Connect with us

News

AKD has no mandate to enact a new anti-terror law except to repeal PTA – NSC

Published

on

President Dissanayake

The National Shoora Council (NSC) has urged President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to honour his election pledge and repeal the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act (PTA) without replacing it with a new Anti -Terrorism law, as no such mandate was sought from the people in the ruling party’s manifesto.

The NSC has also pointed out in its letter to President Dissanayake that over a dozen new laws had been enacted during the last 25 years with wider powers being vested in the executive and the police. The Muslim civil society has also said that 16 years have elapsed since terrorism was wiped out and that today there is no sign of any terrorism in the country.

The following is the full text of the NSC letter to the President: “The National Shoora Council (NSC) is a consultative body of premier Muslim organisations in Sri Lanka with a national reach and includes citizens of repute. The NSC was established in 2013 following a series of Islamophobic attacks on the Muslim community from 2012 onwards and which led to several devastating anti-Muslim riots in the country.

The National People’s Power (NPP) pledged in its recent presidential and general election manifestos to repeal the PTA unequivocally, but it did not declare in the manifesto or in its election campaigns that any other new law would replace the PTA! If the pledge were to replace the PTA with another law, the NPP would have said so clearly. ‘Repeal of PTA’ was the pledge, while ‘replacement of the PTA’ was never even talked about or placed before the people!

You are well aware that the abuse of the PTA by the country’s then executive from 1979 onwards contributed significantly to the 1983 anti-Tamil riots as well as to the growth of violence and terrorism in the island nation. Sri Lanka got pushed into a costly war that lasted for over thirty years. The PTA instead of eliminating violence, multiplied terrorism and economically bankrupt the nation while enriching the arms-producing countries.

You are also no doubt aware that after the war ended in May 2009, the PTA was not used to restrain the majoritarian hate campaigns that were unleashed from 2012 onwards, initially against the Christians and soon thereafter on the Muslims. The Muslim community endured several violent attacks on their businesses, Mosques, and homes from 2014 onwards. Over 25 Mosques were attacked in 2018 alone, months before the Easter attacks. The Parliamentary Select Committee and the Presidential Commission on Easter attacks blamed the actions of seven majoritarian extremist organisations as also having led to the Easter attacks of 21/04/2019.

The point we make is that the then executive abused the PTA, directing it only against the minorities, particularly against the patriotic Muslim community of Sri Lanka, who stood against the division of the country, opposed LTTE terrorism and were soon ejected from the North by the LTTE whilst thousands in the East were killed and their lands grabbed.

It is in this context that we urge the NPP to honour its promise to the nation to repeal the PTA and not to replace the PTA by another law, as there are over a dozen new laws enacted within the last twenty-five years with wide powers vested in the executive and the police. It is 16 years since terrorism in Sri Lanka was wiped out. There is no sign of terrorism anymore.

The Anti-Terrorism Bill will send a negative message and image of Sri Lanka worldwide. It will discourage tourism, investments, and economic recovery!

We urge the NPP not to fall into external traps that seek to replace PTA’s draconian provisions with a new Anti-Terror Law as indeed today there is not the slightest threat of terrorism anywhere in the country. The objectives of these external elements appear to be to propagate to the world that Sri Lanka is still a country subject to terrorism, debilitating its economic resurgence, and keeping Sri Lanka subservient to powerful nations to better facilitate forthcoming regional conflicts in the Indian Ocean!

The ‘Anti-Terrorism Bill’ Committee, appointed by the Minister of Justice and National Integration to draft a non-mandated replacement to the PTA, is packed regrettably with 90% government officials and does not have a diversity of independent members reflecting the spirit of the Constitution, justice, or national integration.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Foreign News

AI chatbots could be making you stupider

Published

on

By

As large language models take over more and more cognitive tasks, researchers are warning this mental outsourcing comes with a cost.

When research scientist Nataliya Kosmyna was looking for interns, she noticed that cover letters she received were suspiciously similar. They were long, polished and after introductions would often jump to an abstract and arbitrary connection to her work.

It was obvious to her that applicants were using large language models (LLMs) – a form of artificial intelligence that powers chatbots such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini and Claude – to write the letters.

At the same time, during lessons on campus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Kosmyna, who studies the interaction between humans and computers, noticed that numerous students were forgetting content more easily compared to a few years ago.

With the increasing reliance on LLMs, she had a hunch that this could be affecting her students’ cognition and sought to understand more.

The concern that researchers like Kosmyna have is that if we become too reliant on AI, it could affect the language we use and even our ability to do basic cognitive tasks. There is now a growing body of research suggesting that this “cognitive offloading” to AI can have a corrosive effect on our mental abilities. The consequences could be alarming and may even contribute to cognitive decline.

