Connect with us

News

Post-war reconciliation: Govt. ponders judicial powers for TRC, special court

Published

on

ISTRM Chief Dr. Gunawansa, PC, says existing draft can be amended

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Director General of the Interim Secretariat for the Truth and Reconciliation Mechanism (ISTRM), Dr. Asanga Gunawansa, PC, says the draft of the law to establish a Commission for Truth, Unity and Reconciliation in Sri Lanka can be amended to enable the proposed Commission for Truth, Unity and Reconciliation (CTUR) to have prosecutorial and/or judicial powers. Otherwise, a special court could be established to address the need, Dr. Gunawansa told The Island.

The top official said so in response to our query based on President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s recent declaration at the inauguration of the Clinical Training and Research Block at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna that his government was considering whether the TRC should wield judicial authority or a separate court should be set up based on TRC recommendations.

The President’s Media Division (PMD) quoted Wickremesinghe as having said he had tasked the relevant ministers in consultation with parliamentarians and ambassadors to draft legislation for parliamentary review. The President declared that the decision on prosecutorial and/or judicial powers for CTUR or special court was of paramount importance. Among those present on the occasion were Tamil National Alliance (TNA) lawmakers, M. A. Sumanthiran, PC, and Dharmalingham Siddharthan representing the Illankai Thamil Arasu Kachchi and People’s Liberation of Organization for Tamil Eelam (PLOTE), respectively. Eelam People’s Democratic Party (EPDP) leader Douglas Devananda was also present.

Asked to explain the status of the ongoing deliberations on the issues pertaining to prosecutorial and/or judicial powers for CTUR or establishment of a special court, Dr. Gunawansa said this was a matter that should be decided by the government.

The President’s Counsel said: “As any law to come into operation required the approval of the Parliament, it is eventually up to the Parliament to decide whether the proposed law should have provisions which enabled the CTUR to wield judicial power or for that purpose or the establishment of a special court. If a special court is to be established, then the relevant articles in the Constitution as well as the Judicature Act amongst other relevant laws may have to be carefully considered.”

Dr. Gunawansa added: “The objectives of any system of transitional justice are to provide for a platform for establishing truth, reconciliation, reparation for victims, taking measures for non-recurrence of violence and abuse of human rights and enabling legal action against abusers of human rights and criminal offenders.”

Responding to another query, the ISTRM Chief disclosed that the current draft of the proposed law that has been gazetted did not go as far as establishing a separate court. However, it included provisions which enabled the relevant competent authorities such as the Attorney General and the Police to consider criminal action pursuant to investigations based on information revealed during the truth-seeking process followed by the Commission and on the recommendations made by the Commission, Dr. Gunawansa said.

 However, as the President declared in Jaffna, if pursuant to the consolations and discussions with the relevant stakeholders if it is felt that the proposed commission should have prosecutorial and/or judicial powers or in the alternative, a special court should be established for such purpose, then provisions can be introduced to the current draft of the law before it is presented to the Parliament, the official said.

Pointing out that the current draft of the proposed law had been initially developed over a period of time immensely aided by more than 7000 consultations conducted by the Consultations Task Force on Reconciliation Mechanisms (CTFRM) that was headed by the late Manouri Muttetuwegama. The CTFRM’s final report was presented in Nov 2016.

Since the establishment of the ISTRM in September 2023, under Dr. Gunawansa’s leadership the outfit has carried out approximately 65 consultations with the stakeholders and organized three discussion forums to engage with the interested parties to seek their views on the draft bill and the need for establishing a credible truth-seeking mechanism. ISTRM in line with its overall strategy has given a series of interviews to present the key features of the draft bill to the public.

Commenting on President Wickremesinghe declaration that the issues at hand were complex therefore demanded collective cooperation and engagement from all stakeholders and he discussed this matter with the members of Parliament from the North and the East, Dr. Gunawansa said that establishment of a system of transitional justice focusing inter alia on reconciliation and non-recurrence of violence required consensus amongst all stakeholders.

The armed forces brought the war to a successful conclusion in May 2009.

Dr. Gunawansa said; The ethnic issue and the related violence and civil war like situation that prevailed in the island during the period 1983 to 2009 has several root causes that needs careful consideration and they need to be addressed by implementing measures acceptable to all stakeholders. Even though we feel that there is peace in the island, especially in the north and the East since 2009, there are victims of violence and war from all races and ethnicities of our country spread out all over the island and these victims have continuing grievances which need to be addressed.

 “It is in order to address the aforesaid concerns that the Cabinet under the guidance of the President has decided to present a law to establish a Commission for Truth, Unity and Reconciliation in Sri Lanka, to the Parliament for consideration and approval by the Parliament.  This law is currently ready as a concept paper and has been Gazetted in all three languages to bring it into public domain so that all relevant stakeholders, including victims, civil society organisations, and politicians could examine it, comment on it and make suggestions.”

