Features
The Great Pope Francis: A Personal Reflection
The resignation of Pope Benedict XVI in February 2013 sent shockwaves through the global community, breaking an eight-century precedent of papal tenure ending only with death. This extraordinary departure from tradition invites reflection on the remarkable evolution of the Catholic Church’s highest office during the modern era.
Following the contentious pontificate of Pope Pius XII (1939-1958) during World War II, the College of Cardinals elected the elderly Cardinal Giovanni Roncalli as Pope John XXIII (1958-1963). Many anticipated a caretaker papacy of minimal consequence. Instead, this supposedly transitional figure stunned the world by convening the Second Vatican Council, which gathered religious leaders from across the Catholic world in an unprecedented assembly. Vatican II catalyzed a sweeping liberalization of Church practices, fostering interfaith dialogue, emphasizing social justice, and revolutionizing liturgical traditions in ways previously unimaginable.
After John XXIII’s death, Pope Paul VI (1963-1978) inherited and completed the Council’s ambitious agenda. More significantly, he transformed the papacy’s global presence by becoming the first pontiff to embrace air travel, embarking on international journeys that redefined papal engagement with the faithful worldwide. His successor, Pope John Paul I, seemed poised to continue this progressive trajectory before his unexpected death just 33 days into his pontificate. The subsequent election of Karol Wojtyla as Pope John Paul II in 1978 marked another watershed moment. This charismatic Polish pontiff became a formidable geopolitical figure who helped precipitate Communism’s collapse while energizing Catholic youth movements globally.
When John Paul II’s trusted advisor Cardinal Ratzinger ascended as Pope Benedict XVI, this conservative restoration continued, culminating in his historic resignation—a final, unexpected transformation of an office that had repeatedly defied expectations throughout the modern era.
In 2013, the Church faced an evident need for renewal. Following Pope Benedict’s unprecedented resignation, the election of Argentinian Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio proved equally astonishing. His selection of the regnal name “Francis,” honoring the humble saint of Assisi, signaled forthcoming departures from convention. The new pontiff immediately distinguished himself when, before offering his first papal blessing to the multitudes gathered in St. Peter’s Square, he requested their prayers—an inversion of protocol without precedent in papal history. This gesture heralded the emergence of a pontiff characterized by joy, humility, and intellectual openness, who demonstrated resolute determination to reform ecclesiastical traditions incongruous with contemporary realities. Remarkably, until his death on April 22, 2025, Pope Francis maintained this distinctive pastoral approach throughout his twelve-year pontificate, preserving the refreshing ecclesiastical vision that defined his papal identity from its inception.
I was a teenager, when Pope Francis was made Pope. Like most youth, I followed his progress via Rome Reports, as well as the Pope’s own Social Media accounts. Throughout his papacy, Pope Francis maintained unwavering advocacy for social justice, consistently centering marginalized communities in Church priorities. His rhetoric and policies regarding refugees, migrants, and victims of economic inequality represented a profound recommitment to Catholic social teaching. This emphasis manifested through personal example—washing refugees’ feet, visiting impoverished communities, and challenging political leaders to create more equitable systems.
The pontiff’s dedication to ecumenical and inter-religious dialogue yielded unprecedented diplomatic breakthroughs. His historical meetings with Orthodox patriarchs, Anglican leaders, and representatives from Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism fostered mutual understanding that transcended centuries of religious division. These initiatives reflected Francis’s conviction that peaceful co-existence demanded respectful engagement across faith traditions.
Internal Vatican reforms under Francis’s leadership were equally significant. He restructured Church governance to enhance transparency, appointed unprecedented numbers of women and laypeople to positions of authority, and decentralized decision-making processes. His introduction of synodality—encouraging collective discernment through broader consultation with clergy and laity alike—represented a fundamental shift toward a more participatory ecclesiastical model.
Francis confronted the Church’s darkest crisis with unprecedented candor, acknowledging clerical abuse through formal apologies to survivors and implementing institutional safeguards to prevent future abuses. His global diplomatic engagement extended Catholic influence into conflict zones such as Ukraine-Russian war and Gaza, and international policy discussions, where he consistently advocated for peaceful resolution and humanitarian priorities. Perhaps, one of the greatest’s contributions of Pope Francis was his strong commitment for the environment and its conservation. His monumental encyclical Laudato Si advocates for the urgent action for the environment and addresses ecological and social issues stressing on sustainable lifestyle as well as responsible economic development.
