Connect with us

Features

Tragic ignorance underlying the maligning of “Born Again Christianity”

Published

on

A clarification in the context of Easter 2023

By Professor A. N. I. Ekanayaka
Emeritus Professor

Amidst much of the irrationality and ignorance that bedevils Sri Lankan society nowadays, the tendency to disparage what is called “born again Christianity” is one of the more prominent examples. The approach of Easter 2023 is an opportune time in which to dispel the ignorance and prejudice underlying this attitude. Across much of society from those in high places to the ordinary man in the street, from prominent politicians to many so-called learned intellectuals, and dominantly amongst some Buddhist clergy and their adherents, there is the notion that while it is perfectly respectable to belong to a mainline Christian denomination, “born again Christianity” is some weird fundamentalist cult that needs to be resisted. Little do they realise that in doing so they are opposing Christianity itself where the need to be “born again” (i. e. spiritually regenerate), is a sine qua non that lies at the very heart of authentic biblical Christian doctrine, as was strongly emphasised by Jesus himself in his earthly ministry.

Opposition to Christianity however is not the issue. Such opposition is as old as the Christian faith. The blood of the martyrs down the running centuries is testimony to that fact. Even in today’s world research shows that Christianity is by far the most persecuted of all religions. That is not surprising. The Christian diagnosis of the human predicament and its prescription of the biblical Gospel as the one and only path of salvation open to mankind is so unique and radical as to invariably evoke the ridicule and hostility of the world. That is the testimony of history through all generations.

Accordingly, that people should be derisive of born again Christianity is to be expected. But let them not delude themselves into thinking that in so doing they are not also opposing Christianity. The truth is that by doing so they are attacking the very foundations of historic bible-based Christianity. True Christianity according to the bible is in and of itself nothing less than ‘born again Christianity”! Christianity is nothing if not “born again Christianity”. Whether people like it or not that is the plain truth. This article is intended to clarify this reality

Ironically, the tendency to disparage “born again Christianity” is not confined to those who are outside the Christian Church. Sadly, many so-called Christians themselves know little or nothing of this fundamental doctrine. Consequently, they live out their entire life as regular church goers comforting themselves with formal religion and empty ritual, and finally go to the grave in darkness without having ever understood the immeasurable riches of the biblical Gospel and what it means to be a born again regenerate Christian enjoying the guarantee of eternal security who can say with the great apostle Paul “for me to live is Christ and to die is gain” !

Many apostate prelates in the mainline churches must bear heavy responsibility for the ignorance of ordinary Christians about the Christian gospel in which being born again (i.e. becoming spiritually regenerate not through human endeavour but through the decisive intervention of God in transforming the human heart), is an essential part. Those to blame for such widespread ignorance include many bishops priests and even popes and cardinals who steeped in the heresies of a spurious liberal theology, wallowing in religious pluralism and denying the absolute authority of scripture, fail to convey to their congregations the whole truth about their faith and what it means to be a Christian. Instead, they promote an unbiblical fallacious lukewarm sentimental Christianity after their own imagination with notions and practices that neither challenge the wisdom of the secular world nor conflict with the teachings of other religions.

No wonder so many unregenerate Christians who have themselves never experienced the miracle of being ‘born again’ feel no sense of outrage when something as basic as born again Christianity is subject to widespread scorn and ridicule in secular society and by those of other faiths. Nor do many apostate bishops and priests feel bad about it either, having neglected to lead their own people within the Church into the experience of being regenerate (born again) Christians. Given their theological devience, ignorance of scripture, doctrinal confusion, and being timid religious pluralists unwilling to say anything that might conflict with the teachings of other religions, it is not surprising that such clergy should maintain a stoic embarrassed silence when born again Christianity is disparaged by those outside the Church.

