Features
SC judgment on MR, GR, BR, PB and Cabraal
By C. A. Chandraprema
The judgement delivered by a divided five-member bench of the Supreme Court with regard to two fundamental rights cases numbered 195/2022 and 212/2022 filed by several individuals including Mahim Mendis, Chandra Jayaratne, Julian Bolling and the NGO Transparency International has stirred up a political storm. The majority judgment was delivered by Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, and Justices Buwaneka Aluwihare, Vijith Malalgoda, and Murdu Fernando while Justice Priyantha Jayawardene dissented.
Some of the headlines by which the local English language media carried on the judgement were as follows. I have left out the names of the media outlets concerned.
“Supreme Court finds Rajapaksa brothers guilty over economic crisis”
“Gotabaya Mahinda Basil & others responsible for economic crisis – SC rules”
“Econ. crisis perpetrators: SC majority finds Gota, MR, Basil et al. responsible”
“Supreme Court finds Rajapaksa brothers responsible for economic crisis”
Of all the English language news outlets that I checked, only Reuters got the nuances of the SC judgement right. The Reuters headline said “Sri Lanka’s top court says ex-president among those who contributed to economic crisis”. Even in the body of the Reuters news item on the judgement, they have been careful in reporting on what the petitioners claimed and what the Supreme Court said. However due to the manner in which the majority of the media outlets reported on the judgement, politically interested parties have gone overboard in paroxysms of hatred and triumph. In the aftemath of the SC judgement, there have been calls for the deprivation of civic rights of those named in the judgement, there have been calls to claim compensation from the Rajapaksa brothers and even calls for the dissolution of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP).
It is quite clear that those who have been making such calls have not read the 119-page-long majority judgement or the 127-page-long dissenting judgement pertaining to this case. The majority judgement never used the word ‘responsible’. What it stated was that certain named individuals namely, Mahinda Rajapaksa, Basil Rajapaksa, Nivard Cabraal, W. D. Lakshman, S. R. Attygalle, Samantha Kumarasinghe, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, P. B. Jayasundra and the Monetary Board collectively had by their “actions, omissions, decisions and conduct hereinbefore identified to have demonstrably contributed to the economic crisis …”
Scope of judgment
There is a significant difference between saying that someone is ‘responsible’ for a certain situation and saying that someone has ‘demonstrably contributed’ towards a situation. It is obviously this nuance that motivated the majority of the bench to state, “We are of the view that it would not be appropriate to order the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners and as such we are not inclined to order compensation. We order however that each petitioner in both applications would be entitled to costs in sum of rupees 150,000.00 each.” The parameters within which the majority judgment had been given were stated as follows (quoted verbatim):
· “When we considered these two applications, the main focus was on the economic situation of the country between November 2019 and April 2022”.
· “Many of the respondents argued that the root causes for this debacle spread well beyond this time period and therefore no responsibility could be attributed to these respondents in the manner alleged by the petitioners. They claimed that heavy borrowings of previous Governments and the mismanagement of such funds had a direct impact on the debt sustainability of the country. While we take note of this argument, in considering the responsibility of the respondents, our attention was drawn to the issue as to whether the conduct of the respondents during the relevant period directly contributed to the economic crisis”.
· “In deciding this issue, we are of the view that the respondents ought to have known the factual situation that prevailed when they assumed public office and they should have fashioned their acts and efforts to ensure that the situation is not further aggravated but resolved”.
· “It is common ground that the country’s economy deteriorated not overnight but over a period of time under consideration in the matters before us”.
The above-mentioned passages tell us something that we should not miss. Firstly, the majority of the bench agrees that the economy deteriorated not overnight but over a period of time. Secondly, that the respondents ought to have known the factual situation that prevailed when they assumed public office. Thirdly, the majority of the bench took note of the argument that the ‘root causes for this debacle spread well beyond’ the time period considered in the judgement and that ‘heavy borrowings of previous governments and the mismanagement of such funds had a direct impact on the debt sustainability of the country’. Fourthly, that with regard to this case, ‘the main focus was on the economic situation of the country between November 2019 and April 2022’.
