Connect with us

Features

Trincomalee Oil Farm and Energy Hub: Sri Lanka’s Missed Opportunity Returns

Published

on

Trinco Oil Farm

The Trincomalee Oil Tank Farm stands today as one of the most strategically significant yet historically underutilized energy assets in South Asia. Located off the deep natural harbour of Trincomalee, the facility embodies a convergence of history, geopolitics, and economic potential. In the current global context—marked by energy insecurity, shifting geopolitical alliances, and regional competition—the Trincomalee oil farm offers Sri Lanka a renewed opportunity to transform itself into a regional energy hub. However, this transformation demands clarity of vision, political consistency, and strategic partnerships.

Origins and construction

The origins of the Trincomalee oil tank farm date back to the era of World War II, when the British Empire recognized the strategic importance of Trincomalee as a naval base in the Indian Ocean. Construction of the oil storage facility on 600 acres of land began in 1924 and continued into the late 1930s. The project was designed to support British naval operations in the Eastern theatre, particularly as Japanese expansion threatened Allied supply lines.

The facility originally comprised 101 large storage tanks, each constructed with a robust one inch thick steel sheet and surrounded by thick one foot thick concrete walls for protection against aerial attacks. These tanks were ingeniously built into the natural contours of the terrain, often partially buried, enhancing both structural stability and camouflage. Each tank had an approximate capacity of around 12,000 metric tons of fuel, giving the entire complex a total storage capacity of nearly 1.2 million metric tons—an immense reserve by regional standards even today. This dwarfs the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation’s (CPC) existing storage facility and even the new storage complex, built by the Chinese at Muthurajawela which has a capacity of 220,000 metric tons.

The fate of two oil tanks

Out of the 101 tanks, one was destroyed when a Royal Ceylon Air Force plane crashed in the early 1960’s. But the most famous is the destroyed tank number 91 lying on the far edge of the forest. During World War II, the strategic significance of Trincomalee attracted enemy attention. In April 1942, Japanese forces launched air raids on the harbour in what became part of the broader Indian Ocean campaign. One of the oil tanks—commonly referred to as Tank 91—was hit during these attacks and destroyed. This incident underscored both the vulnerability and the importance of the facility. While most of the tanks survived the bombardment, the destruction of Tank 91 remains a historical reminder of the oil farm’s wartime role.

Strategic location and infrastructure

The inclusion of China Bay within Trincomalee Harbour complex was not incidental. China Bay offered deep-water access, allowing large oil tankers to dock safely. The harbour itself is one of the finest natural deep-water harbours in the world, capable of accommodating large naval and commercial vessels with minimal dredging.

A sophisticated pipeline system was constructed to facilitate the transfer of oil from ships directly to the storage tanks. This network of pipelines minimized handling time and reduced vulnerability during wartime operations. The integration of maritime access with inland storage infrastructure made Trincomalee a logistical asset of immense value, capable of supporting sustained naval operations across the Indian Ocean.

Post-Independence neglect

Following Sri Lanka’s independence in 1948, the Trincomalee oil tank farm gradually fell into neglect. Successive governments failed to recognize or capitalize on its strategic and economic potential. The facility was largely abandoned, with many tanks left unused and the surrounding area overgrown with dense shrub jungle. Infrastructure deteriorated, pipelines corroded, and the once-critical installation became a symbol of missed opportunity.

This neglect was not merely administrative but also strategic. At a time when global energy demand was rising and regional economies were expanding, Sri Lanka failed to leverage a ready-made asset that could have positioned it as a key player in the Indian Ocean energy network.

It may be argued that if newly Independent Ceylon, hosting two British bases at Trincomalee and Katunayake, seized the opportunity of encouraging Western investment to optimize utilization to the existing tank farm asset, companies like Shell, Stanvac and Caltex already in the profitable oil distribution business here, would have looked positively of making Sri Lanka a regional oil hub – something Singapore enjoys today.

Early attempts at revitalization

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, President J. R. Jayewardene recognized the potential of the Trincomalee oil tank farm and proposed its development. However, these efforts were complicated by geopolitical considerations, particularly concerns from India regarding foreign involvement in a strategically sensitive location so close to its southern coastline.

As a result, the project faced diplomatic resistance and was ultimately abandoned. This marked another missed opportunity, driven by a combination of external pressure and internal indecision.

The Indo-Sri Lanka Accord and aftermath

The signing of the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord in 1987 brought renewed attention to Trincomalee. The accord included provisions recognizing Trincomalee’s strategic importance and implicitly acknowledged India’s security concerns regarding its use.

During the years of civil conflict in Sri Lanka, the oil tank farm remained largely inactive. Security concerns, lack of investment, and the broader instability of the region prevented any meaningful development. Even after the end of the war in 2009, progress remained slow.

