Connect with us

Editorial

Thus spake Prez

Published

on

Monday 06th November, 2023

President Ranil Wickremesinghe, on Friday (03), flayed the western bloc for its double standards on human rights. Speaking at a ceremony to mark the opening of a new court complex in Welimada, he said that all nations had to abide by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. He pointed out the absurdity of the western nations adopting different approaches to human rights issues in Gaza and Sri Lanka.

Whoever would have thought a few years ago that Wickremesinghe would ever tear into the western members of the international community in this manner? It may be recalled that he used to draw heavy flak from his political opponents, especially the Rajapaksas and their cronies, for being subservient to the western powers.

The SLPP politicians and the nationalistic forces that back them berated him when the Yahapalana government, on his watch as the Prime Minister, co-sponsored a UNHRC resolution which called for a probe into alleged war crimes in Sri Lanka. On listening to him on Friday, one may have wondered whether the Rajapaksa’s Medamulana Chinthanaya had rubbed off on him. But his criticism of the West is nuanced and tempered with finesse.

President Wickremesinghe reiterated Sri Lanka’s position on the Gaza conflict and Palestine. Pointing out that Sri Lanka had condemned the Hamas incursion into Israel on 07 October and recognised Israel’s right to self-defence, he said Israel had to act within the confines of internal law. He reaffirmed Sri Lanka’s support for Palestine’s statehood while denouncing terrorism.

The home truths President Wickremesinghe came up with on Friday, for the consumption of the West are of interest, but what is of greater import is how, he thinks, Sri Lanka should prepare a strong defence to be presented in Geneva next year in the context of the ongoing war in Gaza and the reprehensible response of the US-led western bloc to Israel’s disproportionate counteroffensive and the resultant humanitarian crisis. The US has passed a 14.3-billion-dollar military aid package for Israel while thousands of Palestinians are perishing in Israeli attacks in Gaza.

Asking the proponents of the UNHRC resolutions against Sri Lanka to come to Geneva with clean hands, President Wickremesinghe asked rhetorically why Sri Lanka should answer questions posed by anyone whose hands were not clean. He stressed, in the same breath, the need for Sri Lanka also to go there with clean hands and implement the agreement reached between President Mahinda Rajapaksa and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in 2009.

It was obvious that his reference was to President Rajapaksa’s undertaking to implement the 13th Amendment, among other things, although he chose to leave that unsaid. According to a joint statement issued by the UN and the government of Sri Lanka soon after the defeat of the LTTE in May 2009, ‘President Rajapaksa expressed his firm resolve to proceed with the implementation of the 13th Amendment ….”

The purpose of the clean hands doctrine is to protect the integrity of a court of law and ensure that those who seek equitable relief do not have a history of misconduct in the matter they are bringing to the court, as it would be unfair to grant them equitable remedies if they themselves have engaged in wrongdoing. Sri Lanka is likely to try to invoke the doctrine of clean hands in Geneva next year.

President Wickremesinghe said: “So, I thought I would ask the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Foreign Affairs, together with the Attorney General and our permanent representative at the UN, to consult international legal opinions on this … why shouldn’t it apply to the Human Rights Council?” The UNHRC may not be a court or a tribunal or a quasi-judicial body technically, but the principle of clean hands, one may argue, should apply to it as well, for its resolutions and decisions could have legal consequences and even serve as the basis for economic sanctions.

President Wickremesinghe seems to think that when Sri Lanka prepares its defence vis-à-vis the hostile human rights campaign against it in Geneva, it could also make use of the fundamental tenet in international relations, advocated by the US and its allies—the rules-based order. This guiding principle or the foundational concept, which has gained currency in the world, where sadly the law of the jungle has become the norm, basically means a shared commitment by all countries to conducting their activities in accordance with agreed rules that evolve over time, such as international law, regional security arrangements, trade agreements, immigration protocols, and cultural arrangements. President Wickremesinghe said: “We are all for the rules-based order … but then the rules must apply to everyone. It can’t apply to some and not to others.”

