Opinion
Rectifying history or wreaking vengeance?
An exclusive Sinhala language BREAKINGNEWS episode on a suspicious, so-called ‘truth connect tv’ youtube video (uploaded September 22, 2025) announces that “the United Nations Organization recommends the appointment of a Truth Commission to re-establish the Sihela identity”. I remember seeing almost the same video with slightly different lay persons speaking in it, uploaded about a year ago. That’s why it struck me as suspicious. The new uploading has been done to coincide with the current Geneva sessions. The same scene of a long drawn psyop drama aimed at the cultural genocide of the majority community might be re-enacted next year too, as it has been done over the past four or five years. It is obvious that this special piece of news is meant only for Sinhala speakers (the targeted potential dupes). Here, for the benefit of my readers I wish to translate verbatim the newscaster’s introductory sentence or two, including the one given above within quote marks. He continued:
“At the 60th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council held today (September 22), Kleppe Ariyamagga Himi, the founder of the Ariyakammattana organization and the convenor of ‘Sri Lanka’s indigenous Nikaya the Sihela Sri Sambuddha Maha Nikaya’, made a historic speech”. (Actually, it is a statement that he read out in an almost empty chamber in that place. It is accessible at the link provided with the video. But the ‘speech’, the statement really, is only in English, so designedly beyond the reach of monolingual Sinhala listeners/readers (on whose behalf Ariyamagga, widely suspected to be a Sinhala fluent ethnic Tamil, is pretending to be engaged in his historic mission. The so-called ‘Sri Lanka’s indigenous Nikaya’ is a baseless new invention that challenges the authority of the three established monastic chapters {or the Siyam, and the now combined Ramanna and Amarapura Nikayas} created under royal patronage by monks brought from Thailand and Myanmar respectively in the 18th and 19th centuries. More about bhikkhu imposter Ariyamagga’s ‘historic speech’ below.) .
Rough translation
The uploaders or their supporters seem to have blocked a Google translation of the thumbnail description of this video given only in Sinhala, which means that interested Tamil or English speakers, if any, are prevented from understanding what it says. So, I made my own rough translation of that sketch summary for the benefit of my readers here:
“The world’s oldest indigenous nation known as Sihela composed of the three main tribes Yakkha, Deva, and Na (ga) have been robbed of their authentic national identity heritage. This has resulted from an act of deliberate cartographical disinformation about the geographical location of the Buddha’s birthplace by falsely marking on the map of northern India the common holy land named Dambadiva or Jambudipa which, until 1836, remained a part of the island which is known today as Sri Lanka.”
The Sinhala phrase that I have translated verbatim as ‘the world’s oldest indigenous nation known as Sihela,’ with its comically extravagant false claim, makes fun of the Sinhalese people’s sense of ethnic identity. .
The video shows three yellow-robed persons including Ariyamagga and a layman accompanying them entering a building. Ariyamagga’s petition is a four page document, a written statement, submitted by a certain ‘African Green Foundation International’, described as ‘a non-governmental organisation in special consultative status’. It is specifically stated that the statement is issued (by the UNHRC) ‘as received in the language of submission only’, which is English. The title is:
‘Erasure of Ethnic Identity and Sacred Geography: A Call for a Truth Commission led by the United Nations Human Rights Council’
The petitioners call upon the UNHRC to
‘ 1. Establish an independent Truth Commission to investigate the erasure of Sīhela ethnic identity and the falsification of Dambadiva/Jambudīpa.
2. Recognise the inter-religious impact of colonial distortions and promote healing through restorative justice and intercultural dialogue.
3. Urge global solidarity to support a UN resolution rectifying this colonial-era violation.
4. Restore the Sīhela People’s Indigenous title and rights under UNDRIP’.
‘Urgent call’
The statement concludes: “This is more than a historical grievance—it is an urgent call to reclaim the true ethnic identity of the Sīhela Peoples and to restore the spiritual integrity of all communities affected by colonial falsification. It is a demand for the right to practice religion in its authentic, undistorted form. Rectifying these distortions is essential not only for the survival of the Sīhela Peoples but also for millions of Buddhists, Hindus, Jains, and Muslims across South Asia who lost access to their true sacred heritage”.
It looks like nothing more than the following happened at the UN in connection with Ariyamagga’s historic mission, in addition to his reading out the ‘statement’ to a hardly identifiable audience apart from the four individuals of the bogus Sihela delegation, staged on September 22:
“Written statement submitted by African Green Foundation International, a non-governmental organisation in special consultative status* The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. * Issued as received, in the language of submission only. [31 July 2025]”
So, the Secretary General has barely acknowledged receipt of the written statement. The UN has made no recommendation in response to the petition as claimed by the newsflash.