The role of Trinco Petroleum Terminal – 2022

A significant development occurred in 2022 with the establishment of Trinco Petroleum Terminal (Pvt) Ltd (TPTL), a joint venture between the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) and the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), through its subsidiary Lanka Indian Oil Corporation (LIOC), which had been operating in Sri Lanka since 2003. Under this arrangement, CPC holds a 51% stake, while LIOC holds 49%, reflecting a collaborative approach to developing the Trincomalee Oil Tank Farm.

As part of the agreement, a portion of the oil storage tanks was leased to the Indian partner, while the remaining tanks came under Sri Lankan control, earmarked for phased renovation and redevelopment by TPTL, LIOC, and potential international partners. LIOC has since been utilizing approximately 14–15 tanks, primarily for fuel storage and distribution within Sri Lanka.

Although these steps marked meaningful progress, the majority of the tanks have remained underutilized, and the full strategic and commercial potential of the Trincomalee Oil Tank Farm continues to be unrealized.

Political opposition and geopolitical concerns

Efforts to expand Indian involvement in the development of the oil tank farm were met with strong resistance from nationalist political groups, particularly the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP). The opposition was rooted in concerns over sovereignty, national security, and perceived over-reliance on India. This political wrangling delayed decision-making and discouraged investment. The Trincomalee oil tank farm became entangled in broader debates about foreign policy and economic strategy, rather than being treated as a national asset requiring pragmatic management.

From geopolitics to geoeconomics

In recent years, there has been a shift in perspective—from viewing Trincomalee primarily through a geopolitical lens to recognizing its geoeconomic potential. The global energy landscape is changing, with increased emphasis on supply chain resilience, regional storage hubs, and diversification of energy sources.

Sri Lanka’s strategic location along major shipping routes in the Indian Ocean positions it ideally to serve as a regional energy hub. Trincomalee, with its natural harbour and existing infrastructure, is central to this vision.

The Tripartite Agreement- 2025

A major breakthrough came in 2025 with the signing of a tripartite agreement involving Sri Lanka, India, and the United Arab Emirates. This agreement aims to jointly develop the Trincomalee oil tank farm, combining Sri Lanka’s strategic location with India’s regional influence and the UAE’s financial and technical expertise. The activation of this agreement marks a turning point. It reflects a pragmatic approach that balances national interests with the need for foreign investment and collaboration.

Importance in the current global context

The importance of the Trincomalee oil tank farm has been heightened by recent global developments, including tensions and conflicts in the Middle East. Disruptions in oil supply chains have underscored the need for strategic reserves and regional storage facilities.

For Sri Lanka, expanding the storage capacity at Trincomalee could provide energy security by maintaining reserves sufficient for up to 60 days of consumption which at present is sufficient only for 30 days. Renovation of the existing tanks, along with modernization of infrastructure, would significantly enhance the country’s resilience to external shocks.

Moreover, the facility could serve as a storage and redistribution hub for other countries in the region, generating revenue and strengthening Sri Lanka’s economic position.

Vision for Trincomalee as a comprehensive energy hub

The transformation of Trincomalee into a dynamic and sustainable energy hub represents one of the most significant strategic opportunities for Sri Lanka in the coming decades. Anchored by its historic oil tank farm at China Bay and supported by one of the finest natural harbour’s in the world, Trincomalee possesses the rare combination of geography, infrastructure, and strategic location necessary to evolve into a major energy centre in the Indian Ocean region. However, realizing this potential requires a shift from a narrow focus on storage toward a broader, integrated, and forward-looking energy ecosystem.

At the heart of this vision lies the expansion and modernization of petroleum storage and distribution. The refurbishment of the existing oil tanks—many of which date back to the Second World War—along with the construction of new, technologically advanced facilities, will significantly enhance storage capacity, efficiency, and safety. With modern monitoring systems and international-standard operational practices, Trincomalee can function as a reliable regional energy reserve, capable of meeting domestic needs while also serving international markets.

Beyond storage, the development of refining and value-addition industries is essential. Establishing a modern refinery would reduce dependence on imported refined petroleum products and create opportunities for producing lubricants, petrochemicals, and other high-value derivatives. These downstream industries would stimulate industrial growth, generate employment, and encourage the emergence of ancillary sectors, thereby contributing to broader economic development.

Trincomalee’s geographic advantages also extend to the aviation sector. Its proximity to China Bay Airport provides an opportunity to develop a dedicated aviation fuel supply chain, catering to both civilian and military requirements. This would enable the region to function as a refuelling and logistics hub within the Indian Ocean network, strengthening connectivity and enhancing operational efficiency for regional air traffic.

Equally significant is the potential of Trincomalee Harbour to emerge as a major centre for maritime services. Located along key east–west shipping routes, the harbour is ideally positioned to provide bunkering, maintenance, and logistical support to passing vessels. Developing competitive bunkering facilities would increase port revenues and enhance Sri Lanka’s standing in global maritime trade, while integrating energy services with port operations.

