Connect with us

News

Yahapalana govt. came to power with minority votes and officials felt helpless – Ex- Defence secy.

Published

on

By Rathindra Kuruwita

Given how important the support from the minorities was for the previous government, the defence establishment had to be very careful when dealing with rising Islamic extremism and radicalisation, former Defence Secretary Karunasena Hettiarchchi on Thursday informed the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) investigating the Easter Sunday attacks.

Hettiarchchi said that State Intelligence Service (SIS) had identified rising Islamic extremism and radicalisation as serious issues by 2016 and steps had been taken to infiltrate and monitor those organisations. The SIS identified a large number of radicals that could pose a serious threat, and the Counter Terrorism Act (CTA), which was proposed by the previous government, was an attempt to bring in laws that could deal with extremists.

“A lot of legal experts examined the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and told us that they could not apprehend people under the PTA for radicalisation. But those people posed a serious threat and until laws were changed we took steps to work with moulavis, parents and other community leaders to advice people who had embraced extremism.”

Between late 2016 and early 2017,  Hettiarchchi met a large number of Muslim political and religious leaders on establishing community mechanisms to address radicalism. Politicians like Rishad Bathiudeen, Azath Salley and children of Alavi Moulana had met him, Hettiarchchi said. 

“All agreed that there was extremism. However, they also said that Sri Lanka was not an ISIS target and should not become one. ISIS targeted countries that took military action against them, they argued.”

Intelligence agencies kept tabs on  the promotion of extremism promoted by certain mosques and madrasas but were hesitant to take action because of political implications. 

“If those things had been happening in the majority community, we could have easily done something. We had to be very careful with Muslims and Christians. We had informed the National Security Council (NSC) of these developments and it could have done something.”

A member of the commission then asked Hettiarchchi what the political implications of taking action against extremism were. The witness said that the yahapalana government had come to power with the votes of the minorities and officials felt helpless.

“The yahapalana government won the North and the East, Mahinda Rajapaksa won all other areas. Religious and ethnic minorities were a powerful force in that government, and we couldn’t act unilaterally. That’s what we felt. We felt powerless. If something had gone wrong, officials would have had to face the consequences,” he said.

Hettiarchchi also said that he had made a proposal to ban the niqab, a veil worn by some Muslim women in public, covering all of the face apart from the eyes. He felt that the niqab was a threat to the national security and it should be banned at least in public spaces, Hettiarchchi said.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Lanka enters new phase of prosecutions as hurdles clear

Published

on

MONETABRIEF –The prosecution of high-profile individuals from the former Rajapaksa administrations is set to escalate this month with the clearing of legal hurdles and administrative bottlenecks, according to officials involved in the process.

Former president Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s attempt to secure an order preventing his arrest in connection with the Easter Sunday massacre was turned down by the Court of Appeal on Thursday.

An overseas travel ban has been in operation against Rajapaksa since June, but the Criminal Investigations Department made no move to question him. He instead filed a writ application seeking an order preventing his possible arrest.

President of the Court of Appeal Rohantha Abeysuriya noted that the court would not interfere with the investigative process. Any attempt by the court would amount to an obstruction of the investigation.

In an unrelated case, the same court rejected an application by opposition legislator Dilith Jayaweera seeking the quashing of a contempt charge filed against him by the Fort magistrate. The charges against Jayaweera and a few other opposition politicians are expected to be taken up in the coming week.

Jayaweera and other opposition politicians — Wimal Weerawansa, Udaya Gammanpila, Sugeeshwara Bandara, and Asanka Navaratne

— were hauled up over their remarks relating to the arrest of Suresh Sallay, the former head of the State Intelligence Service.

SLPP academic Mahinda Pathirana is also charged over his public comments about Sallay’s arrest in February under the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act.

Former president Mahinda Rajapaksa’s son, legislator Namal Rajapaksa, is already in remand custody following his arrest in connection with three cases of bribery and money laundering relating to the 2013 Airbus deal and the Krrish property development in Colombo.