“The ChatGPT group showed notably less brain activity – it was reduced by up to 55%”

It’s well known that the tools we use can change how we think. With the advent of the internet for instance, tasks that once required deep research could be found by plugging a simple query into a search box. As the use of search engines increased, research found we became less likely to remember details, something dubbed “the Google effect”. (Some argue, however, the internet also serves as an external memory system that frees up our brain to do other tasks)

But there is now growing alarm that as we offload even more of our thinking to LLMs and other forms of AI, the effects on our memories and ability to solve problems could get worse. Artificial intelligence tools can write convincing poetry, give financial advice and provide companionship.  Students are increasingly outsourcing their own work to AI tools as well.

Studies have already shown that young people might be particularly vulnerable to the negative effects that using AI can have on key cognitive skills like critical thinking.  Kosmyna, however, wanted to dig deeper into the potential effects.

Reduced mental effort

She and her colleagues at MIT Media Lab recruited 54 students to write short essays and split them into three groups. One was instructed to use ChatGPT. A second could use Google search, with AI-generated summaries turned off. The third didn’t use technology. Each student’s brainwaves were measured while they worked.

The essay topics were deliberately open-ended, meaning little research was needed for the task, with prompts including questions around loyalty, happiness or our daily life choices.

The results haven’t been published in a scientific journal yet, but they were none-the-less eye-opening, according to Kosmyna. Those who used their own minds had a brain that was “on fire”, showing widespread activity across many parts of the brain, she says. The search engine-only group still showed strong activity in the visual parts of the brain, but the ChatGPT group showed notably less brain activity – it was reduced by up to 55%.

“The brain didn’t fall asleep, but there was much less activation in the areas corresponding to creativity and to processing information,” says Kosmyna.

ChatGPT also affected people’s memories. After submitting their essays, people in the AI group were unable to quote from their essays, and several felt they had no ownership over the work. Other studies have also shown that people become less able to retain and recall information when they use AI tools such as ChatGPT.

While the findings are still undergoing peer review, they echo those from other studies. One study by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania suggests that some people undergo something they term “cognitive surrender” when using generative AI chatbots. This means they tend to accept what the AI tells them with minimal scrutiny and even allow it to override their own intuition.

Similar effects can be found outside the world of AI chatbots too – even in life-or-death situations. A recent multinational study team found that medical professionals who used an AI tool to screen for colon cancer for three months were subsequently worse at spotting the tumours without it.

Getty Images Researchers have growing concerns about the harms that rapid adoption of AI might be causing (Credit: Getty Images)
Researchers have growing concerns about the harms that rapid adoption of AI might be causing (BBC)

 

Outsourcing work to AI also risks losing much of the creativity that produces original work, warns Kosmyna. The essays that students in her study wrote with ChatGPT looked very similar and were described by the teachers marking them as “soulless”, lacking originality and depth, Kosmyna says. “One of the teachers asked if students were sitting next to each other because the essays were so similar.”

While studies such as these illustrate the short-term effects LLMs can have on the brain, the long-term impacts are far less clear. The study by Kosmyna and her colleagues provides a glimpse. Four months after the initial study they asked the students to write another essay, but this time those who had used ChatGPT were told to work without LLM support. The neural connectivity in their brains was lower than those who switched the opposite way, perhaps indicating that they had not engaged with the topics properly in the first place.

Cognitive decline

Yet, LLMs can be a positive tool to aid thinking, but only if we don’t rely on them by outsourcing our mental tasks in the process, says computational neuroscientist Vivienne Ming, author of Robot Proof. She’s concerned though that this is not how most people interact with this technology.

Her reasoning comes from research she conducted for her book, during which Ming asked a group of students at the University of Berkeley to predict real-world outcomes, such as the price of oil. She found that the majority of participants simply asked AI and copied the answer.

She measured their brains’ gamma wave activity – a marker of cognitive effort – finding it showed very little activation. Again her research is yet to published, but Ming worries that if her findings are borne out in further studies it could have long-term implications. Other research, for example, has linked weak gamma wave activity to cognitive decline later in life.

“That’s really worrying,” Ming says. “If that is a natural mode for people to interact with these systems – and these are smart kids – that’s bad.” Deep thinking, she says, is our superpower. “If we don’t use it, the long-term implications for cognitive health are pretty strong.”

That’s because when we rely on LLMs it requires very little cognitive effort, Ming adds, which is exactly what’s needed for a healthy brain.

A small subset of participants though – less than 10% – worked differently and used AI as a tool to gather data that they then analysed themselves. These individuals made more accurate predictions than others participants and showed stronger brain activation too.