In keeping with global trends, the integration of renewable energy sources must form a key component of this vision. Trincomalee’s climatic conditions are conducive to both solar and wind energy generation, allowing for the development of hybrid energy systems that complement traditional fossil fuel infrastructure. Incorporating renewable energy will not only reduce carbon emissions but also align with international sustainability goals, ensuring that the hub remains relevant in a rapidly evolving global energy landscape.

Another dimension that warrants reflection in the development of Trincomalee as an energy hub is the story of Sampur—an example of both missed opportunity and emerging renewal. Strategically located in close proximity to China Bay, Sampur was once envisaged as a key site for a coal power project, later evolving into proposals for a liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility. However, a combination of political opposition, environmental concerns, and shifting policy priorities led to the abandonment of these initiatives. This not only delayed potential gains in energy generation and regional development but also underscored the need for policy consistency and long-term planning in national energy strategy.

Yet, Sampur’s relevance has not diminished. Its transformation into a ground mounted solar power facility, commissioned in 2025, marks a significant shift towards sustainable energy development. While its contribution to the national grid when fully operational may be modest (120 MW in two phases) compared to the scale of earlier proposals, it represents an important step in diversifying Sri Lanka’s energy mix and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. More importantly, Sampur’s evolution highlights the potential for integrating renewable energy into the broader vision for Trincomalee. As the energy hub concept matures, Sampur could serve as a model for balancing economic ambition with environmental responsibility, reinforcing Trincomalee’s role in a resilient and forward-looking energy future.

The realization of the energy hub vision depends heavily on robust infrastructure development and enhanced connectivity. Modernizing port facilities, expanding pipeline networks, and improving road and rail links to the rest of the country are essential steps. In addition, ambitious proposals such as undersea pipelines linking Trincomalee with regional partners could further strengthen its role as a critical node in South Asia’s energy network, facilitating cross-border energy trade and cooperation.

Strategic partnerships will play a crucial role in this transformation. Given the scale of investment and technical expertise required, collaboration with international stakeholders is both necessary and beneficial. However, such partnerships must be carefully structured to ensure transparency, equitable benefit-sharing, and the protection of national interests. Drawing on global best practices while maintaining sovereignty over strategic assets will be key to long-term success.

Equally important is the establishment of a stable and consistent policy environment. Investor confidence depends on clear, predictable policies governing taxation, pricing, and operations. A well-defined national energy policy, supported by a strong regulatory framework, will provide the foundation for sustained investment and long-term planning. Regulations must also ensure strict adherence to environmental standards, safeguarding the ecological integrity of the Trincomalee region while enabling responsible development.

Human resource development is another critical pillar. The successful operation of a modern energy hub requires a skilled and knowledgeable workforce. Investment in education, technical training, and capacity-building programs will be essential to equip local professionals with the expertise needed to manage advanced infrastructure and complex operations.

Finally, regional integration offers a powerful pathway for growth. By strengthening energy and economic ties with neighbouring countries, Trincomalee can position itself as a reliable and efficient hub within the wider Indian Ocean region. This will not only enhance energy security but also elevate Sri Lanka’s role in regional and global energy networks.

In essence, the vision for Trincomalee is one of transformation—from a historically significant but underutilized asset into a vibrant, multifaceted energy hub that drives national development, fosters regional cooperation, and secures a sustainable energy future

Lessons from past failures

Sri Lanka’s history with the Trincomalee oil tank farm and the projects in Sampur for power generation is marked by missed opportunities, often due to political indecision, opposition by nationalist political parties and short-term thinking. Repeated changes in policy, lack of continuity, and politicization of strategic assets have hindered progress.

To avoid repeating these mistakes, there must be a clear, long-term national strategy agreed by the parties concerned. Transparent governance, professional management, and accountability are essential.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the future of Trincomalee stands at a decisive crossroads, shaped by both its historic legacy and its untapped potential. What was once conceived as a strategic wartime asset now presents itself as an opportunity of national significance especially during a time of energy crisis in the world brought about by the present war in the Middle East. The convergence of geography, infrastructure, and global energy demand places Trincomalee in a uniquely advantageous position within the Indian Ocean region.

Realizing this vision demands more than ambition—it calls for disciplined planning, policy consistency, and a commitment to national interest above short-term considerations. Investment in modern infrastructure, technological advancement, and human capital must proceed alongside transparent governance and environmental responsibility. Equally important is the cultivation of strategic partnerships that enhance capacity while preserving sovereignty.

If approached with foresight and unity, Trincomalee can evolve into a resilient, multifaceted energy hub that not only secures Sri Lanka’s energy future but also stimulates trade, industry, and regional collaboration. It is an opportunity to convert past delays and failures into present momentum and future success.

The time has come to act decisively. The foundations are already in place; what is needed now is the will to build upon them.

