Features
From a Sri Lankan : A Letter to the West
As the International Court of Justice prepares to deliver its verdict on South Africa’s case against Israel, this is an opportune moment to reflect on what it means for the West, the Global South, and international law and human rights.
The news from Gaza is pretty grim, and it is getting grimmer by the day. Nearly 24,000 civilians have been killed by Israeli forces since the war began on October 7, and they are dying at the rate of 250 a day. Oxfam has reported that the daily death toll of Palestinians exceeds that of any other major conflict in the 21st century.
Human Rights Watch says that the people of Gaza are being targeted, abused, and killed “at a scale unprecedented in the recent history of Israel and Palestine.” The Secretary General of Amnesty International observes that there is “no end in sight to the mass human suffering, devastation, and destruction we are witnessing on an hourly basis.”
Euro-Med Monitor reports that at least 14 Palestinians are dying by the hour. Most of them, two-thirds to be specific, are women and children. The Executive Director of UN Women points out that two mothers are killed every hour and seven women every two hours. For a region as small as Gaza, this is a staggering figure.
The statistics belie the horror of what they go through every day: with no access to water and medication, 180 women give birth every day under the most appalling conditions. The newborn face an uncertain future, riddled with death and violence.
Journalists and artists are also facing the brunt of the attacks. The Committee to Protect Journalists calls the current war the “deadliest period for journalists” since the organisation began collecting data in 1992.
The numbers are harrowing: 82 journalists have been killed so far, including 75 Palestinian and four Israeli. 25 have been arrested, and scores of others have been in some way and form assaulted, threatened, and censored.
Artists, including poets and writers, have become victims too. Israeli forces have killed at least 13 writers and poets since the war began last October. One of them, Heba Abu Nada, wrote the following post on Facebook on October 8.
“Our pages are consolation houses, mourning tents, obituaries, we go from page to page as if we are walking in a crowded, open funerals. Oh God, how heavy are these days!”
Twelve days later, she was killed by an Israeli airstrike.
These stories form a tapestry of horror and violence in Gaza and in Palestine. Overnight, ordinary civilians have been thrown into a war they did not call for.
They are being pummelled, flattened, erased out of existence, systematically exterminated, like vermin and outcasts. They are being dehumanised.
In this context, it’s everybody’s business to care. An entire people are being wiped off the face of the earth. The world cannot wait and watch.
And yet, one half of the world is doing exactly that. In response to South Africa’s case against Israel, one world leader after another is slowly, shamefacedly, getting up, holding lavish press conferences in which they say, in so many words, that what the Israeli government is committing is not a genocide.
The Canadian Prime Minister states that his government does not support the “premise” of South Africa’s case. He denies that there has been a genocide in Gaza.
Canada is not a stranger to claims of genocide. In 2021 reports surfaced of more than a hundred residential schools that had been set up to brutalise indigenous children. The Canadian Museum for Human Rights calls these institutions “part of a broader process of colonialism and genocide.” The schools were little better than concentration camps; one report highlights a death toll of more than 3,200.
Germany, too, has stated it will support Israel. The government claims that Hamas intends on destroying Israel and justifies its support of the Israeli government on the grounds that South Africa’s case amounts to “political instrumentalization.”
In response, the Namibian government has condemned Germany, and reminded the German government of the atrocities it committed against two indigenous communities, the Hereros and the Namas, between 1904 and 1908.
Germany’s campaign led to the deaths of almost a hundred thousand indigenous people. This is recognised today as the 20th century’s first case of genocide. In 1985 the United Nations officially classified it as such. In 2004 the German government issued an apology. But it refused to compensate the families of the victims.
As for the United States, President Joe Biden’s statement marking 100 days of the war makes no mention of Palestinian civilians. Leaders of such countries seem to have their notions of who constitutes people and who do not. For their governments, the people of Gaza do not meet the criteria, and hence can be disregarded.
In a way, I suppose these developments are interlinked. Hitler’s Final Solution had its antecedents in the West’s campaigns against indigenous communities. Europe’s wars of conquest and Washington’s forever wars share much in this regard.
