Connect with us

Midweek Review

‘Nine: The Hidden Story’ FACT or FICTION

Published

on

Wimal Weerawansa, MP, at the launch of his latest work ‘Nine: The Hidden Story’

The government reaction to the police shooting at a violent protest at Rambukkana on April 19, 2022, undermined the overall security posture. Repeated US interventions, HRCSL (Human Rights Commission) action as well as the position taken by some members of the Bar Association demoralized the police and the military. That was the only death caused by police/military shooting during the entire protest campaign. Those who now question the failure on the part of the military on May 09 and July 09 conveniently forgot how the government responded to the Rambukkana shooting. Therefore, the decision on the part of the National Freedom Front (NFF) to present ‘Nine: The Hidden Story’ to the two daughters of the protester who died in the Rambukkana shooting surprised quite a number of people, including the writer, at the well-attended book launch.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

US Ambassador to Colombo Julie J. Chung tweeted: “I am disappointed that an MP has made baseless allegations and spread outright lies in a book that should be labelled ‘fiction’. For 75 years, the US and SL have shared commitments to democracy, sovereignty, and prosperity – a partnership and future we continue to build together.”

Ambassador Chung was responding to explosive accusations made by National Freedom Front (NFF) leader Wimal Weerawansa, MP, at the launch of ‘Nine: The Hidden Story’ at Sri Lanka Foundation on the evening of April 25. The American responded within 24 hours.

Displaying a 133 page book written in Sinhala, one-time minister Weerawansa discussed the US role in President Gotabaya Rajapaksas’s removal and their current strategy that involved some projects targeting Parliament. It must be noted that the US Ambassador must be having a super-fast translator to translate that book into English, in a matter of a few hours. Therefore, the bone of contention is whether the US, in fact, conducted the regime change operation as it had done elsewhere, as alleged by lawmaker Weerawansa.

Chung presented her credentials to the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa at Janadhipathi Mandiraya on February 25, 2022, just over a month before public anger exploded, opposite the President’s private residence, at Pangiriwatte, Mirihana, possibly incited by interested parties, as happened in Libya, in the lead up to the staged ouster of Gaddafi by Western powers. President Rajapaksa was flanked by State Foreign Minister Tharaka Balasuriya and Gamini Senarath, Secretary to the President. But, by the time Chung took over the US mission here, the Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration was in serious trouble. The Rajapaksas quite wrongly felt that the situation could be somewhat stabilized by replacing Dr. P.B. Jayasundera, who functioned as the Secretary to the President.

Gamini Senarath was brought in on January 19, 2022. though President Gotabaya Rajapaksa preferred senior public servant Anura Dissanayake. This was disclosed by Derana Chief, Dilith Jayaweera, at one time, one of the closest associates of ousted President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, in a YouTube interview, with Eraj Weeraratne, recently.

By the time Chung succeeded Alaina B. Teplitz, the architect of the controversial deal with US-based firm New Fortress Energy, finalized close to midnight on September 17, 2021, the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) was rapidly moving towards inflicting grave injury on the coalition. President Gotabaya Rajapaksa sacked Ministers Wimal Weerawansa and Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) leader Udaya Gammanpila on March 03, 2022, over their protests against the deal with the US firm. Weerawansa is on record as having alleged that they were sacked by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the behest of his brother Basil Rajapaksa, Minister of finance. Vasudeva Nanayakkara, who joined Weerawansa and Gammanpila to move the Supreme Court against the New Fortress deal, thereafter boycotted the Cabinet.

In the run-up to the Pangiriwatte flare-up, the United States’ notorious regime change guru, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland. arrived in Colombo. Her delegation included Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu, and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Amanda Dory. Ambassador Chung joined the visiting delegation when a meeting took place with President Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the Presidential Secretariat on March 23, 2022.

The stage was set for an operation to oust President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. But, according to Weerawansa, National List MP Ranil Wickremesinghe, the UNP leader was not to be the beneficiary of the US project, according to the original plot hatched by them.

A clandestine meet

The crux of the matter is Weerawansa’s assertion that Chung put immense pressure on Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to accept the Office of the President, consequent to President Gotabaya Rajapaksas’s resignation. Weerawansa declared that the US envoy visited the Speaker, unannounced, at his official residence, amidst protesters’ bid to take control of Parliament. The MP’s statement that the Speaker hadn’t been aware of Ambassador Chung’s arrival at his official residence, until she walked in, is astonishing.

Speaker Abeywardena never contradicted Weerawansa’s claim though Ambassador Chung swiftly and totally rejected Weerawansa’s work ‘Nine: The Hidden Story.’ Speaker Abeywardena, for some reason, remains stone silent so far, even though Weerawansa, at the book launch, acknowledged the possibility of the Matara District lawmaker denying his claim.

If MP Weerawansa lied through his teeth, as alleged by Ambassador Chung, why is Speaker Abeywardena remaining silent? Did the clandestine visit actually take place? Would Ambassador Chung have gone to the extent of assuring Speaker Abeywardena that he could assume presidency, contrary to the Constitution, without specific instructions/approval of the US State Department?

In case Speaker Abeywardena quickly denied MP Weerawansa’s claim, immediately after Ambassador Chung’s denial, or before Weerawansa’s book came out, it would have been thrown to the dustbin.