The ‘truth connect tv’ video’s ‘historic newsflash’ about the UN recommending the appointment of a truth commission to ‘re-establish Sihela identity’ is clearly fake news. The newsreader they have employed (for a fee, no doubt) is a professional, whose professional reputation cannot be at stake, since he is catering to a dumb audience. It’s a very familiar voice for me, but I can’t remember the name of the person (a TV news presenter I usually hear from Sri Lanka) that it belongs to.
I remember having viewed a similar video with a different, but related theme, nearly three years ago involving the same fake monk Ariyamagga. This was aYoutube video (uploaded December 27, 2022) with the alarmist caption (in Sinhala), which can be rendered into English as “Let’s learn about the enormity of the injustice perpetrated on (Sri) Lanka the birthplace of the Buddha” that captured my attention four or five days later (to be precise, on January 1, 2023). It was both because of the sensationalism of the title and its connection with a popular youtuber who presented its content as an important newsflash issued from a so-called ‘We Rectify Our History’ organization (presumably based in the UK). Five days after uploading, the video had got about 8,500 views, and only 301 subscribers. Though the veteran youtuber announced it as a newsflash under ‘Breaking News’, the maker of the video was someone else who chose to obscure their identity.
Controversial new hypothesis
While watching the video, though, I felt that the professional newscaster himself made this video in the manner of a strong believer in the controversial new hypothesis that the Buddha was born in Sri Lanka. I thought ‘could a person like the particular YouTuber (I prefer not to reveal his name for the time being) agree to provide his professional expertise for the propagation of an egregious lie that is harmful to the country?’ In terms of my experience, the YouTuber in question was far too rational, educated, cultured and knowledgeable to embrace such a harebrained ideology. I believed that he was too honest to prostitute his journalism for mercenary ends.
Lucidity, idiomaticity, and precision of expression characterise this person’s Sinhala. Such linguistic elegance is not common among ordinary Sinhala language Youtubers. His professionalism and sophistication as a journalist are hard to match. However, the emphatically positive tone of voice that he adopted right through to the end of the presentation could not be due to any real personal commitment to the authenticity of the ‘Buddha was born in Sri Lanka’ concept. Instead, I tried to rationalise to myself, out of my personal regard for that person, that, by lending his voice to this video, he might have been helping out a struggling new YouTuber, through his own established fame. That’s what I thought at the time. Yet, he seemed to be overdoing his generosity because, his apparent espousal of that extremely anti-national heresy, might only have provided some justification for the insidious process of cultural genocide that was being carried out, unknown to most ordinary Sri Lankans of diverse ethnicities, against the country’s innocent Sinhala Buddhist majority, something that had been already going on for decades even by then.
‘Legal action’
According to that ‘Breaking news’ announcement a certain ‘Ariya Kammattahna Sanvidhanaya/Ariya Kammattahna Organization’ led by a so-called Sri Lankan Buddhist monk by the name of Kleppe Ariyamagga (Ariyamagga of the municipality of Klep in Norway) was going to sue the British government. He had taken steps to institute legal action against the government officials who served during British colonial times. He charged that Britain had distorted historical information relating to the subcontinent of India and that his fundamental rights were being violated by officials serving today in their place by intentionally failing to rectify those distortions. ……. “The case names the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, the State Secretary for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports, Secretary of State for Tourism Zones and National Heritage, and the Secretary of State for Education as respondents……the court action will go ahead as the violations are continuing …” (This is from the opening of the spoken text of the video as roughly translated by me from Sinhala as other relevant parts of the same spoken script found in the rest of this essay; details such as names of ministries may not exactly tally with the real ones. – RRW)
‘We Rectify Our History’
The ‘We Rectify Our History’ organisation argues that Britain has violated provisions of various legal statutes that it cites such as Britain’s 1998 Human Rights Act, the 1988 Copyrights, Designs, and Patents Act, and the 1907 Hague Convention. It demands that at least certified photocopies of the ancient ola leaf books stashed away in British libraries and museums be made available (to it on behalf of Sri Lankans) free of charge without reserving copyrights and that steps be taken to provide funds for new archaeological excavations needed to correct those (deliberately introduced) errors in our country’s history.