Trincomalee Oil Farm and Energy Hub: A Strategic Asset Sri Lanka Can No Longer Ignore

At a time when Sri Lanka continues to grapple with energy insecurity, volatile global oil prices, and the economic aftershocks of recent crises, one national asset stands out—vast, historic, and still underused. The Trincomalee Oil Tank Farm, located within the deep natural harbour of Trincomalee, is no longer merely a relic of the past. It has re-emerged as a critical national asset with the potential to reshape Sri Lanka’s energy security and economic future. In the context of an ongoing global energy crisis, the question is not whether Trincomalee matters, but whether Sri Lanka is finally prepared to act decisively.

The origins of the Trincomalee oil tank farm date back to the strategic imperatives of the British Empire during the Second World War. Recognising the unmatched value of Trincomalee’s harbour—one of the finest natural deep-water harbours in the world—the British constructed a vast oil storage complex across approximately 600 acres at China Bay. Built between the 1920s and late 1930s, the facility comprised 101 massive storage tanks, each capable of holding around 12,000 metric tons of fuel. With a total capacity of nearly 1.2 million metric tons, the complex was designed to support sustained naval operations in the Indian Ocean theatre. The tanks were ingeniously embedded into the natural contours of the terrain and reinforced with thick concrete, offering both protection and structural stability. A sophisticated pipeline network enabled the efficient transfer of oil from ships directly into storage, making Trincomalee a logistical asset of exceptional value.

Despite this remarkable beginning, the decades following independence in 1948 saw the gradual neglect of the facility. Successive governments failed to incorporate the oil tank farm into a coherent national energy strategy. As global demand for energy expanded and regional economies strengthened, Sri Lanka allowed one of its most valuable assets to deteriorate. Infrastructure decayed, pipelines corroded, and many of the tanks fell into disuse, eventually becoming overgrown by jungle. What should have been a cornerstone of national energy security instead became a symbol of indecision and missed opportunity.

There were intermittent attempts to revive interest in Trincomalee. In the late 1970s, President J. R. Jayewardene recognised the strategic and economic potential of the facility and proposed its development. However, these efforts were constrained by geopolitical realities, particularly concerns from India regarding foreign involvement in a strategically sensitive location close to its southern coastline. The Indo-Sri Lanka Accord once again highlighted Trincomalee’s strategic importance, but the ensuing years of civil conflict and persistent policy inconsistency prevented any meaningful progress. Even after the end of the war in 2009, development remained slow and fragmented.

A more structured effort emerged in 2022 with the establishment of the Trinco Petroleum Terminal (Pvt) Ltd, a joint venture between the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation and the Indian Oil Corporation. Under this arrangement, Sri Lanka retained a 51 percent stake, while the Indian partner held 49 percent. A number of tanks were allocated for immediate use, while others were designated for phased development. Although this marked a positive step forward, the majority of the facility remains underutilised. Political opposition, particularly from groups such as the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna, continued to slow progress, often framing the issue in terms of sovereignty rather than economic necessity.

The urgency of developing Trincomalee has been amplified by the current global energy crisis, driven in part by instability in the Middle East and disruptions to global supply chains. These developments have exposed the vulnerability of countries with limited strategic reserves. Sri Lanka, at present, maintains fuel reserves sufficient for roughly 30 days. With full development of the Trincomalee oil tank farm, this capacity could be extended to 60 days or more, providing a vital buffer against external shocks. Such an expansion would not only enhance national energy security but also reduce the risk of recurring fuel shortages and economic instability.

A significant breakthrough came in 2025 with the signing of a tripartite agreement involving Sri Lanka, India, and the United Arab Emirates. This partnership represents a pragmatic alignment of interests, combining Sri Lanka’s strategic location with India’s regional presence and the UAE’s financial and technical capabilities. More importantly, it reflects a shift in thinking—from viewing Trincomalee purely through a geopolitical lens to recognising its broader geoeconomic potential. In an era where energy infrastructure and regional cooperation are increasingly interconnected, Trincomalee has the capacity to emerge as a key node in the Indian Ocean energy network.

However, the true potential of Trincomalee extends far beyond oil storage. To fully realise its value, Sri Lanka must adopt a more integrated and forward-looking approach, transforming the region into a comprehensive energy hub. This would involve modernising storage facilities, expanding distribution networks, and developing refining capacity to reduce dependence on imported petroleum products. The establishment of petrochemical industries could further enhance value addition and create new avenues for export and employment.

Trincomalee’s geographic advantages also position it well for the development of aviation fuel supply chains, particularly given its proximity to China Bay. In addition, the harbour’s location along major east–west shipping routes offers significant potential for bunkering and maritime services. By integrating energy infrastructure with port operations, Sri Lanka could enhance its role in global maritime trade while generating substantial revenue.

Equally important is the integration of renewable energy into this vision. The nearby area of Sampur, once the site of abandoned coal and LNG projects, has now been repurposed as a solar power facility commissioned in 2025, with a planned capacity of 120 MW. While modest in scale, this development represents a meaningful shift towards sustainability and highlights the potential for combining traditional and renewable energy sources within a unified framework. Sampur’s evolution serves as both a lesson in missed opportunity and a model for a more balanced and forward-looking energy strategy.

