Connect with us

News

Aragalaya failed for want of proper leadership, Rajapaksas regained power through Wickremesinghe – JVP

Published

on

…won’t join coalitions ever again, calls for relentless struggle

By Shamindra Ferdinando

JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake has said that ‘Aragalaya’ failed for want of proper leadership and planning though it compelled Gotabaya Rajapaksa to give up executive powers.

Appearing on ‘Salakuna’ on Hiru, Monday (17) night, MP Dissanayake pointed out that though the Rajapaksas’ power collapsed, as a result of the protest campaign, they were able to quickly regain, and consolidate political power, by installing UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s term.

Responding to interviewers Chamuditha Samarawickrema, Madushan de Silva and Kalindu Vithanage, MP Dissanayake alleged that the incumbent Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa administration was as corrupt as successive Rajapaksa administrations.

Speaking on behalf of the Jathika Jana Balavegaya (JJB), a coalition that includes the JVP, lawmaker Dissanayake faulted those who spearheaded ‘Aragalaya’ for bringing the project to an early end.

Having forced Gotabaya Rajapaksa to flee, the protest should have been diverted towards the Parliament.

Protesters’ ultimate objective should have been to force the then government to dissolve Parliament and call for a fresh election, the JVPer said, pointing out that they pressed for the appointment of Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena as the President temporarily to pave the way for early parliamentary polls.

The JVP leader acknowledged as a result of shortcomings on the part of those who directed ‘Aragalaya,’ the Rajapaksas succeeded in regaining political power. Alleging that President Wickremesinghe, too, had been responsible for the overall deterioration of the national economy, over the past several decades, MP Dissanayake stressed that the public shouldn’t expect him to save the country.

Commenting on Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka’s recent assertion that the ongoing struggle may lead to an armed rebellion, the JVP leader emphasized that his party wouldn’t go on that path again. The JVP launched insurgencies in April 1971 and 1987. Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike’s government crushed the 1971 insurgency within days while the second lasted over four years.

Asked to explain their strategy, MP Dissanayake said that they believed that the government should be relentlessly pressed until it called a general election. “We’ll secure power through elections,” MP Dissanayake said, warning the electorate not to be deceived by the Rajapaksas and Wickremesinghe again.

MP Dissanayake alleged that Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) leader Sajith Premadasa, who is also the Leader of the Opposition, was also part of the utterly corrupt political party system that ruined the country. The SJB leader, as well as the vast majority of those around him, couldn’t absolve themselves of waste, corruption, mismanagement and irregularities though they now pretended to be paragons of virtue.

When the interviewers pointed out that the JJB parliamentary group comprised just three members (Anura Kumara Dissanayake, Vijitha Herath and Dr. Harini Amarasuriya), lawmaker Dissanayake said that it would be a grave mistake, on the part of the electorate to believe the SJB genuinely represented their interests.

Declaring that they were the real Opposition, MP Dissanayake said that the SJB backed the policies of the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government. There couldn’t be a better example than the SJB skipping the vote on the Social Security Contribution Levy to highlight Premadasa’s despicable strategy. Nearly 50 SJB members, including Sajith Premadasa, skipped the vote, though Ajith Mannapperuma, Ashok Abeysinghe and Chief Opposition Whip Lakshman Kiriella were exceptions. Only 10 MPs voted against the Bill whereas 123 skipped the vote. The Parliament ratified the Social Security Contribution Levy in the second week of September, this year, with a majority of 81 votes. The Bill received 91 votes.

MP Dissanayake said that the formation of the SJB should be examined against the backdrop of the split in the UNP, caused by the belief the party couldn’t win under Ranil Wickremesinghe.

The JVP leader said that a major difference between those now exercising power, as well as the SJB and the JVP, was the composition of the Cabinet of Ministers. The JVP believed the Cabinet of Ministers should be restricted to 25 and an equal number of Deputy Ministers whereas the rest were hell bent on expanding the Cabinet of Ministers and accommodating as many State Ministers as possible, at taxpayers’ expense.

Acknowledging the role played by the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), MP Dissanayake, in an obvious reference to the rebel SLPP groups, alleged that they distanced themselves from the government after failing to achieve their objectives, and agendas.