Those who dismissed MP Weerawansa’s shocking claims, pertaining to the US project here, should be concerned about Speaker Abeywardena’s response. If the Speaker remains silent, to protect a lawmaker propagating lies, the Matara District MP, too, should be held accountable for the destabilization caused.

Perhaps, one of the most exciting chapters dealt with the rapid developments that took place immediately after a disappointed Ambassador Chung left the Speaker’s residence. Having seen a contingent of over 100 Special Forces troops in the Speaker’s compound, a much agitated Speaker Abeywardena contacted the then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, who was at Army Headquarters at Pelawatte, Battaramulla. Following consultations with Premier Wickremesinghe, Speaker Abeywardena had left the compound, from a gate in the rear, and sought refuge at Army headquarters where the PM and military top brass viewed aerial footage of the mayhem. Live drone coverage included footage of protesters setting Premier Wickremesinghe’s house, near Royal College, ablaze.

Did Speaker Abeywardena visit Army headquarters, on the evening of July 09, 2022, and subsequently moved to a safe location, close to the Ratmalana airport, provided by the Air Force, as claimed by MP Weerawansa?

As disclosed by MP Weerawansa, did Speaker Abeywardena issue all statements pertaining to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s resignation, and related matters, from the safe house, provided by the Air Force?

The government should respond to MP Weerawansa’s published allegations and set the record straight, if the NFF leader propagated lies. Actually, Speaker Abeywardena should have raised a privilege issue if a lawmaker pursued such a destructive political project, at the expense of Sri Lanka’s relations with the US. Regardless of accountability issues, raised by the US since the successful conclusion of the war, in May 2009, to Washington’s dislike. The US, however, did facilitate the destruction of the LTTE’s sea supply chain by divulging specific US intelligence on the positioning of floating LTTE arsenals, on the high seas, during the last phase of the war, that enabled the Navy to deliver a knockout blow to the Tigers, in international waters, at a crucial time for the overall combined forces fight to end the LTTE terror menace.

In case of a second print of ‘Nine: The Hidden Story,’ Weerawansa should examine whether Speaker Abeywardena had revealed Ambassador Chung’s sudden appearance, at his residence, on the evening of July 09, and the controversial offer made to install him as President of an interim administration, when he called Premier Wickremesinghe, from his official residence. If not, did Speaker Abeywardena brief Premier Wickremesinghe of the unexpected development when they met at Army headquarters shortly thereafter?

Speaker Abeywardena should unreservedly earn the respect of all Lankans for turning down the US underhand offer to facilitate a complete regime change. Regardless of whatever shortcomings and failures on his part, lawmaker Abeywardena thwarted plan ‘A’ designed to install an interim administration, under the Speaker’s leadership. For how long can Speaker Abeywardena remain non-committal as MP Weerawansa repeats accusations?

India’s role and plan ‘B’

Can MP Weerawansa substantiate accusations directed at New Delhi? The former JVP firebrand claim that India sought to replace Premier Mahinda Rajapaksa with Basil Rajapaksa in response to growing public protest campaigns cannot be taken at face value. Similarly, Weerawansa’s other unsubstantiated assertion that India declined to deploy an aircraft to take President Rajapaksa, and the first lady, out of Sri Lanka to their safety, consequent to the President’s refusal to sack Premier Wickremesinghe before he himself resigned, has to be proved. Weerawansa boldly claimed that India made its position clear to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, through Sri Lanka’s Ambassador in Washington, Mahinda Samarasinghe, and High Commissioner in New Delhi, Milinda Moragoda. Regardless of the President’s refusal, Gamini Senerath, the then Secretary to the President, forwarded two letters -one the President’s resignation letter and the other that dealt with Premier Wickremesinghe’s removal – for approval. Did such a drama really take place? If Weerawansa propagated blatant lies, in a bid to cause further chaos, those who have been identified by name, as part of the US-India conspiracy, should contradict the NFF leader. It would be pertinent to mention that Samarasinghe and Moragoda represented in Parliament and served Cabinet-of-Ministers, under President Mahinda Rajapaksa, both notable turncoats after having crossed over from the UNP.

Weerawansa’s assumption that both the US and India wanted to thwart Wickremesinghe shouldn’t go uninvestigated. The plan ‘A’, designed to be implemented, envisaged an interim administration, under the leadership of Speaker Abeywardena. Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka, MP, has lambasted Weerawansa, in Parliament, for implicating him, as well as Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Shavendra Silva in the alleged conspiracy. Denying his role or that of the serving military in the alleged conspiracy to oust President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, the war-winning Army Commander questioned the very basis of the former Minister’s claims. Fonseka, who contested the 2010 presidential election, challenging his former Commander in Chief President Mahinda Rajapaksa, with the backing of the US, as revealed by Wikileaks, obviously attempted to denigrate Weerawansa by claiming to recall how subservient Weerawansa had been during the time he served as the Commander of the Army.

Weerawansa referred to Field Marshal by name when he addressed the gathering at the book launch, though the name was not mentioned in ‘Nine: The Hidden Story.’