At the other end of the spectrum are some pastors and evangelists of smaller denominations who though they are not ashamed to proclaim the necessity for Christians to be “born again” do so in a shallow manner that trivialises, cheapens, dilutes and distorts the doctrine of spiritual regeneration in the truly born again Christian as taught by Jesus. Those who are guilty of this include certain charismatic groups and their populist preachers with a shallow and superficial understanding of salvation through the biblical Gospel. Worse the slogan of born again Christianity could be maliciously exploited by opulent politically influential charismatic heretics who lead satanic cults and posing as ‘prophets’ in complete defiance of scripture deceive thousands in gargantuan mega churches where they preach a pernicious ‘prosperity theology’ that is as evil and heretical as the ‘liberal theology’ which makes bishops and priests of the mainline Churches underplay the importance of ‘born again Christianity’.

On the other hand, for people of other faiths especially Buddhists and Hindus to disparage “born again Christianity” is also unfair and inconsistent. The fact is nearly all religions have some concept of rebirth deeply ingrained in their philosophy (however different it may be to the Christian understanding of spiritual regeneration). For example, to deny rebirth would be a violation of one of the most basic tenets of Buddhism.

The Buddha himself accepted the premises and concepts relating to rebirth and there are several references to rebirth in early Buddhist texts including several Suttas. What is rebirth unless it is one particular understanding of being born again? Consequently, it is particularly unkind and illogical that any Buddhist should look down on ‘Born again Christians’. In Hinduism, too, the Bhagavad Gita acknowledges that every human being has a choice to get out of the cycle of rebirth. So, where Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism all in their own way have a doctrine of new birth which goes to the very foundation of these religions, it is perplexing why the peculiarly Christian understanding of regeneration should evoke so much cynicism.

It only in Christianity that being born again is understood hopefully and expectantly as a glorious consummation devoutly to be desired, the gateway to peace joy and victorious living in this life whatever its sufferings, and the passport to the glories of eternal life to come in the heavenly kingdom where the scriptures promise that God will dwell with his people “and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning nor crying nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away” (Rev.21: 3-4)

The glorious optimism of the Christian understanding of being spiritually ‘born again’ here and now and the cast iron guarantee of eternal security that it includes contrasts with the depressing pessimism that surrounds all other conceptions of rebirth/or being ‘born again’ in other religions. So, the cynicism towards ‘born again Christianity’ may in part be the reaction of those whose own conception of new birth according to their belief system amounts to a depressing intangible mystical notion of reincarnation which dependent on the vagaries of human endeavor and being rooted in abstract philosophy is hard to understand and offers little to look forward to. This may also explain the conversion anxiety which drives the continuing hostility towards evangelists who peacefully preach the doctrine of ‘born again Christianity’ in the community.

In the free market of human ideology especially pertaining to matters of life and death, notions of salvation that are grounded in incontrovertible historical events, stand the test of time in the furnace of human experience, are of greater immediate value in coping with the problems of life, and are seen to guarantee the consolation of eternal security beyond death, will inevitably be more attractive. The great hope and eternal truth of the Christian Gospel that lies at the heart of ‘born again Christianity’ has this advantage. Consequently, it is not surprising that those who are alarmed at the prospect of peaceful conversions to the Christian religion should seek to stigmatize the notion of being a born again Christian.

So, what is this doctrine of being ‘born again’ that lies at very heart of the Christian religion ? The concept in one way or another underlies the entire Bible from start to finish where all scripture is the Word of God spoken and the record of God’s historic offensive against human sin in a fallen universe where all human beings in their natural state in every generation find themselves alienated from God, in a state of total depravity and total inability to save themselves by their own meritorious works. In this context, the specific reference to the imperative of being “born again” goes back to a memorable encounter in the life of Jesus, who controversially claimed to be God himself incarnate as the perfect human being, who had come into the world to save sinners. He would achieve this by being their sin bearer and redeemer thereby atoning for their sins through his bitter suffering and death on the cross, before his mighty resurrection three days later as predicted.