Furthermore, the body of the written judgement shows that in arriving at its conclusion, the SC has taken into account three key issues – the tax reductions in November 2019, the delay in allowing the Rupee to depreciate and the delay in seeking IMF assistance. In a nutshell, what the judgement said about each of these issues is as follows:
Tax reductions
“In November 2019, the new government of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa had reduced taxes. The Inland Revenue Department had estimated the potential loss from tax income resulting from the proposed tax for the year 2020 amounts to Rs. 493 billion. The loss of government revenue due to the measures referred to resulted in an unmanageable budget deficit …. Furthermore, a major adverse consequence that resulted directly from the tax revisions was lowering of the country’s credit rating by the international agencies ….The main impact of such downgrading was the loss of access to capital markets at reasonable costs which resulted in drying up foreign exchange inflows from such sources … the Gross Official Reserves which stood at USD 7,780.08 million as at 31st October 2019 had decreased to USD 5,555 million by November 2020. It had further depleted to USD 2,362 million in January 2022. It is apparent that the continued inaction to reintroduce and/or to raise taxes and regain the government revenue that was lost, brought about an adverse impact on the economy….”
Seeking assistance from IMF
“This was not a straightforward case of assessing the suitability of seeking IMF assistance under normal circumstances but the call to seek IMF assistance was critically relevant given the unique circumstances our economy was placed in. The depleted official reserves; the need to secure foreign exchange on an urgent basis; the reluctance of the other agencies to extend support without an IMF programme were critical factors in deciding whether seeking assistance was in the best interest of the country at the relevant time …. According to the material available a decision to seek assistance from the IMF was ultimately taken by the President on 16th March 2022.”
“Comments and the conduct of the officials of the Central Bank over this period clearly point to the direction that the need to seek assistance from IMF did exist over a period of time and any prudent person who did not act arbitrarily would have foreseen the serious repercussions in the failure to act swiftly to remedy the situation …. Deputy Governor K. M. M. Siriwardane in his comments says that “the little experience I had in working with macroeconomic policy making enabled me to foresee well in advance the economic crisis that the country is experiencing at present. This is the exact reason for me to recommend and emphasize to the MB to approach IMF… The pain to the economy and the people of Sri Lanka would have been less if this decision was taken at least one year ago ….” All factors referred to above clearly establishes that the relevant state organs/officials demonstrated reluctance to reach out to the IMF in the face of the critical situation the country’s economy was facing in spite of the fact there was no other viable alternative.”
Depreciating rupee
“The Monetary Board as well as the Minister had failed to take correct decisions at the relevant time to float the rupee and thereby caused a loss to the Government ….”
“… During the period 2019 and 2021 (especially after March 2020) Sri Lankan economy experienced a drop in foreign remittances by Sri Lankan workers abroad due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a significant drop in Foreign Direct Investment and the inflow of foreign earnings from export markets too. As revealed before us, it appears that although the need was to retain the meagre remittances received and create a conducive environment to enhance the inflow, the Finance Ministry and the Central Bank worked towards maintaining the exchange rate at around Rs. 200…”
“… the exchange rate is expected to be an automatic adjuster under the flexible exchange rate regime, but if the exchange rate is to be maintained at a stable rate, then a depletion of reserves would take place as foreign exchange will have to be pumped to the market to meet the demand.”
“… a significant increase in the use of informal methods in transferring money such as Hawala/ Undial by Sri Lankan workers abroad was observed mainly due to the high exchange rates offered in the “Gray market” compared to the exchange rate maintained by the Central Bank ….”
During this period (April 2021 to 7 March 2022) “the Central Bank had sold USD 1,773.8 million and purchased USD 746.2 million from the Domestic Exchange Market, making a net sale of USD 1,027.6 million. This outflow of USD had led to further depletion of the reserves”.
“… a series of discussions had been held with a view to permitting the exchange rate to be determined by market forces, supply and demand of USD, but we note with dismay that no positive steps were taken to implement a ‘moderate method’ to protect the reserves and stem the depletion when the need to do so was felt but waited till the 11th hour to take the decision to float the Sri Lanka Rupee …”
It is due to these three matters – the decision of the respondents to reduce the taxes, the delay in allowing the rupee to depreciate and the delay in seeking the assistance of the IMF that the majority of the bench held that the respondents had ‘demonstrably contributed’ to the economic crisis.
Tomorrow: The dissenting
judgment
Features
Proactive peacemaking becomes a paramount need
It may be some time before the full impact of food inflation is felt in the West. Until such time the world would continue to keep itself in suspense over whether the Trump administration is in earnest when it seeks to convey the impression that it is backing a negotiated solution in West Asia.
As is usually the case, consumer stress would be one of the final determinants of political change. To the degree to which the average US consumer somehow ‘muddles through’ and puts the food on the table, to the same extent would the Republican sections of the US public in particular be tolerant of the Trump administration’s inconsistent handling of the West Asian war and the main issues stemming from it. That is, there would be no grave popular disaffection and a demand for political change in the short term.
However, the indications are that the Trump administration’s support base is suffering some erosion in the wake of the current economic crisis. While reports indicate that Democratic sections are firming-up their opposition to the political centre, Republican support for Trump is also showing signs of waning, we are given to understand.
The above developments are probably why Trump is on record as having given Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a ‘dressing down’ recently on his seeming intransigence on the question of giving negotiations a chance in West Asia. The show of displeasure could be really aimed by Trump at containing the impatience of the American public.
However, the current ground situation in the Middle East, particularly the uncontained bloodshed, is likely to impress on the thinking sections of the world that more than temporary political change is needed in West Asia and the US.
A well thought out political solution that addresses all the contentious issues at the heart of the Middle East conflict is what enlightened opinion would demand, and very rightly. Right now, the ‘peace efforts’ initiated by the Trump administration give the impression of being piecemeal solutions at best.
There have been, of course, numerous initiatives in the past aimed at bringing permanent peace to the Middle East. These failed mainly because they did not address in full the root causes of the conflict.
At bottom the Middle East conflict is mainly about race and religious hate bred by socio-economic and material inequalities. For instance, if the Palestinian people were not displaced and deprived of land occupied by them at the time of the founding of the Israeli state, ethnic enmities would not have grown to the current unmanageable proportions.
When addressing the above questions, though, it must be remembered that the Israelis too were a displaced people who were entitled to land and a state of their own in the Middle East. Basically, out of these seemingly irreconcilable and conflicting demands have grown the Middle East imbroglio.
Middle East peace is considerably about reconciling these demands and arriving at a solution that would ensure the creation of two states that would opt for peaceful co-existence thereafter.
As long as the US does not see the need for a non-partisan solution that addresses the needs of both ethnicities and religions and goes all-out, as it were, to have it implemented, the Middle East would continue to bleed.
However, staunching the blood flow through the creation of two states would be only half the job done, though a very important part of it. More pernicious, pervasive and difficult to remedy are the inter-ethnic and inter-religious hatreds that have been unleashed over the decades.
However, if substantial, long-lasting peace is to be fostered in the region the latter ‘demons’ would need to be exorcised from the hearts and minds of the communities concerned. No doubt an uphill task but one that must be undertaken by those who wish the region well.
The UN would need to put its ‘best foot forward’ in such undertakings but it is time that it dawned on the international community and other caring quarters that Middle East peace, and all other such uphill challenges, require proactive peacemaking on the part of all civilized sections for their effective management. That is, public involvement in peacemaking too is a must.