The JVP leader dismissed the interviewers’ assertion that whatever the allegations directed at the incumbent President, he was the most qualified to handle the economy, as baseless. Lawmaker Dissanayake challenged interviewers on the basis that of the USD 15.5 bn loans obtained by way of ISB (International Sovereign Bonds), during the 2007-2020 period, the yahapalana administration had taken USD 12 bn between 2015 and 2019, in addition to USD 1.1 bn received for handing over the Hambantota Port, to China, on a 99-year-lease. President Wickremesinghe owed an explanation in that regard.

Referring to the Colombo High Court, in June this year, sentencing Chief Government Whip Prasanna Ranatunga to two years rigorous imprisonment, suspended for five years, after he was found guilty of one of the charges in a case filed over threatening a businessman, MP Dissanayake said that Sri Lanka’s reputation had been ruined by some of those represented in Parliament. The JVPer said that the recent declaration at the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) that economic crimes had been perpetrated in Sri Lanka was a warning that the international community wouldn’t recognize Sri Lanka as long as the country didn’t honour its own laws.

Responding to a spate of questions on the JVP’s readiness to form a government of its own, MP Dissanayake insisted that the party wouldn’t, under any circumstances, join other political parties. Referring to the JVP joining the CBK government, in 2004, and backing Sarath Fonseka and Maithripala Sirisena at the 2010 and 2015 presidential elections, MP Dissanayake said that they wouldn’t repeat that strategy.

Commenting on several high profile corruption cases, including reduction of Rs 50 per kilo duty on imported white sugar, to 25 cents, in Oct 2020, Treasury bond scams perpetrated in 2015 and 2016, lawmaker Dissanayake said that those responsible would never be punished. The JVPer claimed that the corrupt would be safe as long as the people failed to elect a JVP-led government.

MP Dissanayake flayed ministers who lived luxurious lives at taxpayers’ expense at a time the vast majority of people struggled to make ends meet. Responding to accusations directed at the JVP by Johnston Fernando, MP Dissanayake alleged that the MP brought a woman suicide cadre to Colombo with a view to assassinating the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa. The attack was to be mounted when the President visited a certain house at Gregory’s Road, MP Dissanayake alleged, claiming that the file pertaining to that particular case disappeared from the Attorney General’s Office. An aide to MP Fernando, while denying the JVP leader’s accusation, said that making unsubstantiated allegations was part of their strategy.

Lawmaker Dissanayake said that those who exercised political power never allowed the police and the Attorney General to proceed with high profile cases. Referring to the Malwana case in which Basil Rajapaksa had been investigated for building a bungalow and the ongoing inquiry into fraudulent activities of Thilini Priyamali, the JVP leader said that politicians didn’t allow the law to take its course. Declaring the Money Laundering Act as a very powerful law, MP Dissanayake claimed that it was not properly implemented in respect of those near and dear to the powers that be.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

President proposes; Speaker disposes

Published

on

Dr. Wickramaratne

AKD’s request to Harsha:

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne has frustrated an attempt by Chairman of the Committee on Public Finance (CoPF) Dr. Harsha de Silva, MP, to intervene to settle the continuing dispute over the appointment of a new Auditor General.

Dr. De Silva yesterday told The Island he had recently written to all members of the Constitutional Council (CC) drawing their attention to the urgent need to address the issue at hand. The AG’s position remains vacant since 08 Dec, 2025. AG W.P.C. Wickremanayake retired in April and since then there have been a couple of Acting appointments. The CC has declined to endorse any of President Dissanayake’s nominees as the AG.

Asked whether he had taken up the issue with the CC following President Anura Kumara Dissanayake soliciting his support in this regard, MP de Silva said that he had written to CC members as agreed with the President.

The former UNPer and one-time State Minister said: “I did so, giving due respect to CC’s independence, underscoring the critical importance in them working with the President to resolve the crisis. I alluded to the need to have transparency in public financial management during this post-cyclone period where large amounts of funds are being transacted on multiple fronts, both domestic and foreign.”

Responding to another query, Dr. De Silva emphasised that he had clarified that the President must send the names of qualified and experienced persons to the CC for consideration. “However, these letters were returned to me by the Speaker, without being delivered to members of the CC. The Speaker didn’t give an explanation. Thus, except for members who are MPs who had been copied via email by my committee office, others never received my letter of concern. Even though I questioned, in Parliament, the basis of his refusal to forward my communication to the members of the CC of which he is Chairman, no answer was given.”

The CC consists of Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne, Speaker and Chairman of the 10-member body. Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Prime Minister, Sajith Premadasa, Leader of the Opposition, Bimal Rathnayake, Aboobucker Athambawa, Ajith P. Perera, Sivagnanam Shritharan, and three civil society members namely Dr. Prathap Ramanujam, Dr. Dilkushi Anula Wijesundere and Dr. Dinesha Samararatne. None of the President’s nominees could obtain CC’s approval as all of them were rejected by the CC.

