Connect with us

Opinion

‘Not even congee now!’

Published

on

by Dr Upul Wijayawardhana

‘Den Kendawath ne’ was the instant response I got from a good friend of mine when I rang him to find out how things are with the new government that came to power with so much of fanfare and promise. Judging from my stunned silence, as it took me some time to understand his cynical comment, he went on to say that the ingredients for polkiri kenda, viz., rice, coconut and salt are all in short supply or so expensive that the average Sri Lankan cannot afford them. For those who could not afford the luxury of a meal of rice and curry, a large cup of the gruel made by boiling rice with salt and coconut milk used to be an inexpensive alternative with reasonable nutritious value. Those who liked a little ‘heat’ chewed on a green chilli but that too has joined the rank of expensive luxuries!

It is blatantly obvious to any, except for the blind supporters of the NPP, that the inability to tame the ‘rice mafia’ is the biggest failure of this government. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake (AKD), during the presidential as well as the parliamentary election campaigns, waxed eloquent on how he was planning to tame that mafia, but what happened? He has done exactly what all other governments have done in the past; shouting about it and importing rice while the rice mafia carries on regardless continuing exploitation! To add insult to injury, the government is yet to announce the guaranteed price for rice; it has let down the farmers who voted the NPP in droves. AKD is increasingly looking to be a man who talks without follow-up action. In addition, he has recently demonstrated that he has mastered the art of diversion in an attempt to camouflage the failures. For the sceptics, of course, it comes as no surprise as the NPP won the elections with a raft of promises impossible to keep, as well as a concerted campaign of throwing mud at the opponents.

AKD’s campaign against Mahinda Rajapaksa is bound to backfire. No one would disagree that the generous ‘grants’ to retired presidents, extended to surviving spouses too, need revision, especially because of the difficult times facing the country. However, he seems not to understand that right things also need to be done in the correct manner through legal and constitutional means. Instead, he is attempting do so by shouting at public rallies!

AKD dropped a bombshell by announcing at a rally in Katukurunda, Kalutara on 19 Jan., that he would ask MR to leave the residence the latter was occupying or pay the rent as assessed by the government valuer, completely disregarding the accepted norms. It is either a demonstration of lack of political skill or arrogance of the highest order. MR, the consummate politician that he is, responded by stating that he is prepared to comply provided the request is made in writing. Of course, he did so, knowing fully well that instructions could not be given in writing without a constitutional amendment changing his entitlements. Why AKD did not use his massive majority to effect the constitutional change and take appropriate action but resorted to browbeating MR needs examination. Perhaps, he quoted massive figures to capitalise on envy so that the failures of the government would be forgotten and anger would be directed towards MR. It obviously was a diversionary tactic!

Not being contend with this, an acolyte of AKD announced that MR needed not wait for written instructions but could leave, to solve the problem. It is a pity this new breed of politicians, who promised to change the system, seems to be changing the system for the worse; not adhering to rules and regulations but use force, verbal or maybe otherwise!

It is well known that memories are short in Sri Lanka and it is no surprise that the NPP is capitalising on this to discredit MR, a vain attempt it would turn out to be, most likely. MR has his faults, the biggest being not knowing when to retire gracefully. Even when he tried to retire, some of the young Rajapaksas and thugs in the guise of politicians prevented him from doing so. Instead, they decided to attack the protesters in Galle Face; exactly what those behind the protests wanted and rest is history!

Whatever MR’s faults, it cannot be forgotten that he ensured that the impossible was achieved. Experts were unanimous that the LTTE could not be defeated militarily but MR’s sheer determination proved them wrong. Many are trying to claim credit for the annihilation of the Tigers and some commentators seem determined to reduce the credit due to MR but it goes without saying that if not for MR’s political leadership things would have been very different. We would either be still in the throes of a continuing war or the likes of Solheim would have seen to it that Sri Lanka was divided, just like what happened in Sudan.

It is a great shame that MR ended his political career in disgrace but, still, we cannot forget what he achieved, there being much more than the finishing of a prolonged insurgency. No one can deny he has earned his place in Sri Lanka’s history and if an attempt is made to erase that grateful Sri Lankans, of whom there are many, would retaliate though they have been silenced at present.

As I mentioned in my piece “Are the actions of the government, so far, purely cosmetic?” (The Island, 15 January), NPP government is showing early signs of failure and as mentioned in the editorial “Only delivery can save govts.” (The Island, 27 January) it will have to face consequences, if no course correction takes place.

It is high time that AKD became a man of action, not words, and behaving in a manner befitting the dignified position he holds than behaving like an opposition politician!



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Spending on import of goods we could produce locally

Published

on

It has been reported that Sri Lanka continues to spend vast sums of foreign exchange on importing goods that could be produced domestically with ease. This pattern raises serious concerns. It may be driven, in part, by vested interests profiting from import commissions and easy margins.

Another contributing factor could be the perceived need to cater to foreign tourists, especially in the hospitality sector.

However, this raises a troubling question: are we spending more on imports to serve tourists than we earn from their visits?

Besides food, a wide range of imported items—including building materials and hotel-related paraphernalia—are draining our foreign reserves. While tourism is touted as a major foreign exchange earner, the actual net benefit to the country remains unclear. It may enrich hotel owners and create jobs, but whether it truly strengthens our economy is debatable.