India hasn’t responded to Weerawansa’s accusations. In fact, except for Ambassador Chung, the only other person to call MP Weerawansa a liar was Sarath Fonseka whose Army brought the LTTE down to its knees in May 2009. But, that wouldn’t have been possible without the extraordinary contribution made by the Navy and the Air Force, and the valiant sacrifices of the battle hardened soldiers, and their frontline commanders, who took the fight to the LTTE. We grant, as someone has said, Fonseka is the type of commander with a sixth sense that a country gets once in a thousand years, but it was wrong of him to claim the victory trophy, single handedly, after it was won by the sacrifices of so many.

Weerawansa has explained that in the wake of the US failure to convince Speaker Abeywardena to assume the leadership, the superpower, and India, were compelled to implement plan ‘B’ with Wickremesinghe. Perhaps a wider examination of the entire gamut of issues, beginning with the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage, is necessary to ascertain what is going on in the ‘land like no other.’

In hindsight it can be recalled that a section of the media jumped the gun and quite confidently, and conveniently, reported simultaneous resignations of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, on July 10, 2022. So how such clairvoyant reports did come to be written unless there were in fact a sinister plot in progress, but it buckled because of the decency of the Speaker and his commitment to do what is right?

Colombo based The Hindu correspondent Meera Srinivasan, in an online report, posted on May 10, 2022, and updated on the following day, headlined ‘Sri Lanka parties scramble to form all party govt,’ with strapline ‘Rajapaksas’ parliamentary majority, public anger with political class complicates exercise’ dealt with resignation of the President and the Prime Minister. Srinivasan declared that both the President and Prime Minister agreed to resign after party leaders asked for their resignations at a meeting chaired by Speaker Abeywardena. The Hindu correspondent added: “Party leaders met on Saturday in a discussion convened by the Speaker. They sought the immediate resignation of the President and the Prime Minister, agreed that Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena be made Acting President as per the Constitution, after which Parliament be convened to elect a President from among its members, to pave the way for an interim, all-party government. A flurry of political meetings followed on Sunday.”

Anurada Herath, in a report headlined ‘Speaker should become Acting President – Watagala’ posted on July 13, 2022, confirmed the push for Speaker Abeywardena’s elevation as the Acting President. JVP Central Committee Member, Attorney-at-Law Sunil Watagala was quoted as having said that if Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe has an iota of sense, he should not allow the political turmoil to drag on and instead should pave the way for the Speaker to become the Acting President.

Hong Kong flag on the protest ground

MP Weerawansa, in his foreword, disclosed hitherto unreported Chinese intervention to prevent the displaying of the Hong Kong flag at the Galle Face protest site, on May 09, 2022, the first day of the ‘Gota Go Gama’ campaign. Comparing the Maidan revolution, launched in Ukraine in February, 2014, with the Western project here, lawmaker Weerawansa questioned the displaying of the Hong Kong flag. Can the lawmaker substantiate his assertion that Western powers planned to unleash protest campaigns in Hong Kong in the wake of their Colombo operation.

Following the Chinese Embassy intervention, ‘Gota Go Gama’ organizers stopped the displaying of the Hong Kong flag.

Maidan violence, instigated by the US, followed a similar wave of protests, beginning November, 2013, when the then President Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign the European Union-Ukraine Association Agreement. Throughout the Maidan uprising, a protest camp occupied Independence Square in central Kyiv.

MP Weerawansa’s declaration that the Galle Face protest campaign should be examined taking into consideration Maidan uprising is of significant importance. The MP underscored the need to educate the younger generation of foreign-funded operations/agendas.

Weerawansa and those who really believe in the much touted conspiracy theory/theories should keep in their minds Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s administration created an environment conducive for such a devious project. ‘Gota Go Gama’ strategy relied on the ruination of the economy. Gotabaya Rajapaksa caused his own downfall and ruined the economy as a result of a spate of ill-advised, ill-fated, and reckless decisions.

Who really advised the President to change the country’s agriculture policy (April/May, 2021)? Overnight, in his capacity as the head of the Cabinet, President Rajapaksa banned the use of chemical fertilisers and other agro chemicals. The foolish decision on the use of chemical fertilisers, followed unprecedented tax cuts (November 2019). In between, Sri Lanka lost an opportunity to reach consensus with the IMF for a bailout package as a result of its decision to go ahead with an unprecedented tax cut that deprived the Treasury of as much as Rs 600 bn (March/April 2020) in vital revenue, at a very crucial time.

The economy couldn’t endure such short-sighted policies, particularly against the backdrop of the devastation caused by the April 2019 Easter Sunday carnage, followed by the Covid-19 pandemic.

However, Weerawansa refrained from speculating the possibility of external hand in influencing ill-fated decisions. Disclosure of an utterly corrupt decision to reduce Rs. 50 tax on a kilo of imported sugar to 25 cents, on October 13, 2020, too, contributed to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s downfall. The government fiercely defended it, both in and out of Parliament. Regardless of repeated assurances, the SLPP failed to pursue the Treasury bond scams perpetrated, in February 2015, and March 2016, thereby causing rapid erosion of public confidence. And, finally, unbridled corruption, at every level, and the pathetic failure on the part of the government to address accusations pertaining to the Easter Sunday massacre and the continuing China-Quad battle created the perfect environment for the President’s ouster.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Midweek Review

Unexpected focus on ‘pieces of tin’ worn by military men

Published

on

Maj. Lalith Jayasinghe with Kaushalya on his wedding day. Jayasinghe, receipient of Sri Lanka's highest military honour, has been credited with unprecedented raids behind the enemy lines. He died in late November, 2008, in the Vanni east.