Perhaps most distinctively, Francis’s pontificate was characterized by profound personal humility. His rejection of papal palatial quarters, preference for modest transportation, and spontaneous interactions with ordinary faithful dismantled barriers between the papacy and the people. This accessibility, combined with his vision of “a poor Church for the poor,” reoriented Catholic priorities toward servant leadership. His enduring legacy lies in having renewed the Church’s prophetic voice on contemporary issues while maintaining its foundational spiritual mission.
The accomplishments outlined above represent only a fraction of the many significant undertakings during the twelve-year pontificate of Pope Francis. Among these, one personal account merits documentation, both as a testament to the Pope’s spiritual influence and for the benefit of the public record. When Pope Francis announced his intention to visit Sri Lanka in early 2015, the news was met with widespread enthusiasm and joy, not only among Catholics but also among individuals of other faiths.
At the time, I had just completed my Ordinary Level examinations and was enjoying a well-earned break. Nationally, the political landscape had undergone a major transformation, with the conclusion of the decade-long regime of President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the election of President Maithripala Sirisena under the banner of the newly formed Yahapalana government. This period was marked by a renewed sense of hope and optimism across the country, making it a particularly poignant moment for a Papal visit to our island nation.
The principal purpose of Pope Francis’ visit was the canonization of St. Joseph Vaz, Sri Lanka’s first saint, as well as a pilgrimage to the Shrine of Our Lady of Madhu in the northern region of the country. Although I was still a teenager, I had already developed a keen interest in both history and ecclesiastical affairs. Motivated by this interest, I authored a short article for The Messenger, focusing on the history of Papal visits to Sri Lanka, with particular emphasis on the visits of Pope Paul VI in 1970 and Pope John Paul II in 1995. I also shared reflections on Pope Francis and the potential impact his visit might have on Sri Lanka. This article was published on January 11, 2015.
When Pope Francis arrived at Katunayake on January 13, 2015, he was received with a brief but dignified welcoming ceremony attended by the newly elected President Sirisena. Following the formalities, the Pope commenced his journey along the Negombo Road aboard the Popemobile, proceeding at a deliberate pace while warmly acknowledging the thousands of faithful who had gathered on either side of the route to greet him. Despite the heat and humidity of that sunny morning, the 78-year-old Pontiff displayed remarkable vitality and endurance throughout this physically demanding procession. I, along with a few relatives, made our way to Wattala to witness this historic moment. To our great fortune, we were able to catch a clear and close view of the Holy Father and even managed to capture a photograph of him—an image that remains a treasured memento of that day. The following day marked the canonization of Fr. Joseph Vaz, held at Galle Face Green. In anticipation of the event, most roads in Colombo were closed, underscoring the magnitude of the occasion.
My entire family and I were among the vast congregation—estimated to be at least half a million strong—that gathered for the solemn and joyous celebration. A beautifully constructed altar had been erected for the occasion, and following the canonization, the Pope once again traversed the grounds, offering his greetings to the faithful in attendance. As a teenager firmly rooted in my Christian faith, witnessing the canonization and experiencing the presence of the Pope was a profoundly meaningful and formative moment. Though Pope Francis delivered his homily in English—a language in which he is not fluent—his words were nonetheless deeply moving and spiritually resonant.
When we returned home, my father received a phone call from his office. My father’s immediate response was that it was perhaps the best call he had ever received. Since the early 90s he had been working for SriLankan Airlines and was by then a Leading Cabin Crew Member. His superiors had selected him along with a few of his colleagues to accompany the Pope to Manila, Philippines in the SriLankan Airlines flight on January 15, 2015, as the Pope planned a 3-day visit there after Sri Lanka. This was an honour only a few would receive in their lifetimes, to closely travel and serve the Pope for nearly ten straight hours. As my father planned for this flight, the silly young me asked him to take my newspaper cutting of the Pope’s article so he could read it. My father did not refuse but asked me not to expect anything!