For long-term brain health we need to continue to challenge ourselves

Almost two decades ago, Ming predicted that within 20 to 30 years we would see a statistically meaningful rise in dementia rates directly related to our overreliance on Google Maps. “I meant it to be provocative,” Ming says. “If you don’t have to think about navigating then there’ll be some detectable effect.”

While we don’t have data on this exact prediction, the increased use of GPS has been linked to worse spatial memory over time, according to one study of 13 people conducted over three years. And poor spatial navigation may be a potential predictor of Alzheimer’s Disease,  according to another study.

It’s clear that the more active our brain is, the more protected it is from cognitive decline. LLMs then, Ming says, could not only reduce creativity but could harm cognition and potentially increase the risk of dementia.

As AI tool use increases, we need to work with it in a way that benefits us rather than harms us. Ming suggests that ultimately, the goal could be a form of “hybrid intelligence” where humans and machines “do the hard stuff” together. By this she means we need to think first and use tools to challenge us later, rather than simply letting them answer questions for us. Kosmyna agrees and suggests learning subjects without AI tools first to build a foundation and then think about using LLMs.

Ming recommends using what she calls the “nemesis prompt” to challenge your own thinking. It works by prompting an AI to act as a “lifelong enemy” or nemesis, then ask it to explain in detail why your ideas are wrong and how you can fix them, forcing you to defend and refine your arguments rather than simply accepting the answers it provides.

Another technique she suggest is prioritising “productive friction” and asking the AI to only provide context and ask you questions, rather than supplying answers. When she tested this by fine-tuning an AI bot not to give answers, she found that more individuals were more engaged.

Ultimately, we should all be wary of cognitive shortcuts, which is something “our brains love”, Kosmyna says. Clearly, for long-term brain health we need to continue to challenge ourselves. Our minds, creativity and cognitive health will benefit in the process.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Heat Index at Caution Level in the Northern, North-central, North-western, Western, Sabaragamuwa and  Eastern provinces during the day time

Published

on

By

Warm Weather Advisory
Issued by the Natural Hazards Early Warning Centre
Issued at 3.30 p.m. on 24 April 2026, valid for 25 April 2026.

Heat index, the temperature felt on human body is likely to increase up to ‘Caution level’ at some places in Northern, North-central, North-western, Western, Sabaragamuwa and
Eastern provinces during the day time.

The Heat Index Forecast is calculated by using relative humidity and maximum temperature and this is the condition that is felt on your body. This is not the forecast of maximum temperature. It is generated by the Department of Meteorology for the next day period and prepared by using global numerical weather prediction model data.


Effect of the heat index on human body is mentioned in the above table and it is prepared on the advice of the Ministry of Health and Indigenous Medical Services.

ACTION REQUIRED
Job sites: Stay hydrated and takes breaks in the shade as often as possible.
Indoors: Check up on the elderly and the sick.
Vehicles: Never leave children unattended.
Outdoors: Limit strenuous outdoor activities, find shade and stay hydrated.
Dress: Wear lightweight and white or light-colored clothing.

Note:
In addition, please refer to advisories issued by the Disaster Preparedness & Response Division, Ministry of Health in this regard as well. For further clarifications please contact 011-7446491.

Continue Reading

News

Opposition holds NPP Cabinet responsible for coal scam, three times bigger than bond fraud

Published

on

Prof. G. L. Peiris

The Opposition yesterday called for the entire Cabinet-of-Ministers to accept responsibility for the coal scam. Addressing the media at the Flower Road Office of UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, former Foreign Minister Prof. G. L. Peiris emphasised that Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody’s resignation, in the wake of the damning report issued by the National Audit Office (NAO), has now implicated the entire Cabinet-of-Ministers.

Prof. Peiris asserted that Jayakody, who had been indicted in the Colombo High Court over alleged corruption, during the Yahapalana administration, stepped down after the NPP failed to suppress the truth on the coal scam.

The ex-Minister declared that Jayakody’s resignation, the first since the formation of new government, with a super majority in Parliament, was a devastating setback for the current dispensation.

The internationally recognised legal scholar said that a future government would move courts against the entire NPP Cabinet. Referring to the NAO report submitted to Parliament, Prof. Peiris emphasised that there was absolutely no ambiguity regards allegations directed at the Energy Ministry. The NAO report proved that the Indian company, Trident Champhar, that won the major contract, didn’t even have the required registration.

Prof. Peiris said that the coal scam was three times bigger than the Treasury bond scams, perpetrated during the Yahapalana time (SF)

Continue Reading

Trending