Second Lieutenant S.U. Aladeniya, the first recipient of the Parama Weera Vibhushanaya, died fighting the LTTE in the second week of July, 1990. The young commanding officer of the isolated Kokavil Army detachment refused an opportunity to leave his wounded colleagues. Instead, he chose to set an extraordinary example. The fate of the Kokavil detachment, as well as the unprecedented military debacle that forced the Army to vacate the Kandy–Jaffna A9 road, north of Vavuniya, in 1990, happened due to the late President Ranasinghe Premadasa’s folly. Premadasa trusted the LTTE to such an extent, he ordered several hundred police officers, in the East, to surrender to appease the LTTE. The rest is history.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Additional Solicitor General Dileepa Peiris recently questioned in court as to why retired Air Force officer Shantha Jayathilake appeared in court wearing armed forces medals.

The highly decorated war hero Flight Lieutenant Jayathilake represented himself under Section 260 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the trial of Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay, the alleged mastermind of the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage.

During his submission, Dileepa Pieris looked at the medals worn by the retired officer and said: “He comes wearing pieces of tin.”

When Jayathilake objected to the ASG’s remark, Magistrate Pasan Amarasena warned the ex-officer not to interrupt proceedings. Then Peiris said that he couldn’t see Jayathilake’s medals properly. Jayathilake is the recipient of Weewa Wickrema Vibhushanaya (WWV), the second highest gallantry medal awarded to Sri Lankan military. The PWV is the highest gallantry decoration that can be received by a living military man. Jayathilake who joined the Air Force in 1989 at the height of the JVP-led insurgency, retired in 1999, and was also the recipient of the Rana Sura Padakkama (RSP).

Senior President’s Counsel Maithree Gunaratne, who represented Sallay in court, said: “The problem is not with your eyes, but with the red-tinted glasses you are wearing. You wore blue-tinted glasses for a while, and now you wear red-tinted glasses, so the gallantry medals, earned with blood, sweat, and tears for the country, look like pieces of tin to you”

Gunaratne requested that Pieris’s comments on the ex-officer be formally recorded in court records. This happened in the Fort Magistrate’s court on 2 July, 2026. The court proceedings caused controversy with various interested parties expressing differing views on Jayathilake wearing medals to a courtroom.

Some found fault with him for wearing medals while others strongly backed him. The issue at hand received social media attention. Obviously some sought political advantage at the expense of the government and the Attorney General’s Department. Others lambasted the former State Intelligence Service (SIS) Chief Sallay (2029-2024) for causing unnecessary developments. However, the gallantry medals worn by military, both officers and men, cannot be ridiculed by anyone, regardless of his/her position in the society. Gallantry medals remind the country of immense and untold sacrifices made by the military, during the war, and any attempt to dilute them should be strongly opposed.

Those who silently backed or publicly take action against war-winning Army Chief General (retd.) Sarath Fonseka, in 2010, after his defeat at the 2010 January presidential election, shouldn’t see the incident at the Fort Magistrate court as an opportunity.

Although Sri Lanka has been deeply divided over investigations into the conduct of armed forces during the war and after, no issue caused controversy like the arrest of Sallay, a post-war head of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) over the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage. Sallay served as the Director of State Intelligence Service (SIS) from 2019 to 2024 before President Anura Kumara Dissanayake replaced him. Perhaps President Gotabaya Rajapaksa shouldn’t have brought Sallay as Director, SIS, contrary to the practice of SIS always being headed by a senior police officer or he was quite right in bringing in a serving military officer with a proven intelligence track record, knowing the shameful behaviour of responsible top police officers in the run up to the Easter Sunday suicide attacks, despite there having been adequate advance intelligence warnings to prevent them.

The intervention made by the retired Air Force officer triggered an unexpected reaction from the Attorney General’s top representative and the subsequent continuing controversy influenced The Island to discuss the awarding of gallantry medals, namely Parama Weera Vibhushanaya (PWV), the highest, followed by Weera Wickrema Vibhushanaya (WWV), Rana Wickrema Padakkama (RWP) and Rana Sura Padakkama (RSP). The fourth medal, Weeradhara Vibhushanaya, is awarded for bravery, regardless of the risks to one’s own life, but for voluntary interventions outside the battlefield.

Bravery of an exceptional kind

During the war, Sri Lanka awarded 32 PVWs posthumously. The Army, Navy and Air Force shared 29, 2 and 1, respectively. The PVW is awarded to all ranks of armed forces, both regular and volunteer, for individual acts of bravery in the face of enemy, disregarding the risks to one’s own life. Of the 32 recipients of the PVW, the extraordinary case of Maj. J.A.L. Jayasinghe (Lalith Jayasinghe), posthumously promoted to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, captured unprecedented public attention.

On many occasions, PWVs were awarded posthumously for sacrifices made in defensive action, while the armed forces were responding to enemy action. However, Lalith had initiated action deep within the enemy-held territory and his efforts reflected the overall military strategy.

