Opinion
‘Not even congee now!’
by Dr Upul Wijayawardhana
‘Den Kendawath ne’ was the instant response I got from a good friend of mine when I rang him to find out how things are with the new government that came to power with so much of fanfare and promise. Judging from my stunned silence, as it took me some time to understand his cynical comment, he went on to say that the ingredients for polkiri kenda, viz., rice, coconut and salt are all in short supply or so expensive that the average Sri Lankan cannot afford them. For those who could not afford the luxury of a meal of rice and curry, a large cup of the gruel made by boiling rice with salt and coconut milk used to be an inexpensive alternative with reasonable nutritious value. Those who liked a little ‘heat’ chewed on a green chilli but that too has joined the rank of expensive luxuries!
It is blatantly obvious to any, except for the blind supporters of the NPP, that the inability to tame the ‘rice mafia’ is the biggest failure of this government. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake (AKD), during the presidential as well as the parliamentary election campaigns, waxed eloquent on how he was planning to tame that mafia, but what happened? He has done exactly what all other governments have done in the past; shouting about it and importing rice while the rice mafia carries on regardless continuing exploitation! To add insult to injury, the government is yet to announce the guaranteed price for rice; it has let down the farmers who voted the NPP in droves. AKD is increasingly looking to be a man who talks without follow-up action. In addition, he has recently demonstrated that he has mastered the art of diversion in an attempt to camouflage the failures. For the sceptics, of course, it comes as no surprise as the NPP won the elections with a raft of promises impossible to keep, as well as a concerted campaign of throwing mud at the opponents.
AKD’s campaign against Mahinda Rajapaksa is bound to backfire. No one would disagree that the generous ‘grants’ to retired presidents, extended to surviving spouses too, need revision, especially because of the difficult times facing the country. However, he seems not to understand that right things also need to be done in the correct manner through legal and constitutional means. Instead, he is attempting do so by shouting at public rallies!
AKD dropped a bombshell by announcing at a rally in Katukurunda, Kalutara on 19 Jan., that he would ask MR to leave the residence the latter was occupying or pay the rent as assessed by the government valuer, completely disregarding the accepted norms. It is either a demonstration of lack of political skill or arrogance of the highest order. MR, the consummate politician that he is, responded by stating that he is prepared to comply provided the request is made in writing. Of course, he did so, knowing fully well that instructions could not be given in writing without a constitutional amendment changing his entitlements. Why AKD did not use his massive majority to effect the constitutional change and take appropriate action but resorted to browbeating MR needs examination. Perhaps, he quoted massive figures to capitalise on envy so that the failures of the government would be forgotten and anger would be directed towards MR. It obviously was a diversionary tactic!
Not being contend with this, an acolyte of AKD announced that MR needed not wait for written instructions but could leave, to solve the problem. It is a pity this new breed of politicians, who promised to change the system, seems to be changing the system for the worse; not adhering to rules and regulations but use force, verbal or maybe otherwise!
It is well known that memories are short in Sri Lanka and it is no surprise that the NPP is capitalising on this to discredit MR, a vain attempt it would turn out to be, most likely. MR has his faults, the biggest being not knowing when to retire gracefully. Even when he tried to retire, some of the young Rajapaksas and thugs in the guise of politicians prevented him from doing so. Instead, they decided to attack the protesters in Galle Face; exactly what those behind the protests wanted and rest is history!
Whatever MR’s faults, it cannot be forgotten that he ensured that the impossible was achieved. Experts were unanimous that the LTTE could not be defeated militarily but MR’s sheer determination proved them wrong. Many are trying to claim credit for the annihilation of the Tigers and some commentators seem determined to reduce the credit due to MR but it goes without saying that if not for MR’s political leadership things would have been very different. We would either be still in the throes of a continuing war or the likes of Solheim would have seen to it that Sri Lanka was divided, just like what happened in Sudan.
It is a great shame that MR ended his political career in disgrace but, still, we cannot forget what he achieved, there being much more than the finishing of a prolonged insurgency. No one can deny he has earned his place in Sri Lanka’s history and if an attempt is made to erase that grateful Sri Lankans, of whom there are many, would retaliate though they have been silenced at present.
As I mentioned in my piece “Are the actions of the government, so far, purely cosmetic?” (The Island, 15 January), NPP government is showing early signs of failure and as mentioned in the editorial “Only delivery can save govts.” (The Island, 27 January) it will have to face consequences, if no course correction takes place.
It is high time that AKD became a man of action, not words, and behaving in a manner befitting the dignified position he holds than behaving like an opposition politician!