The plaintiff organisation pleaded (on the earlier occasion in 2022) that (the British government) acknowledge that the school education system established under the colonial administration disseminated false information for public consumption without any foundation in Sri Lankans’ (collective) national and religious identity, and also that (the British government) tender an apology to the general public of the world for the crimes committed.
The truth is quite contrary to what Ariyamagga is asserting on both occasions. In Sri Lanka’s ancient chronicles, Buddhist literature and even in colloquial parlance in Buddhist religious contexts today the name Jambudipa (Pali) or Dambadiva (Sinhala) refers to the subcontinent of India. But according to the ‘Buddha was born in Sri Lanka’ theorists, Jambudeepa was in the northern part of Sri Lanka, and Lankadipa was in the south-east corner of the island, with the ancient capital Anuradhapura located there! But they keep changing the map to suit their shifting responses to criticisms from time to time.
A central complaint made in the aforementioned (false) pleas for justice is that the true location of the Jambudipa where the founder of Theravada Buddhism, Gotama Samana (as they call him), was born and lived, and the locations of its cities and Buddhist holy sites were conspiratorially concealed from the world and that these venues were substituted by those in India by deliberately altering the maps of Sri Lanka and India. This is alleged to have misled the Theravada Buddhist adherents and deprived them of their right to know the truth about their spiritual master. By ‘Theravada Buddhists’ the petitioner ‘We Rectify Our History’ organisation means Sinhalese Buddhists. What does it aim to achieve for the Sinhalese Buddhists by exiling Buddha Gotama to a remote corner of the small island? The ludicrous complaint of the ‘We Rectify Our History’ organization lets the cat out of the bag.
The ‘Buddha was born in Sri Lanka’ idea is obviously a piece of fiction carefully thought up by some evil minded individual or a group of individuals to confuse the credulous unsophisticated, grievously ill informed (embarrassingly large) section of the Sinhalese Buddhist community about their religion as well as their history. Those who stand to gain by this may be having a field day at present. They must be laughing their heads off in private at the silliness of those Sinhalese Buddhists who have swallowed this and other similar fabrications such as the Ravana myth hook, line, and sinker.
To be continued
Opinion
Spending on import of goods we could produce locally
It has been reported that Sri Lanka continues to spend vast sums of foreign exchange on importing goods that could be produced domestically with ease. This pattern raises serious concerns. It may be driven, in part, by vested interests profiting from import commissions and easy margins.
Another contributing factor could be the perceived need to cater to foreign tourists, especially in the hospitality sector.
However, this raises a troubling question: are we spending more on imports to serve tourists than we earn from their visits?
Besides food, a wide range of imported items—including building materials and hotel-related paraphernalia—are draining our foreign reserves. While tourism is touted as a major foreign exchange earner, the actual net benefit to the country remains unclear. It may enrich hotel owners and create jobs, but whether it truly strengthens our economy is debatable.
A Ratnayake
Opinion
Mannar wind power project and people’s protests
It has been reported that the government has abruptly halted the Mannar wind power project, which was to be launched by a prominent conglomerate.
This conglomerate is widely known to have close ties with the ruling party, and several of its directors currently hold positions in government-linked institutions.
Would a government that has been accused of changing its mind quite frequently, really suspend a multi-billion-rupee project simply because of objections from a small group of citizens in one corner of the country?
Is this a rare instance of the government standing up for ordinary people—or is it something else entirely?
Is it that the government decision has resulted from an internal conflict?
S K Muthukumara
Opinion
Inserting the foot in your mouth
At a diplomatic reception held in Vienna in the 1960s, British Foreign Minister George Brown sat in his chair enjoying a glass of wine. Then he heard the orchestra strike up a tune. When he turned round he saw a beautiful woman seated beside him. He politely asked her, “Madame, may we dance?” The lady in scarlet dress told him, “No, Mr Brown, for three reasons. First, this is a reception, not a ball. Second, even were this a ball, this would still be a state anthem and not a waltz. And third, were this a ball and not a reception and were that a waltz and not a state anthem, I would still be the Cardinal Archbishop.”
This is a well-known faux pas, a French term meaning an action or remark that causes embarrassment because it is not socially correct. Although we do not hear this phrase today, we still make socially unacceptable remarks every now and then. One day I met an old friend in Colombo who had migrated to Canada a few years ago. I said, “Good to see you again. How is your wife?” He looked at me in a serious way and asked, “Didn’t you know that she passed away a few years ago?” I felt like banging my head against a wall.