The 29 recipients consisted of 27 Army: Second Lieutenant S.U Aladeniya, Lance Corporal (LC) Y.G.G. Kularatne (Hasalaka Gamini), Second Lt. K.W.T. Nishshanka, Staff Sgt. H.P.B. Gunasekera, LC W.I.M. Seneviratne, Lt. Col. A.F Lafir, Capt. G.S. Jayanath, Maj. J.A.L. Jayasinghe, Maj. K.A. Gamage, Capt. U.G.A.S. Samaranayake, H.G.M.K.I. Megawarna, Sgt H.G.S. Bandara, Corporal P.N. Suranga, Corporal P.M.N. Pushpakumara, Corporal D.N\M.S. Chandrasiri Bandara, LC K. Chandana, Private R.M.D.M. Ratnayake, LC A.M.M.P. Abeysinghe, recruit A.M.B.H.G. Abeyratne Banda, private T.G.R. Dayananda, Lt. P.N. Punsiri, Second Lt W.D. Jayathilake, Sgt. K.G.N.L.R. Perera, Corporal K.P.D.T. Gunasekera, LC H.A. Nilantha Kumara, LC S.V.A.M. Pushpamal. Navy: Lt. J.L.D.S. Wijetunga, Petty Officer K.G. Shantha and Air Force: Squadron Leader T.D.S. Silvapulle.

Although Jayasinghe paid the supreme sacrifice, while serving the Special Forces, he had been a proud member of the Gemunu Watch (GW). GW veteran Maj. Gen. K.B. Egodawele in his Hewayekuge Mathaka Satahan (Memories of a soldier), first launched in 2012, declared that Jayasinghe had been among four GW personnel, namely Captain U.G.A.S. Samaranayake, Captain H.P.M.K. Meghawardena and Corporal D.M.A.M. Pushpakumara to receive the PWV, posthumously.

All of them received the highest gallantry award for actions on the Vanni east region during Eelam War IV (2006 August to 2009 May).

Jayasinghe’s wife Kaushalya accepted the PVW on 19 May, 2012, at the annual Victory Day parade. Maj. Gen. Kamal Gunaratne read the awardee’s official citation. Kaushalya had been five months pregnant at the time Jayasinghe mounted a raid deep inside the LTTE-held territory in the Vanni east region. Gunaratne, the wartime General Officer Commanding (GoC) of the 53 Division declared that Jayasinghe had been in command of an LRRP (Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol)/Deep Penetration Unit tasked to eliminate LTTE leaders. That unit had moved about 40 kms into the enemy held territory in Oddusuddan and was positioned alongside the Mankulam-Oddusuddan road to kill LTTE leaders, on 26 November, 2008.

Suddenly, Jayasinghe had fallen sick but joined other members of the LLRP to fight the enemy after fierce fighting erupted between the two sides. In spite of having an opportunity to retreat, Jayasinghe, hero of many previous battles, suffered grievous injuries during the battle and succumbed to his injuries.

Jayasinghe had been an extraordinary soldier and was the recipient of the second highest gallantry medal, WWV, on three or four occasions. In one such occasion, Jayasinghe had received two WWVs at one ceremony and recalled retired Maj. Gen. Dhammi Hewage, who received the RSP at the same event. Hewage spoke admirably about what he called high risk and extraordinary LRRP operations undertaken by Jayasinghe over a period of time. Let me give you an opportunity to know more about Hewage whose no holds barred examination of the Army during the war received public attention ( https://island.lk/a-special-forces-officers-narrative/)

Those who risked their lives to earn battlefield recognition played a significant role in transforming the armed forces, particularly the Army. Gallantry medals had been earned by armed forces officers and men in various circumstances but the deadly LRRP strikes, deep within the LTTE held territory, made quite a difference in the overall direction of the war. Those who operated in enemy territory in a way functioned as suicide cadres/units as the probability of them being intercepted by the LTTE was very high. But, regardless of severe risks, they ventured out of government-held areas to infiltrate deep inside enemy held territory to carry out operations. The LRRP team, led by Jayasinghe, is a case in point.

Clandestine operations received public attention in the run-up to the 2001 December parliamentary election when UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe all of a sudden alleged that the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) was planning to assassinate him. Within weeks after the UNP victory at the parliamentary election, the UNP unleashed the police on the DMI. The police raided the DMI safe house at Millennium City, Athurugiriya. In spite of Army Chief, the late Lt. Gen. Lionel Balagalle, personally assuring the UNP that there was absolutely no basis for such claims, Wickremesinghe was not prepared to change his political strategy. He gave Minister John Amaratunga in charge of police the go ahead for planned action.

The January 2, 2002, raid led to the arrest of Captain Mohamed Nilam, Staff Sgt. P. Ananda Udulagama, Staff Sergeant I. Edirisinghe Jayamanne, Corporal H.M. Nissanka Herath, Lance Corporal H. Mohamed Hilmy and an LTTE operative identified as Niyaz/Subashkaran. Others involved in that particular operation had been living in the East and were called into join operations, depending on the requirement. On the instructions of Lt. Gen. Balagalle, those tasked with carrying out attacks on selected targets received the opportunity to train under Special Forces instructors from Maduru Oya. They underwent training at the Panaluwa Test Firing Range, where firing special weapons was a key element in the training schedule.

In a bid to ensure secrecy, those operatives mostly operated on their own, and had their own arsenal, which included a range of weapons, including claymore mines. In fact, those involved in such operations functioned on a need-to-know basis. Even senior DMI officials, as well as the Army top brass, except a few, hadn’t been aware of what was going on. Even the then powerful Deputy Defence Minister, the late Anuruddha Ratwatte, hadn’t been told of the Millennium City safe-house, though he knew of the ongoing hits behind enemy lines.

Shortly after the exposure of the DMI operation, Balagalle met Premier Wickremesinghe to explain the secret operations undertaken against the LTTE. The Army chief had been accompanied by officials, including Hendarawithana, while one-time Attorney General Tilak Marapana, National List MP holding the Defence portfolio, and Minister Milinda Moragoda, too, were present.

“Except for Minister Moragoda, the others obviously didn’t realise what we were doing. They acted as if we were conspiring to do away with the political leadership so as to undermine the Norwegian initiative,” a source familiar with the dynamics of the project said. “We quickly realised we were up against a government, which simply wanted to negotiate a deal with the LTTE at any cost. The LTTE and the Norwegians exploited the situation to the hilt.”

Success in the East

Hitting the enemy in the area under its control had been Balagalle’s idea. The DMI hadn’t been successful in its first and the second attempts to take two specific targets. The targeted area had been Batticaloa south and the first and the second operations were mounted on 18 July 2001 and 12 September 2001. But both actions went awry and the targeted men identified as Jim Kelly (commander of Jeyanthan regiment) and Jeevan escaped death.

But, they succeeded on 17 September 2001. Operatives carried out a successful attack on ‘Major’ Mano Master, who was at that time in charge of the communications network in the Ampara-Batticaloa area.

But immediately after the UNP’s victory, the government terminated all such operations. The treacherous government betrayed those who risked their lives for the country. Ex-LTTEers and others who worked for the Army were exposed and the LTTE hunted them down. Scores of men were killed. Some were tortured and killed.

Apart from Mano Master, the secret raids claimed the lives of Batticaloa District Intelligence Head Lt. Col Nizam and Capt. Thevathasan.

Among those killed in the north were LTTE Air Wing Head Col. Shankar (Vaithilingam Sornalingam) and Sea Tiger Deputy Commander Lt. Col Kangai Amaran.

S.P. Thamilselvan, his Deputy Major S. Thangan, Vavuniya Special Commander Col. Jeyam and Deputy Military Chief Col. Balraj were believed to have been targeted in the North but escaped. In the East, among those who escaped targeted killings, were Col. Karuna, Karikalan, Jim Kelly and Intelligence Chief Lt. Col. Ramanan.

In spite of the LTTEers, particularly its leaders on a heightened state of alert, the Army ambushed Karikalan’s vehicle on 18 October, 2001. The destruction of the vehicle fuelled speculation of Karikalan’s demise, with a section of the media reporting him killed in a special operation. Shortly before the attack on Karikalan’s vehicle, the Army intercepted a radio conversation between Karikalan and his wife, a medical doctor by profession, serving in the Northern Province. “She simply begged him to leave Batticaloa and take refuge in the North to avoid the Army’s deep penetration operations,” a source familiar with LRRP operations told the writer many years ago.

The Army struck again on 26 November, 2001. ‘Major’ Swarnaseelan and ‘Captain’ Devadas were eliminated in the Pulipanjikkal area. It was the last operation before the December 5 General Election.

The UNP terminated the operation. But, the Army revived the strategy after the eruption of hostilities in 2005.

It would be pertinent to mention that hit and run attacks, deep within the LTTE held territory, troubled them to such an extent, they took up the issue with Norway. Fearing a relentless campaign, the LTTE got Norway to include LRRP operations in their negotiations, leading to a one-sided Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) signed in February 2002 by the Wickremesinghe regime. That CFA revealed the existence of a secret Army project to target the LTTE in their own area. The CFA called for termination of LRRP operations.

Three PVWs

Lieutenant J.L.D.S. Wijetunga was the first Navy recipient of the Parama Weera Vibhushanaya (PWV), Sri Lanka’s highest gallantry award given posthumously. Wijetunga, Commanding Officer of the Israeli built Dvora Fast Attack Craft (FAC), maneuvered his vessel to intercept an explosives-laden Sea Tiger suicide boat approaching a troop transport ship off Point Pedro on 30 March, 1996. Wijetunga, in spite of knowing his action was suicidal, went ahead with the risky maneuver that saved the lives of a large contingent of off duty servicemen on their way to Trincomalee from Kankesanthurai (KKS).

The Navy earned its second PWV on 1 November, 2008, off Point Pedro, during the Eelam war IV. A Petty Officer of elite Special Boat Squadron K.G. Shantha rammed an explosives-laden Sea Tiger suicide craft with his Arrow boat (Z-142 ). Shantha and his three SBS colleagues were blasted to smithereens, though their action saved an Inshore Patrol Craft (IPC) carrying a dozen SBS personnel.

Wing Commander T.D.S. Silvapulle received the nation’s highest gallantry award PWV for attacking Sea Tiger boats firing at Army defences south-east of Elephant Pass on 19 December, 1999. Silvapulle, flying a Mi 24 helicopter gunship in adverse weather conditions, regardless of the threat posed by surface-to-air missiles, engaged the enemy craft. Silvapulle compelled the enemy to flee but was hit during the confrontation. His individual act of gallantry was recognized in 2012, four years after the eradication of the LTTE. The then President Mahinda Rajapaksa conferred the PWV at a ceremony held on 19 May, 2012. Maj. Lalith Jayasinghe received his PWV at the same ceremony.

The betrayal of the armed forces in October, 2015, at the Geneva-based Human Rights Council, by the treacherous Sirisena-Wickremesinghe regime, underscored the mentality of those who wielded political power. The calling of gallantry medals ‘pieces of tin’ reminded the country of the pathetic and disgraceful state of affairs.

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Poor, little upper-middle income country

Published

on

“Sri Lanka has been ranked among the least happy countries in the latest World Happiness Report 2026…standing alongside Ethiopia”- The Sunday Island March 2026

Sri Lanka was officially declared an Upper-Middle Income country by the World Bank in July 2026, regaining the classification it had in 2019.

On the 30th of June, the IMF delegation meeting the President at the Presidential Secretariat praised the government: “…IMF praised the government’s economic programme and noted that Sri Lanka has made greater progress than many other countries implementing IMF-supported programmes. The delegation commended the government for maintaining macroeconomic stability despite a series of external shocks and for remaining firmly committed to its reform agenda…” (Presidential Media Division, 30 June 2026)

Meanwhile, a UN-backed World Happiness Report 2026 compiled by the Wellbeing Research Centre at the University of Oxford, ranked Sri Lanka 134th out of 147 nations. A daily newspaper which ran the story on the 19th of March 2026, added that the report showed that “Sri Lanka has slipped one place from its 133rd ranking in 2025, now standing alongside Ethiopia. The country also trails behind its South Asian neighbours, with India ranked 116th, Pakistan and Bangladesh positioned significantly higher.”

Good News, Bad News

The Upper-Middle Income classification was declared by the World Bank during the Yahapalana government in July 2019. 6 months later, the Yahapalana government was swept out at elections.

Only 2 years later, in April 2022, the country was declared bankrupt, and by July that year the newly elected President was toppled by a people’s uprising for the first time in the country’s history.

To fill the vacuum, an unlikely combination of an unelected MP from the Opposition who was made President by the Parliament and an unpopular government that had barely survived the uprising, governed the country together. It was massively defeated by the people only 2 years later in 2024, despite ‘stabilising’ the economy.

An Upper-Middle Income status may give the impression of a prosperous people, but prosperous people are not an unhappy people. The World Bank report 2026 (World Bank, Sri Lanka Development Update) notes the anomaly: “the recovery is unfinished and has not translated into widespread improvements in welfare.”

The report adds:

* Real output remains below 2018 levels.

* Although poverty is projected to decline in 2025, it remains double the 2019 levels.

* Vulnerability remains high with an additional 10 percent of the population living just above the poverty line.

*  Malnutrition continues to be elevated.

* The labour market recovery is slow with real wages and labor force participation well below 2019 levels.

The World Bank’s Poverty and Equity Brief (October 2025) sheds further light:

* Poverty is projected at 22.3-22.4 percent in 2025 and around 20 percent until 2027 without stronger inclusive growth.

* Real earnings remain below pre-crisis levels.

So, are Top of the Class in the IMF index and almost Bottom of the Class in the Happiness Index related?

As a friend who is a highly-placed economist explained to me, if people are poorer, undernourished, indebted, and insecure after stabilisation, then reserves, inflation, and primary balances alone cannot be relied on to judge the next IMF programme. Sri Lanka needs a national programme whose success metric is household recovery, jobs, nutrition, and productive capacity.

From the praise heaped on the President and this government’s strong leadership by the IMF for their performance thus far, sticking closely to the IMF conditionalities, we can only infer that things for the unhappy citizens will hardly get better as they negotiate the 18th IMF programme.

The AKD administration doesn’t haggle on behalf of the people. They see the rewards of that approach in fiscal consolidation and macroeconomic stability. This however, is not the only kind of stability they have to bear in mind, given recent history.

By the People, But Not for the People?

The new or renewed (from July 2019) ‘Upper-Middle Income’ classification has served to remind people where the government has failed, been weak, as much as where it has been strong and succeeded. The economy in the abstract is better off, but the majority of the people who gave the government a two thirds majority, are much worse off in material reality.

To return to my top economist friend, she explained that Sri Lanka should not reject fiscal discipline, but it must own the design of fiscal adjustment. The country needs a fairer tax mix, better tax administration, public investment discipline, and protection of health, education, nutrition, and climate-resilient infrastructure. Otherwise, fiscal discipline becomes socially brittle and growth-reducing.

The direction she recommended is hardly where the government is heading. The World Bank warns that the on-going reliance on regressive indirect taxes could worsen the poverty outlook, while the primary expenditure ceiling of 13 percent of GDP can constrain public investment and service delivery.

A leading financial daily (6 July) reported that at the CA Sri Lanka’s 5th Annual Economic and Tax Symposium, both the Government’s tax policies and the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) “came under sustained criticism from leading private sector tax professionals”.  Gajma & Co. Senior Partner N.R. Gajendran argued that “…higher revenues had come largely from imposing a heavier burden on existing taxpayers rather than widening the tax base.”

