****

That this move cost Sri Lanka hosting rights to the Under 19 Men’s World Cup in early 2024 caused little distress at the board, but did create problems for Sri Lanka’s Under-19 cricketers, who had trained for months for a home World Cup, only to have to eventually travel to South Africa for the event. The Sri Lankan spectators that may have turned up to this World Cup were barely an afterthought. Local businesses also had potential revenue whisked away. But in having the sports minister sacked through the course of all this high-level hijinx, SLC achieved its major objective, however.

There is also the Lanka Premier League (LPL) in which, incredibly, home audiences have also been an afterthought.  What is supposed to be SLC’s flagship T20 product has been little more than franchise-owner roulette, owners almost uniformly uninterested in sticking around for more than a couple of seasons, and even less bothered with developing local fanbases, as any number of IPL, or PSL teams have done.

In the first season of the LPL, Jaffna Stallions had begun to engage fans in the northern city which for decades had been cut off from Sri Lankan cricket by war. By the beginning of the next season, Stallions – who had won the first tournament – had been tossed out by SLC largely for business reasons with a higher bidder poised to come in. The Dambulla franchise has been Dambulla Viiking one year, Dambulla Giants the next, Dambulla Aura for two years, then rebranded as Dambulla Thunders until one of its potential owners was arrested under Sri Lanka’s sports corruption law, and then Dambulla Sixers the last time the LPL was played.

Building a tournament brand season-on-season, ensuring a high level of competition through which players may hone skills, attracting quality overseas talent both on the coaching and playing fronts – these are all secondary and tertiary considerations to picking up the next franchise cheque. This tournament has now not been played since July 2024, SLC’s official reason for cancelling it in 2025 having been the unavailability of grounds, which were getting upgrades ahead of this T20 World Cup. Even by SLC’s own logic this is an admission of dizzying incompetence. SLC had known it was hosting this World Cup years ago. On top of which, canceling the nation’s top men’s T20 competition precisely in the same season the team is due to compete in a home World Cup is almost glorious in its stupidity.

In fact, stadium upgrades were not the real reason for the LPL’s cancellation – grounds at Khettarama and Pallekele did not require substantial overhauls, and venues in Dambulla and Hambantota (which were not used in this T20 World Cup, but have both hosted LPL games in the past), were unused in any case. The real reason for its cancellation is perhaps more embarrassing: the tournament’s brand had become so toxic, that it was struggling to attract even the substandard franchisees it had previously drawn. No firm dates have been announced for a 2026 LPL.

SLC has also crowed about its financial health over the past several years, publishing audited accounts while holding press conferences to advertise its solvency. And yet the men’s Test team has only four matches on its schedule this year. The women’s team (who while the men have crashed out of the World Cup, have just won a bilateral series in the Caribbean), had also seen their schedule obliterated during the Covid-19 years, Sri Lanka’s one remaining superstar cricketer – Chamari Athtapaththu – losing 24 prime run-making months from her career.

In the 12 years since a senior Sri Lanka team last reached the knockouts of an ICC final (the men didn’t even qualify for last year’s Champions Trophy), there has been significant turnover in coaching personnel – Marvan Atapattu, Graham Ford, Chandika Hathurusingha, Mickey Arhtur, Chris Silverwood, and now Sanath Jayasuriya now all having failed in various attempts to return the men’s side to a modicum of its former glory. In that stretch, Sri Lanka has had at least 10 T20I captains, ranging from Lasith Malinga, to Charith Asalanka, to Angelo Mathews, to Kusal Mendis. Selectors, like players, have been tried and discarded.

At the highest levels of the board, Silva is currently serving his fourth consecutive term as president of SLC, having been voted in uncontested yet again by a compliant body of members. The board’s key positions continue to be filled by Silva loyalists, while CEO Ashley de Silva has been in situ for more than a decade.

Among the public, the Sri Lankan board has long been among the most reviled public-facing institutions in the country, a consensus having developed that SLC is little more than a den of sycophants and profiteers, and that only root-and-stem removal will bring lasting positive change. But why should their ire matter to the board? Even on the financial front, the local cricket supporter is increasingly irrelevant to Sri Lanka’s cricketing governance.

“No matter how we as cricketers try to stay positive, there is negativity outside” said Sri Lanka captain Dasun Shanaka, after his team collapsed against New Zealand and became the first Super Eight team to be eliminated from the T20 World Cup. “That’s a big loss for Sri Lankan cricket. This is the only sport we have, and I don’t know if we’ll be able to protect it. If you look outside the stadium, you’ll see how many people are standing outside with mics, and people will say stuff without having watched the match.”

Having complained about how fans were treating the team, he went on to make a suggestion that was astoundingly tone-deaf: “We will play and leave, but if for the players who will come in the future, if the government can even stop it [the negativity] that’s better for their mental health.”

Shanaka is merely the latest log to be fed into the woodchipper of Sri Lankan cricket, so perhaps his comments do not deserve to be taken especially seriously, particularly as Sri Lanka cricketers face significantly fewer challenges in their day-to-day lives than do cricketers elsewhere in South Asia, and the media environment is not especially malicious by global standards. But the comments do reveal something else: so long has the men’s team been in decline, that some players have begun to develop loathing towards their own supporters.

Supporters, meanwhile, have also begun to clock that top cricketers’ lifestyles – often as advertised on social media – are out of step with their achievements for the national side. Comments sections bear this out. A classic top comment on a player’s post about the restaurant he visited, or a watch he has just bought might go, in Sinhala lokka, velaavak thibunoth vitharak cricketuth poddak gahanna. Essentially: “boss if you have some time between all this, please also play some cricket”. Irony, as mentioned up top, comes naturally.

It might be simpler for all parties if they merely refused to show up to these matches. Players will still earn their salaries and match fees, the source of these monies now increasingly foreign, particularly if they play in the leagues. SLC can continue to strike lucrative deals without having to contend with the island’s own hurting audiences.

And still, kids still race home from school to play cricket at the local ground with their friends, parents around the island still load up kit-bags into trishaws to take kids to training, and the moment either the men’s or women’s team shows even a glimmer of promise, the nation finds itself hopelessly gripped.

They will likely turn up to Pallekele for their final match of the World Cup,  having bought out the fixture soon after Sri Lanka qualified for the Super Eight. What will they do there? Hate-watch? This particular fanbase-board-cricketer dynamic is perhaps unlike anything else in the cricketing world, and in the past Pallekele crowds have not been shy to make their displeasure felt. We are in uncharted territory on this one.

Whatever happens on Saturday, both players and board will fear the crowd’s ire, because for one more night at least, the world’s eyes are here. The players will have to show up of course, but Silva, the SLC president, may not ask to be shown on television and talked about, as he often does when the team is winning. Through their unyielding affection for the game, Sri Lanka’s fans have become a thorn in the establishment’s side.

[Cricinfo]

Shaheen Afridi’s performance against England makes it likely he will keep his spot. If Pakistan are to stick to two specialist seamers on this surface, it makes it a straight shootout between Naseem Shah and Salman Mirza. What’s less certain is how the equation changes Pakistan’s batting line-up. So far, they have been reluctant to drop Babar Azam, or play Khawaja Nafay. Any caution needs to go out of the window as they battle to stay alive.

Pakistan (probable): Sahibzada Farhan, Saim Ayub, Salman Agha (capt),  Babar Azam/Khawaja Nafay, Fakhar Zaman,  Shadab Khan,  Usman Khan (wk), Mohammad Nawaz/Faheem Ashraf, Shaheen Afridi,  Salman Mirza/Naseem Shah,  Usman Tariq

[Cricinfo]