One night a distinguished ruler of the Jews and a member of the Jewish Sanhedrin named Nicodemus visited Jesus secretly for fear of being found out by his peers. Nicodemus was curious to know more about Jesus’ identity and the core of his teaching. The scriptures record that to Nicodemus’s astonishment Jesus cut through unessentials and went straight to the point saying “Truly, truly I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot (even) see the kingdom of God” ! (Jn 3:3). Unable to make sense of the spiritual metaphor used by Jesus Nicodemus reportedly lapsed into good humoured cynicism exclaiming that such a suggestion was as preposterous as a man “entering a second time into his mother’s womb and being born”. But Jesus was adamant insisting that unless one is born again “he cannot enter the kingdom of God” (Jn 3:5). “You must be born again” (Jn 3:7) he reiterated. It is one of the most explicit warnings Jesus ever issued during his earthly ministry. Let there be no mistake. It is this warning that people belittle nowadays when they make light of born again Christianity.

One of the greatest theologians of the age Dr JI Packer has explained that being “born again” was a picture phrase Jesus used in his conversation with Nicodemus to depict the concept of “Regeneration”. It is “God renovating the heart, the core of a person’s being, by implanting a new principle of desire, purpose and action, a dispositional dynamic that finds expression in a positive response to the (biblical) Gospel and its Christ” : i. e. saving faith. From first to last such regeneration is seen entirely as the work of God, where God raises those whom he has chosen among the spiritually dead to new life in Christ Jesus as Christians. Dr David Martyn Lloyd Jones the brilliant physician who gave up medicine to become the greatest preacher in England last century, in his book “Experiencing the New Birth” explained that Christianity is that which brings a person to a personal knowledge of God. True (born again) Christianity is knowing God he said. “Not just believing a few things about God and having a nice little life. That is not Christianity. That is nothing but morality or mere religion”. The essence of the new birth is beginning to know and have communion with God, a radical conversion that will be publicly reflected in a transformed lifestyle which in every detail of daily life acknowledges the Lordship of Christ.

That in brief is what “born again” means in Christianity. That is the glorious God driven consummation that people disparage when they in their ignorance mock born again Christianity. Hopefully, those who stand corrected by this clarification will cease doing so rather than further imperil their own souls by stigmatising the truth.

Finally, those who presume to write about such matters if they are to be credible witnesses to the truth must themselves be able to lay some claim in all humility to a personal experience of what it means to be born again from a uniquely Christian perspective. True, this may lay them open to a charge of committing intellectual suicide or worse arrogant self-righteous, holier than thou presumption where on the surface they appear to be flawed personalities no better than other people.

But such cynical reactions are themselves an example of the ignorance surrounding born again Christianity. Jesus once said, “Those who are well have no need of a physician but those who are sick. For I came not to call the righteous but sinners” (Matt 9:12-13). In the Christian understanding salvation through being born again represents the spiritual liberation of those, even the dregs of society, who lamenting their sins and acknowledging their wretchedness, bemoaning their total depravity and inability to save themselves and putting their faith in Christ, find themselves unworthy recipients of the free gift of God through grace. The great apostle Paul, who himself admitted to being the “very least of all the saints …” (Eph 3:8), writing from a Roman prison about AD 60 put it perfectly: “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing. It is the gift of God. Not a result of (meritorious) works so that no one may boast” (Eph 2:8-9). So it was with the regenerate John Newton formerly the degenerate wretched captain of a slave ship and an investor in the slave trade (later becoming an evangelical English cleric and slavery abolitionist), who in 1772 wrote this memorable lyric :

Amazing grace how sweet the sound
That saved a wretch like me,
I once was lost, but now I’m found,
Was blind but now I see
That is what it means to become a “born again Christian”.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Arctic link discovered: Lankan scientists trace 8,000 km seabird migration route

Published

on

By Ifham Nizam

Sri Lankan scientists have uncovered a remarkable long-distance migration route used by seabirds, linking the island’s shores with the Arctic—an achievement that is expected to reshape global understanding of bird movement and highlight Sri Lanka’s importance in the natural world.

The discovery, led by Professor Sampath S. Seneviratne of the University of Colombo, shows that Heuglin’s Gulls travel nearly 8,000 kilometres from Sri Lanka to breeding grounds in northern Russia, following a carefully chosen path that combines coastal travel with long inland journeys.

