Connect with us

News

SLPP’s opposition to privatisation and restructuring discarded: Mahinda, too, votes for Electricity (Amendment) Bill

Published

on

Mahinda Rajapaksa Ranil Wickremesinghe

Over a dozen SJB MPs, Maithripala skip vote

By Shamindra Ferdinando

In spite of differences between President Ranil Wickremesinghe and the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) over the latter’s call for early General Election, a consensus seems to be emerging on the overall political strategy with the ruling party voting for the Sri Lanka Electricity Amendment Bill, political sources say.

The SLPP has so far declined to officially endorse Ranil Wickremesinghe candidature at the forthcoming Presidential Election though several members publicly supported the UNP leader.

SLPP leader Mahinda Rajapaksa, in spite of publicly declaring his opposition to the government privatization and restructuring plan, voted for the Bill along with his elder brother Chamal Rajapaksa, MP, his son, Shashendra Rajapaksa and General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam, who recently warned of the SLPP withdrawing support to the government.

However, SLPP National List MP Namal Rajapaksa skipped the vote. Namal Rajapaksa was among about 10 SLPPers absent at the time of the voting.

During the debate JJB MP Vijitha Herath declared that the Bill was enacted to pave the way for the Adanis.

The Supreme Court determined the Bill as a whole is inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by the special majority of Parliament required under Article 84 (2). This inconsistency shall however cease if Clause 1(2) and Clause 1(3) were amended, the SC declared.

Political sources said that the SLPP’s stand was surprising against the backdrop of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s declaration on May 12 that the privatization and restructuring programme of the government should he stopped, pending the conclusion of the Presidential Poll later this year.

The following MPs voted for the Bill: Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena, Leader of the House Susil Premjayantha, Bandula Gunawardena, Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, Gamini Lokuge, Rear Admiral (retd.) Sarath Weerasekera, Major (retd.) Pradeep Undugoda, Premanath C. Dolawatte, Madura Withanage, Nalin Fernando, Lasantha Alagiyawanna, A.H.M. Fowzie (SJB), Indika Anuruddha, Sisira Jayakody, Prasanna Ranaweera, Nimal Lanza, Kokila Harshani Gunawardena, Milan Jayatilleke, Upul Mahendra Rajapaksa, Sahan Pradeep Vithana, Vudura Wickremanayake, Piyal Nishantha de Silva, Anupa Pasqual, Rohitha Abeygunawardena, Sanjeewa Edirimanne, Lalith Warnakumara Manju, Dilum Amunugama, Lohan Ratwatte, Anuradha Jayarathna, Mahindananda Aluthgamage, Pramitha Bandara Tennakoon, Rohana Dissanayake, Janaka Bandara Tennakoon, Nalaka Bandara Kottegoda, Jeevan Thondaman, S.B. Dissanayake, C. B. Ratnayake, M. Rameshwaram, Ramesh Pathirana, Manusha Nanayakkara, Mohan de Silva, Geetha Kumarasinghe, Sampath Atukorale, Isuru Dodangoda, Kanchana Wijesekera, D.V. Chanaka, Ajith Rajapaksha, Chamal Rajapaksha, Douglas Devananda, Carder Masthan, Seevanesathurai Chandrakanthan, Wimalaweera Dissanayake, S.M.M. Musharaff, D. Weerasinghe, Kapila Nuwan Atukorale, Mahinda Rajapaksa, D. B. Herath, Shantha Bandara, Johnston Fernando, U.K. Sumith Udukumbura, Samanpriya Herath, Anura Priyadarshana Yapa, Ashoka Priyantha, Priyankara Jayaratne, Ali Sabri Raheem, Shehan Semasinghe, S.M. Chandrasena, S. C. Muthukumarana, M. G. Weerasena, Siripala Gamlath, Jagath Samarawickrema, Nimal Siripala de Silva, Thenuka Vidanagamage, A Aravinda Kumar, Janaka Tissakuttiarachchi, Major (retd) Sudarshana Denipitiya, Vijitha Berugoda, Shashendra Rajapaksha, Dr. Gayashan Nawanandana, Kumarasiri Ratnayake, Pavitradevi Wanniarachchi, Janaka Wakkumbura, Premalal Jayasekera, John Seneviratne, Akila Saliya Ellawela, Muditha Prishanthi, Ranjith Siyambalapitiya, Kanaka Herath, Tharaka Balasuriya, Sudath Manjula, Rajika Wickremesinghe, Ali Sabry, Tiran Alles, Dr. Seetha Armbepola, Suren Raghavan, Wajira Abeywardena, Jayantha Ketagoda, Sagara Kariyawasam, Yadamini Gunawardena, Manjula Disanayake, Ranjith Bandara, Jayantha Weerasinghe and Mohamed Faleel Marjan.