Referring to President Wickremesinghe reference to economic hardships and the failure on the part of successive governments to allocate required funds for the post-war reconciliation process, Dr. Gunawansa said in spite of difficulties the government established ISTRM to lay the foundation for setting up the CTUR, subject to the proposed law being approved by the Parliament.Dr. Gunawansa appreciated the support extended by President Wickremesinghe, Foreign Minister Ali Sabry, PC, and Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, PC.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Judicial vacancies: President keeps country guessing

Published

on

President

The NPP government has not taken a final decision regarding filling of the vacancies in the judiciary.

A group of Opposition MPs, led by SJB leader Sajith Premadasa, on 12 June, requested Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremeratne to take up the issue of judicial vacancies with President Dissanayake. Opposition sources said that there were four vacancies, each in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, and the inordinate delay had adversely affected the judiciary.

Government sources indicated that there was no change in the status quo as regards filling of vacancies. Referring to the government proposal to extend the retirement age of judges, authoritative sources said that no final decision had been taken yet.

SJB lawmaker Dayasiri Jayasekera told The Island that they would raise the issue in Parliament this week.

He said that the deliberate delay in making appointments to superior courts and the move to extend the retirement age couldn’t be taken separately.

The MP noted that the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, the Lawyers’ Collective, the Colombo High Court Lawyers’ Association, Colombo Magistrate’s Court Lawyers’ Association and the Bar Association of Badulla had opposed the government move.

There hadn’t been any public statements in support of the government move, MP Jayasekera said, urging the government to end uncertainty in the judiciary.

by Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Sajith calls on Opposition parties to rally around SJB

Published

on

Sajith

SJB leader Sajith Premadasa has invited the UNP and other political parties to join his party. Premadasa, who is also the leader of the Opposition, has emphasised that the UNP and the SJB could reach a consensus on policies but his party wouldn’t, under any circumstances, accept whatever formula to share positions. Premadasa said so, speaking to the media over the weekend, after meeting the Mahanayaka Thera of the Malwatta Chapter of the Siyam Nikaya Most Venerable Thibbatuwawe Sri Siddhartha Sumangala Thera.

A statement issued by the Opposition Leader’s Office quoted MP Premadasa as having extended an invitation to all political parties to give up extremist policies and join the SJB.

The SJB leader alleged that the NPP government feared facing elections and that was the reason for the inordinate delay in holding Provincial Council polls. PC polls were last held in 2012, 2013 and 2014, on a staggered basis. Premadasa said that if PC polls were held his party would definitely win the majority of PCs.Premadasa also urged the government to reduce electricity tariffs and fuel prices.

Continue Reading

News

Ex-EC Chief slams govt. over PC polls delay

Published

on

Deshapriya

Former Chairman of the Election Commission, Mahinda Deshapriya, on Saturday, strongly criticised the continued postponement of local government elections, declaring that every day without elections constitutes a violation of both the Constitution and democratic principles.

Speaking during an interview with journalist Bhanuka Rajapaksa, on Hiru TV, on Saturday, Deshapriya described the current administration of local government institutions by unelected officials as fundamentally undemocratic and contrary to the spirit of representative governance.

Deshapriya said local authorities, across the country, are presently being managed by secretaries and bureaucrats rather than elected representatives, depriving citizens of their democratic right to be governed by individuals, chosen through the electoral process.

“If the Constitution recognises and provides for local government institutions, then it is the responsibility of the State to ensure that elections are held and that these bodies are administered by representatives, elected by the people,” he said.

Deshapriya rejected attempts to justify the prolonged delay, arguing that responsibility for the situation rests with the government.

He noted that while various political parties have publicly stated their readiness to face elections, the ruling administration possesses the authority to resolve any issues relating to the electoral system.

The former Election Commission chief pointed out that the government enjoyed a two-thirds majority in Parliament, enabling it to enact any legislative amendments required to facilitate the conduct of elections. Instead, he said, successive committees and review processes had been used to postpone a final decision.

He also referred to efforts by opposition legislators who have moved motions seeking to address concerns relating to the electoral framework and expedite the holding of local government polls.

Deshapriya warned that any attempt to appoint a fresh delimitation committee could further delay the electoral process, making it unlikely that local government elections would be held within the current year.

He also dismissed claims that financial constraints have prevented the conduct of elections. Expressing surprise at such assertions, he questioned how funding shortages could be cited as a reason for postponement while expenditure continues in other sectors.

According to Deshapriya, the existence of laws establishing local government institutions imposes an obligation on the State to ensure that those institutions are populated through democratic means.

“The legal framework exists. If elected representatives are not appointed through elections and institutions continue to function under unelected administrators, that is a failure of the State,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending