also four (04) vacancies in the Court of Appeal. These are all matters we have already written to Your Excellency about.

Your Excellency informed the BASL Delegation when we met that you would be taking steps to make recommendations to fill these vacancies as soon as possible, within a month.

We write to reiterate the importance of giving due consideration to the criteria set out in our aforesaid letter dated 29th December 2025. We also wish to emphasise that, in making judicial appointments and promotions, seniority should be given due priority, in keeping with longstanding practice, until such time there are objective and defensible guidelines governing the assessment of merit.

The only justifiable departure to this criterion would be where there exists a specific and recognized demerit in respect of the particular Judge concerned or such other known compelling circumstances that are objectively identifiable such as where a Judge has previously been overlooked for promotion unfairly or conversely, where a Judge has been unfairly previously granted promotions above others.

This approach will safeguard both the integrity of the Judiciary and the trust reposed in it by the public.

Further, while there has been considerable discussion and representation by the Government regarding the importance of retaining experienced judges, as reminded to Your Excellency at our said meeting that, only a few months ago on 8th May 2026, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled, and in which there were four vacancies at the time.

The failure to promote and recognise his distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.

We also drew Your Excellency’s attention at the said meeting to the fact that the Senior-most Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice R. Gurusinghe, who joined the Judicial Service in 1996, who also Acted in the Office of President of the Court of Appeal (appointed by Your Excellency) on 11th May 2026, is due to retire at the end of this month. In fact, we learnt through the Media that Her Ladyship then Chief Justice Justice Murdu Fernando, PC, had previously in July 2025 recommended to Your Excellency the promotion of Justice R. Gurusinghe to the Supreme Court, but the same is pending from that time.

 He too is well deserving of promotion to the Supreme Court and has already been recommended by the former Chief Justice, and his case must also receive due and urgent consideration before his impending retirement.

We hope that Your Excellency will take due note of and give due regard to the concerns of the Bar, as well as to the established principles, practices and conventions governing judicial appointments, when taking steps to fill these vacancies.

On this, Your Excellency is already open to the accusation that these vacancies have been kept open, to fill with favourites of the Government which is yet another serious indictment on the independence of the judiciary which accusation would be confirmed if recommendations are made outside established practice.

Moreover, the BASL expresses grave concern that withholding promotions of Judicial Officers for extended periods of time places undue pressure on Judicial Officers in the discharge of their duties and constitutes both directly and indirectly, interference with the independence of the Judiciary, in addition to the strain obviously caused to the dispensation of justice in other Courts and the stifling and delay of career progression of Judges legitimately entitled to promotions.

We do hope that Your Excellency would take due note and cognizance of the foregoing when effecting these judicial promotions which have been long overdue and which have already adversely impacted the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration of justice.”

The BASL has copied the letter to Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and all members of the Constitutional Council.

Continue Reading

News

Sajith challenges govt. to hold PC polls

Published

on

Sajith

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa on Saturday (29) challenged the government to hold the long-delayed Provincial Council elections, saying the polls would provide an opportunity to gauge the level of public support enjoyed by the administration.

Addressing a farmers’ meeting in Tissamaharama, Hambantota, Premadasa also criticised the latest Rs. 17 per kilogram increase in wheat flour prices, warning that it would push up the prices of bread, bakery products and other flour-based food items and place further pressure on households already struggling with the rising cost of living.

He said Sri Lanka ranked 120th among 130 countries in an international comparison of minimum wages, arguing that wages remained inadequate to meet the escalating cost of living.

Premadasa also questioned official assessments of living standards, asking whether a person could survive for an entire month on Rs. 17,315, a figure he attributed to the Department of Census and Statistics.

He claimed that between 30 and 40 percent of the population was living in poverty and called for a clear programme to help affected families improve their economic conditions.

Turning to the proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which seeks to increase the retirement age of superior court judges, the Opposition Leader accused the government of attempting to undermine judicial independence and interfere with democratic institutions.

He also criticised the government’s handling of poverty, employment, agriculture, healthcare and investment, saying more effective measures were needed to provide relief to people facing economic hardships.Premadasa called for stronger policies to attract foreign direct investment and urged the government to formulate a national strategy for developing the tourism industry.

Continue Reading

Trending