Although Namal has been granted bail in the Airbus money laundering charge, he is in custody until October 13 over the bribery charge relating to the same Airbus transaction. His arrest is under a provision of the Anti-Corruption Act that does not allow a magistrate to grant bail unless under exceptional circumstances.

Meanwhile, his mother Shiranthi Rajapaksa, who had been asked to report to the Financial Crimes Investigations Division on September 24, was a no-show and was yet to return from Singapore.

She had travelled overseas on September 16, and a family spokesman said she was handed the FCID summons at the departure lounge of Bandaranaike International Airport just before she boarded a flight to Singapore.

At the time, the family spokesman said she was due to return in three days.

“We will see greater momentum in the legacy cases in the coming weeks,” an official involved in the prosecutions said.

“We have cleared the legal hurdles to press ahead with more arrests,” he said.

“We are working on a few administrative issues which will be resolved very soon.”

The controversial prosecution of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe is dragging on without him being formally indicted since his arrest in August last year. The Fort magistrate has listed the case again for November 11, when the Attorney-General is expected to report on his decision regarding action against Wickremesinghe.

Continue Reading

News

Police warn: Court evaders face property seizure

Published

on

Police have reminded the public that courts have the power to take legal action against individuals who evade arrest or remain in hiding after warrants have been issued against them.

Police said that under Section 60 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, a court could issue a written proclamation requiring a person evading arrest under a warrant to appear at a specified place and time.

The proclamation must allow the person at least 30 days to appear before court, Police said.

If the person fails to appear even after the proclamation has been issued, the court may take further action under Section 61 of the Act.

This includes issuing an order for the attachment of the movable or immovable property belonging to the person concerned.Police issued the reminder highlighting the legal measures available against persons who deliberately evade arrest and remain in hiding after warrants have been issued.

Continue Reading

News

Nearly 20 Iranian tankers stranded off Lanka amid US sanctions

Published

on

Around 20 Iranian oil tankers are reportedly stranded about 15 nautical miles off Sri Lanka’s southwestern coast, with several vessels facing shortages of food, fuel and fresh water amid tightening US sanctions and maritime restrictions, The Wall Street Journal reported.

According to the report published on Thursday (1), US officials have in recent weeks urged Sri Lanka to prevent local vessels from supplying essential provisions to the tankers and their crews.

The report, citing Sri Lankan Government documents and companies involved in supplying the vessels, said the US had raised concerns over assistance being provided to the sanctioned tankers.

The situation follows the United States’ decision to reimpose a maritime blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in July, which has reportedly left dozens of Iranian and Iran-linked tankers involved in transporting sanctioned oil to China stranded near Asian countries, including Sri Lanka and Malaysia.

Most of the vessels are reportedly empty tankers that had previously transported Iranian crude to Asia, often through ship-to-ship transfers, before preparing to return to Iran for additional cargo.

The WSJ reported that the US Embassy had warned Sri Lanka in August that it was monitoring 19 Iranian tankers off the country’s western coast and had raised the possibility of secondary sanctions against companies providing services to sanctioned vessels.

Sri Lankan authorities have maintained that the vessels are located outside the country’s 12-nautical-mile territorial waters and that the Government is not providing them with logistical assistance.

Meanwhile, shipping companies told the WSJ that obtaining approval to supply essential items, including food, drinking water and fuel, as well as repair services, to the Iranian vessels had become increasingly difficult.

Separately, Reuters reported in late August that 27 sanctioned Iran-linked tankers were waiting off Sri Lanka without cargo.

The Trump administration has also imposed additional sanctions on Iran and warned countries and companies trading with Tehran of potential consequences, as Washington seeks to pressure Iran to make concessions amid the ongoing conflict.

Similar concentrations of Iranian-linked tankers have been reported off Malaysia, where waters have historically been used for ship-to-ship transfers of Iranian crude destined mainly for China.

Continue Reading

Trending