The transformation of Trincomalee into a functioning energy hub will depend on several critical factors. Foremost among these is the need for policy consistency and long-term planning. Investor confidence cannot be sustained in an environment of shifting regulations and political uncertainty. Transparent governance, clear regulatory frameworks, and a commitment to protecting national interests are essential. At the same time, strategic partnerships with international stakeholders must be carefully managed to ensure that Sri Lanka benefits fully from its assets while maintaining sovereignty.

Infrastructure development will also play a central role. Upgrading port facilities, expanding pipeline networks, and improving road and rail connectivity are necessary to support increased activity. Investment in human capital is equally important, as the operation of a modern energy hub requires a skilled and technically proficient workforce.

Sri Lanka’s experience with the Trincomalee oil tank farm and related projects, including those in Sampur, underscores a recurring pattern of missed opportunities driven by political indecision and short-term thinking. To break this cycle, there must be a clear national consensus on the strategic importance of Trincomalee, supported by consistent policy and professional management.

In conclusion, the future of Trincomalee stands at a decisive crossroads. What was once conceived as a strategic wartime asset now represents an opportunity of immense national importance, particularly in the context of a global energy crisis. The convergence of geography, infrastructure, and rising global demand places Trincomalee in a uniquely advantageous position within the Indian Ocean region. Realising this potential will require disciplined planning, sustained commitment, and a willingness to act in the national interest. If approached with foresight and unity, Trincomalee can evolve into a resilient and dynamic energy hub, securing Sri Lanka’s energy future while driving economic growth and regional cooperation. The foundations are already in place; what is needed now is the resolve to build upon them.

(Dr. Gamini Goonetilleke, FRCS, is a senior consultant surgeon in Sri Lanka with over four decades of distinguished service, including extensive work in conflict-affected regions during the civil war, where he managed complex trauma cases. He is the author of three acclaimed books—In the Line of Duty, The Extra Mile, and The Healing Cut. Transitioning from medicine to intellectual inquiry, he is now a researcher, writer, and commentator on national issues. In this article, he brings a critical perspective to Sri Lanka’s energy challenges, highlighting missed opportunities and the urgent need for strategic vision.)

by Gamini Goonetilleke



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Is power devolution under JVP-NPP a political daydream?

Published

on

Former President Chandrika Kumaratunga

The JVP General Secretary Tilvin Silva’s recent remarks at a news conference in Jaffna where he ruled out the possibility of holding provincial council elections this year has been widely reported and widely criticized. About the same time there was another media event in Jaffna that went largely unnoticed and unreported outside Jaffna. What was said at the second media event may carry far more political implications than Tilvin Silva’s election timing talk. A veteran Tamil political participant made the startling yet not implausible statement that the prospect of having political devolution under the JVP-NPP government is becoming “a daydream”. The statement was made by Dr. K. Vigneswaran, who served as Provincial Secretary to the only North-East Provincial Council Government that was elected under the auspices of the Thirteenth Amendment.

Dr. Vigneswaran is a Professional Civil Engineer who studied at Royal College, graduated with First Class Honours in Engineering in 1964, and went on to complete a pioneering PhD at the university of Waterloo, Canada, applying the finite element method (FEM) in the field of Geotechnical Engineering. His engineering career has always been at the Irrigation Department where he rose to a Deputy Director. That was when the department was in its golden years, and Vigneswaran was known for his technical mentorship, meticulous administrative skills, and for knowing the fine print of everything. While at the Irrigation Department, Vigneswaran married Ramya de Silva, a fellow irrigation Engineer. After 1983, Vigneswaran became a fulltime political activist and a powerful resource in Tamil politics, but with unwavering commitment to nonviolence, democracy and federalism. The family moved first to India and then Canada, and Vigneswaran has been shuttling between Canada and Sri Lanka.

Devolution: Tortuous Trajectory

Since 1987, the Indo-Sri Lanka Agreement, and the 13th Amendment, Vigneswaran has been a permanent fixture in all the politics and institutional dynamic of implementing 13A and establishing provincial councils. He served as Secretary to the only elected Provincial Government for the Northern and Eastern Provinces. After 1994 and the election of Chandrika Kumaratunga as President, Vigneswaran became a key participant in all the civil society efforts and government initiatives to restore the PCs and implement 13A, both during the Kumaratunga presidency and the succeeding administrations of Mahinda Rajapaksa and the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe duo.

Devolution efforts stalled after the election of Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who in so many words declared that he had no time for 13A or PCs in his presidential agenda, whatever it was. Only that his whole agenda turned out to be a wholesale disaster for the country. Already by then, all the nine Provincial Councils had fallen into abeyance with the cancellation of the 1988 PC elections by the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe duo, with the TNA standing by. The abeyance continues under the JVP-NPP government with no apparent end in sight after Tilvin de Silva’s statement in Jaffna.

