Connect with us

News

Tariff shock from 01 April as power costs climb across the board

Published

on

By Ifham Nizam

Electricity consumers will face a fresh financial jolt from 01 April, with the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) approving a countrywide tariff increase that will push up monthly bills across all consumption categories, with the heaviest burden falling on high-end users.

The decision follows a proposal by the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB), which sought a 13.56 percent upward revision for the second quarter of the year, citing mounting operational costs and financial pressures within the power sector.

Under the new tariff structure, even the lowest-income households will not be spared, though the increases at the bottom tiers remain relatively modest. Consumers using between 0–30 units will see a 4.3 percent rise, adding approximately Rs. 15 to their monthly bill. Those in the 31–60 unit bracket will experience a 6.9 percent increase, translating to an additional Rs. 45.

For middle-tier users, the impact becomes more pronounced. Households consuming 61–90 units will pay around Rs. 120 more per month, following a 6.9 percent hike, while those in the 91–120 unit range will face a sharper increase of 7.1 percent, pushing their monthly costs up by about Rs. 420.

However, the steepest escalation is reserved for heavy electricity users. Consumers exceeding 180 units will be hit with a staggering 25 percent increase — the highest adjustment under the latest revision — raising serious concerns over affordability, particularly for urban households and small businesses already grappling with rising living costs.

Energy sector analysts warn that the latest revision signals deeper structural issues within the power sector, including reliance on costly thermal generation, currency pressures, and inefficiencies in energy procurement.

“The burden is gradually shifting toward consumers as the sector struggles to maintain financial stability,” a senior power sector analyst said, noting that repeated tariff adjustments could further strain public tolerance.

The PUCSL maintained that the revision was necessary to ensure the sustainability of electricity supply and to prevent a recurrence of crises that previously led to widespread outages and load shedding. The regulator has also indicated that cost-reflective pricing remains a key policy direction, particularly as global energy markets remain volatile.

The move comes at a time when many households are still adjusting to broader economic pressures, including high food prices and transport costs, raising fears that the tariff hike could have a cascading effect on the cost of living.

Small and medium enterprises, already operating on thin margins, are also expected to feel the pinch, with higher electricity costs likely to feed into production expenses and retail prices.

Despite the increases, questions remain over whether the tariff revision alone will be sufficient to stabilise the financially strained power sector, or if further adjustments — or reforms — may be inevitable in the months ahead.

With electricity demand steadily rising and generation costs remaining unpredictable, consumers now brace for yet another phase of higher utility bills, underscoring the fragile balance between energy security and economic resilience.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Navy seize Indian fishing trawler, nine fishermen poaching in Sri Lankan waters

Published

on

By

The Sri Lanka Navy seized an Indian fishing trawler and apprehended nine Indian fishermen whilst engaged in illegal fishing having crossed the International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL) in Sri Lankan waters North of Talaimannar on Wednesday  (22 July 2026). evening.

Over 50 Indian fishing trawlers had trespassed into the Sri Lankan waters South of Iranativu engaging in illegal fishing. During the operation, one Indian fishing trawler was seized, while nine Indian fishermen on board were taken into custody

The apprehended fishermen and the seized trawler were handed over to the Fisheries Inspector of Mannar for onward legal proceedings.

Continue Reading

News

United Opposition moves to halt interference with judicial independence

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

Leaders of all Opposition parties are scheduled to meet today (23) at the Opposition Leader’s Office, on Sir Marcus Fernando Mawatha, Colombo, to discuss future action against the proposed extension of the retirement age of superior court judges, which, they describe, as growing threats to judicial independence.

The special meeting has been convened by Opposition and SJB Leader Sajith Premadasa amid escalating tensions between the government and the Opposition over issues relating to the judiciary.

According to the Opposition Leader’s Office, the meeting is intended to formulate a collective response to, what it termed, a crisis facing the judicial system, alleging that arbitrary actions by the government have posed a serious challenge to the proper functioning and independence of the judiciary.

Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, former President Maithripala Sirisena, former Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena, Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna National Organiser and MP Namal Rajapaksa, Joint Opposition Convener Prof. G.L. Peiris, and leaders and representatives of all Opposition parties, are expected to attend.

The Opposition Leader’s Office noted that the meeting will mark the first occasion on which Wickremesinghe will visit the Opposition Leader’s Office, since Premadasa assumed office as the Opposition Leader.

The development follows an urgent meeting of Opposition MPs, chaired by Premadasa, at the Opposition Leader’s Office in Parliament yesterday after the government declined to permit a parliamentary debate on matters relating to the judiciary.

Opposition sources said that at the previous Party Leaders’ Meeting, Opposition parties had requested a debate, based on democratic principles, the tripartite system of government, comprising the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary, the separation of powers, and the system of checks and balances. However, the government had not agreed to allocate time for such a discussion.

Opposition MPs argued that issues affecting judicial independence should be openly debated in Parliament and warned that preventing such discussion could undermine democratic governance and accountability.

Addressing the meeting, Premadasa said the refusal to allow a debate on judicial matters was a setback to democratic principles and discussed with MPs the parliamentary and political measures to be pursued in response.

Among those present at yesterday’s meeting were MPs Rohini Wijeratna, Chithral Fernando, V. Radhakrishnan, Chaminda Wijesiri, Gayantha Karunathilaka, J.C. Alawathuwala, Sujith Sanjaya Perera, Kavinda Jayawardana, Chathura Galappaththi, Kabir Hashim, Ravi Karunanayake, M.S.A. Wazeed, Rohana Bandara, W.H.M. Dharmasena, B. Ariyawansa, Dayasiri Jayasekara, Anuradha Jayaratne, Harsha de Silva, Rishad Bathiudeen, Rauff Hakeem, Archchuna Ramanathan, Nizam Kariapper, M.S. Uthumalebbe, Chanaka Madugoda, Suranga Ratnayake and Selvam Adaikkalanathan.

The Opposition meeting today is expected to decide on a coordinated strategy, both inside and outside Parliament, regarding the proposed extension of judges’ retirement age and broader concerns over the independence of the judiciary.

Continue Reading

News

PM labels seven Presidential Houses white elephants ; govt. to make them commercially viable

Published

on

Dr. Amarasuriya

By Saman Indrajith

Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya yesterday told Parliament that the government was considering commercially viable uses for seven Presidential Houses across the country, while continuing to bear the cost of maintaining the properties until such plans are implemented.

Responding to a question raised by Badulla District SJB MP Chaminda Wijesiri, the Prime Minister said Sri Lanka currently has seven Presidential Houses located in Colombo, Kandy, Nuwara Eliya, Kataragama, Anuradhapura, Mahiyangana and Bentota.

She identified the properties as the President’s House on Janadhipathi Mawatha, Colombo 1 and the ones located at Hill Street, Kandy; on Kandy Road, Nuwara Eliya; Kirivehera Road, Kataragama; in Old Town, Anuradhapura; in Mahiyanganaya; and in Bentota.

Providing details of maintenance and repair expenditure incurred on the properties from 2018 to date, Dr. Amarasuriya said the Government had spent Rs. 125 million in 2018, Rs. 77.2 million in 2019, Rs. 34.7 million in 2020, Rs. 28.8 million in 2021, Rs. 25.6 million in 2022, Rs. 37.4 million in 2023, Rs. 24.4 million in 2024 and Rs. 10.5 million in 2025.

Expenditure for the first six months of 2026 amounted to Rs. 3.04 million, she said.

The Prime Minister said a committee had been appointed in terms of a Cabinet paper submitted by the Ministry of Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government and a subsequent Cabinet decision to examine options for the future use of the properties.

She said the committee had already submitted its recommendations, which include converting the premises into commercially viable ventures.

According to the Prime Minister, some former Presidential residences have already been converted into courthouses, while others are expected to be used for economically productive purposes.

“The government has to spend funds to maintain Presidential palaces until they are put to economically viable use,” Dr. Amarasuriya told Parliament.

Continue Reading

Trending