As Alex Ross has noted in a perceptive piece in the New Yorker, American racism, specifically its campaigns against American Indians, influenced Hitler’s views on race.
Not that they have ever found this reason enough to atone for what they did. As John Wayne put it bluntly, “I don’t feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them… There were great numbers of people who needed new land and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”
It is hence not ironic that the same Western countries that sanctioned or looked the other when Hitler embarked on his genocidal campaigns should do so today, as tens of thousands of Palestinians find themselves on the brink of extinction.
What is ironic, however, is how these countries are shielding Israel from claims of genocide on the basis that Israel is at the receiving end of a genocide itself.
They frequently cite the October 7 attack, forgetting that the Israeli government’s response to those attacks has been anything but proportionate, and forgetting the many racist if hateful remarks that the most right-wing governments Israel has elected in its entire history has made, and continues to make, about the people of Gaza.
These countries have also forgotten the hundreds of thousands of Jewish voices who have risen against their own government. Some of these voices include relatives of the hostages captured by Hamas themselves. They say they don’t want this war to continue. But their own government, busy tweeting one ridiculous claim after another against South Africa, the ICJ, and the UN, seems not to have heard their call.
To be fair, not every Western country has made itself complicit in this genocide. Spain and Norway have voiced concerns. Long before the current conflict, the Mayor of Barcelona suspended ties with Jerusalem, citing its subjugation of Palestinians in Gaza.
And while governments have shamefully sided with Israel, civil society organisations, human rights activists, writers, poets, actors, directors, and academics have sided with Palestine. Establishment liberals have either gone quiet or chosen to focus on Hamas’s October 7 attack – an attack that warrants criticism. But the most unexpected figures from places like Hollywood have condemned the atrocities of the Israeli forces.
As an American friend put it the other day, when Tywin Lannister (Charles Dance) says you are committing genocide, perhaps you need to rethink your stance.
Nevertheless, the rift between our part of the world and theirs remain. This has several important ramifications. Europe and the United States, with Canada thrown in for good measure, have effectively abandoned what little moral clout they have. Their moral compass does not hold. For that matter, neither do they.
In just 100 days, the West has shown the world just how selectively human rights and all those other values it still thinks it holds dear can be applied.
When Russia invaded Ukraine, and hundreds of Ukrainians fled their homes, the media was awash with journalists crying over their plight. One correspondent thought it emotional “to see Europeans with blue eyes and blond hair being killed every day.”
Some victims, it seems, are more worthy than others. Palestinians, clearly, are not.
The West frequently speaks of a rules-based order and the equality of nations. These were values we thought would hold for all situations, for all countries, for all people.
That, however, has not been the case. There has been a disproportionate response to the tragedy unfolding in Gaza, and most countries in the Global North have been content in taking the side of those committing the atrocities.
The West refuses to hear the hundreds of thousands of millions of its own citizens who are speaking up for Palestine, and for Palestinian lives.
It refuses to listen to the hundreds of thousands of Jewish voices that are critical of Israeli forces and what they are doing in Gaza.It refuses to acknowledge the growing tide of global opinion against Israeli atrocities.
What does this mean? It means, simply, that the West has absconded from the moral high ground on which it thought it once stood. In doing so, it has given half the world a reason to come together, to gather around in solidarity.This is a definitive historical moment. As each day passes, the West’s tone-deafness makes it clear who is on the right side of history, and who is on the wrong.
Features
Why ‘Southasianness’ should continue to matter for the ‘SAARC Eight’
At a time when Sri Lanka’s foreign policy is coming under intense scrutiny by some local sections it is only right that impartial and independent commentators shed some clarity on what fundamental foreign policy directions Sri Lanka ought to take. The extremely fluid and complex nature of current international politics renders such an understanding crucially important.
Given its vulnerabilities in a number of spheres Sri Lanka has no choice but to persist in broadly following the path of Non-alignment. That is, it should be ‘a friend of all and an enemy of none’, to the extent possible. However, it does not follow that in the process it could compromise what is seen as its national interest.