President Wickremesinghe’s arguments about the western double standards on human rights and Sri Lanka’s right to ask the critics of its human rights record to prove that they have clean hands and respect the so-called rules-based order are logical and tenable. But the world powers are impervious to reason and do not care a tinker’s cuss about justice and fair play when they further their interests. They have turned the entire UN system into ‘a cesspool of political bias’, which is the phrase used by US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, to describe the UNHRC while announcing her country’s dramatic exit from it, in 2018.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial

Danger of weak drug regulation

Published

on

Monday 22nd December, 2025

Maan Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the manufacturer of Ondansetron, which has been withdrawn from hospitals here pending a probe, is reported to have asked the Sri Lankan health authorities to have the drug tested by an internationally accredited laboratory. The use of nine other Maan products too has been suspended in Sri Lanka over quality concerns. Maan’s reaction has come as no surprise; all companies ardently defend their products. However, its concerns should be heeded. The National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) and the Ministry of Health ought to furnish irrefutable evidence in support of their decision to suspend the use of the drugs at issue. The manner in which the NMRA has carried out its duties and functions, especially granting approval for drugs and investigating complaints of their quality, over the years, does not inspire public trust.

The subtext of what has been reported of the Maan’s letter to the Sri Lankan health authorities is worth taking note of. It can be argued that in corporate newspeak, Maan has questioned the competence of the NMRA to test its products. As Maan would have us believe that its products meet international standards, it should be asked to state whether it has gained access to stringent regulatory destinations, such as the US and EU, and, if not, why.

It is being argued in some quarters that the degradation of pharmaceuticals can happen due to improper storage and transport. Maan’s aforesaid letter reportedly has reference to drug storage here. There are allegations that the Sri Lankan health authorities leave imported drugs in freight containers under inappropriate conditions for extended periods. However, the phials of Ondansetron which were tested at the Kandy National Hospital and found to be affected by microbial contamination had been stored properly and their seals were intact, according to media reports, quoting doctors. Thus, the contamination of the drug points to issues in manufacturing and packaging rather than storage and transport.

Meanwhile, a news item in this newspaper today reveals the pivotal importance the pharmaceutical industry has assumed in the Indian economy; India’s pharmaceutical exports have crossed USD 30 billion. Therefore, some critics of the Indian pharmaceutical products are of the view that India will do everything in its power to protect the interests of its drug companies, including Maan. But the fact remains that India itself has cracked down on some of its pharmaceutical companies involved in scandals. It severely dealt with the Indian companies that manufactured contaminated cough syrups which killed 66 children in Gambia in 2022 and 22 children in India in September 2025.

In the greed-driven corporate world, profits take precedence over human life, and there is hardly anything that Big Pharma spares in pursuing profit maximisation. As we pointed out in a previous comment, the World Health Organization has revealed that at least one in 10 medical products in low-and middle-income countries fails to meet quality standards or is falsified. This shows the enormity of the problem of fake and substandard drugs. Hence the need for robust mechanisms to protect patients.

All issues related to substandard and falsified drugs and their adverse effects in this country boil down to the failure of successive governments to address multiple problems pertaining to drug regulation and testing and find long-term solutions. Flaws in regulatory oversight and the absence of proper testing facilities have helped corrupt politicians and bureaucrats enrich themselves by turning this country into a dumping ground for poor-quality and fake medicines. Health Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa himself has said that not all drugs approved by the NMRA undergo rigorous testing, and thorough tests are conducted on drugs only when there are complaints about their quality.

Most of all, the NMRA has to be cleansed, as a national priority. Its history is replete with numerous scandals, including allegations of corrupt drug registrations, data manipulation, issues with substandard and fake medicines leading to patient deaths prompting investigations, suspensions, legal action, and internal turmoil with officials resigning amidst claims of threats and cover-ups.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Misplaced priorities

Published

on

Sri Lanka has a very ‘promising’ government and a perennially protesting Opposition. The government makes various promises, which are like piecrusts made to be broken. The Opposition in a perpetual state of agitation bursts into protests at the drop of a hat. The two sides have been clashing in Parliament instead of sinking their political differences and cooperating at least in the aftermath of a disaster.

The Opposition has requested Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne to appoint a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to probe the government’s alleged failure to mitigate the impact of Cyclone Ditwah despite repeated warnings issued by the Meteorology Department and the Irrigation Department. The government is determined to avoid a fate similar to that which befell the Yahapalana government following the Easter Sunday terror attacks, which became the undoing of that dysfunctional regime. It is therefore very unlikely to meet the Opposition’s demand at issue. Even if it agrees to appoint a PSC to probe its own alleged lapses, by any chance, it will not allow an Opposition MP to chair the committee and will go all out to frustrate its rivals’ efforts to ruin its political future.

Interestingly, some of the key Opposition members are former Yahapalana MPs who sought to derail a PSC probe into the 2015 Treasury bond scam. They craftily appointed a member of the JVP, which was a Yahapalana partner in all but name, as the Chairman of that PSC, and incorporated a slew of footnotes into the committee report in a bid to dilute it.