I say all this to provide the proper context for Vigneswaran’s statement in Jaffna that the prospects for power devolution under the JVP-NPP government are becoming a political daydream. He said something else as well: that of all the government leaders he has encountered over the years, the only leader who has been genuinely sincere about power devolution is former President Chandrika Kumaratunga, and no one else. I am constrained to add that the insincere category would include Ranil Wickremesinghe, who for all his handsome promises, never matched any of them with experiential sincerity. The present JVP-NPP government still has time to show that they are not an insincere lot.

It is not my purpose to agree with or question Dr. Vigneswaran’s assertions, but to use them as cue and context to comment on the widening mismatch between the JVP-NPP government’s promises and its practices on the matter of power devolution and the restoration of the PC system. With a stalling economy, rising prices and external shocks, it is obvious that the government has all the economic matters to worry about, but that does not mean that it can ignore all the other government responsibilities. No government is put in power to solve a single problem or address a single issue. It is in the nature of governments to deal with multiple problems with varying priorities. Otherwise you could have a single cabinet minister to deal with one problem at a time. That is never going to be the case.

The economy is of course the top of mind priority for the government even as it is a top of mind concern for the people. Even on the economic front, the government is holding steady but is showing little progress. And there are other government initiatives where political accountability will call for answers: to wit, the catchall Clean Sri Lanka programme, ambitious educational reforms, contentious energy sector reforms and, yes, power devolution as well as the overpromised constitutional reforms. Not to mention the sprawling unforced errors over substandard coal imports, foreign exchange fraud, and the chronic neglect of developing the renewable energy sector. Correcting these fields of errors may require a separate ministry for each.

Devolution: Daydream or Deliverable

On the PC system and constitutional reform, there has been scant progress in spite of handsome promises. On both, the government is inadvertently deepening the holes that it had dug itself into through indifference, inaction or procrastination, or all of them and more. In the matter of devolution and provincial councils, the government can simply defuse the situation by directing the Election Commission to conduct elections at the earliest opportunity that is logistically possible. Making his statement in Jaffna, Mr. Tilvin Silva alluded to funding shortfall and legal complications as reasons for the necessity to postpone PC elections until next year. Neither reason holds water.

The funding question would seem to have been put to rest by the statement of Health Minister and Cabinet Spokesman Nalinda Jayatissa, presumably reflecting cabinet consensus, that there are no funding issues and if needed additional funds could be arranged through supplementary allocations. It is also disingenuous to cite legal complications as a reason. The so called legal complications arose because of the collective stupidity of the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe parliament that included the then miniscule NPP and the politically-lost TNA. The JVP-NPP has now ballooned from a handful MPs to a two-thirds majority and it can expedite any legislation that it wants to enable the PC elections to be held without delays.

Alternatively, the elections can be held under the old arrangement of proportional representation with assurance by political parties to honour their commitment to fielding more female candidates. Already at a gathering of all political parties, including the NPP (but not the JVP), and civil society groups, convened by People’s Action For Free & Fair Elections (PAFFREL), the political parties jointly committed to a 25% quota for women and youth under the old electoral system. The ongoing parliamentary committee exercise studying the legal matter, headed by the overstretched Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath, is also an unnecessary red herring. The Election Commission is ready to go under whatever law or electoral system that is before it. So, there is no reason to hide behind legal complications to further delay the PC elections.

Somewhat amusingly, Public and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Ananda Wijepala has trotted out the argument that the NPP government has already conducted two nationwide elections during the one and a half years it has been in office, and that unlike the Ranil Wickremesinghe government the JVP-NPP is not in the business “to delay elections for our personal benefit” – whatever that means. Unfortunately, the good minister is missing the point. The question is not how many elections can the JVP-NPP hold in how many years, but how many years do people in the provinces have to wait before they vote in another provincial election? How many more years? That really is the question.

We know the current situation in the provinces. There are provincial governments but no elected provincial councils. The government administration in every province is being run by the President of the Republic through his handpicked governors and unelected government officials. This is a travesty of democracy and the euthanizing of the PC system. Already under 13A, the office of the provincial governors has been constitutionally and legally compared to the office of the Governors of old Ceylon who represented the monarch in what was then a crown colony. The irony is that a JVP-NPP President may have inadvertently positioned himself as the monarch of all he provincially surveys, courtesy of the Thirteenth Amendment!

The JVP was in the forefront of the litigation that caused the demerger of the Northern and Eastern Provinces. If Dr. Vigneswaran’s assertion were to prove correct, a potential dissolution of the provincial system under the JVP-NPP government would be the consummation of the JVP’s original opposition to the introduction of the provincial council system itself. The whole system may not be eradicated, but it could be devoured of its democratic essence while preserving the administrative shell as the medium for the country’s president to overreach into the provinces. That would be worse than a daydream, a real nightmare.

by Rajan Philips ✍️

Continue Reading

Features

Rewiring Brain: Meditation to Break the Cycle of Craving

Published

on

“Craving begets sorrow, craving begets fear. For him who is free from craving there is no sorrow; how can there be fear for him,” Dhammapada verse 216 states. The mental factor craving, Tanha in Pali, is central to Buddhist Teaching, as its ultimate goal is the cessation or extinction of it—tanhakkhaya. Even though Tanha is translated as craving here, it can sometimes mislead modern readers into thinking tanha only refers to extreme or physical addictions. Just as with any Pali term, it has broad meanings. Venerable Walpola Rahula describes it as “thirst” or unceasing wanting, one of the deep-rooted proclivities or latent tendencies (anusaya) of life (Rahula 1959), without which life as we know would not exist.