Prof. Seneviratne told The Island that the finding challenges the long-standing belief that seabirds depend mainly on ocean routes.

“For a long time, we assumed seabirds would stay close to the sea throughout their migration. What we are seeing here is very different. These birds are moving across land as well, using a route that connects Sri Lanka directly with the Arctic,” he said.

Brown headed gull- migrating from Himalayas to Mannar

The birds begin their journey from the northwestern coast of Sri Lanka, especially around Mannar—an area known for its rich birdlife and coastal habitats. From there, they cross over to India and move along the western coastline before turning inland.

Their journey then takes them through Pakistan and Afghanistan, across parts of Central Asia, and onwards to the Arctic region, where they breed during the northern summer.

What has drawn particular attention from scientists is the route chosen by the birds.

Instead of attempting to cross the world’s highest mountain ranges, or taking a much longer path over the open ocean, the gulls appear to follow a middle course that allows them to avoid harsh conditions while still maintaining a steady journey.

Map 1 &2 birds moving through the continent to reach the Artctic

“They are not simply taking the shortest distance,” Prof. Seneviratne explained. “They are choosing a route that gives them the best chance of survival. Along this path, they are able to find food, rest, and avoid extreme environments.”

The birds travel long distances each day, covering hundreds of kilometres, but they do not do it all in one stretch. Their journey depends heavily on stopovers—places where they pause to rest and rebuild energy.

“These stopovers are critical,” Prof. Seneviratne said. “If the birds cannot find suitable places to feed and recover, they will not be able to complete the journey.”

Co-researcher Dr. Gayomini Panagoda said the discovery sheds light on a route that had remained largely hidden until now.

“We always knew these birds were leaving Sri Lanka during certain times of the year, but we did not fully understand where they were going or how they got there,” she said. “Now we have a much clearer picture of their journey.”

Awareness among schoolchildren

She added that the findings show how closely connected different parts of the world are through nature.

“A bird that spends part of its life in Sri Lanka ends up in the Arctic. That tells us how linked these ecosystems really are,” she said.

The findings also underline the importance of Sri Lanka’s coastal areas, which serve as vital feeding and resting grounds for migratory birds before they begin their long journey north.

Veteran ornithologist , Professor Emeritus Sarath Kotagama said these habitats are of international importance and must be protected.

“These coastal regions, especially places like Mannar, provide the food and shelter these birds need before migration. If those areas are damaged, it will affect bird populations far beyond Sri Lanka,” he said.

Professor Seneviratne with Dr. Gayomini Panagoda

Kotagama warned that increasing pressure on coastal ecosystems—from development, pollution, and climate change—could pose serious risks.

“We are already seeing changes in many of these birds. If we are not careful, we could lose habitats that are essential not just for local wildlife, but for species that travel across continents,” he said.

The discovery also draws attention to the wider network of migration routes that connect countries across Asia and beyond. Birds do not recognise national borders, and their survival depends on conditions in many different places along their journey.

Prof. Seneviratne stressed that protecting these birds will require cooperation between countries.

“These birds travel across several regions, and each of those regions plays a role in their survival. Conservation cannot be done by one country alone,” he said.

A GPS tagged Crab Plover

He added that more work is needed to understand how other species use similar routes and how changes in climate and land use may affect migration patterns in the future.

“There is still much we do not know. This is just one piece of a much larger picture,” he said.

Environmentalists say the findings should encourage stronger action to protect wetlands and coastal ecosystems in Sri Lanka, many of which are under increasing threat.

“These areas are not just important for birds,” Dr. Panagoda said. “They support fisheries, protect coastlines, and are part of our natural heritage. Protecting them benefits both people and wildlife.”

She noted that conserving these habitats will also help ensure that future generations can continue to witness the arrival and departure of migratory birds.

For Sri Lanka, the discovery is both a moment of pride and a reminder of responsibility.