The present CC was introduced by the 21st Amendment to the Constitution which was endorsed on 31 October 2022.

Both the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) and the Transparency International Sri Lanka Chapter recently requested President Dissanayake, in writing, to propose a suitable person to the post of AG. The BASL, in another statement that dealt with the forthcoming vacancies in the CC due to three civil society members completing their terms, declared its concern over possible attempts by the President and the NPP government to fill the vacancies with rubber stamps.

The three civil society members will complete their terms on 18 January. In terms of Article 41E of the Constitution, the CC meets at least twice every month, and may meet as often as may be necessary. The Chairman presides at all meetings of the CC and in the absence of the Chairman, the Prime Minister, and in the absence of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition presides at the meetings of the CC.

Asked whether the CC could be disrupted due to the end of civil society members’ terms, an authoritative official pointed out that in case new appointments were not made the current members could continue.

The Parliament has not so far called for applications to fill the forthcoming vacancies.

by Shamindra Ferdinando ✍️

Continue Reading

News

Sri Lanka loses Rs.7.5 bn due to coal tender irregularities: FSP

Published

on

Pubudu

The NPP government’s coal procurement process has once again come under scrutiny following allegations by the Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) that substandard coal has been imported for power generation and that tender procedures were manipulated to favour a specific supplier.

Addressing the media after a party meeting in Maharagama on Saturday, FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jagoda said a test report issued by the government laboratory at the Lakvijaya Power Plant had confirmed that the latest coal shipment unloaded in Sri Lanka did not meet the required quality standards. According to the report, the coal’s calorific value ranged between 5,600 and 5,800 kilocalories per kilo, below the 5,900–6,200 kCal/kg range specified in tender requirements.

Jagoda warned that lower calorific value coal would require higher volumes to generate the same amount of electricity, increasing costs significantly. Preliminary estimates, he said, indicated an additional financial burden of around Rs. 7,500 million, which might eventually be passed on to consumers through higher electricity tariffs.

The FSP also accused the government of tailoring procurement rules to benefit the Indian supplier, which has deposited bonds for long-term coal supply for the upcoming season. Jagoda alleged that tender conditions had been altered to accommodate the company, pointing to changes in coal reserve requirements. Under the 2021 Sri Lanka Coal Registration Document, suppliers were required to maintain a minimum reserve of one million metric tonnes with a gross calorific value of 5,900 kCal/kg. This threshold, he said, had been reduced to 100,000 metric tonnes in the 2025 document which is a 90% reduction raising serious concerns.

He further cited past allegations against the Indian company, including findings in a 2016 Auditor General’s report that the company violated procurement guidelines regarding a rice supply contract with Sathosa in 2014. Jagoda also referred to legal issues involving individuals linked to the company, and the suspension of a representative by the International Cricket Council in 2019 over match-fixing allegations.

Beyond company-specific concerns, Jagoda criticised what he described as systemic manipulation of the coal tender process. He questioned why the coal tender, typically called in February or March, was delayed until July, despite electricity being declared an essential service. He also alleged that the tender submission period had been progressively shortened from the internationally accepted six weeks to five weeks, and now reportedly to three giving an unfair advantage to suppliers with existing stock.

The Ministry of Energy has recently issued an amended tender to procure 4.5 million metric tonnes of coal for the Lanka Coal Company for the 2025/26 and 2026/27 periods, following the cancellation of an earlier tender.

Jagoda warned that delays and irregularities could lead to coal shortages, higher spot market purchases, increased electricity costs, and even power cuts if hydropower generation falls short. He called for urgent investigations into the procurement process, insisting that the burden of alleged mismanagement and corruption must not be transferred to the public.

by Chaminda Silva ✍️

Continue Reading

News

CID summons SJB MP for criticising education reforms

Published

on

Prasad

SJB Gampaha District MP Prasad Siriwardhana has been summoned to the CID today (12) for questioning in connection with a statement he made on a private television channel regarding education reforms.

He was earlier asked to report to the CID on 10 January to make a statement. However, as Siriwardhana had notified the authorities that he was unable to appear on that day, he was subsequently asked to come today.

Siriwardhana is one of the critics of the shortcomings of the education reforms introduced by the NPP government.

Continue Reading

Trending