Of the 103 MPs who voted for the Bill, two represented the SJB (Manusha Nanayakkara and A.H.M. Fowzie).

Sources said that Udayakantha Gunatilleke, though being present in Parliament at the time of the voting, hadn’t voted. The JJB’s three MPs -Anurta Kuamar Dissanayake, Vijitha Herath and Dr. Harini Amarasuriya – voted against the Bill, whereas the 10-member Tamil National Alliance (TNA) abstained.

Twenty MPs who had been elected on the SLPP ticket at the last General Election voted against the Bill, along with 36 SJB MPs. The SJB won 54 seats at the last General Election.

Former President Maithripala Sirisena (SLPP/Polonnaruwa) skipped the vote, whereas other SLFP MPs voted for the Bill. They included Wijeyadasa Rajapakse and Nimal Siripala de Silva, leading two factions in the SLFP.

Sources said that the SLPP’s backing for the Bill meant that the May 12 statement regarding their opposition to privatization and restructuring was not relevant.

They said that the SLPP was most likely to support the Economic Transformation Bill (ETB) that had been challenged by the SJB in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court summarized the Constitutionality of Sri Lanka Electricity Bill as follows:

The Bill as a whole is inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by a special majority of Parliament required under Article 84 (2). This inconsistency shall however cease if Clause 1(2) and Clause 1(3) are amended as set out in the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

Clauses 3(6) (a) and 10(1) (c) are inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by the special majority required under Article 84(2). However, the inconsistency shall cease if those Clauses are amended as set out in the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

The first proviso to Clause 11(1) of the Bill is inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by the special majority of Parliament required under Article 84 (2). However, the said inconsistency shall cease if the Clause is amended as set out in the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

Clause 17 is inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by the special majority of Parliament required under Article 84(2). The said inconsistency shall however cease and Clause 17 may be passed by a simple majority if the Clause is amended as set out in the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

Clause 18(3) (e) (ii) of the Bill is inconsistent with the provisions of Article 12(1) and shall only be passed by the special majority of Parliament required under Article 84(2). The said inconsistency shall however cease if Clause 18(3) is amended as set out in the Summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

Clause 18(3) (f) of the Bill is inconsistent with Article 12(1) and Article 14(1) (g) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by the special majority of Parliament required under Article 84(2). However, the said inconsistency shall cease if the Clause 18(3) (f) is amended as set out in the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

Clause 18(5) (b) (ii) is inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by the special majority of Parliament required under Article 84(2). The said inconsistency shall however cease if Clause 18(5) (b) (ii) is amended as set out in the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

Clause 21 and Clause 23 are inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by the special majority of Parliament required under Article 84(2). The said inconsistency shall however cease if those Clauses are amended as set out in the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

Clause 38 (2) of the Bill is inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall only be passed by the special majority required under Article 84(2). The said inconsistency shall cease if Clause 38(2) is amended as per the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.

Clause 48 is violative of Article 4(a) read together with Article 3 and 76 and hence needs to be passed by the special majority of Parliament and approved by the People at a Referendum.