It highlights the role the island plays in supporting wildlife that travels across vast distances and connects different parts of the world.

It also shows that even a small country can have a big impact when it comes to global biodiversity.

As Prof. Seneviratne put it, “What happens in Sri Lanka does not stay in Sri Lanka. These birds carry that connection across continents.”

The discovery is expected to encourage further research into bird migration in the region, as scientists continue to explore how different species move across landscapes and adapt to changing conditions.

It also reinforces the need to protect the natural environments that make such journeys possible.

In the end, the story of these birds is not just about distance. It is about survival, connection, and the delicate balance of nature.

From the shores of Sri Lanka to the frozen Arctic, their journey is a powerful reminder that the natural world is far more connected than we often realise—and that protecting one part of it helps protect the whole.

Continue Reading

Features

Why the promotion of drone warfare is unconscionable

Published

on

A drone strike on an oil facility in the Middle East in the current war.

For the morally-conscious, the tendency among some sections in Sri Lanka to promote the production of drones for national defence purposes could be deeply worrying. Besides, this proposition flies in the face of common sense and disregards the relentlessly increasing harsh economic realities coming in the wake of the current wars that could push many a southern country into beggary. In fact even the West is facing an economic recession.

To begin with the latter issues, it is a proved reality that the majority of Southern countries are descending further into poverty at present. The FAO has the ‘bleeding statistics’ . For instance, food insecurity in Asia is of such disquieting proportions that the region accounts for ‘ approximately half of the world’s 370.7 million undernourished people’.

It is against such a bleak economic backdrop that countries of the South are being called on to pump money into the production or importing of drones. Pointed reference needs to be made here to the South because drones are peddled as cutting-edge defence systems that are comparatively economical to acquire and relatively easy to operate. It is even voiced that with time drones could enable even smaller countries of the South to acquire ‘strategic parity’ with the major powers of the North and middle level powers.

Meanwhile, no thought is spared for the poor of the South who would sink steadily into poverty and powerlessness. Because more defence spending by southern countries only entrenches the ruling classes of those countries, and in some cases their military high commands, further in the systems of governance and repression.

This has essentially been the experience of the majority of post-colonial states. As aptly phrased by economic and political analyst Susan George in the seventies, it has always been a case of ‘The Other Half Dying’.

Accordingly, it cannot be perceived as to how more defence spending by the South on drones could help alleviate the latter’s principal problem of deepening poverty. As for the perceived escalating insecurities of the South, these problems are of such complexity that drones could never be seen as offering a quick fix for them. They need patient, multi-pronged managing, mainly at the negotiating table with the powers that matter. These are long- gestation projects that need to be compulsorily undertaken in view of the fact that the alternative could be indefinite conflict and war.

Since Sri Lanka too is mentioned as one of those countries that needs to look at the drone proposition with some seriousness, it is relevant to underscore that Sri Lanka is second in a list of countries that are described as facing acute material hardships at present in the wake of the economic instability bred by the Hormuz crisis. The source of such information is no less than the respected Kiel Institute for the World Economy. The first 10 such gravely affected countries are: Zambia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Pakistan, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Bangladesh, Vietnam, the Philippines and Thailand.

It is thought-provoking that among the above countries are not only those that have been traditionally seen as experiencing severe underdevelopment but also up-and-coming middle income countries that have been hitherto described as being on a fast track to development. The interesting mix proves that no country at present could consider itself immune to current economic shocks originating mainly in the Middle East that could plunge it dramatically into acute poverty virtually overnight.

We are left to conclude that ‘Bread’ or the economic well being of people could in no way be sacrificed for ‘Drones’ in democratic countries whose governments are obliged to be accountable to the people. Considering the phenomenal hardships that could be waiting to happen worldwide, the world could very well do without more ‘Guns’ or ‘Drones’.

However, if southern governments in particular opt for ‘Drones’ or an accumulation of ‘Guns’, the chances are that there could be overwhelming tides of social discontent in their countries, bred by economic want, that could then ignite indefinite war and repression. That is, a ‘No-Win’ situation for all concerned.

