Business
SL can speed up economic recovery by bolstering its democratic institutions: US Ambassador
‘US has provided SL more than US$26 million for health and US$2 billion in aid’
The U.S. Ambassador to Sri Lanka and Maldives Alaina B. Teplitz in a wide ranging interview on Sri Lanka – United States relations says; “Unfortunately, there has been a lot of misinformation surrounding our engagement and several of our programs in recent times, but none of our programs infringe upon Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and we are very transparent in their design and implementation”.
At one point of the interview she says,” By relying on your long history of democracy and continuing to bolster your democratic institutions, you can speed up your recovery and be a leader in the region”.
Below you find some excerpts from the interview with Ambassador Teplitz.
By Dinesh Weerakkody
Q: Given the Covid-19 global pandemic and the challenging economic backdrop what do you see as the key priorities for US-SL relations in 2020 and in 2021?
Sri Lankans have done a tremendous job managing the COVID-19 pandemic. As the country continues to take measures to prevent community transmission, it must also consider the economic recovery from the pandemic. The combination of economic shocks that have impacted the country in deep ways over the past two years are cumulative. It’s challenging, and of course the U.S supports a strong and sustainable recovery for Sri Lanka. We remain a steadfast partner to Sri Lanka, contributing over $5.8 million to Sri Lanka’s COVID-19 management efforts. That’s on top of the $26 million over the last couple decades devoted solely to health. And we anticipate we’ll be a strong partners not only around this particular crisis but around many issues to come in the future. We look forward to continuing to work together to bolster the bilateral relationship and address regional and global issues.
Q: The U.S. committed US$ 5.8 million in Covid-19 assistance to Sri Lanka reinforcing its long tradition of support for Sri Lanka’s security and sovereignty. Could you shed some light on which development areas, services and programs these funds have been channeled into?
The $5.8 million in assistance to Sri Lanka was channeled through USAID to partners such as UNICEF to directly address the needs of the Sri Lankan people. It includes $2 million to increase social services for areas and populations most impacted by the crisis, and support for activities that build social cohesion. Another $2 million will strengthen small and medium enterprises and increase women’s economic participation. As part of the newly-announced assistance, the U.S. is also providing $590,000 in humanitarian assistance through the International Red Cross that will support vulnerable people during the pandemic.
This assistance builds on the $1.3 million in health assistance the U.S. Embassy announced in April, which is helping the government prepare laboratory systems, activate case-finding and event-based surveillance, and support technical experts for response and preparedness. U.S. assistance is also enabling Sri Lanka to conduct communicate more effectively about the risk of infection and prevent and control infectious diseases in health facilities. As part of this $5.8 million, Deputy Chief of Mission, Martin Kelly recently joined with UNICEF to hand over U.S.-funded medical equipment to the Ministry of Health.These supplies will equip four COVID-19 isolation and treatment units specialized in maternal and neonatal care. In addition to this $5.8 million, we recently provided PPE to eight health care facilities across Sri Lanka and we are gifting Sri Lanka 200 brand-new ventilators in the coming days. Over the years, we’ve provided Sri Lanka more than $26 million for health and $2 billion in aid.
Q: U.S. influence in Sri Lanka has been hotly debated in recent times on matters ranging from military co-operation to development to wider assertions that the U.S. is seeking to undermine Sri Lanka’s sovereignty. What will the future look like?
The strongest partnerships are those that respect and protect one another’s sovereignty. Unfortunately, there has been a lot of misinformation surrounding our engagement and several of our programs in recent times, but none of our programs infringe upon Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and we are very transparent in their design and implementation. Our two countries share a strong and resilient relationship. We will continue to work with the Sri Lankan government to promote Sri Lanka’s prosperity and uphold its sovereignty.
Q: What do you see as Sri Lanka’s medium-term opportunities in terms of bilateral, political and economic co-operation?
COVID-19 could really be a game changer in terms of both opportunities and challenges in the short and medium term. We don’t yet know the extent of the damage to the global economy or what the road to recovery will look like. The pandemic underscored how susceptible we are to global problems beyond our control and how we work more effectively in solving those problems when we work together. Strong international cooperation was required in addressing the crisis and it will be imperative in working towards recovery. Countries that adhere to democratic values, that respect rule of law, that have open and honest communications and provide credible information to protect their citizens will recover faster and be well staged to seize opportunities as they arise. The challenge for Sri Lanka will be continuing to provide the assistance your citizens require while you jump start your economy, attract foreign investment and repair the economic damage caused by the pandemic. But by relying on your long history of democracy and continuing to bolster your democratic institutions, you can speed your recovery and be a leader in the region.