The latter point needs stressing against the backdrop of the criticisms the Sri Lankan government has been attracting from some quarters over what is made out to be some opaqueness in security and defence cooperation agreements it has entered into with India. It remains advisable for the Sri Lankan government to enter into pacts of this nature with India, but the government is obliged to disclose the contents of these agreements to the Sri Lankan people without undue delay in consideration of the uncompromisable sovereign rights of a people in a democracy.
However, there is no denying that the government should make it a central foreign policy premise to always work in cooperation with India. A consideration of what it cost Sri Lanka in the past to be in a disharmonious relationship with India and how such policy missteps worked against Sri Lanka’s best interests ought to dictate to Sri Lanka the advisability of maintaining uninterrupted cordial ties with India. Moreover, common sense ought to drive home to a country the costs of being at loggerheads with one’s closest neighbour who has also proved a ‘ready friend in deed.’
That said, it is the bounden duty of Sri Lanka’s diplomatic community or establishment to ensure that such cooperation does not degenerate into a policy of subservience towards India. That is, finesse and farsightedness in local diplomacy become prime requirements.
While India’s geographical location and physical size, besides her other strengths, contribute towards her centrality in regional and world affairs, her neighbours would be thinking and acting far-sightedly if they not only focus on India and her legitimate interests but also ensure continuous friction-free intra-South Asian relations. That is, for them collective South Asian well being should be of fundamental importance.
Much more than for India perhaps, such harmonious ties are of inestimable importance to India’s neigbours who are up against multiple vulnerabilities which are to a great extent regionally rooted. The latter could never, that is, afford to take their minds off the region’s collective development prospects.
The above are some of the reasons why it could prove highly counter-productive and self-defeating for the ‘South Asian Eight’ to render dormant and ineffective the historic SAARC organization. Rather than ‘dead’ SAARC has been allowed to drift into the ‘Limbo of Forgotten Things.’
The growing inter-dependence of the ‘SAARC Eight’ ought to impress on the collectivity the need to step-up regional cooperation in multiple areas which impinge on its members’ legitimate interests. For instance, the youth-led ‘Cockroach’ revolts, first in India and subsequently outside, should convince South Asia that it is continuing to be plagued in a major way by poverty and equity-linked issues. That is, West-inspired, largely market economics-dictated ways to see an end to poverty are simply not working completely.
Likewise climate-related questions are ravaging South Asia in unimaginable ways; Nepal being just one case in point. The rationale for regional cooperation remains valid and undefeated. It is time for revived and stepped-up SAARC cooperation. That is, the solutions to the region’s development dilemmas need to be found in mainly the region.
This amounts to making a case for a continued sense of ‘Southasianness’ among the SAARC countries. That is the conviction should be firm that they know their developmental challenges best and that answers to these issues must be primarily evolved by the grouping itself in cooperation with concerned sections.
From the above viewpoints the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Colombo did very well to tie-up with the South Asian University (SAU), India, to increase public awareness on the developmental problems affecting South Asia and for initiating a number collaborative measures that aim at ameliorating them. The relevant agreement was formalized in early September at the RCSS. The sealing of the pact took place under the aegis of SAU President Prof. K.K. Aggarwal and RCSS Executive Director Ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha.
A press release issued by the organizations said the collaboration aims ‘to foster research networks, partnerships and collaborations for transformative change across South Asia.’ It also mentioned that the partnership marked the first agreement to be signed by SAU with an independent think tank in Sri Lanka.
Among other things, pacts such as the above are bold moves in the direction of fostering a spirit of intellectual independence in those areas of the South facing some of the stiffest developmental challenges. Rather than ‘import’ solutions to these challenges from outside the region, the SAU-RCSS initiative aims at fostering fresh approaches to evolving solutions to problems that are uniquely South Asian.
It is hoped that the SAU and RCSS initiative while leading a to a greater degree of Southern intellectual independence in the area of development thinking would also help in kick-starting the SAARC process all over again in a major way.
What ought to lend fresh urgency to the latter undertakings are fast-breaking current developments in international politics. It ought to be perceived by the most underdeveloped regions of the South that going forward their well being would matter least or not at all to the major powers of both East and West.
For example at the time of writing the foremost among US and Chinese political leaders are meeting in the US in what is made out to be a historic coming together of sorts to address issues of common concern. It is highly unlikely that the parties would be addressing the economic preoccupations of the least developed countries. The same goes for other states that matter from the East and West.
Essentially, the US and China would be looking at ways of strengthening business ties that matter majorly for them. The South and its issues would prove to be of peripheral interest, if at all they happen to matter to the protagonists. Such developments ought to be fresh reminders to the South and their collaborative organizations that there is no escaping self-help and joint solidarity.
Features
Is Sri Lanka prepared for global literacy crisis?
by Prof. M.W. Amarasiri de Silva
Adult literacy has for a long time been one of Sri Lanka’s greatest sources of pride, serving as a social indicator that has set the country apart from several of its neighbours in the region. For many years Sri Lanka has been recognised for keeping its literacy rates at a level like those of middle-income countries and even some high-income ones, even though it has faced economic difficulties and political instability. However, since new global research has now shown an unexpected and concerning decline in adult literacy in several high-income countries, it is important to consider what this means for Sri Lanka.
The phenomenon described by Jishnu Das, Yash Dhuldhoya and Ethan Sager, the unexplained fall in functional literacy among adults in wealthy nations. calls for a more thorough examination of the nature of literacy, the pressures exerted by the modern information environment, and the vulnerabilities that Sri Lanka might encounter as it moves towards a more digital, ageing and complex society. Even though Sri Lanka’s basic literacy rates remain high and steady, the global trend acts as a warning that literacy is not a fixed accomplishment but a dynamic capability which must be continually fostered, safeguarded and adapted to changing circumstances.
Decline in functional literacy
The drop in literacy rate in high-income countries is not due to people losing the ability to read or write in the ordinary way. On the contrary, it reflects a decline in functional literacy, which is the capacity to deal with, understand, and apply information in real-life situations. This kind of literacy involves following instructions, comprehending official documents, using digital interfaces, interpreting medical information, and making sense of complicated texts that demand continuous attention.
Researchers stress that the decline cannot be attributed merely to disruptions caused by COVID-19 or the increasing use of smartphones; instead, there is going on something more fundamental: a weakening of the cognitive and informational bases that adults need to function properly in modern society. In countries such as the United States, the percentage of adults regarded as functionally illiterate has increased significantly, indicating that even highly educated societies are having difficulty in keeping up the skills required to handle ever more complex streams of information.
Sri Lanka immune?
At first sight, Sri Lanka seems to be immune from this trend. The country’s adult literacy rate is still above 92 per cent and youth literacy is even higher. According to the 2024 Census, literacy rates exceed 97 per cent among people aged ten and over, with nearly equal levels between the sexes. These figures show the continued strength of Sri Lanka’s system of free education, a system which in the past has guaranteed widespread access to school and has produced generation after generation of citizens who could read and write at a basic level.
There has also been a steady improvement in educational attainment, with an increasing number of adults finishing secondary education and a larger proportion going on to tertiary institutions. Unlike the mysterious drops observed in rich countries, Sri Lanka’s literacy figures demonstrate stability and even a slight improvement.
However, although the surface appearance is reassuring, an even more complicated reality exists. The literacy figures for Sri Lanka only record basic literacy, that is, the ability to read and write simple sentences, and they do not include measures of functional literacy. It is impossible to tell from these statistics whether adults can interpret a bank statement, understand a medical prescription, use an online government portal, or critically assess information that is spreading on social media. As is shown by the global trend, having a high level of basic literacy does not ensure a strong degree of functional literacy. On the contrary, functional literacy can fall even if basic literacy stays the same. This difference is important for Sri Lanka, particularly since the country is currently experiencing rapid digitalization, demographic ageing, and social change.
Major risk factor
A major risk factor is the move towards digital information environments. In high-income countries, researchers believe that the prevalence of smartphones and short-form digital content may be diminishing people’s ability to engage in deep reading. Nowadays, individuals take in information in short, rapid segments by scrolling through social media feeds, quickly reading headlines, and viewing short videos. Such behaviour decreases the opportunity for sustained reading, which is necessary for keeping comprehension, critical thinking, and the capacity to deal with complex information intact.