The definition of ‘national grid’ in Clause 53 of the Bill is inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution and shall be passed by the special majority of Parliament required under Article 84(2). However, the said inconsistency shall cease if the said definition is amended as set out in the summary of the Determination of the Supreme Court.



News

New education reforms are not only to align education with job market demands but also to cultivate skilled youth who can contribute to the economy and provide leadership to society -Prime Minister

Published

on

By

As part of the series of programmes conducted for schoolchildren by the Presidential Secretariat, the Ministry of Education and the Sri Lanka Parliament Department of Communication, a special Student Parliament session for Visakha Vidyalaya, Colombo, was held on Tuesday (25) at the Old Parliament Chamber of the Presidential Secretariat. The event was conducted under the patronage of Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya.

During the session, the student parliament members of Visakha Vidyalaya had the opportunity to gain insights into the conceptual and practical significance of the “Clean Sri Lanka” initiative.

A special commemorative edition of the ‘Vision’ magazine, which focuses on the student Parliament initiative, was presented to the Prime Minister by Nadeeka Dangolla, Assistant Director of Parliamentary Affairs and Executive Functions.

Furthermore, the Principal of Visakha Vidyalaya, Mrs. Manomi Seneviratne, presented a special commemorative token to the Prime Minister.

Addressing the gathering, Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya highlighted that the government’s commitment to implementing new educational reforms aimed at nurturing a generation capable of seizing economic opportunities.

The Prime Minister further stated that the government aims to prepare Sri Lankan children to acquire global knowledge while fostering a self-reliant and empowered future generation.

The Prime Minister stated that the objective of the new education reforms are not only to align education with job market demands but also to cultivate skilled youth who can contribute to the economy and provide leadership to society.

Furthermore, she underscored the government’s commitment to addressing resource disparities among schools and emphasized the significance of civic responsibility in this endeavour.

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne:
‘Leadership must be devoid of selfishness. Selfless leaders guide both the nation and its people towards a better direction. To achieve this, skills must be enhanced. We can learn about talented leaders from both Sri Lankan history and global history. We should study as children how Chandashoka transformed into Dharmashoka and how Hitler’s regime brought devastation to the world. A nation achieves stability when leaders who prioritize minimal personal consumption and demonstrate a true dedication to their nation arise. Therefore, we must strive to cultivate leaders who can face challenges and prioritize national interests. By fostering selflessness, we can ensure a prosperous future for our people.’

Senior Presidential Media Advisor Mr. Chandana Sooriyabandara:
‘The students gathered here today are not just future leaders; they are leaders already. Leadership knows no age. Anyone who stands for a group could be consider as a leader. Those who exercise the power of the group are considered leaders. Throughout Sri Lankan history, individuals who contributed to the country through their words and actions have played leadership roles. Therefore, logical reasoning should lead the process of making decisions. Both leaders and citizens share the duty to act rationally. You all have a duty to shape a prosperous nation through logical thinking, and this obligation lies with every young person.’

The event was also attended by Deputy Speaker Dr. Rizvie Salih, Deputy Chairperson of Committees Hemali Weerasekara, Secretary-General of the Parliament Kushani Rohanadeera, Senior Additional Secretary to the President K.M.N. Kumarasinghe, Director-General of Legal Affairs to the President J.M. Wijebandara, Principal of Visakha Vidyalaya Manomi Seneviratne, along with members of the teaching staff and a group of students.

Continue Reading

News

UK sanctions: MR urges govt. to stand by military

Published

on

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa has urged the NPP government to stand by Sri Lanka’s war-winning military. The following is the text of the statement issued by the former President: “The United Kingdom govt. has announced sanctions, including travel bans and asset freezes, against Sri Lanka’s former Chief of Defence Staff Shavendra Silva, former Navy Commander Wasantha Karannagoda and former Army Commander Jagath Jayasuriya over unproven allegations of human rights violations during the war with the LTTE. It was I, as the Executive President of Sri Lanka, who took the decision to militarily defeat the LTTE and the armed forces implemented that decision on the ground.