Even though the Buddha recognized this natural phenomenon two and a half millennia ago, it was only in the late 20th century that science took note of it and gave it a captivating term—the Hedonic Treadmill. The advantage of this empirical investigation to us Buddhists is that it provides a way to gain penetrative, experiential comprehension (anubodha) of this concept using the vernacular of this technology-savvy age—an alternative to struggling with the language of a bygone era.

These investigations have revealed that there are no hard-to-comprehend metaphysical or mysterious elements involved with this phenomenon; it is a biochemical process fundamental to sustaining life. What is more, an effort to grasp this concept would be well within the goals of Vipassana meditation described in the Sutta Pitaka, incorporating the four elements of investigation: body (kayanupassana), sensations (vedananupassana), mind (chittanupassana), and natural laws (dhammanupassana).

Vipassana and modern science

Vipassana meditation is an in-depth exploration of how humans perceive the world, gain knowledge, and interact with themselves and the environment. Knowing this with wisdom allows one to lead a harmonious way of life (samadhi), a condition conducive to curbing the “thirst” and achieving the Buddhist ideal. The goal of modern science is also to investigate life, but humanity has often used that knowledge to increase material wealth and comfort, providing only lip service to spirituality on the fringe.

An attitude that tends to ignore the consequences of wanting more and more – thirst, potentially endangering the planet. However, that does not prevent us from using scientific information as and aid or a tool to grasp Buddhist concepts. The scientific method bears parallels to the Buddhist approach: it is based on causality (paticcasamuppada), empirical verification (ehipassiko), systematic observation (meditation), and rejecting dogma and beliefs. The primary difference is simply the vocabulary used.

The process of perception: five aggregates

Our five external sense organs receive data (vedana) containing information on the environment: Eyes: receive light, Ears: receive sound, Skin: senses physical contact and temperature, Nose & Tongue: sense chemical properties of substances. The data received by the sense organs is transmitted to the brain, where it is registered as neural networks (sanna). Neural networks, which are interconnected groups of nerve cells (neurons) can be viewed as mind-readable QR codes.

The activity of the brain, or mind (mano), processes this data and converts them into actionable information (sankhara). Modern neuroscience and psychology have made great advances in understanding these processes at the molecular level. This process allows the individual to become aware of their environment, build an autobiographical memory or the notion of a self (atta), and take actions to protect and perpetuate life.

The Pali term vinnana refers to the collection of information committed to memory. Translating vinnana as “consciousness” can be confusing, as the latter often refers to all brain activities. All physical phenomena that sense organs encounter and the mental constructs (sankhara) are referred to as Rupa. This activity of mind forms the basis of all knowledge, representing the entire world as perceived by the individual. This process is what the Teaching refers to as the Five Aggregates (pancakkhanda). The critical takeaway is that the world we perceive is merely a mental construct. While an objective world exists, our sense organs have limitations in seeing it—a fact easily realized through the hundreds of illusions used for entertainment.

Evolution and emotion

The evolutionary purpose of this data processing mechanism is to enable living beings to respond to environmental factors for survival. The psychological and physiological state that arises prior to acting is called emotion. Primarily, emotions can be of three kinds: desire (loba) – seeing a new phone causes an urge to buy it, even though the current one works fine; aversion (dosha) – encountering a vicious dog triggers a “fight or flight” response; delusion (moha) or illusion – an unanswered message to a loved one triggers worry or speculation. Thus, tanha or thirst represents how we connect to the world in its entirety; it can be desire, aversion, and delusion, not merely simple greed. Consequently, these are natural phenomena beyond our immediate control, which are intended to sustain life. In other words, emotions are the forerunner to volitions or intentions, which the Teaching defines as kamma.

The biochemistry of craving

Emotions result from the interaction between the nervous system and biochemicals known as neurotransmitters and neuromodulators (e.g., dopamine, serotonin, epinephrine, GABA, glutamate, acetylcholine, and endorphins). Just as the Buddha’s simile of two bundles of bamboo supporting each other describes, these two processes are interdependent and co-arising. Every thought or emotional state corresponds to patterns of neural firing. When neurons fire, they release these chemicals into synapses, influencing how one feels and acts. This release perturbs the body’s normal balance, or homeostasis. Once an action is complete, these chemicals are reabsorbed, and the body returns to its baseline.

Return to baseline is essential for survival. For example, if we stay satisfied with just one meal forever, we could not sustain life. Nature has developed another mechanism to prevent us from being satisfied – we also habituate. In the case of dopamine, the brain adapts by reducing the response to the same stimulus. To get the same level of satisfaction with repeated experiences, the amounts of neurotransmitters needed keeps increasing. This leads to the cycle of craving and dissatisfaction—the Hedonic Treadmill. You “run” toward happiness on the treadmill, but it does not take you anywhere, leaving you in the same emotionally unsatisfactory state, wanting more and more.

Breaking the cycle

This explains why achievements and possessions do not bring permanent happiness, and lead to a cycle of struggle, addiction, crime, and other ills of society. For Buddhists, it also explains why we cling to meaningless rituals. The Dhamma captured this complex phenomenon in the Four Noble Truths: pleasant experiences are impermanent (anicca), leading to grasping (tanha) and unsatisfactoriness (dukkha). The remedy is the Eightfold Path that involves wisdom (panna), conduct (sila), and harmony (samadhi).

Neuroplasticity and the point of liberation

While we cannot stop the sense organs from receiving stimulation (vedana) and sending them to brain, the mind can be developed to prevent vedana from leading to tanha. This is the “point of liberation,” the seventh link in the paticcasamuppada formula. We may not have free will, but we have ‘Free Won’t’ or the ability to say no to the natural tendency to act upon stimuli. We can rewire our neural connections to do so. This ability can be cultivated by practice and repetition, and neuroscience refers to it as neuroplasticity—the brain’s ability to change with experience.

The natural tendency of the brain is to strengthen frequently used neural networks while weakening and eliminating lesser used networks and building new ones as needed. This is known as neural plasticity or rewiring the brain. As described in the Eight-fold Path, the way to weaken and eliminate dopamine-driven neural networks includes three aspects. First, the process leading to thirst must be understood. One must engage in sila – activities and thoughts that cultivate Metta: loving-kindness and goodwill, Karuna: compassion, Mudita: appreciative joy, and Upekkha: equanimity, emotional stability, calmness, and evenness of mind in the face of gain and loss, praise and blame, fame and disrepute, pleasure, and pain. That must be done with wisdom, ritualistic behavior does not strengthen the correct neural networks. These activities promote a “cocktail” of oxytocin, serotonin, and GABA, subduing the role of dopamine and helping us step off the Hedonic Treadmill. This leads to a tranquil state of mind and a harmonious existence – samadhi. Again, it is an interdependent, co-arising process that improves upon repetition. Using mind altering substances hijacks this process, thus the need for adhering to the Fifth Precept.

The goal of Vipassana is to understand this process and train the mind to say “no” to tanha. It is not just about sitting on a mat; it requires developing a lifestyle that maintains homeostasis or harmony, samadhi, at every moment. Pali term bhavana means the development of wisdom and insight. In modern vernacular – rewiring brain. This model must be assessed for its efficacy by the individual and realize the benefits by themselves –ehipassiko; knowledge without practice does not work. According to what the Buddha taught, that is the path to cessation or extinction of craving – tanhakkhaya, the supreme goal.

by Geewananda Gunawardana, Ph.D. ✍️

Continue Reading

Features

‘Spectrum’ Art Exhibition Showcases Emerging Talent at Lionel Wendt

Published

on

A new art exhibition, titled Spectrum ,will be held at the Lionel Wendt Art Centre on the 20th and 21st of June 2026, bringing together a collection of works by ten emerging artists.

Athsara Wijegunawardena

Neha Thirumavalavan

Dillai Joseph

Wasantha Siriwardena

Champika Dias

Nipun Dias

Dr. Prasanna Siriwardena

Kalhari Perera

Siromi Samarasinghe

Chandana Illankone

All ten artists have trained under the guidance of renowned Sri Lankan artist Royden Gibbs, and this exhibition marks an important point in their individual journeys.

Dr. Prasanna Siriwardena

Spectrum brings together a mix of styles, subjects and approaches, giving visitors a chance to experience a wide range of work in one place. The exhibition will include pieces in watercolors, soft pastels, oils and charcoal, reflecting both the discipline and personal direction of each artist. The work ranges from scenery and portraits to still life and studies of the human form, offering different ways of seeing and interpreting familiar subjects.

Dillai Joseph

Although they share the same mentor, each artist presents a distinct point of view. The result is a show that feels varied yet connected, with each piece carrying its own character and intent. It is this balance that gives Spectrum its identity.

The exhibition aims to support and highlight emerging talent within Sri Lanka’s art scene, while also creating a space where artists and audiences can connect. Visitors will find work that shifts between quiet observation and more expressive pieces, making it an engaging experience for both seasoned collectors and those simply interested in art.

Spectrum is expected to draw art lovers, collectors, students and members of the wider creative community. It also offers an opportunity to discover and support new artists at an early stage in their careers.

Open to the public over two days, Spectrum invites visitors to experience a range of work in a venue that has long been part of Colombo’s cultural landscape.

Continue Reading

Trending