Q: What are your thoughts on the current investment environment in Sri Lanka? Has the ease of doing business improved?
The government needs to consider comprehensive policy reforms to improve the ease of doing business if it’s going to be in a position to attract foreign investment and take advantage of some of the supply chain changes that are going to come as many countries and companies seek to diversify their investments from China. Companies are actively looking to ensure they have some diversification in location and redundancy in that supply chain. So it’s an opportune moment for Sri Lanka. Major U.S. firms such as Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, Virtusa, Dell, and others are here and looking to develop and invest in the IT sector. An investment climate that is predictable and transparent will attract top international firms to invest in the country, not just in IT but other sectors as well. Additionally, continuing to build strong intellectual property rights protections will make Sri Lanka a competitively attractive destination in the region for IT investment.
Q: What do you see as the biggest opportunities for U.S. investors in Sri Lanka? Which sectors? And, what more needs to be done on the regulatory front to attract investment?
The pandemic has forced U.S. manufacturers to reevaluate their supply chains and figure out how to diversify suppliers to avoid disruptions. Sri Lanka is well positioned to benefit from this. For U.S. buyers looking at potential suppliers from any country, including Sri Lanka, the key factors are quality, price, and the ability to deliver on time. So is predictability, as well as fair and transparent bidding opportunities and contract enforcement. Apparel is a prime example: U.S. buyers associate a Sri Lankan product with high quality and dependable product delivery. Tea is another product that has gained the confidence of U.S. consumers. Sri Lankan products generally are viewed as manufactured under conditions that adhere to international labour regulations and proper quality standards.
Q: President Donald Trump is seen as a key promoter for protectionism and to only buy made in America products. How would you justify some of the trade measures introduced by the Trump administration, in the context of recommending greater inter-regional trade within South Asia?
The U.S. is the number one destination for Sri Lankan exports. Bilateral trade is heavily weighted in Sri Lanka’s favor: the United States imports around $2.9 billion worth of products from Sri Lanka and only exports around $390 million. Sri Lankan companies have benefited from friendly U.S. trade policies, such as the General System of Preferences (GSP), that encourage fair and competitive trade. In these difficult times, our trade relationship has only grown stronger to our mutual benefit, as Sri Lanka has stepped up to manufacture masks for the U.S., production that has kept factories running and workers in jobs. The GSP program promotes economic growth in the developing world by providing duty-free entry to the U.S. market for goods imported from specific developing countries. As a GSP beneficiary, Sri Lanka may export more than 3,500 different products to the U.S. duty-free. This is in addition to the 3,800 products that are duty-free for all countries. In the Indo-Pacific region, the U.S. remains deeply engaged and committed to its prosperity. With $1.9 trillion in two-way trade, our futures are intertwined.
Q: Given that you are a very seasoned diplomat with good connections to the Trump Administration, what are your aspirations for United States-Sri Lanka relations during your tenure?
The U.S. and Sri Lanka share common goals as fellow democracies working to promote and protect human rights and the rule of law. We continue to urge the government of Sri Lanka to take concrete steps to respond to the concerns of all its people. The U.S. is also Sri Lanka’s single largest export market and Sri Lanka’s largest trading partner. In 2017, Sri Lanka exported over $2.9 billion of goods to the US, $2.1 billion of which were ready-made garments. The U.S. also views Sri Lanka as a great customer for American-made goods. The U.S. exports into many sectors of the Sri Lankan economy from advanced machinery to agricultural products. Building upon these powerful economic ties, we aspire for expanded growth and prosperity for the citizens of Sri Lanka and the U.S.
Ambassador Teplitz is a senior member of the US Foreign Service, she joined the State Department in 1991 and is the recipient of numerous Awards. Ambassordor Teplitz also held the Assistant-Secretary ranked position of Director of the Under Secretary for Management’s Office of Policy, Rightsizing, and Innovation (M/PRI) at the Department of State from 2012-2015. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service.