Ukraine has been spiritedly and admirably taking the fight back to the invading Russian forces over the past few years but its skillful use of sophisticated drones of its own making has in no way decreased the human costs the war has been incurring for itself. Ukraine has no choice but to continue with all the weaponry at its command to beat back the Russian invader but sooner rather than later it would need to take into account the immense suffering the war has been inflicting on its people and focus on the fact that the Russians are not backing down but using equally lethal weaponry against it.

The above are some of the dilemmas of the present wars that call for urgent resolution. Warring countries are obliged to address on a priority basis the misery and destruction their actions incur for their publics and consider deploying diplomacy, preferably under the aegis of the UN, to work out peaceful solutions to their enmities and differences. Considering the futility of their war Russia and Ukraine are obliged to think on these lines.

No less a power than the US should be considering deeply right now the advisability of continuing with its military interventions in the South in particular to achieve its self interests. The rising loss of American lives and the economic costs of war in the Middle East will be weighing heavily with the Trump administration and it shouldn’t come as a surprise if negotiations are given a serious try, going ahead. Ground realities in the region moreover indicate that the US ‘has bitten off more than it could chew’ and that Iran is remaining hostile and unyielding despite being bloodied.

For both sides to the war what should be inescapable is the harsh reality of continuing human suffering on a chilling scale. Sophisticated and increasingly destructive weaponry such as drones and missiles are being used but they have not brought either side any closer to victory. Instead human misery is being perpetrated mindlessly with a steady deadening of consciences and a flagrant abandoning of reason.

Accordingly, what perceived legitimate aims could drone warfare, for instance, help achieve? It is quite some time since sections of the world community came to realize the futility of violence and war. There is no choice but for humans to recognize and revere the principle of the sacredness of life. A return to fundamentals is imperative.

Continue Reading

Features

Unforgettable experience …

Published

on

The committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK, who made Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance a total success (Photographs by: Praneeth Hettiarachchi)

Singer Rajiv Sebastian has the unique ability to woo an audience and he did just that on his recent trip to London, performing at the Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance.

This particular event of music, nostalgia, and celebration, was organised by the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya Old Girls’ Association – UK, and held at the DoubleTree by Hilton London Elstree, in Borehamwood, on 28th February.

They say the success of the evening was made possible through the dedication and hard work of President Devika Arrawwalage and the committed committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK.

Rajiv Sebastian was in top form, delivering an engaging performance that took the audience on a nostalgic musical journey through the iconic sounds of the’70s.

Doing the first set in full suit, with a fan joining in the action

He did three sets, appearing in three different outfits – suit, the normal shirt and trouser, and the sarong – and the crowd loved it.

Adding to the energy of the event, I’m told, was the music provided by the band Hasthi, made up of Sri Lankan musicians based in the UK.

At the end of a truly enjoyable and memorable event, the organisers had this to say about Rajiv Sebastian’s performance:

“On behalf of the entire team, I want to extend our heartfelt thanks to you for travelling all the way from Sri Lanka to perform at our first ever ABV dinner dance in the UK.

“Your performance was truly the highlight of the night. You have a superb talent for captivating an audience; from the moment you took the stage, your vibrant energy and incredible vocal range completely transformed the atmosphere.

“It was wonderful to see how effortlessly you engaged the crowd, keeping the dance floor packed and everyone in high spirits throughout the evening. You have graced the stage as a guest artiste on three separate occasions, delivering exceptional performances that set you apart from your peers.

“We feel incredibly privileged to have had an artiste of your calibre and charisma join us. You didn’t just provide music; you created an unforgettable experience that people are still talking about.

Surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, as well

“Thank you for sharing your immense gift with us. Hope to see you back on a UK stage very soon!”

Yes, and it’s happening soon; Rajiv says he is off to London again, in mid-April, and will be performing at four different venues.

He also mentioned that he has some surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, when he and his band, The Clan, present their 35th Anniversary concert … in June, this year.

Continue Reading

Trending