He said that “When taxes become excessive and unbearable, and it is not coming from the widening of the base, it is coming from the same taxpayer, it erodes expenditure capabilities, it erodes saving capabilities, and it erodes investment capabilities,” warning that “sustained over-taxation ultimately weakens consumption, investment, and long-term economic growth.”

Sri Lanka has already lost a large number of skilled professionals who migrated in droves in the last two years. Factum reports (April 2026) that the annual departures for foreign employment have hovered above the 310,000 mark. This includes Healthcare Professionals (Doctors, nurses), Academics and Researchers (including 80-90% of State University graduates), Technologists and Engineers.

Will the Lawyers be next? The Island editorial of 6 July 2026 strongly supports the stand that the BASL has taken, (endorsed by the Colombo Law Society, Colombo High Court Lawyers Association, LAWASIA and the Commonwealth Lawyers Association) opposing the government’s effort to move a constitutional amendment to extend the retirement age of judges of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, denouncing political interference in the judiciary and urging the government to avoid a Zimbabwean crisis.

None of this makes for a happy citizen, stability notwithstanding.

By the People, for the Creditors

So, what of all those promises made with such passion to do better than all previous governments since Independence in 1948?

The World Food Programme has this to report:

* Households unable to meet essential food needs increased from 14 percent in 2024 to 20 percent in 2026.

* If price trends continue, another 1.3 million people could be unable to afford essential food needs, including nearly 300,000 urban poor.

* Child nutrition remains worrying: stunting 10.1 percent, wasting 8.6 percent, and underweight 16.1 percent. (WFP, Food Security Under Pressure)

Economists warn that a programme that ‘stabilises’ the economy while households sell assets, cut food, reduce education and health spending, and slide into coping strategies, i.e., de-stabilises the household economy and lives, will not be socially, politically or developmentally sustainable.

Those who care for the people recommend that Sri Lanka’s own programme must place adaptive social protection, nutrition, and livelihoods at the very centre.

The promised re-negotiation of the 17th IMF package to make the necessary economic recovery less taxing (pun intended) for the people, less painful, and more sustainable overall, never happened. The government acted as if it was elected by the People for the Creditors.

We have been warned that Sri Lanka’s shift toward commercial borrowing and ISBs changed the debt-risk profile, with ISBs carrying high interest rates and short maturities. The government’s promised negotiations didn’t resemble anything like what was expected by the people, and went the way of the ISB holders who celebrated the victory in Canary Wharf toasting our President in absentia.

IMF Country Report No 26/111 indicates that even after restructuring, debt sustainability risks remain high. Public debt is projected at around 100.1 percent of GDP in 2026, with central government gross financing needs at 19.8 percent of GDP.

Economists remind us that Sri Lanka’s recent graduation to the Upper Middle-Income classification means that we will have to pay more in debt repayments as per the macro-linked bond of the debt restructuring settlement with the creditors.

IMF 18, going on 19?

Who’d have thought it? In the last 77 years, the most pro-people, pro-poor administration has certainly not been the AKD government. There were much better ones, even during the 30 year war, when policies were more enlightened and served the people; were undertaken with confidence and determination, and some still continue to provide the foreign exchange to pay for subsequent errors of judgment. And with the courage of their convictions and confidence in their capacity to deliver, those leaders didn’t feel the need to postpone any elections.

Stabilisation was an immediate necessity. But my economist friend spoke for us all when she told me “Sri Lanka cannot stabilise its way to prosperity. It should not risk turning emergency discipline into a permanent development model”.

With the current state of play, is that what we are looking at? There is little evidence that this administration has the capacity to design an independent programme, not subject to the whims and fancies of IFIs, but as my friend put it, “our own programme: fiscally responsible, socially protective, production-oriented, climate-resilient, and politically owned. The IMF can support that programme, but it cannot be the programme.”

An unhappy people is surely as much of an indicator of the real health of the economy, as the Gross National Income per capita calculated in US dollars by the World Bank. A Sunday newspaper quoted a young economist, Rehana Thowfeek, co-founder/director at Arutha Research, who says: “There is no point in celebrating becoming an upper-middle-income country while 1 in 4 of our people is in poverty, two out of every 5 Sri Lankans cannot afford a healthy diet and 1 out of 3 of our children under 5 years is malnourished.”

This is not a situation that should be allowed to prevail by an allegedly pro-people government, or indeed any government that has been granted the privilege to govern, through the people’s vote. The planning, the policy choices are all in the hands of the government. Will they choose a better path?

People are not unhappy because they are too mean to acknowledge what a wonderful job this government is doing, and give praise to this administration like the IMF at the Presidential Secretariat. It is because they are in pain, they are suffering, they are hungry, they cannot pay the bills, and they are looking at a future where none of these things are going away, but is set to get much worse, as the government slouches towards its next IMF programme and the next debt repayment.

by Sanja de Silva Jayatilleka

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Her Humiliation Remains

Published

on

In the brave new wired world,

With the cyber bully and fraudster,

She needs to constantly contend,

Which should set the sensible thinking,

Whether in its basic essentials,

For Her the world has changed,

And let’s also see the message,

That’s understood but not voiced,

That Her cause has suffered dire neglect…

That the whip is in the grasp of the patriarch.

 

By Lynn Ockersz

Continue Reading

Trending