Although we dress well we have not been able to check ourselves when we speak to others. Faux pas has been defined by Pundit Michael Kinsley as the truth politicians accidentally speak. At the 1980 Democratic Convention, U.S. President Jimmy Carter extolled the virtues of former Vice President Hubert Horatio Humphrey as “Hubert Horatio Hornblower.”
Major social faux pas
Forgetting someone’s name is a major social faux pas. Sir John Kotalawala addressing an election rally turned to the organiser and asked “What’s that b ….’s name?” I met my former English teacher at a wedding ceremony after a long time. He greeted me, “Hello, Kodituwakku. How are you?” My wife asked me whether I had changed my name from Kodituwakku to Karunaratne. I told him, “Sir, I am not Kodituwakku …” Then he cut me off by saying, “Oh, it’s a faux pas.”
We meet so many people and sometimes we tend to forget their names. It is quite natural. However, when you have to introduce a friend to another person you have to remember his name. By the way, if you have to attend a function, do not go there too early or too late. They are supposed to be social blunders. Remember that we had a President who was always late for Cabinet meetings!
If you have to attend a wedding or interview, dress properly. You should not wear casual clothes for such events. There is no excuse for dressing improperly. However, if you forget someone’s name, you can ask for his name politely. A simple apology will smooth things over. You may have heard of Dr Sigmund Freud’s eponymous slip of the tongue. One day a man arrived at a railway station to buy tickets to Pittsburgh. He went to the ticket counter and asked for “Two tickets to Tittsburgh.” Sometimes people mispronounce your name. One day a wealthy socialite Mrs Stuyvesant Fish attended a fancy-dress ball in Rhode Island. At the entrance she told the butler the theme of the costume as “A Norman peasant.” Later she heard someone announcing “An enormous pheasant.”
Disrespectful and rude
If you keep on checking your mobile phone repeatedly when someone is trying to speak to you, you are committing a social faux pas. Many people view this behaviour as an indication that you are not paying attention to what another person is saying. This is something disrespectful and rude.
Sometimes we misunderstand others. One day Robert Benchley, an eminent author, while leaving a restaurant at night saw a man in uniform. The author thought that he was the doorman and asked him to call a cab. The man in uniform turned round and told him, “I happen to be a rear admiral in the U.S. Navy.” “In that case,” Bentley said, “get me a battleship.”
Another example of social faux pas is excessively dominating a conversation. To avoid hogging the conversation, practise active listening. If you talk to someone, look at his face and maintain eye contact. Ask him thoughtful questions, if necessary.
Talking about women
At a party Ben and Peter were drinking and talking about women. After some time they saw two women coming down the staircase. Ben said, “That’s the woman I was in love with.” Peter said, “That’s my wife.” Ben immediately corrected himself by saying, “I mean the other woman.” “That’s my daughter,” Peter said somewhat angrily.
There are many other instances where you make blunders. One such instance is attending a birthday party empty-handed. If you are unable to decide what to give as a gift, a reasonable amount of money can be given to the birthday boy or girl.
Some women do not like to divulge their real age. Therefore do not press them to do so. On the other hand, both men and women do not like to tell you how much they earn. Such matters are extremely personal.
Intimate personal details
When you strike up a friendship with someone for the first time, make it a point not to share intimate personal details. If you do so, you will make yourself a laughing stock. Reveal your real character to close friends, if it is really necessary.
Finally, bragging is a form of faux pas. One day a young lecturer was invited to deliver a talk on the English Day at a prestigious school in Colombo. Instead of telling the students the importance of English, she started bragging about how she got a postgraduate degree at a young age. Another lecturer began his lecture by telling the audience that he had a doctorate. They do not realise that people are not interested in their academic qualifications. You are judged by your performance.
By R. S. Karunaratne ✍️
karunaratners@gmail.com
-
Features6 days agoFavourites for the title of Miss Universe 2025
-
Midweek Review7 days agoFocus on Minister Paulraj’s UK statement
-
News6 days agoDr. Saman Weerasinghe receives Russia’s prestigious Order of Friendship
-
Opinion5 days agoReturning to source with Aga
-
Opinion7 days agoAmid winds and waves: Sri Lanka and the Indian Ocean – III
-
Business5 days agoMiss Universe Sri Lanka 2025 Lihasha Lindsay White departs for Bangkok
-
Features6 days agoVision of Dr. Gamani Corea and the South’s present development policy options
-
Features7 days agoSri Lanka’s Northern Gateway: Economic promise and geopolitical power in the Indian Ocean