Business
At Asia’s crossroads, Sri Lanka must decide how it will join the future
In the ancient Silk Road city of Samarkand, where merchants once connected civilisations through trade and ideas, a new conversation unfolded from 3–6 May at the 59th Annual Meetings of the Asian Development Bank.Political leaders, central bank governors, investors, innovators and development partners gathered under a compelling theme: “Crossroads of Progress: Advancing the Region’s Connected Future.”
The message resonating across the forum was unmistakable. Asia and the Pacific are entering a decisive decade in which connectivity, technology and regional cooperation will shape economic power and social resilience. Supply chains are being redesigned. Artificial intelligence is transforming productivity. Energy systems are becoming increasingly interconnected. Financing models are evolving to accommodate climate pressures and development needs. Countries that move quickly and cohesively are likely to benefit from this transformation. Those trapped in internal fragmentation risk falling behind.
The Annual Meetings demonstrated that the future envisioned by the ADB is no longer theoretical. Across the region, governments are already repositioning themselves to participate in a more integrated Asian economy. Discussions focused heavily on cross-border infrastructure, digital innovation, energy interconnection, sustainable finance and regional policy harmonisation.
One recurring theme was that “integration is power.” In an era marked by geopolitical uncertainty and economic disruption, regional cooperation is increasingly viewed as the foundation of resilience. From trade corridors and logistics systems to energy-sharing mechanisms such as the ASEAN Power Grid, policymakers emphasised that countries can no longer afford to operate in isolation.
The conversations in Samarkand also reflected how development itself is being redefined. Data, digital infrastructure and artificial intelligence are becoming as important as roads, ports and airports. Governments across Asia are already deploying AI-enabled public services, fintech systems, smart agriculture and real-time disaster response technologies to improve efficiency and social inclusion.
Equally important was the recognition that public financing alone will not be enough to meet the region’s ambitions. The ADB repeatedly stressed the need for innovative financing mechanisms capable of mobilising private capital while strengthening domestic fiscal systems. Climate adaptation, energy transition and infrastructure expansion will require development finance that is scalable, catalytic and capable of attracting long-term investor confidence.
For Sri Lanka, the discussions carried particular significance.
Having emerged from one of the gravest economic crises in its post-independence history, Sri Lanka today stands at a delicate juncture. The country possesses many of the advantages needed to participate meaningfully in Asia’s next growth phase: strategic geographic positioning, human capital, maritime access and longstanding relationships with multilateral institutions such as the ADB. Yet the gap between potential and preparedness remains considerable.
While many Asian economies appear to have moved toward greater institutional maturity and long-term policy coordination, Sri Lanka continues to wrestle with recurring political instability, governance concerns, debt restructuring pressures and inconsistencies in economic policymaking. Questions surrounding legal processes, public sector reforms and policy continuity continue to affect investor confidence and national coherence.
The challenge facing Sri Lanka is therefore not merely economic. It is fundamentally institutional and political.
The larger Asian story unfolding in Samarkand was one of countries aligning national purpose with regional opportunity. Whether through digital transformation, energy integration or climate financing, many nations appear increasingly focused on continuity, coordination and long-term execution. Sri Lanka, by contrast, still appears engaged in resolving foundational questions about governance, accountability and economic direction.
This does not diminish the country’s prospects. Rather, it highlights the urgency of reform and policy harmonisation if Sri Lanka is to become a meaningful participant in the region’s connected future.
The ADB’s vision for Asia is ultimately centered on resilience through cooperation. It is a vision in which countries strengthen themselves not in isolation, but through deeper engagement with regional systems of trade, finance, energy and technology. For Sri Lanka, this presents both an opportunity and a warning.
The opportunity lies in leveraging multilateral partnerships, embracing digital modernisation, strengthening institutional credibility and integrating more deeply into emerging regional networks. The warning is that Asia’s transformation is accelerating. Countries unable to build stable governance structures and coherent development strategies may struggle to capture its benefits.
Samarkand itself offered a symbolic reminder of this reality. Historically, it flourished because it connected worlds. Today, Asia is once again building new networks of connection – digital, financial, infrastructural and geopolitical.
The question confronting Sri Lanka is whether it can align its political will and economic resilience quickly enough to travel alongside the region’s next decade of growth rather than watch it from the margins.