Sri Lanka is going through a comparable change. There has been a sharp increase in the number of people using smartphones, and social media sites have become the main sources of news, leisure, and communication. Although there are many advantages to having digital access, it also results in a situation where superficial reading becomes the standard approach and could therefore lead to a decline in functional literacy over time.
Demographic ageing as challenge
A further challenge that is coming up is demographic ageing. Sri Lanka is rapidly moving towards becoming an ageing society, with an increasing number of older people who might experience cognitive decline, have less exposure to new information, and enjoy few opportunities for further learning. In high-income countries, ageing populations have led to a fall in functional literacy since older individuals have had difficulty adapting to digital systems and complicated bureaucratic procedures.
The older generation in Sri Lanka, many whom were educated many decades ago under different curriculum standards, could end up becoming increasingly vulnerable in a world in which essential services, such as banking and healthcare, are being moved online. If appropriate support is not provided, the country may witness a growing gap between basic literacy and functional literacy among older adults.
In Sri Lanka, the way in which administration and the workplace are organised has in the past placed greater trust in personal communication and on basic forms of documentation. What in high-income countries would require complex reading is instead carried out through face-to-face contact in Sri Lanka. Nevertheless, this situation is now changing. Government services are becoming available online, banks are introducing digital systems, and in workplaces there is an increasing need for employees to use electronic systems. Since these changes are happening at a faster rate, the demand for functional literacy will increase. Should adults not be able to meet these new demands, Sri Lanka might start to see the kind of decline in literacy that has been seen in other places.
Misinformation and disinformation
Another worry is the spread of misinformation and disinformation. In Sri Lanka, there has already been the quick dissemination of false information via social media, with this having an impact on public health, politics, and social cohesion. Since functional literacy is essential for allowing people to assess sources, doubt the claims made, and tell the difference between reliable information and falsehoods, a lack of functional literacy causes societies to be more open to manipulation, polarisation, and confusion.
The fact that there has been a global drop in functional literacy at the same time as misinformation has increased points to a dangerous feedback cycle: when literacy is low people become more prone to misinformation, and the misinformation in turn damages their ability to think critically about information. Given that the country has a high level of social media use and a lack of digital literacy training, Sri Lanka should take this risk seriously.
Even though there are these risks, Sri Lanka has several advantages which can assist in avoiding a drop in functional literacy. The country’s system of basic education is still strong, showing high enrolment figures and good results in basic literacy.
Families in Sri Lanka still place a great deal of importance on education and reading is still a respected cultural activity. Furthermore, because of its relatively small size and the fact that it has a centralized form of government, it is more efficient than in bigger countries to carry out nationwide literacy campaigns. These strengths offer a firm basis for developing new strategies for protecting and improving functional literacy.
Literacy a process
It should be realised by Sri Lanka that attaining literacy is not a single accomplishment achieved in childhood. In the modern world, literacy must be a skill that is constantly put into practice, kept up to date and adapted to changing circumstances. The fact that adult literacy is declining worldwide shows that even in wealthy countries with well-developed education systems deterioration can occur if adults are not supported in keeping their cognitive and informational abilities. Sri Lanka cannot afford to be careless.
It is necessary for the country to invest in adult education, in programmes concerning digital literacy and in the development of cognitive skills for all age groups. It also needs to establish ways of measuring functional literacy rather than just basic literacy so that policymakers can detect emerging weaknesses and act in advance.
A vital measure is to increase the opportunities for adult learning. Although Sri Lanka has effective literacy programmes based in schools, the country’s infrastructure for adult education is limited. Community centres, libraries, universities, and vocational institutes should take on a more significant role by providing courses, workshops, and reading programmes which are tailored for adults. The programmes should place an emphasis not just on reading and writing but also on digital navigation, critical thinking, and information processing. Adults should be given the chance to practise the skills that are necessary for them to function effectively in a rapidly changing world.