A Ratnayake

Continue Reading

Opinion

Mannar wind power project and people’s protests

Published

on

It has been reported that the government has abruptly halted the Mannar wind power project, which was to be launched by a prominent conglomerate.

This conglomerate is widely known to have close ties with the ruling party, and several of its directors currently hold positions in government-linked institutions.

Would a government that has been accused of changing its mind quite frequently, really suspend a multi-billion-rupee project simply because of objections from a small group of citizens in one corner of the country?

Is this a rare instance of the government standing up for ordinary people—or is it something else entirely?

Is it that the government decision has resulted from an internal conflict?

S K Muthukumara

Continue Reading

Opinion

Inserting the foot in your mouth

Published

on

At a diplomatic reception held in Vienna in the 1960s, British Foreign Minister George Brown sat in his chair enjoying a glass of wine. Then he heard the orchestra strike up a tune. When he turned round he saw a beautiful woman seated beside him. He politely asked her, “Madame, may we dance?” The lady in scarlet dress told him, “No, Mr Brown, for three reasons. First, this is a reception, not a ball. Second, even were this a ball, this would still be a state anthem and not a waltz. And third, were this a ball and not a reception and were that a waltz and not a state anthem, I would still be the Cardinal Archbishop.”

This is a well-known faux pas, a French term meaning an action or remark that causes embarrassment because it is not socially correct. Although we do not hear this phrase today, we still make socially unacceptable remarks every now and then. One day I met an old friend in Colombo who had migrated to Canada a few years ago. I said, “Good to see you again. How is your wife?” He looked at me in a serious way and asked, “Didn’t you know that she passed away a few years ago?” I felt like banging my head against a wall.

Although we dress well we have not been able to check ourselves when we speak to others. Faux pas has been defined by Pundit Michael Kinsley as the truth politicians accidentally speak. At the 1980 Democratic Convention, U.S. President Jimmy Carter extolled the virtues of former Vice President Hubert Horatio Humphrey as “Hubert Horatio Hornblower.”

Major social faux pas

Forgetting someone’s name is a major social faux pas. Sir John Kotalawala addressing an election rally turned to the organiser and asked “What’s that b ….’s name?” I met my former English teacher at a wedding ceremony after a long time. He greeted me, “Hello, Kodituwakku. How are you?” My wife asked me whether I had changed my name from Kodituwakku to Karunaratne. I told him, “Sir, I am not Kodituwakku …” Then he cut me off by saying, “Oh, it’s a faux pas.”

We meet so many people and sometimes we tend to forget their names. It is quite natural. However, when you have to introduce a friend to another person you have to remember his name. By the way, if you have to attend a function, do not go there too early or too late. They are supposed to be social blunders. Remember that we had a President who was always late for Cabinet meetings!

If you have to attend a wedding or interview, dress properly. You should not wear casual clothes for such events. There is no excuse for dressing improperly. However, if you forget someone’s name, you can ask for his name politely. A simple apology will smooth things over. You may have heard of Dr Sigmund Freud’s eponymous slip of the tongue. One day a man arrived at a railway station to buy tickets to Pittsburgh. He went to the ticket counter and asked for “Two tickets to Tittsburgh.” Sometimes people mispronounce your name. One day a wealthy socialite Mrs Stuyvesant Fish attended a fancy-dress ball in Rhode Island. At the entrance she told the butler the theme of the costume as “A Norman peasant.” Later she heard someone announcing “An enormous pheasant.”

Disrespectful and rude

If you keep on checking your mobile phone repeatedly when someone is trying to speak to you, you are committing a social faux pas. Many people view this behaviour as an indication that you are not paying attention to what another person is saying. This is something disrespectful and rude.

Sometimes we misunderstand others. One day Robert Benchley, an eminent author, while leaving a restaurant at night saw a man in uniform. The author thought that he was the doorman and asked him to call a cab. The man in uniform turned round and told him, “I happen to be a rear admiral in the U.S. Navy.” “In that case,” Bentley said, “get me a battleship.”

Another example of social faux pas is excessively dominating a conversation. To avoid hogging the conversation, practise active listening. If you talk to someone, look at his face and maintain eye contact. Ask him thoughtful questions, if necessary.

Talking about women

At a party Ben and Peter were drinking and talking about women. After some time they saw two women coming down the staircase. Ben said, “That’s the woman I was in love with.” Peter said, “That’s my wife.” Ben immediately corrected himself by saying, “I mean the other woman.” “That’s my daughter,” Peter said somewhat angrily.

There are many other instances where you make blunders. One such instance is attending a birthday party empty-handed. If you are unable to decide what to give as a gift, a reasonable amount of money can be given to the birthday boy or girl.

Some women do not like to divulge their real age. Therefore do not press them to do so. On the other hand, both men and women do not like to tell you how much they earn. Such matters are extremely personal.

Intimate personal details

When you strike up a friendship with someone for the first time, make it a point not to share intimate personal details. If you do so, you will make yourself a laughing stock. Reveal your real character to close friends, if it is really necessary.

Finally, bragging is a form of faux pas. One day a young lecturer was invited to deliver a talk on the English Day at a prestigious school in Colombo. Instead of telling the students the importance of English, she started bragging about how she got a postgraduate degree at a young age. Another lecturer began his lecture by telling the audience that he had a doctorate. They do not realise that people are not interested in their academic qualifications. You are judged by your performance.

By R. S. Karunaratne ✍️
karunaratners@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Trending