By Sanath Nanayakkare
Business
CBSL and Australia’s S4IE programme partner to advance digital financial literacy for MSMEs
The Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Australia’s Skills for an Inclusive Economy (S4IE) programme to launch a pilot initiative aimed at enhancing digital financial literacy among micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Recognised as a vital engine of Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and inclusive development, MSMEs stand to benefit from targeted interventions designed to improve access to finance, strengthen institutional coordination, and foster a more supportive enabling environment.
The pilot will test evidence-based approaches, the outcomes of which will inform future policy design and programming. CBSL intends to scale successful measures in collaboration with national and international partners.
Commenting on the partnership, Dr. P. Nandalal Weerasinghe, Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, stated: “This initiative reflects CBSL’s dedication to practical, evidence-based solutions. The pilot enables us to test and refine methodologies that can be expanded over time to deliver sustainable outcomes for MSMEs across the country.”
His Excellency Matthew Duckworth, Australian High Commissioner to Sri Lanka, emphasied the program’s long-term vision: “Australia is pleased to partner with the Central Bank of Sri Lanka on this initiative. From the outset, our focus has been on building systems and partnerships that are both sustainable and scalable, ensuring benefits extend well beyond the pilot phase.”
The initiative aligns with broader efforts to promote inclusive economic growth and strengthen institutional capacity. It reflects Australia’s ongoing partnership with Sri Lanka in support of reforms that advance economic stability, resilience, and shared prosperity.
Representing the Australian High Commission, Zoe Kidd, First Secretary (Development), and R. Sivasuthan, Senior Programme Officer, reaffirmed Australia’s commitment to close collaboration with CBSL. Their aim is to ensure the pilot yields actionable insights and sustainable outcomes, with a clear pathway toward future scaling.
Business
Higher power costs and a weakening rupee set to strain Sri Lankan kitchen budgets
Adding to the existing pressures, the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) has approved a revision of electricity tariffs for the second quarter of 2026, effective from today for users who consume over 180 electricity units. This increase arrives just as the Sri Lankan rupee faces renewed pressure, having recorded a 3.6% depreciation against the US dollar year-to-date. The convergence of a weaker currency and higher power costs creates renewed pressure on the cost of living.
For the average Sri Lankan household, this policy shift is not just a line item on a utility bill; it is a catalyst for a broader inflationary trend. Even before this revision, headline inflation had already shown signs of a sharp ascent, with the Colombo Consumer Price Index (CCPI) surging to 5.4% in April 2026, a stark jump from the 2.2% recorded only a month prior.
This statistical climb is most painfully visible at the local marketplace. At the Narahenpita Economic Centre, the cost of essentials has become highly volatile: beans have climbed to Rs. 700/kg, while carrots have reached Rs. 400/kg. The protein basket is equally strained, with Kelawalla fish priced at Rs. 2,980/kg. With the new electricity tariffs taking effect, the food manufacturing industry now faces fresh overheads for processing, refrigeration, and packaging. These increased costs will inevitably trickle down to the retail shelf, threatening to push these prices even higher.
While global energy markets offered a brief moment of relief with Brent crude prices dipping by over $6 per barrel last week, the domestic impact of a depreciating rupee means that the cost of imported fuel and raw materials remains high.
This invisible pressure, combined with the visible hike in electricity rates, leaves little room for families to breathe.
Despite these immediate challenges, the broader economic framework shows pockets of resilience, according to the Central Bank’s economic indicators. Industrial production in food and apparel grew steadily earlier this year, and the government recorded a notable budget surplus of Rs. 169.7 billion in the first two months of 2026.
However, as the nation moves into the second quarter, the strength of this fiscal discipline will be tested against the lived reality of its citizens. As the new rates come into effect from today, Sri Lankans are left to wait and see just how much further their kitchen budgets can be stretched.
By Sanath Nanayakkare
-
News4 days agoMIT expert warns of catastrophic consequences of USD 2.5 mn Treasury heist
-
News6 days agoCJ urged to inquire into AKD’s remarks on May 25 court verdict
-
News1 day agoLanka Port City officials to meet investors in Dubai
-
Editorial4 days agoClean Sri Lanka and dirty politics
-
Opinion6 days agoSecurity, perception, and trust: Sri Lanka’s delicate balancing act
-
Editorial3 days agoThe Vijay factor
-
News2 days agoSLPP expresses concern over death of former SriLankan CEO
-
News5 days agoDevelopment Officer bids Rs. 48 mn for CPC’s V8 at auction