On the following day, Pope Francis departed for Manila, boarding the papal aircraft after a solemn and dignified farewell ceremony at the airport. My father, who was among those present, recalled that the Holy Father, even in the privacy of that setting, remained remarkably affable, serene, and gracious. After a simple meal, he warmly greeted and engaged in conversation with both the crew members and the pilots, offering each a moment of personal connection. In a fleeting yet unforgettable moment, my father too was granted an audience with the Pope—a brief exchange immortalized not by a personal photograph, which was not permitted, but by the official papal photographer. Hours into the journey, my father remembered the “small request.” Approaching the Pope’s secretary—who was seated beside the Pontiff—my father offered the article, enclosed within a folio. As is often the case with protocol, the secretary politely but firmly responded, “Unfortunately, the Holy Father is busy.” However, in a moment that revealed the Pope’s extraordinary attentiveness and humility, he overheard the exchange and requested the folio be handed to him.
Though the article was written by a teenager and, in hindsight, may seem rather unrefined, Pope Francis read it in its entirety. With a gentle smile, he turned to my father and inquired whether he might acknowledge the piece. Then, in a gesture as graceful as it was unexpected, the Pope removed his black ink pen and signed the article in his native Spanish: Franciscus, 15.1.2015.Before returning the folio, he also offered several gifts—tokens of affection and goodwill. Among them were a rosary, a commemorative medal, and a signed photograph inscribed with a simple yet moving directive: “Give this to your son.” When my father returned home and handed me these cherished items, I was overcome with awe and gratitude. The Pope, by no means obligated to engage with such a small request, had instead transformed it into a moment of lasting grace. I kept this remarkable testimony to myself for ten years, but now when the world reflects on the glorious years of Pope Francis, I thought this may be worth recording,
I am certain there are countless other narratives like mine—testimonies of kindness, humility, and quiet greatness that define Pope Francis. But for me, this singular act of thoughtfulness stands as an enduring emblem of his extraordinary humanity and spiritual generosity. I never saw or heard anything very personal of the Pope again. However, for the next ten years, I followed his work, especially his stance on Global issues. Not for one moment did he differ to his principles and style. Thus, when his death on Easter Morning was announced over the news, I too felt his loss terribly. Pope Francis’s legacy is one of luminous compassion, courageous reform, and unwavering fidelity to the Gospel’s call for justice and mercy. In an age of cynicism and division, he embodied the Church’s tender heart. His was a pontificate not of grandeur, but of grace—marked by simplicity, humility, and a love that embraced the whole world.
by Avishka Mario Senewiratne
Editor, The Ceylon Journal
Features
‘There are no private universities in Sri Lanka’ – some considerations for higher education reform
Academics involved in education policy like to say that there is no such thing as a private university in Sri Lanka. The only ‘universities’ in the country are state universities; anything else offering degrees is a private higher education institution (HEI). This position is technically accurate. Yet, in the discourse and imagination of the public, private universities are very real – people teach in them, students register in them, families pay fees, and such degree holders enter job markets in Sri Lanka and outside.
For decades, activists concerned for public higher education have ignored or resisted looking at private HEIs, as if such scrutiny would taint them. Others have worked in both types of institutions, carrying practices from each to the other. The apex body governing state universities, the UGC, has, meanwhile, ignored the concept of conflict of interest and appointed individuals in private higher education in committees and leadership positions. It is unsurprising then that some of the ideologies informing private higher education appear in reform agendas in the state sector.
This is a good time then to consider the varying types of private HEIs around us, and to take a look at some of the issues within them in the hope that higher education reform agendas will include private, as well as state higher education.
What is a ‘private university’?
First, some clarifications. In the public imaginary, a ‘private university’ is typically an institution that provides a foreign or local degree for which the student makes a payment. But this broad classification encompasses a host of diverse institutions and types of degrees which I detail below.
The Non-State Higher Education Division (NSHE) of the Ministry of Education has recognised 295 degrees by 32 institutions. Most of these are private companies and include a handful of established, well-known private HEIs that are ‘university like’. The degrees are local degrees conferred by the institutions accredited by the NSHE Division. While private HEIs conferring local degrees must be accredited by the NSHE Division, there appears to be no legal consequence for not doing so. In addition, there are several permutations of the private degree that miss the net of this Division and the Standing Committee on Accreditation and Quality Assurance (SCAQA) that assists this Division.
For one, degrees conferred by foreign universities offered, via these same private HEIs, are not vetted by the NSHE Division. Secondly, there is a growing plethora of private HEIs which have either no physical presence locally or only a dubious presence. The University Grants Commission has notified the public, through their website, that foreign universities listed in the Commonwealth Universities Yearbook and the World Higher Education Database are recognised, but refrained from giving any other details – which degrees? Offered by what modes? These details are not known. Some of the foreign universities in the lists may be legitimate entities in their own land but the degrees conferred locally, in their name, may not adhere to curriculum or teaching specifications of the NSHE Division or the UGC.
Another troubling phenomenon is the ‘top up degree’, which appears to work on the same principle as that of a pre-paid mobile connection: if I have a Diploma or an HND of a sort, I am eligible to complete a course of study which provides me with a degree, usually from a foreign university. The idea that someone who does not initially qualify for a degree programme should be able to work their way towards one is a progressive notion. This is the concept that open and distance learning (ODL) was based on initially, but which is now sadly exploited. ODL models are expected to provide opportunity for learning for those who may be excluded from traditional learning institutions. In Sri Lanka, however, we have seen ODL become a marketplace offering easy to obtain, for-fee qualifications by institutions with little commitment to superior teaching and learning.
Finally, a perusal of the many types of private HEIs and their varied degrees bring to mind another question – how should the private degrees, provided by state institutions (that are not educational institutions), be regulated? Who should do so?
All of these create a host of problems for the public – for hopeful students and parents and trusting employers. For the higher education sector, recruitment of academic staff, too, has become difficult due to this plethora of ambiguous higher education qualifications, as I discussed in a previous Kuppi article (‘Recruiting academics to state universities’).
Some issues in private HEIs – a bellwether for change in state universities
In this second part of this article, I will discuss some aspects of work in private HEIs – albeit the more established institutions – given that such issues may appear in reform agendas in future.
Across state universities, all permanent staff of a specific category are paid according to the same criteria. The picture is not so clear when it comes to private HEIs since they are different entities legally, typically companies. Private HEIs have salary scales and financial incentives that are different to each other. The more established private HEIs reportedly have attractive renumeration packages, possibly a reason for academics of state universities migrating eagerly to such institutions during sabbatical years and on retirement. This may not of course be the case with other less established, or improperly registered HEIs of which we know little. Academic staff of these more accepted private HEIs seem to value the high financial remuneration they receive (in comparison to state universities) as something that makes their work rewarding.
Attractive remuneration is important to sustain the good life and is at times seen as the institution’s way of encouraging good work. Yet, this has implications for the future of the institution: to continue to deliver on promised financial packages, institutions must continue to have large profit margins. One strategy has been to enroll multiple cohorts of students per year, even up to three or four intakes per year. This can result in exploitative work conditions, since staff must cater to all these cohorts in that same year. If there is inadequate staff, employees are further burdened. On the other hand, if there is a sudden drop in enrolments (degrees can go out of fashion) unexpected layoffs occur. Similar to other sectors that employ short-term contract staff – including state universities – in private HEIs, too, individual teachers, who are on short term contracts that need regular renewal, can feel pressured to work under difficult or exploitative conditions.
At the same time, even in the more established private HEIs, work norms differ from those of state universities in that they include promotional work that keeps the institution’s name in the eye of the public. The Marketing (or similarly named) unit comes up in conversations as one of the most important departments. It appears to weigh in on decision-making related to the number of staff, the amount of re-sits per exams, and other pedagogically important matters. This is a worrying example of how financial rationales interfere with pedagogically or academically sound processes, resulting in problematic results in the classroom. On the plus side, junior colleagues, who had experience in both state and private HEIs, also felt that they faced less harassment in private HEIs – primarily due to the private HEIs ability to take swift action in reported cases of harassment. This is a real indictment on state institutions and their reluctance to address chronic issues of harassment in our universities.