In this country, PSCs rarely help get to the bottom of the issues they probe. The PSC on the Treasury bond scam went out of its way to clear the then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe’s name, and helped the UNP scapegoat former Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran and throw him to the wolves. In 2012, Mahinda Rajapaksa government turned a PSC probe into a witch-hunt against then Chief Justice Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake, who was subsequently wrongfully impeached. The PSC that investigated the Easter Terror attacks (2019) gathered a lot of valuable information but its findings, conclusions and recommendations were tainted by a glaring political bias.

Going by the government’s determined bid to let its MP Asoka Ranwala off the hook, following a road accident, how ruthless the JVP-led NPP will be in warding off threats to its political survival is not difficult to imagine. The Opposition can go on shouting until it is blue in the face but it will not be able to have the government’s alleged failure to heed disaster warnings and save lives investigated properly as long as the JVP/NPP is in power.

What we are witnessing on the political front, especially in Parliament, is like a drunken brawl at a funeral. The government and the Opposition are fighting while the country is mourning those who perished in recent floods and landslides.

What the political parties represented in Parliament ought to do at this juncture is to get their priorities right. They must stop clashing and make a concerted effort to carry out post-disaster rebuilding operations and strengthening the economy. They must not lose sight of the rapid depreciation of the rupee, and the disconcerting forecasts of an economic slowdown. The much-advertised revenue bubble, created by an unprecedented increase in vehicle imports, is about to burst, and the possibility of the country having a rupee crisis to contend with again cannot be ruled out. Foreign reserve targets are far from achieved, and there is a pressing need to boost the forex inflow and ensure that the country will be able to honour its pledge to resume foreign debt repayment in 2028.

All political parties have done precious little for the disaster victims. They have been only visiting the welfare centres and distributing relief materials collected from the considerate public. They ought to engage in post-disaster rebuilding actively. Reconstruction is a labour-intensive task. The self-righteous political leaders should mobilise their community level organisation for post-disaster rebuilding. Sadly, they have not even helped clean flood-hit houses.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Cops as whipping boys?

Published

on

Saturday 20th December, 2025

Disciplinary action has reportedly been taken against several police officers for their alleged failure to conduct a proper investigation into a recent accident caused by NPP MP Asoka Ranwala in Sapugaskanda. This move, we believe, has the trappings of a diversionary tactic. The police would have incurred the wrath of the government if they had conducted a breathalyzer test on Ranwala and produced him before a Judicial Medical Officer immediately after the crash where an infant, his mother and grandmother were injured.

Ranwala was subjected to a blood alcohol test more than 12 hours after the accident, according to media reports. The police would not have dragged their feet of their own volition. They were obviously made to do what they did. The law applies equally only to ordinary people. Will the police top brass explain why no disciplinary action was taken against the police officers who unashamedly sided with a group of JVP members involved in grabbing an office of the Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) in Yakkala in September 2025. After turning a blind eye to that blatant transgression, the police provided security to the JVP members who were forcibly occupying the FSP office. Thankfully, a judicial intervention made them leave the place. The current rulers claim they have not placed themselves above the law, unlike their predecessors. A wag says they have placed the law below them instead!

Having made a mockery of its much-advertised commitment to upholding the rule of law by intervening to prevent Ranwala from undergoing an alcohol test immediately after the aforesaid accident, the government is making attempts at face-saving. Curiously, blood samples obtained from Ranwala have been sent to the Government Analyst for testing! The government seems to have a very low opinion of the intelligence of the public, who voted for it overwhelmingly, expecting a ‘system change’.

It is being argued in some quarters that the disciplinary inquiry against the police officers has been scripted, and the charges against them will be dropped when the issue fizzles out. This argument is not without some merit, but there is a possibility of the government going to the extent of trying to clear its name at the expense of the police officers concerned if push comes to shove.

Successive governments have scapegoated police personnel and other state employees to safeguard their interests, and the incumbent administration is no exception; it has already sought to shift the blame for its failure to mitigate the impact of Cyclone Ditwah to the Meteorological Department, which, it has claimed, did not warn it about the extreme weather events fairly in advance. Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa told Parliament on Thursday that the government had muzzled some senior officials of the Meteorological Department.

Some leaders of the incumbent government are bound to face legal action for their commissions and omissions when they lose power, and the state officials pandering to their whims and fancies will have to do likewise.

The public officials who are at the beck and call of politicians and carry out illegal orders should realise that they run the risk of being left without anyone to turn to in case they have to face legal action for their transgressions. Their ruthlessly self-seeking political masters will not scruple to sacrifice them.

Continue Reading

Trending