Since hatreds are harboured in the human consciousness the enmities embedded in the latter need to be managed and defused judiciously alongside other undertakings in a peace process. In the case of West Asia, such enmities could be even spread globe-wide besides being multi-dimensional. For instance, it ought to be thought-provoking that Iran is insistent on a peace initiative that would also include Lebanon.
Besides security considerations it is also ethnic and religious affiliations that account for Iran making this demand. For instance, the Shias are a numerically important religious community in Lebanon and they provide a significant number of Hizbollah fighters, who are in a vital sense carrying out a ‘proxy war’ for Iran. It also needs to be factored in that Iran is a Shia-majority country.
Thus trans-border religious affiliations could add to the complexities and enormity of ethno-religious conflicts. However, the task of managing centuries-long enmities needs to be launched and prodded on with by peacemakers since a downing of arms alone would not guarantee substantive peace.
It is not realized sufficiently that the process of ending hatreds begins with mutual apologies by antagonists to a conflict for the harm inflicted on each other. This would be anathema in some ears but there is no getting away from the requirement. It is the vital first step to permanent peace anywhere.
In fact there could be no reconciliation worth speaking of without such mutual apologies. It is a point worth re-iterating in these times when even the government of Sri Lanka is voicing the need for national reconciliation. Well, without the words, ‘I am sorry’, there could be no permanent end to enmities – they would do well to remember.
The above requirements may not go down very well with governments, but they resonate in the hearts and minds of most people, since they are inheritors of religious traditions of some kind.
This is a principal reason why peacemaking works well when publics too are involved in them. The effectiveness of such campaigns increases several fold when they have a Mahatma Gandhi or a Jawaharlal Nehru at their helm. A strong proactive involvement by the public in peace could lead to the emergence of such leaders at some point in these campaigns.
Features
Dialog Brings Sri Lanka’s Largest Digital Vesak Experience to Matara
Official Digital Partner of the 2026 ‘Dakshina Prabha’ National Vesak Zone
Dialog Axiata PLC, Sri Lanka’s #1 connectivity provider, collaborated with the Ministry of Buddha Sasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs to bring one of Sri Lanka’s largest and most technologically advanced Vesak experiences to the ‘Dakshina Prabha’ National Vesak Zone. The three-day celebration, in Matara attracted more than hundred thousand visitors, who engaged with a series of innovative digital activities powered by Dialog 5G Ultra, including Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Virtual Reality (VR) experiences, digital pandols and a Data Dansala. The opening ceremony was attended by Hon. Sunil Handunnetti, Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development and Hon. Saroja Savithri Paulraj, Minister of Women and Child Affairs, along with distinguished guests and Dialog’s senior management.
One of the key attractions at the venue was the Dialog 5G Ultra-powered Virtual Reality (VR) experience, which attracted more than 35,000 participants. The activation enabled devotees to virtually visit and pay homage to sacred Buddhist sites, including the Jaya Sri Maha Bodhi in India and the Atamasthana in Anuradhapura, directly from the Vesak zone in Matara.

Visitors receive complimentary mobile data through Dialog’s QR-powered Data Dansala.
Dialog also conducted an AI Digital Vesak Greeting Card Competition from 21 May to 01 June 2026, attracting numerous entries from across the country. The shortlisted designs were showcased across 20 large LED screens throughout the venue and across Matara City, and were also made available for download via mobile devices. Further, through the use of AI, traditional Jathaka Katha were reimagined in a digital format, demonstrating how technology can be used to preserve and enhance cultural and religious heritage. Together, these initiatives blended traditional Vesak celebrations with emerging technologies, offering visitors a unique and immersive way to engage with Vesak traditions.
Extending the spirit of Vesak through connectivity, Dialog conducted a special Data Dansala powered by its QR Reload platform, enabling visitors to receive complimentary mobile data by scanning QR codes placed across the venue. In addition to the Matara National Vesak Zone, similar Data Dansala activations were also conducted at the Gangaramaya and Bauddhaloka Vesak zones in Colombo.Visitors also had the opportunity to create personalised Vesak-themed digital photos through an AI Photo Booth, generating AI-enhanced portraits using their own photographs and adding a contemporary digital element to the Vesak celebrations.

Visitors watch AI-generated Jathaka Katha
Commenting on the initiative, Hon. Sunil Handunnetti, Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development, said, “The 2026 Dakshina Prabha Vesak Festival marked the first time AI-powered digital innovations were incorporated into a National Vesak Festival in Sri Lanka. Presenting Buddhist stories and teachings through technology created a new and engaging way for visitors to connect with these traditions. We thank Dialog for supporting this initiative and for working closely with us to bring our vision to life. Their contribution played an important role in making this first-of-its-kind event a reality.”
Lasantha Theverapperuma, Group Chief Marketing Officer of Dialog Axiata PLC said, “We thank the Government of Sri Lanka for the opportunity to support the 2026 Dakshina Prabha National Vesak Festival and for embracing technology as part of this year’s celebrations. As the Official Digital Partner, we were privileged to contribute through our Dialog 5G Ultra and AI capabilities, creating new ways for visitors to engage with Vesak traditions while preserving their cultural significance for future generations.”
Beyond supporting the National Vesak Zone in Matara, Dialog also enhanced the Gangaramaya and Bauddhaloka Vesak zones through a range of digital activations during the Vesak season. The company additionally continued its sustainability initiatives, including the Thirasara Aloka Poojawa, which illuminated rural places of worship through solar-powered lighting solutions.
Features
Beauty, elegance and talent…for women
Universal Woman is an international pageant focused on “beauty, elegance, and talent” for women, positioning itself as a platform to shape global ambassadors. The 2026 edition will be held in Cambodia, and Sri Lanka will be there, as well.
According to reports coming my way, contestants, at the international event, will work with industry trailblazers, under international standards.
Sri Lankan supermodel, runway and pageant trainer Chulpadmendra Kumarapathirana, is the National Director for Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026.
With over two decades in the industry, Chula was crowned Miss Sri Lanka 2006, and has since shaped the next generation of titleholders through her Colombo-based Chulpadmendra Catwalk Studio, widely regarded as one of the country’s leading modelling academies.

The team behind Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026
A former host of Derana Miss Sri Lanka for Miss World 2008 and a judge for Miss Universe Sri Lanka 2025, Chula now serves as National Director for Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026, leading the franchise’s search for Sri Lanka’s delegate to the international final in Cambodia.
Applications for Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026 are being taken, via WhatsApp: 077 659 4994, says Chula.
The judging panel for Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026 includes Senaka De Silva, Pageant Aesthetic Advisor & Chairperson of the Judging Panel, Angela Seneviratne, Caroline Jurie, Rozelle Plunkett, and Suraj Mapa.
Universal Woman Sri Lanka 2026 officially began its journey with a first round of auditions, held in Colombo, marking the start of an exciting new chapter in Sri Lanka’s pageant industry.

Launching the first round of auditions
The platform aims to empower women while selecting an intelligent, confident, and inspiring representative to compete at the Universal Woman International Pageant 2026 in Cambodia, this September.
Universal Woman Sri Lanka now moves forward with the vision of creating one of the country’s most prestigious and empowering pageants while preparing to crown a queen who will proudly represent Sri Lanka on the international stage.
-
News5 days agoIMF urges Lanka not to meddle with exchange rate
-
News2 days agoLankan duo emerge winners in Latin dance championship held in Blackpool, UK
-
Business7 days agoSri Lanka’s construction industry losing ground while no one watches
-
Business4 days agoIMF’s unstated rate:Sri Lanka’s $695m loan costs about 5.33% per annum
-
News5 days agoState of emergency extended
-
Features7 days agoThe Division Bell Mystery
-
Features5 days agoAre threats to Buddha Sasana external or from within?
-
News3 days agoUNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act