Despite the 2002 ceasefire agreement, the LTTE had carried out 363 killings during the ceasefire between February 2002 and the end of September 2005. LTTE attacks intensified in the first few weeks and months after I was elected President in November 2005. Among the most serious such incidents were claymore mine attacks on 4 and 6 December 2005 in Jaffna that killed 13 soldiers, a suicide attack on a naval craft on 5 January 2006 that killed 15 naval personnel, and the suicide attack on the Army Commander inside Army Headquarters in April 2006.

Despite all that, my government held two rounds of peace talks in January and June 2006, in Geneva and Oslo, which were unilaterally halted by the LTTE. The LTTE landmine attack on a civilian bus in Kebithogollawa in June 2006 which killed 64 and seriously injured 86, many of them children – was a pivotal moment for me and my govt. Military operations commenced in July 2006 when the LTTE closed the Mawilaru anicut, cutting off irrigation water to cultivators in the Trincomalee district, and did not stop until the LTTE was completely defeated on 19 May 2009.

I categorically reject the UK govt.’s allegation of widespread human rights violations during the military operations. Lord Naseby stated in the House of Lords on 12 October 2017 that the then UK Defence Attache in Colombo Lieutenant Colonel Anton Gash had in conversation with him, praised the discipline of the Sri Lanka Army and stated that there certainly was no policy to kill civilians. Because Lt. Col Anton Gash’s war time dispatches to London differ so significantly from the narrative promoted by the UK political authorities, only a heavily redacted version of those dispatches have been released. We conducted military operations only against the LTTE and not against the Tamil people.

Just months after the war ended, when my wartime Army commander came forward as the Opposition candidate at the 2010 presidential elections, the Tamil National Alliance issued a statement on 6 January 2010 appealing to the Tamil people to vote for the former Army commander and he won over 60% of the votes cast in the Northern and Eastern Provinces, thus directly contradicting the narrative being promoted by the UK govt. Imposing sanctions on Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan, aka Karuna Amman, who broke away from the LTTE, in 2004, and later entered democratic politics, is a clear case of penalizing anti-LTTE Tamils so as to placate the dominant segment of the Tamil diaspora in the UK.

When the UK Foreign Secretary David Milliband came to Sri Lanka, in April 2009, and demanded a halt to military operations, I flatly turned him down. Later, a London-based newspaper The Telegraph revealed – quoting secret documents made public by Wikileaks – that Mr. Miliband had tried to intervene in Sri Lanka to win Tamil votes for the Labour Party. Regrettably, to this day, vote bank politics determines the UK’s stand on Sri Lanka’s war against the LTTE.

Three decades of LTTE terrorism claimed the lives of 27,965 armed forces and police personnel not to mention the lives of many thousands of civilians, including politicians. What Sri Lanka defeated in 2009 was the organization that the US Federal Bureau of Investigation had officially designated as the deadliest terrorist organization in the world. It is noteworthy that the United Kingdom introduced special legislation in 2021 and 2023 to protect their own armed forces from persecution by interested parties.

Hence I expect the present government to resolutely stand by and defend former armed forces personnel who face persecution by foreign governments and organisations for doing their duty to safeguard Sri Lanka’s national security.”

Continue Reading

News

Jet crash: Deputy Defence Minister, too, contradicts Minister Ratnayake

Published

on

Deputy Defence Minister Maj. Gen. (Retd) Aruna Jayasekera, on Tuesday (25), said that Air Force investigation into the 21 March K-8 advanced jet crash had not been concluded.

Jayasekera was responding to a media query. The media sought the Maj. Gen’s comments in the wake of Transport Minister and Leader of the House Bimal Ratnayake’s declaration that the crash had been caused by pilot error.

The Air Force Headquarters has already contradicted Minister Ratnayake’s unsubstantiated claim. The qualified instructor and the trainee ejected before the ill-fated aircraft, attached to the Katunayake-based No 05 squadron, crashed at Wariyapola.

Continue Reading

Trending