Opinion
All-Female!
by Anushka Kahandagamage
The world moves forward, but the challenges women face in Sri Lankan society—whether as visible barriers or as invisible misogyny—are unbelievable. Gender-based violence, in its many (un) structured forms, is deeply ingrained in various aspects of society, including language, politics, economics, religion, media, and even the education system. In She Current, my goal is to shine a light on issues that spark conversation about women in society and provide resources to help individuals unlearn harmful gender stereotypes, ultimately working towards a society that is equitable for all genders.
Recently, there was news about the first all-female-staffed hotel in Sri Lanka, which attracted much attention on social media. What was even more interesting, however, was how this news sparked many negative comments. Some of them were: ‘Is the hotel named Sunday Market? The rule that the customer is always right doesn’t apply here. Who would maintain the machinery? Who built the hotel? Why is there a gender-restricted institution? Isn’t that discriminatory? Toxic feminism. If there is a place where only women are present, that place will be a disaster. Is it a lesbian hotel?’ and many more.
All these comments suggest how Sri Lanka society sees women in general and how they are being discriminated against.
Female friendly hotels are gaining prominence in the world as there is a significant increase in female solo travellers. These hotels have emerged as a solution for the challenges faced by female solo travellers, creating a safe and empowering space where they can also meet like-minded women from all around the world. The negative buzz created around this ‘women only’ endeavour is a big talk for a country which is based on tourism, and gradually crawling out from bankruptcy and maintained a huge military (predominantly male) for ages from dollars earned from the labour of female garment factory workers and tea plantations which is run predominantly by female workers.
The negative attention surrounding this ‘women-only’ initiative kind of ‘wise’ conversation you would expect from a country which heavily relies on tourism, with increased female solo traveller population and an economy, including a large military force (predominantly male), long sustained by the labour of female workers in garment factories and tea plantations.
The use of the term ‘Sunday market’ as an insult is built upon certain discourse around the female street vendors called vaṭṭi amma. The term is often directed at women who are outspoken or assertive, carrying with it an underlying implication that they belong to a lower social class. In this context, ‘Sunday market’ is employed to criticize women-run businesses as ‘unorganised.’. And also, positioning these women outside the realm of the ‘civilised’ and ‘passive’ qualities traditionally expected of a ‘pious’ woman, who are considered suitable as marriage partners. When women step outside their expected gender roles – whether by speaking up, being independent or running business – they are often labeled as ‘bad’ women. The insult implies that women who deviate from these norms are somehow less refined or respectable, according to the criteria set by Victorian and middle-class values, and their assertiveness is viewed as a transgression. In a similar comment, it is stated that, ‘If there is a place where only women are present, that place will be a disaster,’ overlooked the fact that, despite the Sri Lankan parliament being predominantly male dominated, the country faced a severe economic crisis and ended up bankrupt. This comment too carries how women are not capable of organised business and rational thinking, which are embedded misconceptions in the society.
This comment—Why is there a gender-restricted institution? Isn’t that discriminatory?’—highlights the lack of awareness about gender issues in society and how people dismiss discussions on feminism, assuming it’s solely about women. The discrimination women faced is historical. While men are considered complete humans, women were often considered as second to them or in a more political sense, considered second citizens. Women had to face many challenges even to have the right to vote, own property or be employed.
Thus, it is simplistic and shallow to state that ‘it is discriminatory for males, as this is a gender-restricted institution.’ As mentioned earlier, the discrimination women have faced for centuries still exists in many forms, and these types of gender-restricted spaces are not meant to discriminate against men but to level the playing field of gender inequality. Empowerment of women does not come at the expense of discriminating against men; rather, it seeks to level a gender field that has been uneven for women and other sexual minorities for centuries.
Finally, the individual who commented ‘toxic feminism’ shows the significant lack of gender education within the society. Feminism does not promote one gender over another; rather, it is an effort to create a world that is sensitive to all genders. In its primary sense, feminism questions the patriarchal structures that limit all genders, including men. Patriarchal structures confine men to high-risk employment, obstruct their ability to express emotions, and contribute to issues such as depression and high suicide rates. One should not equate feminism with toxic masculinity; instead, it presents an ideology that advocates for all genders to live their lives as they choose, free from societal discrimination. Feminism, therefore, is not about demonising men or promoting female dominance; it is about questioning and dismantling the harmful gender norms that restrict everyone
Finally, the subtle existence of gender stereotypes in society and how they create misogynistic and unsafe spaces for women—even in the news—provokes serious concern. When we see a simple tagline like ‘all women staff’ attracting such intense negativity, it forces us to reflect on the broader, more insidious realities that women face on a daily basis. Women who venture into the world—whether they are solo female travellers, garment factory workers, tea pluckers, or parliamentarians—face verbal, physical, and mental threats in the real world, making it feel like a minefield filled with constant dangers. Women are often forced to remain hyper-aware of their surroundings, constantly evaluating the risks of every situation, from choosing where to stay to deciding which streets to walk down. The idea of being ‘safe’—a concept many take for granted—is, for women, often an illusion.