Importance of digital literacy programmes
It is just as important to have digital literacy programmes. Since an increasing number of services are being offered online, adults need to learn how to use digital tools with confidence and in a safe manner. This involves knowing how to fill out online forms, moving around on government websites, using banking apps, and being able to spot misinformation. The digital literacy courses available should be accessible, affordable, and adapted to different age groups, especially older adults who might feel put off by technology. Schools can also contribute by incorporating digital literacy into their curriculum so that future generations acquire good functional literacy skills from an early age.
Sri Lanka should also investigate introducing policies which promote cognitive health among older people. Since cognitive decline can lead to a deterioration of functional literacy, it becomes more difficult for older individuals to deal with information. It is possible to help keep cognitive function by setting up programmes that promote reading, social interaction, physical activity, and continued learning. During regular medical visits, healthcare professionals should include cognitive assessments so that any problems affecting literacy-related skills can be picked up early.
Sri Lanka needs to create tools for measuring functional literacy, since the figures available on basic literacy give an incomplete account of the country’s capabilities. By using assessments of functional literacy like those employed in high-income countries, Sri Lanka would be able to monitor how well its adults can apply their literacy skills in real-life situations.
Features
From Colombo to Vegas: Sri Lankan talent shines at WCOPA
The World Championships of Performing Arts (WCOPA) is known globally as the Olympics of performing arts, but Sri Lankans came to know of it more closely when Natharie Wickramasinghe, representing Team Sri Lanka at WCOPA 2026, in Las Vegas, earned a Bronze Medal in the Ethnic/Folklore Dance category.
Behind Sri Lanka’s WCOPA journey is Sri Lanka-born Chris Rajendra, who migrated to the United States in 2007, and deserves special congratulations.
Passionate about discovering and promoting talent, Chris has been actively involved in the pageant and performing arts, industry since 2002.
A major milestone came in 2015, when he introduced WCOPA, to Sri Lanka, for the first time, creating an international platform for Sri Lankan performers.
Sachini Ayendra became the very first candidate to represent Sri Lanka at WCOPA, in 2015, marking the beginning of Team Sri Lanka’s journey.
Chris served as National Director for Team Sri Lanka from 2015 to 2018, and has returned to the role for the 2026–2027 term, continuing his commitment to identifying, developing and promoting Sri Lankan talent internationally.
His involvement in pageantry and performing arts includes:
Recruiter, Miss Nevada United States – 2014

Chris Rajendra: National Director – WCOPA Team Sri Lanka
Manager, Miss Colombia Las Vegas – 2013 to 2017
Director for the West Coast and International Divisions of Ms. Latina International and Ms. International World – 2017
National Director for Team Sri Lanka – WCOPA, 2015–2018 and 2026–2027
Co-National Director for Team USA – WCOPA 2026
In the USA, Chris began his career in retail before transitioning into insurance and financial services, where he built extensive experience in sales, marketing, leadership and business development.
He owned and operated a brokerage, affiliated with multiple insurance companies, and later served as Marketing Director with Transamerica and World Financial Group.
As his business expanded across Las Vegas and California, he continued to hone his expertise in sales, marketing and client relations. He now works as a Sales Executive at Hilton Grand Vacations.
Looking ahead, Chris will shortly launch the application process for Team Sri Lanka 2027, giving talented Sri Lankan performers another opportunity to represent the country on the world stage.
The 2027 World Championships of Performing Arts will take place in Las Vegas, USA, in July or August 2027.
Through his work in both the corporate and performing arts worlds, Chris Rajendra continues to combine leadership, networking and talent development — creating opportunities for Sri Lankan performers to showcase their abilities on a global platform.
-
News6 days agoShanakiyan urges urgent action over reported death sentence for Lankan in Saudi Arabia
-
News7 days agoBid for Basil’s extradition nears final stage: Police
-
News5 days agoNamal Rajapaksa Buddhist gambit fails, bail denied
-
Features5 days agoWhy the spelling Sri Lankan names in English vary
-
Features5 days agoThree bands, a new identity: Sri Lankan wolf snake recognised as distinct species
-
Business5 days agoSLIIT holds largest-ever convocation
-
News5 days agoGovt monitors reported Saudi death sentence – Foreign Ministry
-
News5 days agoVehicle prices drop by up to Rs. 1 mn, says importers’ body