Yet, while we hear much about problems in state universities, we hardly hear of problems that staff in private HEIs face. One rationale for a lack of public expressions by staff is that expressions of discontent might lead to trouble given the importance of reputation for private HEIs. The worry about reputational damage is a growing concern in state universities, too, as evidenced by social media policies and internal conversations on reputational damage, consequent to negative publicity. Institutional worries of reputational damage are harmful in the long run since these impact not only freedom of expression by student and staff, but also research that is possible in and about the education sector.
Some thoughts at the end…
A close look at the private higher education sector is important given its strong presence in the country. Impending reform needs to regulate this diverse array of higher education offerings in the private sector, as well as the state institutions that offer privately-funded options of higher education (a topic for a separate Kuppi on its own). It is time we carefully considered how to build a whole system of higher education out of this broken mess.
Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.
Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.
Features
Ready for solo spotlight
Singer Nish Peiris is set to take the next big step in her music journey.
The talented vocalist, who has been seen and heard in the scene here for a short while, and was also featured with the now-defunct band, Inner Vision, has announced that she will be fully committing to her solo career, after completing her degree this year.
“I’m finishing my degree this year, and after that I’ll be fully committing to my solo music career,” Nish told The Island.
“I’ve already got a few tours lined up for next year, so I’m really excited for what’s ahead.”
Fans, no doubt, will remember Nish for her smooth voice and stage presence, and the good news is that she is now ready to chart her own path and bring new music to audiences at home and abroad.
With tours already planned for 2027, the year 2026 promises to be an exciting year for the young artiste as she steps into the spotlight on her own.
We wish Nish every success in this new chapter!
Features
Exclusive musical evening for Sri Lankans in Toronto
While Sri Lankan music lovers, in Dubai, are eagerly looking forward to being a part of the action on Saturday, 25th July, with Rajiv Sebastian in the limelight, Sri Lankans, in Toronto, Canada, are equally excited and are anxiously awaiting the arrival of Sri Lanka’s famous singer/entertainer Sohan Weerasinghe.
Having done the needful with The X-Periments, the legendary performer has now embarked on an exciting new chapter – a solo career – and Toronto, Canada, will see him do the needful, on Friday, 31st July, 2026, from 8.00 pm to 12.00 am, at the Angus Glen Golf Club.
Reports indicate that it’s a ‘sold out’ event – naturally with Sohan in the spotlight.
Having built his reputation through years of unforgettable performances, and hits that became part of our musical fabric, Sohan is ready to bring his own vision, sound, and stories directly to the audience, in Toronto, Canada, backed by the phenomenal Toronto Ceymphony Live Band.
Says Gamini Hemalal, who has been instrumental in reviving the Sri Lankan entertainment scene, in that part of the world:
“The countdown begins for the most exclusive musical event of the summer! Join us for a premium night of incredible music, elite hospitality, and a lavish buffet as the legendary Sohan Weerasinghe takes the stage live in Toronto!
“This is a high-end event, designed for those who appreciate exceptional entertainment and great food.”
Gamini, who is also a member of the Toronto Ceymphony Live Band, mentioned that it’s going to be an intimate musical evening with the celebrated Sohan Weerasinghe.
From packed auditoriums to intimate shows, Sohan continues to prove why he remains one of Sri Lanka’s most beloved entertainers.
For decades, Sohan Weerasinghe has been a household name in Sri Lankan entertainment.
Known for his captivating smooth voice and charismatic stage presence, Canada will experience it all on Friday, 31st July.
Next on the list of events, Gamini Hemal is working on, is Halloween night and he says “what we plan to do will be very interesting and unique … with a surprise guest star, as well!”
-
Business2 days ago‘Giving up was never an option’: The fisherman who fought back after losing millions in SL
-
Features2 days agoTwo memorable excerpts from a former SLAF commander’s memoir
-
Latest News3 days agoDavis cup Asia/Oceania Group IV 2026 to be held in Colombo from 20th to 25th July
-
Features2 days agoErdoğan’s New Republic
-
Life style2 days agoTaste of the Swiss Alps comes to Colombo
-
Features6 days agoDirty Money
-
News3 days agoDengue outbreak gallops ahead: Infections surpasses 73,455, leaving 50 dead
-
News3 days agoEvidence recorded in money laundering case against Yoshitha Rajapaksa