Anushka Kahandagamage recently completed her PhD at School of Social Sciences, University of Otago.
Opinion
to pathi
in a brown dream
i had the other day, I bear an offering
i call ‘amunu,’ that which I carry up to you,
struggling on the steep climb to darien’s peak.
you leaning away, looking tall, on the other side,
me in a dull grey skirt. the blue sea lay below,
as we glanced down at the unmoving waters,
living out the vanishing moments, as limn, time pass.
The dream faded, a shadow shimmering in the waters
set alight by the mid morn sun.
The dream faded, like betrayal
in the blink of an eye.
sumathy
january 28, 2025
Opinion
For a national transportation safety board
There have been reports of 12,000 road deaths in Sri Lanka in the last five years. I believe it is time to form a National Transport Safety Board (NTSB) encompassing all six modes of transportation: road, rail, maritime, aviation, multimodal, and pipelines. The body should be administered under the aegis of a single independent organisation whereby modern incident/accident investigation and prevention techniques could be shared with the aim of reducing death and destruction.
Totally independent operations will relieve the suggested NTSB from governmental and political interference when carrying out incident/accident enquiries, and should be done in a non-punitive atmosphere, purely with the intention of prevention. Punitive measures and retribution do not stop the recurrence of such events. While incidents/accidents will occur most frequently in road transportation, advanced methods of investigation are practised in the field of aviation, with common principles of investigation applied to other modes of transport.
The primary objective should be to determine the root cause of any incident/accident, sometimes known as the ‘cause behind the cause’. In addition to roadworthiness, rail worthiness, airworthiness and other mechanical reasons, studies in ‘human factors’ that contribute to accidents are common to all modes of transport. These can be used to be proactive, preventive, and predictive.
A little more than a year ago it was the intention of the Civil Aviation Authority-Sri Lanka (CAASL) to establish an ‘independent’ air accident investigation team. Although seven volunteers were selected from many fields in civil aviation by the CAASL (and the Civil Aviation Ministry), to act on behalf of the CAASL, true independence was never intended or achieved. Sadly, by imposing an age limit on the team the authorities chose to overlook the fact that experience in the industry comes with age. That short-sighted decision prevented the appointment of trained accident investigators who were in any case performing a voluntary service.
Many years ago, while on his regular commute to Katukurunda airport and experiencing the crazy and dangerous antics of long-distance bus drivers on Galle Road, this writer suggested that CCTV cameras inaccessible to the crew should be installed on public buses, for analysis after an incident or accident. The proposal was well received, but never implemented.
‘Dashcams’ should also be mandatory for other forms of road, rail and maritime traffic as well. Relatively inexpensive options of that type of equipment are available.
The proposed NTSB will certainly make a difference.
Capt. Gihan A Fernando
Royal Ceylon Air Force/ Sri Lanka Air Force, Air Ceylon, Air Lanka, Singapore Airlines and SriLankan Airlines
Former Secretary and Honorary Life Member Air Line Pilots’ Guild Sri Lanka
Former member CAASL Incident/ Accident Investigation Team
Human Factors and Crew Resource Management Facilitator Singapore Airlines
Former Deputy Director Air Operations CAASL
Organisation of Professional Associations (OPA) Representative for ‘Aviation’
Immediate Past President of the Aircraft Owners And Operators Association Sri Lanka
President UL Club, Sri Lanka
-
Business7 days ago
Member, National Council for Road Safety
-
Features6 days ago
Hambantota oil refinery – From fairy tale to reality?
-
Sports6 days ago
Mr. Neil Perera passes away at 95
-
Opinion3 days ago
Cost of ‘Sinhala Only’
-
Latest News6 days ago
2024 Grade 5 Scholarship Exam results released
-
Features3 days ago
A conversation that cannot be delayed
-
Editorial7 days ago
A tale of two cities
-
Editorial6 days ago
From brown-bag lunch to buffet